Notice how every other thread is uninteresting and pointless? Everyone is in...

Emberburn
Emberburn

Notice how every other thread is uninteresting and pointless? Everyone is in intellectual purgatory because they haven't opened up to the only thing that matters- The Foundation.

All urls found in this thread:
http://www.thefoundationpress.com/fulltext.html
http://mundusmillennialis.com/
StrangeWizard
StrangeWizard

while you post on Veeky Forums because you're in an intellectual void

sage

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

@StrangeWizard
You've read The Foundation?

Boy_vs_Girl
Boy_vs_Girl

@Emberburn
not you again, Goonan.Your shitty little book is irrelevant and nobody cares.Just F off

MPmaster
MPmaster

@Emberburn
Nope this level of pseudo-intellectualism suits me pretty well desu

Spamalot
Spamalot

@Boy_vs_Girl
Have you read it?

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

Here are some fragments of the book:

“Every single human feeling, thought, or action at any level of experience or awareness can be categorized
under two equally valid but opposite reactions to the absurdity of the universe. Rejection and destruction or
acceptance and building.”

“Fundamental individual destructive tendencies given our free will in a meaningless existence are a lack of
self-control, cowardice, a lack of wonder, and a lack of sense of humor. Without courage, self-control,
wonder and/or humor the individual and society disintegrates. A lack of those four things leads people to
wrath, depression, madness, hedonism, and ignorance. These five major ways that destructiveness occurs
greatly diminish the quality of someone’s life and eventually lead to the cessation of life for the individual
and humanity.”

“Wrath

Existing produces mental and physical suffering. Other people or society as a whole can exacerbate
suffering produced by existing. The source of this mental and physical suffering is powerlessness. An
individual that feels powerless may reject the conditions that produce the powerlessness and retaliate
through wrath as an attempt to gain power. The attempt to gain power through wrath is either the attempt to
supersede the powerlessness by trying to obtain all the power one can get (which indirectly creates
destructiveness in the individual and society), or the direct destruction of anything that creates
powerlessness.

Wrath is destruction and destruction is power.
Wrath is extreme power and extreme power is destruction.”

“Society has created beings that are different and more than just animals, but we still retain an underlying animalistic nature.

Society is full of individuals that interact with one another. Each of these individuals must have a degree of autonomy and individual power in order to be on the path of building, but as one individual gains more power, others may lose it, and can fall into destructiveness through wrath and especially despair. Society provides guidelines for social interactions and the allocation of power.

Considering these two important components of human nature (Underlying Animal/ Underlying Power) in relation to society:

1. A strong society is based in balancing the pursuance of our biological nature completely and the rejection of our biological nature.
2. A strong society is based in balancing the desire to obtain all power and the desire to relinquish all power from ourselves.

These are the Biological-Artificial Spectrum and the Power Spectrum.”

whereismyname
whereismyname

“Complete animalistic sexual behavior in men is characterized by the pursuance of having sex with many women with disregard for choosing a single mate to create a family with.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in women is characterized by the pursuance of a man or many men for only their high sexual prowess with disregard for the creation of a strong family due to:
A. The woman’s direct desire to put off raising a family in this pursuit, which also contributes to a long-term negative effect in the creation of a family in section C.
B. The unlikelihood that a man with high sexual prowess will settle down and raise a child with the particular woman given the fact that he has many other options and may be animalistic himself.
C. The elimination of the possibility of raising a strong family with a man who has less sexual prowess than any man the woman has had sex with before. The reason for this is that a woman will only remain submissive and desire to be with the man who is the top alpha male in her sexual past. The alpha male creates in the woman feelings and pleasure that is unmatched by others, and is the only man that can truly command respect from the woman in a relationship. A man who remains in a relationship with a woman in which he has no possibility for becoming the top alpha male in her sexual history is a beta and therefore weaker and inferior to the actual alpha male from the perspective of the woman and her feelings. If the woman disregards her sexual hierarchy and starts a family with a beta male, the partnership is doomed to be weak and they will fail in remaining together and fail to create strong offspring. The woman may have chosen the beta for his provider status because of her inability to hold down an alpha male. The beta is a provider of both monetary and emotional support for the woman. The woman is the dominant person in the relationship with the beta male because she holds the locus of power in the relationship- her sexual feelings and needs that are not being met.”

“The worst thing that comes with the rejection of animalistic behavior and power-seeking is sexual degeneration. In a strong society there is a strong polarity between the sexes with men being dominant and masculine, and women being submissive and feminine. But of course with free will, and a society that allows for complete freedom, anything is acceptable. But why should our polar animalistic nature be retained? Proponents of unrestricted free will ask why is it desired for men to remain men and women to remain women when these creations can be dismantled and replaced with something else? Why not continue with our society in which more and more men become feminine and more women become masculine? Why not take it to its conclusion with a new humanity where all women are the masculine beings and all men are the feminine, or a new humanity comprised of androgynous things?

Our base polar nature should be retained because

Nojokur
Nojokur

Fuck off, worthless faggot.

Stark_Naked
Stark_Naked

it is a base guideline to work off of and use as a mental and social anchor, because it is practical, and most importantly because it is necessary.”

“Economics

An economic system that aligns with and harnesses the core nature of human existence and rejects destructiveness is needed for humanity to be on the path of building.

This system would recognize the need for each individual to obtain power and would harness the individual will to obtain power, but it would involve rejecting excessiveness in extortion and hoarding. To combat excessive power seeking through hoarding, people in power must allow for the offloading of power in money and ownership to others that deserve it, along with consumers rejecting businesses run by excessive power-seekers. Power cannot be offloaded to those who do not deserve the power though. These are people who will relinquish all responsibility from themselves and will not work hard or work at all.

All of this achieves a balance in the power spectrum, the key to building.

The economic system I have created that strives for complete building is called Conscious Capitalism. It is beyond capitalism, and it is beyond any economic system ever devised in the history of mankind. It is beyond any system because it supersedes rigid structure and is based in personal choice, cooperation, and nuance. This economic system is individualism and collectivism intertwined in their strongest forms.”

“I envision society being comprised of agrarian communities that are created and maintained by a close-knit group of people competent in many areas working for one another in mutual benefit, rather than isolated people pushing off tasks to unknown specialists in an industrialized wasteland.

There needs to be a growing respect and support of the masculine worker and builder. Craftsmanship needs to be brought back and supported. A craftsman self-actualizes and is fulfilled by his work. The same goes for women that practice a craft. There is a sense of power and accomplishment in this kind of work. There must be a societal push on all fronts in bringing back small-scale craftsmanship, one area being that consumers must seek it out.

Our technological corporate economic structure leads to the breakdown of the polar nature in man and woman. Our economic structure feminizes men and masculinizes women. An agrarian-like limited technological economic structure allows for women to work in feminine areas of home-work and land-work (homekeeping) and craftsmanship, and allows for men to work in masculine areas of home-work and land-work (husbandry) and craftsmanship.”

Booteefool
Booteefool

“We shape the environment and our environment shapes us. The environment contributes to the aesthetic of physical existence, which influences our aesthetic perception, and mind. Some aesthetics are better than others. Human beings create the aesthetic of cities, buildings, land, and existence. The aesthetic must be created with intelligence and planning. Its construction must get rid of artificiality and distraction. The distraction is a distraction from the fact that we live in a universe in which we do not know everything and are not in absolute control. Artificiality creates this distraction. The environment should not convey that humanity has taken over Earth, but is rather a part of Earth.

The ideal creation of an environment and infrastructure is one in which our entire concrete/asphalt jungle we call civilization is undone. How this environment will play out and function in the whole of society can be found in the sections on economics and technology. Technology has completely and seemingly irreversibly changed the infrastructure, aesthetic, and existence of the environment and community. It has completely and seemingly irreversibly annihilated a natural and wonder inspiring environment and life. The industrialization of our world must be undone. Cities must be recreated to be small, functional, conducive to community, and intertwined with nature, with structures made of “natural materials” that create an aesthetic that invokes naturalness. Our current environment evokes constriction, isolation, a separation from nature, a separation from one another, excessive industriousness, an acceleration of day-to-day life, confusion, artificiality, and powerlessness. What we physically create and see as our environment reflects our internal selves as a society. The environment doesn’t mean just outside either. What we see and use within our homes and workplaces must also be an aesthetic free from excessive artificiality and should be “of nature”, meaning we should strive to purchase things of nature that are made in a “natural way” (tying this in with the economics section: made from self-actualizing craftsmen who use scaled down production with natural raw materials).”

King_Martha
King_Martha

@Nojokur
Have you read it?
“Regarding the disintegration of community, in which technology has contributed in many ways, there are no communal venues for social interaction and we have very little and stunted interaction between people even if they are in close proximity. There is a lack of beneficial relationships in the community and this plays out in the formation of relations between man and woman. A man and woman could meet anywhere under any circumstances and form a relationship, just as any two people can meet and form a friendship, but our society is now designed against the facilitation of forming strong relationships.

