All art is propaganda.
All art is propaganda
t. Jordan Peterson
Fuckin' a right brother
All propaganda is art.
All X are Y
Jordan Memerson?
All Y are X
All X & all Y are Z
all your base
No X or Y are not Z
All your base are belong to us
All of us are belong to your base
>X is not Y
Nothing politically motivated is good, because political narratives are oppressive rather than expressive.
...
true - but not doctrinally so.
holy fuckaroo, dude
If all X & Y are Z then there are no X or Y
What?
>all X are B haha uhh
If he says this then I should start watching some of his stuff.
ALL X ARE Y
NO B ARE X
IF B THEN NOT X!
uhhh brainy hurtie now haha
Sorry! I didn't mean to hurt you! I'm just being logical!
1. P ↔ Q
2. (S v T) → Q
3. ¬P v (¬T & R)
4. (P → Q) & (Q → P)
5. Q → P
6. (S v T) → P
7. P → (¬T & R)
8. (S v T) → (¬T & R)
9. ¬(S v T) v (¬T & R)
10. (¬S & ¬T) v (¬T & R)
11. [(¬S & ¬T) v ¬T] & [(¬S & ¬T) v R]
12. (¬S & ¬T) v ¬T
13. ¬T v (¬S & ¬T)
14. (¬T v ¬S) & (¬T v ¬T)
15. ¬T v ¬T
16. ¬T
17. ¬T v U
18. T → U
Oh wow we got a real thinky boi in here, lads! Check this fella out!
All art is rhetoric, you mean
He says Frozen is propaganda used to push feminism and that if art discusses social or political issues (I.E. all art) then it is propaganda.
it okay
1. Jordan Peterson is a dumbass.
2. All dumbasses are Jordan Peterson
3. All dumbasses and Jordan Petersons are memes
4. Therefore, no dumbass or Jordan Peterson is not a meme
I agree with him then.
OK!
unto are inferior derivatives of to
How does doctrinally function in this sentence? As in they don't have the specific aim of indoctrinating people or?