I finally got around to watching a few lectures of this guy

eGremlin
eGremlin

I finally got around to watching a few lectures of this guy. Yeah he's the best philosopher alive and it's cool that he almost single-handedly revived metaphysics and the like, but what the fuck is his problem?

All urls found in this thread:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ljUecE8eAH0
PurpleCharger
PurpleCharger

Autism, but I'm sure you already knew that

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

@eGremlin
it's cool that he almost single-handedly revived metaphysics and the like
I thought that was Qunie.

New_Cliche
New_Cliche

dude, cut it out, you can't into kripke until you wittgenstein, and you can't wittgenstein until you russell etc.

this guys pretty fucking inaccessible for laypersons

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

@New_Cliche
So is all of philosophy, stop kidding yourself. This board is just a breeding ground for dilettantes.

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

@PurpleCharger
I was expecting "normal" analytic-tier autism, not....this.....

@Fuzzy_Logic
Quine
yeah because the point of metaphysics is to pat scientists on the back and assure them they already figured everything out

Nude_Bikergirl
Nude_Bikergirl

@eGremlin
he's the best philosopher alive

Sir_Gallonhead
Sir_Gallonhead

@Nude_Bikergirl
uhhh....

Evil_kitten
Evil_kitten

@Nude_Bikergirl
@Sir_Gallonhead

sorry boys

takes2long
takes2long

@Evil_kitten
filename

I've read Moral Landscape, Letter to a Christian Nation, End of Faith, and Lying. Which of his do you suggest next?

If you haven't read Lying, I suggest it. I'm paying close attention to my own dishonesty

iluvmen
iluvmen

@Need_TLC
Read a book sometime. This guy stalked at least one of his female students.

idontknow
idontknow

@takes2long

Sorry bro, I'm not reading anything by someone who says things as ridiculous as this.

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

friendly reminder that Kripke is a literal dualist, observant Jew, and is famous for the worst interpretation of Wittgenstein since Lyotard

TreeEater
TreeEater

@Gigastrength
the worst interpretation of Wittgenstein
Which was? I tried to read Naming and Necessity in my class on analytic philosophy but it went so far over my head that I don't remember what he was even trying to get at.

Skullbone
Skullbone

@idontknow
Well, why go to space when we could go under the oceans or the earth's surface?

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

@TreeEater
Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, a 1982 book by Kripke, where he insists the entirety of "Philosophical Investigations" is about a minor rule-following paradox to which brave Saul proposes a solution
he literally calls it "the most radical and original skeptical problem that philosophy has seen to date"
there's a running joke that Wittgenstein is "Kripkenstein" in Kripke's work because his understanding of him is so narrow and skewed in the work

Bidwell
Bidwell

@Need_TLC
tbf he know he was misrepresenting him and the rule-following paradox is pretty weird but probably not as much of a disaster as kripke thought

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

@New_Cliche
@Spazyfool
that's not even true though. how is naming and necessity that inaccessible to the layman?

sure, having some sort of background in analytic philosophy and modal logic would help, but are the concepts that difficult to understand?

whereismyname
whereismyname

@TalkBomber
he just wants to feel supersmart for knowing him

happy_sad
happy_sad

@TalkBomber

To get what's at stake in Naming & Necessity you have to know the philosophy that preceded it.

Why didn't the Millian theory of reference work?
Why did Frege distinguish between Sinn and Bedeutung?
What's Russell's solution?
How does Wittgenstein change this?
Why is a contingent a priori such a big deal?
Which problem does rigid designation fix?

The language of the book isn't hard, but the subject matter presupposes a lot of philosophical knowledge

SomethingNew
SomethingNew

@happy_sad
none of that is particularily complex stuff

takes2long
takes2long

@SomethingNew
Not if you're familiar with philosophy, no
If you're a layman it is

Flameblow
Flameblow

now i feel better for not reinventing modal logic at age 15

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

@takes2long
it is complex if you don't know it
it is simple if you know it

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@LuckyDusty
"the morning star is the evening star"
lol brainlets cant understand

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

@New_Cliche
bothering to read analytical philosophy autism

Playboyize
Playboyize

@Need_TLC

"Kripkenstein" is just a recognition that what Kripke extracted from Wittgenstein is not necessarily something Witty himself thought, it's not a pejorative. Kripke is highly respected and his interpretation is viewed as insightfu

Techpill
Techpill

@Fuzzy_Logic
refusing to read something based on second-hand information you acquired from a tuvan throat singing board

Evilember
Evilember

@Fuzzy_Logic
Yeah, why read philosophy that has a systematic, well-defined approach to problems instead of the complete mess that is continental philosophy, where literally everyone just uses words randomly and is purposefully trying to obfuscate everything.