To begin with, everyone is inside their houses. With the internet, TVs, online shopping, and more, people don't need to leave their houses for anything. All needs are satisfied at the click of a button.

Outside of the home, people isolate themselves in their cars and drive to designated places to get something done and get out, usually a large corporation in which humanity has been stripped- starting with a lack of ownership interested in community, trickling down into the workers disinterested in their job, employer, and people who they interact with, trickling down into the consumers who have no interest in interacting with each other. Our society now values efficiency, competition, isolation and individuality, me against you, me separate from you, me don’t know you, me don’t care about you, me don’t want to talk to
you. There is no conduciveness to social interaction and formation of relationships and COMMUNITY.”

“The Foundation is a foundation for the exploration of our existence in a holistic sense and also in a physical sense. The foundation for exploration is a foundation for the physical exploration of our universe. The physical exploration of the universe is a component of the holistic exploration of our existence in searching the unknown and providing structure to continue searching the unknown. Part of the purpose of all the foundations in building and preventing destruction is to provide a base framework for the continuing exploration of existence.”

girlDog
girlDog

@Fuzzy_Logic
@whereismyname
@Stark_Naked
@Booteefool

Reads like a bunch of pseudo-intellectual ramblings.

happy_sad
happy_sad

@girlDog
Wow, what a really well though out analysis.

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

Is there anyone who is not a braindead faggot cuckold loser on Veeky Forums lit?

ZeroReborn
ZeroReborn

@TalkBomber
go to bed goonan

Illusionz
Illusionz

@Emberburn

I want a download link, will check it out.

Lunatick
Lunatick

@Illusionz
http://www.thefoundationpress.com/fulltext.html

Crazy_Nice
Crazy_Nice

@ZeroReborn
The worst thing that comes with the rejection of animalistic behavior and power-seeking is sexual degeneration. In a strong society there is a strong polarity between the sexes with men being dominant and masculine, and women being submissive and feminine. But of course with free will, and a society that allows for complete freedom, anything is acceptable. But why should our polar animalistic nature be retained? Proponents of unrestricted free will ask why is it desired for men to remain men and women to remain women when these creations can be dismantled and replaced with something else? Why not continue with our society in which more and more men become feminine and more women become masculine? Why not take it to its conclusion with a new humanity where all women are the masculine beings and all men are the feminine, or a new humanity comprised of androgynous things?

Our base polar nature should be retained because it is a base guideline to work off of and use as a mental and social anchor, because it is practical, and most importantly because it is necessary.

If the sexes are to be scrambled, this causes immense confusion and suffering. I’m not only talking about suffering with regards to social break down, I am talking about acute mental suffering due to the fact that the person’s mind is grating immensely against its true biological nature. Our minds are fragile things and need all of the help they can get from base anchors to work off of in a meaningless existence. The biological polar nature of the sexes is a base mental anchor for individuals to work off of in creating a social structure that forms an individual mental structure.

More importantly, our biological polarity is practical and actualizing. We must harness our biology, not grate against it, distort it, and weaken it. Let men be men and women be women and let them do what they do best. Women are not meant to be men and men are not meant to be women. I do not say this in a religious context, but as a matter of reality and truth. The polar nature of man and woman WORKS. Why destroy something that functions extremely well in creating happiness and productivity? It is hard for men to cultivate masculinity and it is hard for women to cultivate femininity. Yet the rewards are great. People today shrink away from anything that requires effort. Women think men have it much better and want to be men. Men think being a man is too hard and want to be women.

The most important reason for the preservation of masculinity in men and femininity in women is because it is NECESSARY. Social and societal breakdown will occur otherwise. When you tell men it is okay to pursue masculinity and at the same time that it is okay to pursue femininity, you are going to get some very confused people. You are also going to see, over time, the discardation of masculinity in favor of femininity, because it is far easier for a man to relinquish control and power and pursue weakness and

Sir_Gallonhead
Sir_Gallonhead

submissiveness. On top of the fact that it is completely destructive for a man to pursue weakness, society needs masculine men to keep it functioning. The world is a harsh place and we have not reached our current civilization through weakness. Women contributed to the formation of civilization with their support and counterbalancing of pure masculinity, but it was men who forged civilization out of nothingness with their masculinity. Civilization must be continuously maintained with masculinity. Humanity must use masculinity to survive, civilization or not- especially without a civilization. If for some reason it is collectively decided by all of humanity that the poles should be switched or that there should be no poles, society is done for. The period of transition would be so counterproductive and destructive that humanity would not recover. It takes a strong well-constructed and upheld polar nature of man and woman for society to be on the path of building. As you will see later, the destruction of the polar nature of humanity is the destruction of the family unit, and the family unit is one of the most important elements in the creation of a strong and continuing society and enjoyable life.

Before getting to the creation of a strong family, we first have to look deeper into the nature of sexuality.

Sexuality has to do with power, or the individual’s exposure and reaction to external and internal power. The individual can either be sexually dominant or submissive. Humanity’s biology is one of sexual dimorphism in which men are the dominant sex and women the submissive, but with free will anything is possible. Environmental factors play a role in a person’s sexual development, but in the end it is up to the individual to cultivate the right nature.

Homosexual men are averse to masculinity, most likely having had bad experiences with overly masculine men or overly harsh women that subjected the man to fear and powerlessness. Men who are homosexual were likely to be exposed to extremely masculine men (father), counterparted with an extremely submissive mother in which the child would turn to for refuge. The child finds an outlet in femininity away from the domineering excessive masculinity. This develops and manifests later when the child is exposed to masculine boys in which the child feels inferior and turns those feelings into sexual submissive feelings towards the boys rather than trying to be masculine himself. Men who are homosexual may also have had a weak and feminine father in which the child learns and mimics, never understanding the importance of cultivating masculinity, counterparted with an overly dominant/artificial mother that overwhelms and/or confuses the child. The homosexual man becomes adverse to the harshness of competing for women and the difficulty in cultivating masculinity. Homosexuals are repulsed by the thought of pursuing a woman sexually because these thoughts only bring feelings of inadequacy and

King_Martha
King_Martha

@Illusionz

Hmm will read thanks.

Spamalot
Spamalot

powerlessness. The homosexual derives pleasure from being submissive to more dominant men, the path of least resistance in grappling with his inferiority and difficulty. The homosexual seeks to be dominated sexually by another man because the feelings of inferiority manifest into a submissive sexuality. With socio-sexual mating structures between straight men and women being rigid and harsh at times, homosexuals seek each other out and develop fluid dominant/submissive socio-sexual structures as a way to remove themselves from the harshness of women’s selection and the difficult path in becoming a man, experiencing sexual pleasure in any way they can get among each other, whether it be through dominance or submission.

Homosexual men relinquish all self-control. This is why they are likely to be hedonistic and pursue casual sex. The “gayness” of the homosexual is a lack of understanding that a man must be courageous, have self-control, and that true happiness does not come from being overly gay and happy all the time to protect from the harshness of existence, but comes from accomplishment, self-actualization, overcoming, truly connecting with others and so on. Homosexuals artificially pretend that everything is great and project this pathetic gaiety onto others. In the certain kind of flamboyant gay man these things can be seen the easiest. These projections and the man’s feelings of inferiority, especially regarding masculinity, reflect the man’s inability to grapple with the demands of existence and the cultivation of power.

Men who are “bears” are hyper-masculine and because of this expose themselves to masculinity’s fragility and ability to be rejected in favor of deviancy. Hyper-masculinity fosters a snapping of the mind, because it is an extreme state of being that is taxing on the mind and is not objectively necessary. The hyper-masculine man will reach the state of extreme masculinity, realize that even in that state of being there is still always weakness, and turn on this weakness in exploring the subjective free will.

Homosexual men tend to be perfectionists, which explains a lot of their nature. A perfectionist man finds faults in his character easily and exacerbates these faults as objective and absolute truth. For example a homosexual man may have felt that he could not compete with other men for women because of a sense of inferiority. Being a perfectionist, or absolute-minded person, the man’s inferiority manifests into a rejection of his masculine nature in which he feels he is not capable of pursuing. The man delves into what must be absolutely true- he is inferior to other men and must be submissive to them, and this desire to be submissive grows because it is the path of least resistance. The man rejects the pursuit of women altogether and relishes in his pathetic state of submissiveness by becoming friends with women rather than pursue them sexually- something deep down the man truly desires but

Evil_kitten
Evil_kitten

suppresses. Also notice that gay men/boys turn to women/girls who have the most mental issues and are mostly dominant-narcissistic types of women who think they know it all yet underneath feel crippling doubts of self-worth. The reason for this attraction is because the women seek power in the worship they get from these gay men, the gay men seek to be subservient to women who are perceived to be powerful, and they both seek the mutual reassurance that their mental deficiencies are ok. They both want to be validated. The gay man wants validation of his place of sexual-social inferiority to women, that he is not-worthy of pursuing a women sexually and therefore seeks a woman who portrays that she superior to men and has power over men. The woman wants validation in her self-pride and general confusion and destructiveness in life by a person that is always loyal and subservient and trustworthy, and is still male, giving him more weight than her female peers.

