Why are people who read neatsay so fucking stupid?

Why are people who read neatsay so fucking stupid?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GRq4EAbhheE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Why are people who read neatsay so fucking stupid?
They don't.

I hate it when someone just drops a famous name like that. They act all smart because they've read something but they can't even explain it well.

...

Because he is the birth of post modernism, the stain on western culture

Or maybe you are just dumb

What is she from?

Says the guy posting stupid pol memes and orbiting aome reddit-tier whore. You reek of baseness

a political protest. do you seriously not browse /pol/?

No, but I'd be interested to see the video if you could post it.

youtube.com/watch?v=GRq4EAbhheE

I don't get why you fags meme her so hard, the dark haired one is cuter

plus she is the voice of reason

If you read Aristotle you'd understand

Explain?

Wow, she's wonderful. A person like that could really go far in life if she just understood her attraction.

If people read beyond good and evil with even a basic understanding then they'd realize he would have hated the people who are like this cunt.

So what did Nietzsche say about truth?

Maybe you're just dumb

>le imperium is for men

>"why don't you read beyond good and evil and then you'll see what Nietzsche really meant"

really?

The way he speaks of the camel, the lion and the child is very revealing of how he views the evolution of humanity and SJWs are the very height of what's wrong with the camel. They are disloyal, constantly complaining, and lazy yet still passive beyond all measure in their moral leanings and manner once outside of the occasional riot.

And yet, they'll all live more enjoyable lives than Nietzsche did.

>Muh emotional gratification
You're not even arguing on the same axis as Nietzsche user.

Nietzsche was an incredibly sickly and grouchy man living in the 19th century as a poor writer. Literally everybody who can house and feed themselves today has a better standard of living than those circumstances. Hell, add in Aristotle or Plato and argue about how destitute they are. Surely, such low standards of living dispute any argument they could have.

Nietzsche never argued for "enjoyable lives"

>It's not about enjoyment it's about "fulfillment!"
Literally just enjoyment under a different name. Don't kid yourselves.

>it's an another alt-right wanker vs indoctrinated liberal name-dropping half-imbecile episode
God bless I am European

Their children won't though, assuming they ever have them. The hyper-individualized Marxist programming these hyper-individualistic white people are prone to embracing is a kind of fake identity these lost souls adopt since our jewish-run system has pumped them full of propaganda telling them their racial identity is evil. So they become a fill-in-the-blank freak as a substitute. Their children and grandchildren are who will suffer upon coming of age in societies that have been taken over by the shitskins the jews presently manipulating their pink-haired, punch a fascist granny let in, because they are who will have to remove these jews and fight to take it back.

Blind hedonistic enjoyment is nothing more than sticking yourself into a skinner box, getting bored and then trying to find a new one. Fulfillment means constantly raising your own expectations and becoming something better than you were earlier and thereby advancing yourself and all of humanity.

>/pol/ is obsessed with a man-hating lesbian in a black ski cap

Pottery

I doubt anyone in charge is browsing Veeky Forums right now, especially not in this thread, but if you are, please make me a mod so I can wash this board clean with nuclear fire. It'll be such a continuous purge, so many permanent bans will he thrown around, that other boards will never crosspost cheap bait here again.

I'll do it boyos, I'll do it for free. Just give me the chance.

"Fulfillment" is anything you want it to be. It's not something that physically exists.
No one identified with race until recently. It has always been national pride, Poles were Poles, Irish were Irish. Only recently did the weak and brittle of society identify with a "race." Keep it to yourself, I don't care.

Don't be an idiot, nation has always meant race and was so implicit as to be assumed until 1965 when jews were able to change immigration laws in the west. White people will continue to embrace that identity as their replacement continues and that is both natural and necessary.

Except people in France 0 AD would have killed you if you showed up 50 miles north of your village. Come on, type less and think more. Who knows, you may actually enjoy the mental quiet for once.