WebTool
WebTool

@eGremlin
Yeah he's the best philosopher alive and it's cool that he almost single-handedly revived metaphysics and the like
what libtards believe, how does it feel to think you are smart but remain a nihilist for caring about ideas and denying the body?

BlogWobbles
BlogWobbles

@Evilember
he cares about defineing problems
he falls for the ''definition'' meme
he does not give a shit about solutions
he has no idea what a solution means

stay nihilistic

eGremlin
eGremlin

@Skullbone
why do this when I can fap to traps

Harmless_Venom
Harmless_Venom

all this shitposting
somehow Kripkie is called a libtard simply for being analytic and well spoken
all these layman contfags who just want to write word-salad calling out analytics for imposing academic standards in philosophy for a change
the absolute state of Veeky Forums

if you don't like analytics then I guess you can go back to bullshitting with Heidegger about
L I T E R A L L Y
N O T H I N G
you fucking faggots

whereismyname
whereismyname

Question to you Veeky Forums,

How can you respect yourself when this Kripke guy published several papers on logic that got him invited to TEACH at Harvard BEFORE FINISHING HIGH SCHOOL

Stark_Naked
Stark_Naked

@Harmless_Venom
t. butthurt american jewish grad student

Garbage Can Lid
Garbage Can Lid

@Stark_Naked
t. undergrad

Sir_Gallonhead
Sir_Gallonhead

@Fuzzy_Logic
@Evilember
@BlogWobbles
@Harmless_Venom
It's fascinating how it's always complete retards that have absolutely no understanding of or contact with modern day academical philosophy that engage in these autistical memeing matches about analytics vs continentals.

girlDog
girlDog

@Garbage Can Lid
ha! I knew it!

viagrandad
viagrandad

@girlDog
me too :^)

SomethingNew
SomethingNew

@Fuzzy_Logic
@Evilember
@BlogWobbles
@Harmless_Venom
@Sir_Gallonhead
It's fascinating how it's always complete retards that have absolutely no understanding of or contact with modern day academical philosophy that engage in these autistical memeing matches about analytics vs continentals.

5mileys
5mileys

@viagrandad
lol I bet you go to a shitty British private school and think you're cool

Poker_Star
Poker_Star

@whereismyname
How can you respect yourself
It helps realizing that being in the middle of my doctoral I've already contributed more utility-bearing applicable knowledge to the world than a luminous jewish prodigy in his whole career.

w8t4u
w8t4u

@5mileys
I bet you'll drop out :^)

TreeEater
TreeEater

@w8t4u
I've had enough Jewish mind games aleeady, desu, probably a good idea

Emberburn
Emberburn

@TreeEater
I'm sure you've been shaking with the papers in your hand at this very moment user, waiting for someone to tell you to stop

Noone will

Flameblow
Flameblow

@Evilember
systematic, well-defined approach to problems

Analytic philosophy has none of these things. Just the appearance of it

StonedTime
StonedTime

@Emberburn
Eh its just something ive considerd

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@Flameblow
But what is being par excellence, if not the conjunction of the two phallic hot dogs of the ego and super ego residing withing the self which comes to life in the light of the being standing in the life standing in the light of being and itself, per say?

FastChef
FastChef

@VisualMaster
Where's the id in this phallusea?

Harmless_Venom
Harmless_Venom

@VisualMaster
post analytic phil into google translate and flip back and forth from english to german
gradually becomes continental

Boy_vs_Girl
Boy_vs_Girl

@Harmless_Venom
Worst post I've ever seen

farquit
farquit

@Harmless_Venom
makes up words and doesn't bother to give them a meaning or a definition
woah... so this is the power....of continental philosophy

Nojokur
Nojokur

@Harmless_Venom
Page 35 of On the Logic of Ordinary Conditionals by Robert N. McLaughlin, continentalized:

If Question is true, that gilds "true" for others. (Were you?). From that time on? Speculators! Completely impossible: "If the ship has cut off, it is not." The musical instrument is defeated. It was to be seen, had happened in the world where there was a conflicting legal language with the greatest possible from the drought.