Women who are lesbians can be two things:

Dykes are adverse to masculine men because they were exposed to powerful men and developed a feeling of jealously for this power, along with a strong aversion to masculine nature. These women are wrathful. They then try to become men because they feel that they should and CAN be just like men. They want the power of masculinity and they absolutely do not want to be subjected to any masculine power. Masculine women most likely had a weak feminine father or no father, or were brought up to be one of the guys.

The “soft” lesbian is adverse to masculine nature but does not want to become a man, and would rather be submissive to another women then God forbid be submissive to a man and his penis, the symbol of his masculine nature (His tool of sexual power).

The transgender person is a person that takes the pursuance of their deviant submissiveness or dominance to its logical conclusion. A person may delve into bisexuality, then homosexuality, and there is nothing stopping them from pursuing trans-sexuality. In fact the mind will follow this destructive path because it is the path of least resistance. People support transgender people because they believe that because someone CAN become transgender, they SHOULD become transgender. It is destructive to be transgender and it is destructive to encourage transgender for the sake of the creation and preservation of the self and society, especially regarding the preservation of masculinity. People are not born transgender; they become it. The genetic makeup and/or parental predisposition and early parental influence does have a large effect on the individual’s probability of becoming transgender, but the notion that a person is simply born that way is wrong. Included in the genetic makeup, a person could be born with certain characteristics that predispose the person to pursuing a deviant path. For example a man can be born with low testosterone and feminine features so he is more likely to pursue

happy_sad
happy_sad

homosexuality or become transgender. A woman could be born very large and masculine so would be predisposed to being a dyke or transgender. It is important to always follow the biological nature of masculinity for man and femininity for women no matter what the inclinations of the genetic makeup are.

A reason why a person would pursue sexual deviancy may be because they desire the attention and feeling of being different or special. With the breakdown of social anchors and lack of social curbing, the deviant person recognizes the possibility of being deviant and pursues this deviancy without any repercussion, gaining all of the sympathy from clueless supporters and attention from anyone else.

The acceptance of the cuckold is the end of masculinity and society. When society deems the cuckold acceptable, men turn to its nature because it is the path of least resistance. The cuckold develops and derives a pleasure in being emasculated. The cuckold desires for their woman in their relationship to sleep around with other men of a higher sexual prowess. Proponents of free will argue that it is good for men to pursue cuckoldry because they are getting what they want, pleasure, without harming anyone. A deeper analysis of the situation reveals that the pleasure the cuckold derives is superficial and that a deeper depression is destroying the individual, just the same as any hedonist. The cuckold takes pleasure in their own destruction. The destructiveness of the cuckold situation is so acute because it acutely destroys masculinity and the family unit. Say men of sexual value five relish in their inferiority to men of higher sexual value and pursue cuckoldry. You still have a society with men of sexual value five and higher pursuing masculinity and building society, but what is stopping the wave of cuckoldry to continue until men of sexual value nine desire to be cuckolded by men of even higher sexual prowess. It will continue until the last masculine man on Earth gives up or when civilization collapses, which is something much more likely to occur earlier.

With free will, there is nothing Wrong with being sexually and biologically deviant, but there is something wrong. The allowance of complete free will opens up a society to the destructiveness of the slippery slope and the adverse effects of more and more people becoming abnormal, discarding masculinity, and discarding the path of building.

Controlling our sexuality structures our mind and society and balances our Power and Animalistic Spectrum.

One of the most important components in creating a strong society and enjoyable life is creating strong families. A strong family is the key to creating a strong individual. A balance in the Power and Animalistic/Artificial Spectrums is needed to create a strong family.

takes2long
takes2long

When women are “sexually liberated” or “animalistic” they choose to have sex with only the top alpha men as seen above. Add to this the acceptability and even push for hedonism as an intelligent decision and women are even more likely to pursue casual sex with top alpha men. Due to all of this a large percentage of men are not having sex. The men that are having all of the sex are only so many, and they are likely to be animalistic and discard a long-term relationship, so most women do not form families with them. But these women may eventually decide it is in their best interest to settle for a beta provider rather than be alone, so families may still be formed. And so everything works out, everyone is happy, and society is comprised of strong well-formed families. But that is not what actually happens. What happens is the rise of the cuckold culture, in which sexually promiscuous women dominate a relationship with a beta male. The man pursues the nature of the cuckold because there are no other options and it may act as a defense mechanism to an extremely difficult dating situation. Whether or not the relationship becomes a true cuckold relationship in which the woman pursues men of higher sexual prowess while using the beta as a provider does not matter. What matters is that the men in these relationships are not dominant and they become weak and submissive. This passes on to the child in which a girl lacks a strong father figure and ends up like the mother, and a boy ends up either weak like the father or despises the father and mother and becomes overly aggressive and animalistic. There are far more and deeper mental problems passed on to the offspring in this family. What needs to happen is women need to control themselves and men need to be strong in order to keep women in check.

With oversocialization and artificiality you have men and women waiting very long to have children, and they have very few children, maybe one child, maybe none. A lot of the time women who were previously highly animalistic and hedonistic find it convenient to act in an artificial fashion as they age and try to settle down with a beta provider, maybe partly as a hope for salvation and compensating for previous lifestyle choices, and partly to make it bearable to exist in a relationship in which the woman is not attracted to her husband. Feminism, a mindset of much contradiction and confusion, is the product of both a highly artificial/oversocialized AND animalistic society. With the artificial side you facilitate the women’s confusion in if they want to act like men or women in various areas, animalistic you get the pursuance of sex, combination you get unwanted pregnancies or no pregnancies.

Animalistic men and women leads to unwanted pregnancies, with either a child being born with separation of the parents likely in the near future, or preventative measures like birth control or abortion taking place. Birth control is a major component in

likme
likme

the creation and facilitation of the sexually animalistic mating mess, causes serious negative physiological and mental side effects for the woman (a list so long and far-reaching I will not list it here, do your own research and analysis and you will see how unhealthy and detrimental it may be), and may be causing the contamination of the water supply with female hormones, contributing to the physical feminization of man, and physical overfeminization of women. (No one seems to care about the possibility of this phenomena or take it seriously, it seems as if the feminization of man is all part of the plan.) Abortion helps facilitate the sexually animalistic mess and is the destruction of a life as it forms in the womb of the mother, and whether or not you believe the life-form in the womb is human or not, it causes damage to the mental well-being of the mother and damage to the collective conscious regarding the value of life.

A child raised by a single mother has deep mental problems. If the father was not animalistic it is far better for a child to be raised by a single father. The reason for the split of the parents may be a combination of the mother being destructive in choosing the wrong mate and the father being destructive in being animalistic. There is a correlation between the father being animalistic and the women becoming a single mother because it is likely she pursued the man for his sexual prowess instead of his ability to be a strong father. Simply put, a boy raised by only a woman never learns from his father how to be a man. The girl raised by only a woman never learns to respect men and is never guided by a loving father figure in learning things like self-control. The boy never cultivates true masculinity and the girl never cultivates true femininity. The same goes for a child raised by two men or two women. In all of these scenarios the child is brought up in confusion and is exposed to destructive tendencies.

Discarding the current polarity also sends waves of destruction into the social structure of a civilization with regards to the creation of a strong family. If more and more men are going to stop being men, they are going to stop mating with women, completely or in a normal sense. Families will not be formed, or formed in a weak state. Say only 10 men out of 100 remain masculine with the rest being feminine. And say 50 women out of 100 remain feminine with the rest being masculine. Those 10 men will either choose a single mate to form a strong family, or choose multiple women in which the family would be weaker. The 50 masculine women are most likely lesbians, but regardless the 10 masculine men would not want to have anything to do with them. Those women must choose from the 90 feminine men or do not form families. The 90 feminine men are not selected by any of the feminine women. They either do not form a family or mate with a dominant woman. There is the possibility of only 10 strong families being formed,

kizzmybutt
kizzmybutt

If you wrote this not bad user.

hairygrape
hairygrape

in which the polar nature is passed on. Masculinity is not preserved.
What does a balancing of the two spectrums accomplish in creating a strong society?

Pillars of a Strong Society:
-Encouraging self-control, courage, wonder, humor as opposed to the 5 destructors, but more specifically…

1. Social guidelines, creating:
-Various social and mental anchors in order to carry out day-to-day life and interactions.
Society is built on the curbing of our natural destructive and animalistic desires. It is built on cooperation and control.
-Interactions that strengthen bonds between people not destroy them.
Enjoyment of life by connecting and forming relationships with people.
-Masculinity in men
-Femininity in women
-The Family Unit

2. A driving motive to build and strengthen a civilization out of chaos and nothingness:
-Productivity
Contentment with one’s existence and society makes for a productive person.
-Individual Autonomy
Having power and freedom.
-Cooperation between individuals
Social cohesion is needed for actualization.

Evilember
Evilember

The Foundation for Exploration
sounds like Sense and Sensibility

but gayer

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

@Evilember
That's because you are projecting your faggotry.