I thank God everyday that I was not born in America

Im not even sure which side was worse here

You must be a mulatto with no identity or something. The scope has changed and the coming century will be defined by white people embracing their collective racial identity and taking their countries back from the shitskin hordes our jewish-run institutions are letting through the gates. You're arguing against an inevitability.

You must be a Spaniard with no identity or something. The scope has changed and the coming century will be defined by Romans embracing their collective racial identity and taking their empire back from the shitskin hordes our pagan-run institutions are letting through the gates. You're arguing against an inevitability.

Well said

lmao at this wannabe janicuck internet policeman

You literally care so much about this "argument" you're replying to yourself.

Most Philosophy worth reading needs supplemental study. The problem is its not 'exciting', takes a long time and with so much extant scholariship its difficult to even know whats what and where to begin - then you have to try find it. 'Tards on the internet read the penguin classics intro and think theyre experts. Thats what most 'misinterpretation' is

Nice

He replied to me you fucking retard.

/pol/ is trash

you're trash

ur cuck

...

cucky mccuckface

Has /pol/ moved from its phase of pseudo-Nietzscheanism to positivism because there was a trump protester who also liked Nietzsche & that's bad?

Hang yourself

Hahahahahahaha go outside nigger

Well now there's all the people who "believe" in God because aalewis. It does well to remember, especially on lit and mu, most people are motivated by social trends and fashion over anything they actually believe.

someone post some kiddie porn to lure in mods, please

>Niichii
lol

>be redditor newfag that cares about making quality posts
>probably a leftist
>pedophile
Checks out

>right wing nut
>complains about pedophilia
>calls me the newfag redditor
You're the cancer.

>quite literally just requested cp
>not a pedo
ok buddy

you don't belong on Veeky Forums

Veeky Forums for me has always been about getting some relief from social groupthink. To that end, /pol is literally the weakest, most pathetic excuse for a Veeky Forums board I have ever seen, since it is entirely accepting and encouraging of groupthink and attempts to ((((educate)))) aka indoctrinate people around a set of assumptions.

/pol is absolute garbage, a waste of what this site could be, made by people who want to be contrarian but literally can't stomach it and so they make a new set of safe and predictable social norms in the last place they should exist. Just to reiterate, it's fucking pathetic. Anyone who mains /pol and accepts their widespread "truths" is a scared little cunt who doesn't belong on this website.

I am a far more nuanced racist than the wigger nationalist trash that would frequent /pol/, I prefer to spend my time with balkan war criminals, spanish HVAC technicians and italian rent boys.

She's a qt I know I could convert if I just had the chance

>I am a far more nuanced racist than the wigger nationalist trash that would frequent /pol/, I prefer to spend my time with balkan war criminals, spanish HVAC technicians and italian rent boys.

I know that feel. I want to turn her into a traditionalist and lead her away from cancerous leftist thought. I know its possible

Newfag

All women become conservatives with a strong male role model. problem is these days most men are nu-makes

...

We are not stupid. We are perhaps a little arrogant and more than a little sentimental, but stupid? It is not possible to love Nietzsche and not love knowledge. The two are the same

postmodernist trash just like you

Do you even know what positivism is?

>Nietzsche
>postmodernism
>even modernism
RE-TARD

jej americans have no national identity so they have to go by race

Hey bro
It seems like you could really do with some books to help you with those frustrations. I used to think I was to smart to be nice to people too but I as I got older I learned that everyone has their own issues. These great books might help you out a great deal!:

1 The Great Gatsby Scott Fitzgereld.
2 The Celestine prophesy by James Redfield.
3. Life was never meant to be a struggle, Stuart Wilde.
4 the sound and the fury by Faulknert.
5. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ
by Daniel Goleman Read it!
6. Steinbecks of Mice and men.
7. You are not so smart by david Mcraney

Because people who study the humanities are stupid.
I can understand getting into it at an older age, or if you're rich. But these kids are reading this shit hoping for answers that just aren't there.
t. Philosophy student turned Finance Student

if you browse /pol/ its probably best to keep it a secret

Why is she so perfect, bros?