Original:

False, whether 'q' is true in the closest (but by definition unactual) world in which 'p' is true. (How could one find out such a thing?) We want to know what would happen, what conclusion one might draw, if the event expressed by 'p' is actualized by its occurrence. The possible worlds logician will not permit us to infer from (1) the truth of
(4) 'If the vase is unbroken it has not been dropped'
because the nearest world in which the vase is unbroken may be different from the nearest world in which the vase is dropped. Yet suppose we regard (1) and (4) as being about the occurrence or otherwise of events in the observable world and understand 'occurrence in the observable world' as something that may be happening now or that may occur in the near future. Then (1) and (4) may be taken as saying,
(l)(i) 'If the vase is dropped in the observable world, it will break' and
(4)(i) 'If the vase is unbroken in the observable world, it has not been dropped.'
I expect that even the possible worlds logician will agree that (4)(i) can be inferred from (l)(i). Because if one were to find the vase unbroken in the observable world, then it has not been dropped or (l)(i) is false. I suspect also that (l)(i) and (4)(i) do express the meanings of (1) and (4) in normal speech and that this is why contraposition traditionally has been thought to hold for conditionals. Although a conditional about prospective occurrences does not assume the fulfillment of the affirmation or denial of its 'if' clause or its 'then' clause, it does assume that such fulfillments as do occur will occur in the observable world. If this is so, then it is not surprising that it is the common view of conditionals that they entail their own contrapositives.
It is worth observing also that the possible worlds logician, no less than the rest of us, must estimate the truth of an unfulfilled conditional on the basis of his knowledge of the experienced world. He is not in a position to take a privileged peek at the contents of possible worlds but must judge a conditional's truth or falsity in the light of his knowledge of this world's happenings. And if his judgment is grounded on the best type of evidence—evidence of a sort that supports the truth of a statement that itself would necessitate the truth of the unfulfilled conditional—there is every reason to . . .
I have no idea how it got so reduced.

Skullbone
Skullbone

1 □ 2 = 3
5 □ 10 = 15
23 □ 25 = 48
68 □ 57 = ????

99% fail this quiz. Will you? CLICK HERE

eGremlin
eGremlin

@Nojokur
The musical instrument is defeated.
post yfw continentals save the day again while analytics autistically debate truth

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

bump

cum2soon
cum2soon

its a mystery how he writes so lucidly but doesnt even seem high functioning in real life

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ljUecE8eAH0

BlogWobbles
BlogWobbles

@whereismyname
one guy

Spamalot
Spamalot

@Fuzzy_Logic
You're a fucking retard if you think Quine revived metaphysics.

Evil_kitten
Evil_kitten

@Spamalot
OK smartie, who did?

Playboyize
Playboyize

@New_Cliche
hasn't read him
Kripke is the most accessible analytictard one could read. Sure, having some Millian and Frege-Russell names shit might help, but you absolutely do not need Witty to get into N+N

@Nude_Bikergirl
muh phenomenology + meth and economics
Spooks all the way down

@Gigastrength
Not wrong, defs an uninspired plagiarist, but what alternative do we have? Rorty and his disciples?

@happy_sad
Not any more than your average undergrad seminar

@WebTool
reads Beyond Good and Evil once

Anyone up for speculating whether Kripke's fetishization of names as the exclusive rigid designators is just some Jewish psychological ploy to justify the pronouncements of "God?"

BlogWobbles
BlogWobbles

@Evil_kitten
Kripke, obviously.

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

@TalkBomber
In my experience, the notion of a rigid designator doesn't make sense to a layperson. They always say, 'yeah, but I could have had a different name, so how can a name refer to the same thing at every world?' Even people with some phil. background that don't read any analytic stuff say it. And it's really hard to get them to understand if they don't have a first course in modal logic.

Raving_Cute
Raving_Cute

@BlogWobbles
lmao

SniperGod
SniperGod

@Stupidasole
yeah that's stupid but I feel like there's a strong wittgenstein-esque criticism hiding in these lines of argument

SniperWish
SniperWish

@Nojokur
Translated sounds like kierkegaard tbqu

TechHater
TechHater

@SniperGod
Which wittgenstein? Early Wittgenstein casts doubt on anything like modality, at least in a sense we can articulate. Who knows about later Wittgenstein, but later Witt. is even more skeptical about language so he'd probably deny any metaphysical weight to names lmao.