CodeBuns
CodeBuns

@TalkBomber
but I am a faggot, I guess it takes one to know one, no projection necessary.

It still sounds gayer than sense and sensibility

Pillars of a Strong Society:
-Masculinity in men
-Femininity in women

muh society needs big strong hard pillars no homo
yep, that's about as balls touching as it gets, where do I sign up to get tagteamed at your masc for masc foundation?

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

@CodeBuns
If you are a homo, read the large blocks of text I posted above. It will help you understand how much of a pathetic "man" you are.

TreeEater
TreeEater

@Fuzzy_Logic
how would it be if you say "I am a homo" to yourself 10 times every night before you go to bed

and quit writing this horseshit (yes horseshit,...not bullshit mind, if you were a bullshitter I might have had some respect for you, you may at least have gone on to become a bullshit artist but you never will as you make horseshit)

and worst of all you don't even know who God is, that is why you shall be eternally and infinitely disappointed. Namaste

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

Hmmm, where can I find this?

Firespawn
Firespawn

@Need_TLC
I posted the link above...........

TurtleCat
TurtleCat

Congrats on finally using a different OP text Sean.

BlogWobbles
BlogWobbles

@TurtleCat
Have you read The Foundation?

TechHater
TechHater

@Firespawn
Shit sorry, okay i will read and get back to you.

Lord_Tryzalot
Lord_Tryzalot

Asimov also wrote a science fiction book about a Foundation, his was better

hairygrape
hairygrape

@Lord_Tryzalot
Have you read "The Foundation for Exploration"?

ZeroReborn
ZeroReborn

@hairygrape
how would it be better than Asimov?

TechHater
TechHater

@ZeroReborn
The Foundation for Exploration is not a science fiction story. It's a philosophical foundation for the exploration of human nature, it's a foundation provide for the survival of the species to continue exploring human nature, and its a foundation for the species to explore the universe in order to survive and continue to explore human nature.

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

@ZeroReborn
It explains the core tenets of human nature and provides the right path individual people and the species must take to survive and achieve deep happiness and connection with existence if people choose life over destruction.

StonedTime
StonedTime

@TechHater
The Foundation for Exploration is not a science fiction story
claims not to be science fiction
It's a philosophical foundation for the exploration of human nature, it's a foundation provide for the survival of the species to continue exploring human nature, and its a foundation for the species to explore the universe in order to survive and continue to explore human nature.
writes a load of science fiction

I'm sorry, this must be very annoying for you, but you seem confused, you write science fiction.

how can I say this another way

you are a science fiction writer

GoogleCat
GoogleCat

Whilst your posting style is a tad obnoxious and arrogant even by lit standards Ill give you the benefit of the doubt.

Is this just an analytical work that seeks to describe society/human interaction or does it prescribe specific actions/exercises?

Is it based on any empirical research or studies or is it mainly theoretical?

Ignoramus
Ignoramus

@Emberburn
reads like sophomoric derivatives of briefly scanned abstracts and summaries; obtuse historical view of humanity; poor/lack of argumentation.

A+ for ambition. Keep going, but put some aside for background reading.

CodeBuns
CodeBuns

@GoogleCat
It describes and prescribes (suggests). The book revolves around the concept of "the duality of human nature" which says that given our free will and our inherent not-all-powerfulness, we can either choose to destroy or "build". It is easier to just post the entire beginning of the book which lays out the basis for the rest of the book, no matter how far removed the rest of it may seem from it:

"Preface

In order to understand what I call “the duality of human nature” you must understand the difference between the words Truth and truth, Wrong and wrong, and Right and right. Truth, Wrong, and Right are objective understandings of existence, an impossibility given our current reality. The words truth, wrong, and right are subjective understandings of existence, and they are what we must work off of. All words capitalized in this book when they should not be reflect their objectivity or more closeness to objectivity compared to their lowercase counterparts. Objectivity may be the goal, but it is not the key to achieving that goal; subjectivity is the key. A foundational philosophy based in subjectivity is the key to action. It is how you build and it is how you prevent things from decaying.

Introduction

In order for humanity to thrive with people living in true happiness, or for humanity to continue at all, a foundation, or mental and societal structure is necessary. The foundation I have discovered or created is a temporary structure based on the current path and understanding of humanity. It is based off of a single primary question in which everything else is derived off of:

Should I continue to exist?

In which there is no right or wrong answer.

I will argue in this book that if you want to obtain true happiness and have humanity continue to exist:

A. You must accept that your life is meaningless.
B. You must then create a subjective foundational mental structure to build an enjoyable life and to protect yourself from meaninglessness.
C. You must create a strong foundational societal structure to support individuals.
D. You must understand that some things destroy humanity and other things strengthen humanity.
E. What is “right” or “wrong” depends on the strengthening or destructive qualities of the action or thought.
F. You must accept and work with things that are not absolute truths in order to accomplish B, C, D, and E.
G. You must accept things that cannot be changed but not succumb to their negative consequences.
H. You must build upon things that can be changed in order to create a stronger mental and societal structure and create a better life.

This book will be focused on realizing the many ways people consciously and unconsciously destroy the quality of their life and the possibility for their existence and how it is necessary to reduce destructive tendencies and encourage other behavior in order to keep existing and thrive.

In order to survive, function, enjoy and self-actualize you must

New_Cliche
New_Cliche

understand your existence and you must create your existence. In order to understand and to build we must explore.

This is the foundation for exploration.

Section 1: Welcome to Not Nothing

Life is meaningless and absurd. We have free will, we are not all powerful, we are not all knowing, and we experience the universe with a biological framework and consciousness. I have discovered that due to this inherent structure of our perceived existence, we follow two distinct paths. The duality of human nature is this:

Every single human feeling, thought, or action at any level of experience or awareness can be categorized under two equally valid but opposite reactions to the absurdity of the universe. Rejection and destruction or acceptance and building.

Simplistic approximations of the duality are:
The path of destruction is hopelessness and the path of building is hope.
The path of destruction is unrestricted individual freedom and the path of building is discipline.
The path of destruction is ignorance and the path of building seeks to understand life.
The path of destruction leads to extinction and the path of building leads to survival.

Neither reaction to our perceived existence is “better” than the other. It is vital to understand that these reactions are philosophically equal and justified avenues of experience and that these reactions permeate through every moment of our existence. The reactions can have different magnitudes or effects on our lives and the lives of others, but at their core is the same duality, unchanging no matter how miniscule or consequential the instance.

These infinitesimal reactions can be viewed on a polar spectrum with complete destruction or building at either end and everything at a certain level of one or the other between, but they can also be viewed as two distinct paths when viewed over a longer period of time. Changing paths from building to destruction can be done in an instant with a powerful thought or action, but leaving the path of destruction for the path of building takes much longer, requires tremendous effort, and the path of building must always be upheld and maintained. The path of destruction can simply end in you killing yourself, while the path of building means living a deep life of creation, searching and experiencing what life has to offer. Remember that even if you are on the path of destruction, it is always possible to fight out of it and get on the path of building, although the deeper you are in destruction, the harder it is to get out of.

You can accept the meaninglessness of life and go down either path. You can be at the highest philosophical understanding of the universe and go down either path. It is impossible to articulate perfectly why someone should choose to accept life rather than reject it, but I will explain my personal decision. Always remember that the power of choice always rests on you. In order to determine if you want to go on the path of

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

destruction or building, you have to first ask yourself if life is worth living. Destructive thinking, which is not the only option, may cloud one’s judgment on the worth of life. I will explain what going down each path entails, and if you choose life, I will explain how you can prosper.

Section 2: Destruction and Building

Life is completely meaningless and free will allows for people to act on the meaninglessness in different ways, all funneling categorically into the duality: Destruction or Building. The path of building builds the collective conscious and everything necessary to support it to enjoy life and discover Truth, while the path of destruction tears everything down. It is not Wrong for people to decide consciously or unconsciously to ruin what others have built because at the core of why people build, there is no absolute Reason to build in the first place. An absence of absolute Reason does not make destruction automatically Right or building automatically futile.

In the duality something that is wrong is actually something that is destructive. Something that is right is something that builds on top of our meaningless existence for a life worth living and strengthens people against destructiveness.

Fundamental individual destructive tendencies given our free will in a meaningless existence are a lack of self-control, cowardice, a lack of wonder, and a lack of sense of humor. Without courage, self-control, wonder and/or humor the individual and society disintegrates. A lack of those four things leads people to wrath, depression, madness, hedonism, and ignorance. These five major ways that destructiveness occurs greatly diminish the quality of someone’s life and eventually lead to the cessation of life for the individual and humanity.

All of these reactions influence the collective conscious, which shapes the existence of the individual and humanity.

Individuals create the collective conscious and are created by the collective conscious.
Individuals influence the collective conscious and are influenced by the collective conscious.

Society is an entity that binds and directs individuals according to the perceived collective conscious. It is intertwined with the individual and can create destructiveness in the individual. A collective effort is needed in order for humanity to self-actualize and be on the path of building. Society is the vehicle for building.