>bitch can't even pronounce nietzsche
what a mess

oi guys, quick reminder you could be reading instead of discussing /pol/itics in the wrong board.

There is literally nothing wrong with saying "Neetchi", I doubt he would even care

Its impossible to talk about philosophy without bordering onto politics. Also you could just take your own advice and read instead of coming here.

/pol/ has the highest IQ on average over all other boards

"Nietzsche is also a precursor for postmodernism in his genealogical analyses of fundamental concepts, especially what he takes to be the core concept of Western metaphysics, the “I”. On Nietzsche's account, the concept of the “I” arises out of a moral imperative to be responsible for our actions. In order to be responsible we must assume that we are the cause of our actions, and this cause must hold over time, retaining its identity, so that rewards and punishments are accepted as consequences for actions deemed beneficial or detrimental to others (Nietzsche 1889, 482-83; 1887, 24-26, 58-60). In this way, the concept of the “I” comes about as a social construction and moral illusion. According to Nietzsche, the moral sense of the “I” as an identical cause is projected onto events in the world, where the identity of things, causes, effects, etc., takes shape in easily communicable representations. Thus logic is born from the demand to adhere to common social norms which shape the human herd into a society of knowing and acting subjects.

For postmodernists, Nietzsche's genealogy of concepts in “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense” (Nietzsche 1873, 77–97) is also an important reference. In this text, Nietzsche puts forward the hypothesis that scientific concepts are chains of metaphors hardened into accepted truths. On this account, metaphor begins when a nerve stimulus is copied as an image, which is then imitated in sound, giving rise, when repeated, to the word, which becomes a concept when the word is used to designate multiple instances of singular events. Conceptual metaphors are thus lies because they equate unequal things, just as the chain of metaphors moves from one level to another. Hegel's problem with the repetition of the “this” and the “now” is thus expanded to include the repetition of instances across discontinuous gaps between kinds and levels of things.

In close connection with this genealogy, Nietzsche criticizes the historicism of the nineteenth century in the 1874 essay, “On the Uses and Disadvantage of History for Life” (Nietzsche 1874, 57–123). On Nietzsche's view, the life of an individual and a culture depend upon their ability to repeat an unhistorical moment, a kind of forgetfulness, along with their continuous development through time, and the study of history ought therefore to emphasize how each person or culture attains and repeats this moment. There is no question, then, of reaching a standpoint outside of history or of conceiving past times as stages on the way to the present. Historical repetition is not linear, but each age worthy of its designation repeats the unhistorical moment that is its own present as “new.” In this respect, Nietzsche would agree with Charles Baudelaire, who describes modernity as “the transient, the fleeting, the contingent” that is repeated in all ages (Cahoone 2003, 100), and postmodernists read Nietzsche's remarks on the eternal return accordingly"

She's Nietzchee's ubermadchen

>this entire thread

>implying identity isnt genetic
are you some kind of biology-denying statist?

>he doesnt know that the kali yuga is coming to a close

I'm loving those hairy pits.

nah her pronunciation is fucking disgusting
it's either "neetch", like most anglos, or the german "neetch-ya"

I concur

Do you by any chance have that picture of that Asian deleuze reading chick with the hairy pits? I need it but forgot to save it

Neetchi sounds cool though

i kekd

>he refuses to accept our reality is completely the result of physics equations on a old chalk board somewhere in an unremarkable university and opts for the crazy cool explanation!

...

If you want to go on a power trip and feel in control for once in your pathetic life go join Reddit and you can delete any comments that hurt your feelings and ban anyone who you don’t like to your heart’s content. Or, if you’re even more of a pathetic, lowly, subhuman weasel than you already seem to be, you can try to become a /leftypol/ mod.

This is some good tangiatelli

I doubt there's a credible source to this

t. trump shill

You must be a Palestinian with no identity or something. The scope has changed and the coming century will be defined by Jews embracing their collective racial identity and taking their empire back from the shitskin hordes our Roman-run institutions let through the gates. You're arguing against an inevitability.