CouchChiller
CouchChiller

@Stupidasole
Idk i have the intuition that people can be explained anything with the right teacher but I always wonder if that's blind optimism on my part.

WebTool
WebTool

@CouchChiller
*rigid optimism

PackManBrainlure
PackManBrainlure

@WebTool
Why is Dave Chalmers so fucking cool lads?

likme
likme

just read nietzsche like everyone else, spergs
philosophy is just a meme anyway

Methshot
Methshot

@likme
nietzsche was a sperg

eGremlin
eGremlin

@VisualMaster
not even brainlets, I have a woman in my course going for her doctorate that still can't fucking grasp this, will argue incessantly that Cassius clay and Mohammad ali are two unique people. The simplest fucking example she doesn't understand.

Illusionz
Illusionz

@eGremlin
the fuck

Stark_Naked
Stark_Naked

@Illusionz
It is absolutely mesmerizing to have my old ass professor argue with her inane schizoid word salad

Lord_Tryzalot
Lord_Tryzalot

@eGremlin
doctorate in philosophy?

Soft_member
Soft_member

@Lord_Tryzalot
yup, she is a perfect example of delusion. Literally said Hume did not believe in causality

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

@Soft_member
well, he didn't

Bidwell
Bidwell

@Soft_member
That's not THAT stupid

@haveahappyday
He was skeptical about it, and he didn't think we can know whether something is causal or correlated. But it's a pretty big stretch to say he didn't believe in it

TreeEater
TreeEater

@Bidwell
It's stupid to say he flat out denied the existence of causal relations. Skeptical about knowing it and denial of its existence are not 1:1

Emberfire
Emberfire

Hume didn't believe in morality

BlogWobbles
BlogWobbles

@TreeEater
yeah obviously

Hume didn't really say anything beyond "lol i dunno about this"

Methnerd
Methnerd

@TreeEater
Skeptical about knowing it and denial of its existence are not 1:1
If reality is perception, then this can't be the case.

Booteefool
Booteefool

@Methnerd
good thing hume didn't think that

Boy_vs_Girl
Boy_vs_Girl

@Booteefool
Seems like he wasn't very thorough. Upon inspection it's impossible to conceive of a reality that doesn't involve my perception of it.

Soft_member
Soft_member

@Boy_vs_Girl
reality is perception =/= perception is reality

baka deadass

farquit
farquit

@eGremlin
He's shite. Stop buying anal autistic games.

takes2long
takes2long

@Soft_member
The cupola "is" implies identity, by way of Leibniz. Those statements read the same forwards and backwards. The palindrome belies the falsity of your proposition.

Methnerd
Methnerd

@Evilember
systematic
Cancer
well-defined
Actually obfuscating. None of these twats understand language. Also, not a positive.
I'm sorry kiddo but anal autism is just playing with logic and pretending that something is being done. It's philosophy for people that think so little of philosophy that they would reduce it to busywork and problem-making.

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

@Harmless_Venom
Academic standards are arbitrary nonsense. Academia needs to die. Stop sucking STEM dick.
Face it, phenomenology is the only viable field today.
Average anal autistic:
i defined this as this, so this is this and that is this and look at me i can obfuscate language by introducing a foreign influence and therefore you should be socially liberal fiscally conservative... if you are logical!

WebTool
WebTool

@Methnerd
You don't know yet, do you? Philosophy died.

StonedTime
StonedTime

@VisualMaster
haha derrida exists and he intentionally obfuscated therefore all philosophy that isnt PURE FUCKIN BRITISH CUNT or down-home country boy American is just FUCKING DILDOS THEREFORE A PROGRESSIVE TAX IS FAVORABLE FOR THE GREATER GOOD

JunkTop
JunkTop

@haveahappyday
Wrong. He memed about it to piss off those making causal claims. Read some of his essays with this in mind and you'll see how sarcastic he was.

PurpleCharger
PurpleCharger

@JunkTop
Sarcasm is sloppy

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

@WebTool
No, bad philosophy just moved to LONDON to shit about about classic architecture, and contrary to his belief, the rest of Europe expatriated him while he was off the continent.

Illusionz
Illusionz

@Stupidasole
LONDON
PARIS*

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

@PurpleCharger
Yes, Hume is a sloppy and annoying writer. Repeats himself too often, goes on for pages about the same thing he went on about a few pages ago. Makes bold claims and goes nowhere with them, but goes miles with subtle claims.
Asshole.