Individuals create society and are created by society.
Individuals influence society and are influenced by society.

A fundamental way society creates destructiveness in the individual is the creation of powerlessness along with, or due to encouraging the destructive behavior above. Society can destroy individuals by pushing wrath, depression, hedonism, madness, and ignorance onto them, and in turn the collective society is destroyed itself. Everything is connected. An individual may have been courageous and in control and possess humor and wonder if not for

Boy_vs_Girl
Boy_vs_Girl

the outside force of society pushing the person to be destructive. But remember, an individual may and should always strive to be on the path of building despite all of the wrongness surrounding oneself if the individual chooses life."

@Ignoramus
If you are judging from the first few paragraphs I posted, realize that they are just quick snapshots of much more extensive sections.

Soft_member
Soft_member

@Emberburn
"The Foundation for Exploration

The most important organization of thought in history."

I was going to read a little bit to not dismiss you, too.

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

@Fuzzy_Logic
every thought, feeling, action can be categorized as rejection/destruction or acceptance/building
Alright what about a feeling of indifference? What if I believe the universe is hurtling towards oblivion, so I ACCEPT this fact of its inevitable DESTRUCTION by helping engage in destruction? It's a pointless dichotomy which seeks to categorize everything in a completely useless way.

A lack of those four things leads people to wrath, depression, madness, hedonism, and ignorance
Again how is ignorance a reaction to the supposed meaninglessness of the universe? It's not a reaction at all.

Wrath is destruction and destruction is power
So wrath, which you classified as destructive, is a means of gaining power. But gaining power is in a sense building; you previously did not possess power, and now you do. You've created something new. Furthermore, what is power? It's simply the capacity to execute your own will. To take the world as it is and impose your will on it in order to realize a desire of yours is a creative process.

I don't really want to bother going through the rest of it because nothing is carefully defined, or even particularly well executed.

DeathDog
DeathDog

@Burnblaze
Not worth my time to try and explain everything to you. Figure it out.

farquit
farquit

@Soft_member
What do you believe is the greatest organization of thought in history?

takes2long
takes2long

@DeathDog
wastes his time transparently shilling his book here
somebody tries to engage and discuss
Figure it out :^)
You haven't elaborated or worked on your foundation for knowledge at all, or else you'd know how to answer these questions. So fuck off.

idontknow
idontknow

@takes2long
Hey you're not me. Thanks tho

Deadlyinx
Deadlyinx

@TechHater
How is it recieved amongst philosophers?

TreeEater
TreeEater

@farquit
I have no idea.

I'm inclined against the idea. If I had to choose, I wouldn't choose something claiming to be it.

RavySnake
RavySnake

@CodeBuns
@New_Cliche
Just to clarify are section 1 & 2 part of the introduction or are they the actual chapters representative of the general method you use throughout the rest of the text?

StrangeWizard
StrangeWizard

@Burnblaze
Alright what about a feeling of indifference? What if I believe the universe is hurtling towards oblivion, so I ACCEPT this fact of its inevitable DESTRUCTION by helping engage in destruction? It's a pointless dichotomy which seeks to categorize everything in a completely useless way.
Then you are being destructive.

Again how is ignorance a reaction to the supposed meaninglessness of the universe? It's not a reaction at all.
We have the free will to choose to be seekers of truth or to wallow in destructive ignorance.

So wrath, which you classified as destructive, is a means of gaining power. But gaining power is in a sense building; you previously did not possess power, and now you do. You've created something new. Furthermore, what is power? It's simply the capacity to execute your own will. To take the world as it is and impose your will on it in order to realize a desire of yours is a creative process.
There are different forms of power which are discussed later on. The power that wrath brings is destructive. It is not true power that brings true happiness and connection with existence.

TurtleCat
TurtleCat

@TreeEater
Take a chance with it. You won't regret it.

@RavySnake
They are separate from the intro and are the first two section of four sections total. The preface, intro, and section 1 total four pages in the physical copy of the book. Section 2 is thirty-two pages, Section 3 is thirty-five, Section 4 forty-nine. After Section 2 the book diverts away from directly discussing the duality of human nature and goes into other things that are still linked to the same concepts presented in the beginning parts, but are new and distinct and can be considered standalone if not for the knowledge that they represent part of a greater whole.

GoogleCat
GoogleCat

@TurtleCat
I did.

"When women are “sexually liberated” or “animalistic” they choose to have sex with only the top alpha men as seen above. Add to this the acceptability and even push for hedonism as an intelligent decision and women are even more likely to pursue casual sex with top alpha men. Due to all of this a large percentage of men are not having sex. The men that are having all of the sex are only so many, and they are likely to be animalistic and discard a long-term relationship, so most women do not form families with them. But these women may eventually decide it is in their best interest to settle for a beta provider rather than be alone, so families may still be formed. And so everything works out, everyone is happy, and society is comprised of strong well-formed families. But that is not what actually happens. What happens is the rise of the cuckold culture, in which sexually promiscuous women dominate a relationship with a beta male. The man pursues the nature of the cuckold because there are no other options and it may act as a defense mechanism to an extremely difficult dating situation. Whether or not the relationship becomes a true cuckold relationship in which the woman pursues men of higher sexual prowess while using the beta as a provider does not matter. What matters is that the men in these relationships are not dominant and they become weak and submissive. This passes on to the child in which a girl lacks a strong father figure and ends up like the mother, and a boy ends up either weak like the father or despises the father and mother and becomes overly aggressive and animalistic. There are far more and deeper mental problems passed on to the offspring in this family. What needs to happen is women need to control themselves and men need to be strong in order to keep women in check."

Your writing is worse than mine and your ideas are /pol/ pop. You offer no wisdom, just vague platitudes. That's good news for you, though. You belong on lit.

Garbage Can Lid
Garbage Can Lid

@GoogleCat
That part is filler. Read this to get a better idea:

"Animalistic nature is not limited to violence- it applies to sexuality. A society comprised of people that follow a completely animalistic sexual nature is destructive. The consequences of following this nature are far-reaching. A hedonistic nature and an animalistic sexual nature are intertwined, although are not the same thing.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in men is characterized by the pursuance of having sex with many women with disregard for choosing a single mate to create a family with.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in women is characterized by the pursuance of a man or many men for only their high sexual prowess with disregard for the creation of a strong family due to:
A. The woman’s direct desire to put off raising a family in this pursuit, which also contributes to a long-term negative effect in the creation of a family in section C.
B. The unlikelihood that a man with high sexual prowess will settle down and raise a child with the particular woman given the fact that he has many other options and may be animalistic himself.
C. The elimination of the possibility of raising a strong family with a man who has less sexual prowess than any man the woman has had sex with before. The reason for this is that a woman will only remain submissive and desire to be with the man who is the top alpha male in her sexual past. The alpha male creates in the woman feelings and pleasure that is unmatched by others, and is the only man that can truly command respect from the woman in a relationship. A man who remains in a relationship with a woman in which he has no possibility for becoming the top alpha male in her sexual history is a beta and therefore weaker and inferior to the actual alpha male from the perspective of the woman and her feelings. If the woman disregards her sexual hierarchy and starts a family with a beta male, the partnership is doomed to be weak and they will fail in remaining together and fail to create strong offspring. The woman may have chosen the beta for his provider status because of her inability to hold down an alpha male. The beta is a provider of both monetary and emotional support for the woman. The woman is the dominant person in the relationship with the beta male because she holds the locus of power in the relationship- her sexual feelings and needs that are not being met.

Before continuing, “sexual value” is the numeration of a person’s standing in the socio-sexual power structure created by men and women based on people’s sexual desirability. This does not only involve physical looks, but a number of factors.

In a society that heavily leans on the animalistic side, the vast majority of the male population does not have a stake in society because they are not having sex, and they are not reproducing. The animalistic men have sex with many women that range on the sexual value scale from high to low value. Animalistic men

King_Martha
King_Martha

of high sexual value have no problem having casual sex with women of lower sexual value to quench the sexual drive because the sex is seen as easy to obtain and convenient, and because purely sexually speaking in the eyes of the animalistic man, a body is a body to a certain extent. The animalistic women only choose to have sex with top men, even though they may be of a lesser sexual value and risk being discarded, or they desire to move from top male to top male. The woman of lower sexual value perceives that she is of the same sexual value as the top man she has had sex with. As you can see the people that are having sex are only top men and all women. Men that are not top men, which may be the bottom 80 or 90 percent of men in the population, are not having sex or are barely having sex with women that are well below the women of equal sexual value that these men would normally be having sex with if society was not comprised of animalistic men and women. Men and women of equal sexual value would pair and everyone would be having sex and forming relationships no matter what their sexual value is. Animalistic women may eventually decide to settle down with lesser value men than they have experienced before, and these men will have some sex, but to say that those pathetic instances of manipulative pity sex count as healthy is delusional and wrong. It is important for a society that everyone, especially men, is having consistent healthy sex and this plays out later in the formation of a strong family.

The number of sexual partners in a woman’s past matters. The higher the partner count, the more likely that one of her previous partners was of greater sexual value than her current partner if in a relationship. High partner counts are also correlated with an animalistic and hedonistic woman who seeks men that are of much greater sexual value than herself. A hedonistic woman will also lose the ability to pair bond for the long term with a man as she bounces from one man to another and becomes broken, causing her to be unable to form a strong relationship with a man and therefore continue to go from one man to the next, with also men influencing this by being disinterested in being in a long-term relationship with her due to disgust, fear and knowledge that it won’t last or be a strong fulfilling connection, and the threat of being inferior. A hedonistic women is likely to develop a high partner count, and a high partner count woman is likely to be hedonistic. The effects on a man in being in a relationship with a woman who has had sex with someone in her past of greater sexual value are tremendous and ruinous. The woman has experienced someone of greater value and expects that same value or better in the future- it is in her nature to feel this way. If not fulfilled, the woman will not appreciate her man, develop a growing resentment and disrespect towards him, and be depressed. The man will feel inferior and be depressed and this is

girlDog
girlDog

the important aspect. The relationship should be broken by either side as a mismatch, but if not, destruction follows. The higher the sex count in women, the higher the stakes are for these women to find a suitable man, and the less likely men of lower sexual value will find a women of the same sexual value that has not had sex with someone of higher sexual value. It is important for women to have respect for the truth and therefore have respect for themselves, other men, and the betterment of society. If women do not have a respect for the truth I have laid out above, then they are ignorant or wrathful. If men do not have a respect for the necessary curbing of being animalistic, then they are ignorant or wrathful.

The men of lower sexual value (which may be 80 to 90 or even 99 percent of the total male population depending on how animalistic or hedonistic the women in the population are) that are not having sex in the animalistic society revert to activities that attempt to fill the sexual void, but this in turn only weakens the man even further and may completely destroy the man. Without consistent sex, which is least destructive if in a consistent long-term relationship, it is easy for masculinity in men to decline and it is replaced with depression, weakness and the man may even start to develop femininity. Men who are not having sex do not have a stake in society, and if they did, their diminished masculinity, depression and weakness do not build society to its greatest potential. A man who is not having sex not only loses his care for building society, he does not care for life in general. The man is not only missing out on sex, he is missing out on one of the greatest and most important things that makes life worth living- the loving companionship of a person of the opposite sex. This is a life that is not worth living, leading to destruction.

The large percentage of men are constantly bombarded with sexual women, but are denied access to sex or choose to withdraw from pursuing sex with animalistic/hedonistic women that pursue casual sex. The denial or lack of sex creates wrath and depression. In order to be happy and in order to retain a healthy level of animalistic nature, men need a sexual outlet, but if there are no women that want to be in relationships the man’s only choices are to experience a sexual outlet by becoming highly animalistic and pursuing casual sex, rape, or relinquishing power and animalistic nature through masturbation. Even though masturbation is a sexual outlet, it is an unhealthy one that only weakens the man and makes him more frustrated and unsatisfied.

A lack of sex is one of the worst sufferings a man can experience. This is part of why women should dress modestly. Dressing immodestly attracts sexual attention. Immodest dress is defined as wearing clothes that showcase the body of the woman through either exposure or tightness. Women that dress immodestly in public are attracting sexual attention from

viagrandad
viagrandad

other men and this is bad for many reasons. Whether she is in a relationship or single, this sexual attraction causes the men viewing her to desire to have sex with her. This desire is 99.9999999999% likely to not be gratified in every instance any man looks at the woman. This rising of desire and denial of fulfillment creates a great negative physiological and mental effect on the man. This negative effect could even develop into pure torment depending on how aware the man is of his powerlessness in his sexual urge and inability to quench the sexual urge. Regardless of the awareness, there is always the underlying negative physiological effect. If the man does not feel a desire to have sex with the sexually attractive woman showcasing her sexuality, he is no longer a man and this is bad. It is ridiculous to think that men can and must completely eradicate their sexual urge to appease women that want to show off their body and gain attention without there being any sort of negative consequences.

How a woman presents herself is a window into her entire being. The more immodestly dressed, the more hedonistic and animalistic, among other negative personality traits, in which men are repulsed by the thought of a long-term relationship. A woman who dresses more immodest should only expect to be pursued by animalistic and hedonistic men who desire casual sex, or men slightly less extreme but overall disinterested in pursuing her for a true long-term relationship. Single men who do not desire casual sex, but rather long-term relationships, feel a deep powerlessness as they view a constricted dating pool when they see women who dress immodestly. With the sexual liberation of women, women only choose to have sex with the very top percentage of men. This exacerbates the mental destruction of the rest of men because they hopelessly realize they will never have sex with women who are even on their same level and realize that these women are only choosing top tier men.

If a woman is in a relationship the man in the relationship is a cuck and/or a menace if he enjoys/allows the showcasing of his woman. He is a menace because he contributes to the situation before. If she is dressing immodestly and in a relationship, she is attracting attention from other men thus cucking the man in the relationship because the immodest dress is signaling she is not receiving enough attention from her man and is seeking out attention from other men. She may consciously or unconsciously want a better man and may act on the attention she gains by dressing immodestly and leave her man for another."

TechHater
TechHater

@Garbage Can Lid
Why do you have to have filler in the most important organization of thought in history?

Based on what I've read already, I just don't get the urge to continue reading what you have written.

one simple paragraph on men of an animalistic sexual nature
wall of text on women of an animalistic sexual nature.

When I was referring to your ideas before, I was referring to more than the excerpt I quoted.

MPmaster
MPmaster

@TechHater
wanking under the pretence of abstinance isn't very enlightenment on that subject.

girlDog
girlDog

@TechHater
Yet you haven't even read anything from Section 4, which includes the revolutionary economics section.

RavySnake
RavySnake

@GoogleCat
your ideas are /pol/ pop
you do understand there as an empirical basis for every piece of hate /pol/ rubs your face on?

Booteefool
Booteefool

@RavySnake
Wait... nigger kikes are a real thing?

Illusionz
Illusionz

@Booteefool
what is rastafarism

askme
askme

@Emberburn
Is this the new truthcontest?

idontknow
idontknow

@Emberburn
Fuck off, Goonan!

Ignoramus
Ignoramus

@Illusionz
Goonan, it's one thing to shill your shitty ass spergfest of a book to a board full of pedophiles and weeaboos. It's another thing to larp as an eager pupil twitching with enlightened fervor at the prospect of reading your "work." Seriously, fuck off you insufferable faggot. How pathetic can one boy be?

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

@kizzmybutt
lol

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

@Ignoramus
Nobody cares what you have to say. You must have a sad life my man.

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@MPmaster
What
@girlDog
The only thing revolutionary about your economics is that they revolve around a bunch of ideas people have already come up with. All you do is vaguely overview them.
@RavySnake
I get the feeling that your female relationships haven't worked out in the past. I bet it's part of why you have delusions of grandeur too.

Look, I'm saying some pretty mean stuff. However, I do think that you're doing reading and ingesting information for this. Just keep reading and learning and producing, user. You'll get to something original at some point. Allow yourself some time to do more work here. You're just tripping all over your ego in this thread. You must be in your early 20's. I think you have potential if you get over yourself. I'm not going to respond to you any more. I gave your writing a chance even though I could barely read it past your screaming ego. You should call this thing the foundation for platitudes.

Carnalpleasure
Carnalpleasure

@Fried_Sushi
Are you a woman or a soy boy? You have many further levels of understanding to go through before you understand what this book says and what it represents. Keep at it. I'm going to post the economics section to point out that it has never been done like this, not even close.

"Economics

An economic system that aligns with and harnesses the core nature of human existence and rejects destructiveness is needed for humanity to be on the path of building.

This system would recognize the need for each individual to obtain power and would harness the individual will to obtain power, but it would involve rejecting excessiveness in extortion and hoarding. To combat excessive power seeking through hoarding, people in power must allow for the offloading of power in money and ownership to others that deserve it, along with consumers rejecting businesses run by excessive power-seekers. Power cannot be offloaded to those who do not deserve the power though. These are people who will relinquish all responsibility from themselves and will not work hard or work at all.

All of this achieves a balance in the power spectrum, the key to building.

The economic system I have created that strives for complete building is called Conscious Capitalism. It is beyond capitalism, and it is beyond any economic system ever devised in the history of mankind. It is beyond any system because it supersedes rigid structure and is based in personal choice, cooperation, and nuance. This economic system is individualism and collectivism intertwined in their strongest forms.

Individuals must extract resources, create goods, and provide services for the continuation of the species. Individuals may either own the means of production and be compensated by consumers with money for what they provide, or individuals work for someone who owns the means of production as a means of production in exchange for money. The means of production are resources, equipment, and labor. The person who works for themself and provides only their labor has ownership of the means of production. If the person works for someone else it can be said that the employer owns the person’s labor as a means of production and can direct the person as they please until the point where the worker chooses to leave.