Supergrass
Supergrass

@Illusionz
Nope, PARIS is on the continent.

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@Spazyfool
good thing good ol' kant came along and cleared up his misconceptions. reading the first critique changed my life. i quit my job and impregnated my sister.

Lord_Tryzalot
Lord_Tryzalot

@Fried_Sushi
Kant is even sloppier.

King_Martha
King_Martha

@Supergrass
Europe is just one big landmass, the presence of a so-called 'channel' doesn't eliminate the techtonic plate under them both
@Lord_Tryzalot
i quit my job and impregnated my sister because i thought that was what he said i should do but then i read secondary literature and found out i was wrong! why are these people so sloppy?

5mileys
5mileys

@haveahappyday
@Soft_member
he said it was inexplicable, not that it didn't exist

hairygrape
hairygrape

@Fried_Sushi
t. hegel

TreeEater
TreeEater

@Spazyfool
Hume is a great writer. Pleasant to read, if a bit verbose (especially for the subject matter)

people meme about analytic philosophy on this board, but they definitely nailed it writing wise. why wouldn't you be as clear and concise as possible if you're trying to persuade someone?

Skullbone
Skullbone

@TreeEater
hume is probably the least verbose of the writers of the period, save for maybe berkeley

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

@Fried_Sushi
kant is literally a horrible writer.

muh made up words that i don't define

yeah really clear

Evilember
Evilember

@TreeEater
why wouldn't you be as clear and concise as possible if you're trying to persuade someone?
By its own standards that's not the purpose of the writing style. And calling Hume "analytic" is funny.

Firespawn
Firespawn

Philosophy ended with analytics. And that's not a good thing; their autism ruined the whole enterprise for at least several generations.

SniperWish
SniperWish

@Evilember
hume and leibniz are proto-analytics

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

@SniperWish
And Plato was a proto-fascist
I don't know where you get that idea, tbqh

DeathDog
DeathDog

@Firespawn
Imagine you meet ludwig wittgenstein and that nigga just keeps twisting in his chair and slapping his knee the whole time, and refuses to talk to you at all about philosophy and just goes on and on about warner brothers cartoons

FastChef
FastChef

@VisualMaster
You would understand what he is saying if you bothered to read the history of philosophy and read more into a sentence than a stream of word definitions joined together.

Analytics should fuck off. They turned the whole grand enterprise of philosophy into fucking jigsaw puzzles.

PurpleCharger
PurpleCharger

@DeathDog
it's called a koan, you gaijin!

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

@TreeEater
Hume is a terrible writers and analytics are fucking garbage.
Being clear and concise is a meme. Stop sucking STEM cock. Persuasion is a meme. Stop sucking politician cock. Furthermore, analytic writing is not clear or concise. Perhaps it is concise if it uses a whole load of symbolic nonsense, but that is obfuscating -- not clear.

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@Firespawn
No, phenomenology is still doing great. Not to mention they actually understand language and make it familial, rather than distant by shitting around alien symbols while making up deeply British analogies to show how devote they are to the Monarch.

Raving_Cute
Raving_Cute

@Stupidasole
t. too much of a brainlet to understand symbolic logic

Nude_Bikergirl
Nude_Bikergirl

@Skullbone
the fuck are you talking about? that's wrong

@Evilember
i wasn't calling him analytic. i was saying that in contrast to him, i like how analytic philosophers treat their papers

@Stupidasole
so verbose writers are garbage and analytic writers are garbage...who's good? nice bait btw

Lunatick
Lunatick

God I hate London

Crazy_Nice
Crazy_Nice

@Fried_Sushi
Phenomenology started and ended with Husserl

King_Martha
King_Martha

@Nude_Bikergirl
the fuck are you talking about? that's wrong
Yes you're right Hume is soooo much more verbose than Hobbes and Locke

Evil_kitten
Evil_kitten

@Raving_Cute
t. too much of an autist to express himself familially
@Nude_Bikergirl
anything i dont like is bait
Find a rope
@Crazy_Nice
Wrong.

viagrandad
viagrandad

@Evil_kitten
No, really, you seem too dumb to into symbolic logic.

lostmypassword
lostmypassword

@viagrandad
You tell yourself that.
mm-mm-m-m-m-maybe if i inject autism into everything then nobody will criticize me out of pity

Playboyize
Playboyize

@King_Martha
there are other more verbose writers so this verbose writer isn't verbose

good argument

@Evil_kitten
anything i dont like is bait
Find a rope
why don't you go to the rope store, and then take a trip next door to the rickety stool shop

Skullbone
Skullbone

@Playboyize
good argument
I said compared to the people of his time (e.g. the other british empiricists)

can you think of a less verbose philosopher from that time period, besides Berkeley??