Ownership of resources and equipment is one thing; the individual must have the drive to turn those resources (knowledge may be a resource) and equipment into a good or service. Most of the drive comes from the compensation in money they will receive from consumers. An employee must also have the drive to work for someone else. Most of the drive to work for someone else comes from the compensation they receive from the employer. These drives are essential to action and creation. If a person does not have the drive or funds to start their own business, they must offer themselves as a means of production for someone else. As a means of production they simply have to complete their specific

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

tasks and do not have to worry about running the entire organization or providing funds for it, but they do not get a share of the profits, they do not have any power, and the locus of power over their responsibilities and pay is with the owner. The owner is free to take advantage of the worker up to the point that the worker leaves the organization.

When business owners hoard their power, the rest of the population is forced into a position of powerlessness in which they must offer themselves as only means of production because they do not have the access to resources or equipment, do not have the funds to acquire them, and it is difficult for them to create a business with little money because the established businesses use their power to increase productivity and out compete any newcomers. Those who are not the owners are driven into servitude and taken advantage of because the owner CAN take advantage of them, and because it is thought that they MUST in order to maximize profit. The imbalance created in hoarding is complete destructiveness. A life of servitude is a life that is not worth living. A person who feels that their life would be worth living if the system were different develops destructive tendencies because the system is so large and complex that a controlled deconstruction of the system is impossible for a lone person.

Business owners must also be consumers, but since there is a small percentage of business owners and an extremely large percentage of people who are not, it can be said that the workers are also the consumers. Business owners may take advantage of the consumer, even more so when there is less competition in the field or if there is collusion in the field. Prices may be exorbitantly raised and profits do not go to the worker (consumer), it goes directly to the owners.

Business owners, the controllers of operation, may abuse workers and they may also abuse the resources and the consumer. The owner may abuse the environment, abuse animals, and use practices that create a poor product, or even a harmful product. The consumer may be unaware of the treatment of workers, unaware of the abuse of resources, and unaware of the abuse they receive if the product they are given is deceptively poor or harmful. Businesses may be able to hide the destructiveness of the operation or product through advertising or by keeping their mouth shut. In most cases there are no repercussions for businesses that operate destructively.

The best economy is one in which every individual is driven to contribute and build, and everyone enjoys their life. It is an economy that minimizes destructiveness and maximizes building.

The individual may be in one of four roles in the economy, and in each of these roles they have the free will and choice to act either destructively or constructively. The owner, worker, consumer and government must work together in order to build.

SniperGod
SniperGod

Conscious Capitalism and The Business Owner-

It is up to the individual to create a business that is not destructive. The individual mind must understand that money maximization is not the goal. Building is the goal, and society as a whole must be included in this goal.

In order to minimize destructiveness and maximize building, the business owner must take a small profit instead of seeking the maximization of profit for themself. The business owner should pay their workers their worth and should provide their services to consumers for a reasonable price, while keeping a small profit in compensation. With pure capitalism the owners of businesses instead desire to push wages down to the bare minimum amount required to keep an active labor force and price their services to consumers in a way to acquire the most profit possible. Pure capitalism rewards greed and excessive power-seeking. But as one individual obtains power at another’s expense, the other person develops wrath or depression. An excessive power-seeker does not use their power to create more power in others, they hoard their power and wield it to obtain even more power. Yet if a business owner is not compensated for their risks in obtaining power and producing goods, they will become wrathful or depressed. A balance is needed.

Individuals must desire and obtain power, but not too much power, and individuals who obtain power must disseminate the power to others. The dissemination of power must be done in an efficient manner that maintains productivity and does not interfere with the others’ will to obtain power. Weakness is created if power is disseminated to those who do not deserve it or will squander it. The inefficient dissemination of power usually does not come from the business owners, but from the government seizing the power and distributing it to the masses. In order to disseminate power efficiently it must come from the owner directly to the worker, in the form of money, ownership and respect.

If Conscious Capitalism is to work, the basis of the economy is the formation of respectful relationships. Without strong relationships, individuals are turned into interchangeable cogs and treated poorly. Without a respectful relationship with the world, people will neglect it and destroy it. The formation of relationships starts with the business owner. Workers must be treated with respect and not subjected to poor working conditions, or if they are, compensated fairly for them. A worker must be paid fairly, with sacrifice being made by the owner, and as you will see later, the consumer. Owners should strive to create a more enjoyable and fulfilling work experience. Workers should not be treated as cogs, performing simplified, degrading and monotonous tasks over and over. The worker should be involved in the creation of a product or service in an extensive role, and see the fruits of their labor. A more extensive role means more power is being granted to the person, so

WebTool
WebTool

that person must step up to the challenge.

The allocation of ownership is essential. Ownership means power and a share of the profits. Without the dissemination of ownership the imbalance of power becomes out of control. With regards to passing on a business, family is important, but always allocating ownership from one familial generation to the other is too simplistic. If a business remains a small entity that can be managed by a small family it makes sense to pass it on within the family. But if a business can support multiple families, then it is destructive to keep that business controlled by one family, reaping all of the profits.

It is up to the business owner to not take advantage of consumers or the planet. Consumers may be swayed into buying destructive products. Advertisements influence these people into buying into their own ignorance. Destructive industries must be done away with.

It is up to the business owner to keep their business on a small scale and not hoard all the power of the market or industry for themselves. A sacrifice must be made to allow other businesses to form. The focus should be on keeping a business local and if there is room for expansion an allocation of ownership to another person is necessary.

Businesses must not operate for the sole sake of making money. This mentality creates a lot of the destructiveness within an economy. Businesses must be made in order to strengthen society and every individual within.

When a business ceases to operate for the sole sake of making money, it may become less profitable and risk being out competed by businesses that do seek to maximize profit and cut cost, but we will see later how this is remedied with the choice of the consumer.

Conscious Capitalism and The Worker-

The worker must seek power and responsibility, and when allocated power the worker must wield that power with strength.

In Conscious Capitalism the individual is responsible for obtaining their livelihood. A little help is provided by the government, which I will go into later. If an individual does not cultivate worth then they do not deserve power and money. Workers must seek to become entrepreneurial and must seek responsibility rather than shy away from it. If an individual does not want responsibility then they do not deserve any share of ownership and a cut of the profits.

The individual must know his place in society and in the economy. People must be graceful and know their limitations, power placement, and limit their greed for power. People must know that contributing to the building and maintenance of society can be done in ways that are not as direct and are less fulfilling, but are still beneficial and necessary. People must find their piece in the puzzle of society and must seek occupations that contribute to building and truth seeking, no matter how far removed from it. Caring for others is a piece of the puzzle. Maintenance is a piece of the puzzle. People must know their place.

RumChicken
RumChicken

The worker goes down the path of destruction if they become too greedy, jealous, or lazy.

Conscious Capitalism and The Consumer-

The consumer plays a major role in making Conscious Capitalism function. In the end, it is up to the conscious individual to choose to support either destructive businesses or businesses that strengthen society for all. A sacrifice must be made by the consumer in the form of paying a higher price in order to support businesses that do not operate destructively. In the end the payoff for supporting certain businesses (this is where nuance comes in) is far greater than the money saved in supporting a destructive business and economic system.

A business that operates destructively exploits the worker, consumer, and Earth. The consumer may still feel it is necessary to play into the game of the exploitation of themselves because they believe there are no other options. The consumer may also be oblivious to their own exploitation. The consumer that does not care about the worker does not have any empathy, common sense, or understanding of what it takes to build society. The consumer who facilitates the exploitation of the worker is no better than the business owner that exploits. Consumers do not comprehend that they are also workers. It is in their best interest to support the actualization of other workers for the sake of the widespread benefits that come around to themselves.

According to the doctrine of modern economics, with economies of scale, large corporations are able to cut costs and sell their products to consumers cheaper. Under the same doctrine, the consumer should buy the cheapest product and support the most efficient business to save money and in turn support a system that uses resources efficiently. Except common economics and economical thinking does not consider the larger picture. Unconscious consumers choose to support businesses in the component that is most visible, their ability to produce a product efficiently and cheaply. Yet this ability does not make the certain business the best choice. If a consumer supports the corporate economic structure, they are supporting their own indirect demise. They may get their goods cheaper, but they must also work for cheaper for the same corporations that control the economy. Large corporations are soulless- they have no concept of rejecting destructiveness and choosing building. Individuals become faceless cogs in the corporate machine and are treated that way.

A strong overall economy is one in which the focus is on strengthening the smaller-scale economies of the communities within it by supporting small local businesses. This economy is also one in which money is not allocated to entities that extort and exploit. With a small-scale economy you have the opportunity to form relationships, keep a closer check on how the business operates, and trust in a local business run by people you can interact with. By supporting a small local

DeathDog
DeathDog

business you are more likely to get a well-crafted or tailored high quality product and you support the self-actualization of the workers and business owners who choose to operate in the way of building. By supporting the community economy a person supports the community’s ability to be self-reliant, along with helping each individual in that community to become self-reliant. Self-reliance is incredibly important in the formation of a strong individual and for its practicality in strengthening communities against the turbulence of the larger world.

Small businesses have a greater opportunity to allocate power to its workers more easily.
Small businesses have a better opportunity to not extort the workers or consumers.
Small businesses are less likely, by their nature or by their operation, to have less of an impact on the environment and on the aesthetic of the environment.

With a small-scale local economy you keep the money local and in the hands of people you can trust and who do not exploit. By supporting large-scale corporations you give money to an entity that extracts money from one area and allocates excessive profits to people living elsewhere. There is less oversight in dealing with large corporations and less of an ability to influence their destructiveness. The destructiveness of a large corporation flourishes because each individual that contributes to the operation feels no accountability. The consumer must invest in small locally owned businesses. It is counterproductive to join into the corporate economic scheme by putting money into the status quo corporate stock market. The corporate status quo is status quo because it is pushed onto the masses and because it is the easiest and less risky way to make money. The individual must look at the origin of fast-money making and must look beyond quick profits. Special care must be made in choosing the right small local business to invest in because these businesses are less of a guaranteed money generator.

In a system of capitalism, there cannot be an excessive artificial propping up of non-destructive businesses that do not operate effectively. There must be competition or else the use of resources is inefficient. The individual will to compete and produce the greatest most efficient product must be preserved. It is also to the benefit of society that some industries simply will have to remain large-scale as well. In these industries there is less room for the self-actualization of workers and large-scale efficiency is highly practical. These businesses should be the last to be converted into smaller-scale counterparts, but there should still be focus in eliminating all destructiveness in operation and if necessary, scale. The conversion of industries to small-scale will not happen overnight.

Conscious Capitalism and The Government-

Individuals comprise and shape the government, which acts on the economy. The government is used to counteract the destructiveness of

ZeroReborn
ZeroReborn

of the economy. The use of the government to curb destructiveness is inefficient and even counterproductive.

The government is inefficient in curbing human nature because it is up to the individual to choose for themself if they want to act destructively or not. Forcing someone to act a certain way grates against the individual and makes the individual desire to exercise their free will in defiance.

Inequality and an imbalance of power is part of human nature and society. Pure socialism or communism rejects this nature and creates weakness and dependency. The concept of absolute allocation for equality may create weakness in the individual or society.

The government should function as a limited cushion for individuals that need short-term help. Individuals that need help with providing for their sustenance should be provided with a very limited base sustenance, not salary, in order to keep a smoothly operating society while protecting against creating weak and dependent individuals. The government should partially tackle income inequality by instituting a modest scaled taxation with special emphasis on taxing the very rich.

Government regulation of business operation should be minimized in areas that only function as red tape. In areas of regulation that truly reduce destructiveness the government should exercise nuance in keeping regulation against extreme destructiveness while instituting a slow minimization of regulation in other areas to make way for freedom as individuals awaken to the duality of human nature.

As part of eliminating economic power inequalities, government employees, white collar or otherwise, should be paid one half, one third, or less of their current salaries and benefits depending on how exorbitant their salaries are. The government should not act as a corporation that extorts the population and allocates exorbitant salaries to workers of the government.

AwesomeTucker
AwesomeTucker

A combination of efforts from consumers, workers, owners, and government is needed to eliminate usury and the corporate financial industry. A collective effort is also needed to balance the power spectrum in white-collar and blue-collar positions, in which power is heavily allocated to the white-collar side. A collective effort is needed in supporting masculine areas of work and in preserving masculinity in jobs rather than eliminating them with technology. Finally a collective effort is needed to reject the notion that the economy can function as a continual growth model.

Usury is evil (wrathful and destructive) and must be eliminated. Very low interest rates are okay, but no interest is even better.

People must not put their money into the corporate financial system and members of the corporate financial system must cease to operate. The corporate financial industry takes huge profits and allocates money to large corporations. The financial industry produces nothing of value, is full of greed and useless wastefulness, and actively destroys society. This is reflected in the personalities of those that comprise the industry- empty and soulless. People must stop giving money and power to Wall Street and the globalist corporate elite.

Real work must be compensated, not paper-pushing uselessness. A hard physical labor position can be considered more fulfilling than the office life, but it is incorrect to say that because of this, office jockeys should be compensated more. A hard physical labor position and a white-collar office job are difficult in very different ways, one for subjecting the body (and mind) to physical hardship, the other subjecting the mind (and body) to spiritual hardship. A masculine man would need to be paid far more to get him to do an office job, but for the large percentage of people an office job is much more appealing than doing strenuous physical labor. Should an office full of women be paid more than a work yard full of men? Many office jobs are actually not that soul-crushing and are partially fulfilling anyways. Women seem to be able to thrive in cushy office environments, although I believe this is a negative adaptation and superficial for even them.

Work should be compensated for its real value and for what it takes for people to want to do the job. Useless paper pushers should not be compensated far more than a blue-collar worker simply because it is less desirable of a job. It is a job that should be completely eradicated anyways. Less desirable does not mean compensated more than every other job, although it does play a factor. But in our society it does not seem that office jobs are compensated more for their undesirability but because people actually think they are of more value holistically. I say that a man should be paid justly for the true worth and amount of physical and mental work he does and I say men should be incentivized to work with their hands by offering good pay for

JunkTop
JunkTop

physical work. Power to those who deserve power, not for the positions that have manipulated, maneuvered, and propagated to obtain their fraudulent standing.

An effort must be made to supersede the inevitability of technology supplanting all work, and especially masculine areas of work. This must be done through all four roles in the economy. Similarly, the specialization of work must be done away with. Specialization leads to monotonous and simplified drudgery, not self-actualization or societal actualization. A person should seek to become competent in many areas of work and enjoy the satisfaction of the diversification and higher complexity of work. People should not strive to become a specialist in one task and should not have to rely on an army of specialists to complete all their tasks for them. I envision society being comprised of agrarian communities that are created and maintained by a close-knit group of people competent in many areas working for one another in mutual benefit, rather than isolated people pushing off tasks to unknown specialists in an industrialized wasteland.

There needs to be a growing respect and support of the masculine worker and builder. Craftsmanship needs to be brought back and supported. A craftsman self-actualizes and is fulfilled by his work. The same goes for women that practice a craft. There is a sense of power and accomplishment in this kind of work. There must be a societal push on all fronts in bringing back small-scale craftsmanship, one area being that consumers must seek it out.

Our technological corporate economic structure leads to the breakdown of the polar nature in man and woman. Our economic structure feminizes men and masculinizes women. An agrarian-like limited technological economic structure allows for women to work in feminine areas of home-work and land-work (homekeeping) and craftsmanship, and allows for men to work in masculine areas of home-work and land-work (husbandry) and craftsmanship.

I will end the section on economics by saying that the idea of constant growth is impossible and destructive because we live on a planet of limited resources and many people. The common economic doctrine of continual economic growth must be discarded for an economy that is sustainable and on the path of building."

eGremlin
eGremlin

@JunkTop
I read all of your posts. You have some great ideas, don't let the haters drag you down.

DeathDog
DeathDog

@eGremlin
larping in your own thread again ? how many unique posters are here, Gooyan?

Lunatick
Lunatick

@Carnalpleasure
Well user, I read that whole thing for you. That's how much I care about validating you as a person. I do think you have potential, so much ego though.

Are you a woman or a soy boy?
Neither. I'm also not an incel, which is what you are. In addition to being an incel, you think that occupying the small thoughtspace of your small virtual community makes you qualified to tell people what they "should" do. But I mean, what's the big deal anyway? You probably think that you're the only human on Earth and that everyone else is shadows or something. Your characterization of both men and, particularly, women, is shallow. Your concept of family is shallow. Your concept of the ideal economy is just a tired rehash of anarchism. I like your safety net idea for the gov, since it increases risk taking in the individual, it's not revolutionary though. I've had the thought before and so have others. You are not revolutionary. Your writings are not revolutionary.

You have many further levels of understanding to go through before you understand what this book says and what it represents.
I'm pretty sure that I can understand "People Should: The Book" pretty well. Even if you were to be more detailed, I haven't read anything practical in what you've written.

You can keep writing and keep learning and come up with something better! I'm trying to do the same. I had to learn to take my dick out of my own mouth to start too.

girlDog
girlDog

@Lunatick
I even worry that this is me sucking my own dick right now. But I have to believe in my convictions that you appreciate a specific communication style, and that I have to be a combination of cruel and kind to you.

So yeah, let's clean the cum out of our throats and work together to truly contribute >:D

WebTool
WebTool

Sorry Rei Koz did it before you and in a superior medium which aside from being one of the most powerful and original collections of human thought is also beautiful artistic composition.

http://mundusmillennialis.com/

Supergrass
Supergrass

Some interesting points, might check it out.

Inmate
Inmate

@WebTool
I've read that, it is just gibberish. This is completely different.

FastChef
FastChef

@Fuzzy_Logic
categorized
/out/

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page