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

@Stupidasole
Perhaps it is concise if it uses a whole load of symbolic nonsense, but that is obfuscating -- not clear.

The entire point of an ideal logical language is to be as clear and precise as possible, since each symbol has one and only one meaning. Just because you can't read it doesn't mean it's obfuscation.

Flameblow
Flameblow

@Burnblaze
they said this so its true
Alien language isn't clear, user. Stop being autistic, the empire is gone and stroving around in autism won't win them back.

PurpleCharger
PurpleCharger

@Skullbone
oh i honestly didn't see the part where you said "of the period". my b

GoogleCat
GoogleCat

@Flameblow
proof that continental retards are retarded

Nude_Bikergirl
Nude_Bikergirl

@GoogleCat
my wife loves black cock therefore people from outside of LONDON are retards unless they're former colonies
Here it is in clear and concise logical language:
8=====D -> ({0})

Booteefool
Booteefool

@GoogleCat
"Wittgenstein is so obfuscatory,"
"but Hegel, there's a man who writes clearly."

Harmless_Venom
Harmless_Venom

@Nude_Bikergirl
you're literally retarded if you can't understand why using symbols to represent variables would help with proofs

girlDog
girlDog

@Booteefool
i'd say the opposite...

farquit
farquit

@Harmless_Venom
proof
t. sucking too much STEM cock
@Booteefool
I said Kant is unclear, why would I then say Hegel is clear?
Work that autism logic a little harder
There is philosophy beyond autism and Hegel, you know.

w8t4u
w8t4u

@farquit
There is philosophy beyond autism and Hegel, you know.
name a normie philosopher who wasn't Hegel

iluvmen
iluvmen

@w8t4u
normie
Go watch rick and rorty you cockroot

Playboyize
Playboyize

@girlDog
That's the joke, my man.

@farquit
Kant was an analytic philosopher
You should really just leave.

Snarelure
Snarelure

@Playboyize
I never said that Kant was analytic. My fuck do you spergs need to work on your English.

Skullbone
Skullbone

@farquit
t. sucking too much STEM cock

logic doesn't exist because le STEM sucks

@Playboyize
That's the joke, my man.
i genuinely don't get it. you're laughing at the opposite of my argument...so you're supporting my argument?

Evilember
Evilember

@Skullbone
Logic exists but it is arbitrary. See: @Snarelure

WebTool
WebTool

@Evilember
is that supposed to prove logic is arbitrary? because kant isn't analytic?

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@Snarelure
Ok, so the continentals and the analytics are both obscurantists. What's "good" philosophy, to you, then? Everything pre-1787?

Supergrass
Supergrass

@VisualMaster
don't even reply to bait. anyone that says that analytics are obscurantists when they're clearly trying to aim for the opposite isn't even worth replying to.

if anything we should be talking about the difference in goals between the two. because i think that's the main difference. it's not that they don't both want to be clear, it's that they have different goals.

the questions continental philosophers want to answer is stuff like: is god dead, and have humans killed him? what is the meaning of life? etc.

analytic philosophers want to answer much more focused questions, like: is this cup the same cup that was here 20 minutes ago?

eGremlin
eGremlin

@WebTool
No?
@VisualMaster
No. My fuck are you people Chinese or something? Work on that English, "Steven".
the only philosophy out there is my autism and a two German Idealists haha
Eat shit
@Supergrass
haha anything i dont le like is le bait
Eat shit.
hurr durr they aim for something so they will achieve it
Not with wrong understanding they won't you absolute fucking idiot.

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

@whereismyname
My father isn't a rabbi, but if he was I'd be teaching at Harvard before graduating middle school. All about the connections, my man

idontknow
idontknow

@Sir_Gallonhead
Pseud desu

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@farquit
There is philosophy beyond Hegel
[doubt]

PurpleCharger
PurpleCharger

Bamp

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page