12 Rules for Life - Jordan Peterson - Official Book Trailer

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-kfIb1dp1w

All urls found in this thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-kfIb1dp1w
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bd04iEhlSR9/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn3WZSjZhVM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjWKPdDk0_U
Nude_Bikergirl
Nude_Bikergirl

@Stupidasole
your move, bucko

Emberfire
Emberfire

Peterson discussion should be banned.

eGremlin
eGremlin

@Emberfire
no u

JunkTop
JunkTop

@Stupidasole
says something everyone agrees man

Is he more profound than the average political science professor?

BunnyJinx
BunnyJinx

starting a meme thread
You are why everybody hates him

New_Cliche
New_Cliche

@Stupidasole
a trailer for a book
haha wtf

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

@New_Cliche
That's not uncommon

Playboyize
Playboyize

@Stupidasole
Is he the Kant of our time?

Methshot
Methshot

@Emberfire
t. antinatalist

Sharpcharm
Sharpcharm

What is with intellectuals and long foreheads?

Flameblow
Flameblow

@Stupidasole
All of you need to get a job.

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

What did he mean by this?

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bd04iEhlSR9/

TurtleCat
TurtleCat

@Stupidasole
I really don't understand the cult of personality around this guy. He seems like a pretty middling thinker.

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

@TalkBomber
Freedom of speech doesnt mean you need to listen

CouchChiller
CouchChiller

@TurtleCat
He talks about thing like duty, tradition. Men are lacking purpose so they find it with him.

BunnyJinx
BunnyJinx

@TurtleCat
What was the lady even asking? I can't quite make it out

Raving_Cute
Raving_Cute

@Stupidasole
Now for the REAL trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn3WZSjZhVM

Nude_Bikergirl
Nude_Bikergirl

@CouchChiller
Your life lacks purpose so you spam Peterson threads on Veeky Forums all day? That's a real shitty duty, desu.

Sir_Gallonhead
Sir_Gallonhead

book trailers

farquit
farquit

@Methshot
I feel like a Petersonite posted that debate just to set a precedent so any anti-peterson posters can be dismissed with this comment.

Hey look guys, Peterson doesn't want to systematically destroy humanity! literally /ourguy/

No, fuck off.

viagrandad
viagrandad

Imagine how much his income must have improved recently

not only now gets his professors salary but 60k a month on patreon and increased books sales

w8t4u
w8t4u

@farquit
Peterson got reked in that debate though.

Inmate
Inmate

@Emberfire
t. postmodern neomarxist

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

@w8t4u
I'm an antinatalist and I don't even think so. Benatar is an idiot that can't adapt his argument to an antifrustrationalist one and instead argues with appeals to emotion.

TreeEater
TreeEater

@TalkBomber

He realized she was a schizo and decided not to waste anyone's time

Ignoramus
Ignoramus

@Gigastrength
frustrationalism
what the heck is that?

I don't really know much about anti-natalism in general, but in the debate Peterson got flustered and (rightly) got called out for jumping from point to point instead of arguing properly. He also kept trying to tie antinatalism to antimortalism eventhough Benatar explained why AN does not logically imply AM.
But in general: Petersons behaviour was simply unfit for an intellectual debate.

Evil_kitten
Evil_kitten

@Ignoramus
It doesn't really matter what Peterson is doing if the other guy is not debating. And with neither of them debating from a logical foundation, I think at the very least Peterson looks somehow more adaptable at the end of the day. When I say antifrustrationalism I am saying that Benetar only needs to frame his asymmetry argument so that pain and pleasure are subordinate to the presence of wants and needs. Since pleasure can only ameliorate some want or need, at best it can only nullify all of these and this condition is already satisfied in the absence of one's existence.

Playboyize
Playboyize

The biggest pseud of our time. I hope OP ironically created this thread.

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@Evil_kitten
Benatar atleast presents a position which is more than can be said about Peterson. But lets agree to disagree here, it doesn't really matter that much to me.

I do however think that you misunderstood a central point of Benatars argument. He is purposefully staying on a level of abstraction that is compatible with many views, including the one you just summarized. Whenever he talks about pain/pleasure he just uses those as an example for the bad/good dichotomy (which, again, can incorporate your view).

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@Playboyize
think of the individual

SniperGod
SniperGod

@Stupidasole
So what are his rules?

SniperWish
SniperWish

@Stupidasole
assuming Chaos is a bad thing
pseud alert

farquit
farquit

@SniperWish
It's not all bad to Peterson

5mileys
5mileys

@TalkBomber
F R E Q U E N C Y O F L O V E

Peterson did the right thing by interrupting her instead of making a non-committal response and feeding into her delusions or publicly humiliating her.

iluvmen
iluvmen

@SniperWish
who /eris/ here?

Methnerd
Methnerd

@TalkBomber
christ that's awkward

Carnalpleasure
Carnalpleasure

@Harmless_Venom
oh fuck the (roughly speaking) got me

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@TalkBomber
He passed over some crazy woman talking about quantifying love as musical notes.

farquit
farquit

@Fried_Sushi
Yup, she was talking about using science to isolate and utilize love-frequencies with healing properties. Complete nutcase. Given the size of Peterson's audience there's bound to be some of those in the ranks of his followers though, so I wouldn't hold it against him.

kizzmybutt
kizzmybutt

@Stupidasole
book trailer
that's a thing?

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

@Nude_Bikergirl
I am the Bucko of Meaning, sir.

Evilember
Evilember

I basically just want to read the chapter on stopping on the streets to pet cats. Knew someone who thought this was profound before, and I just need to know what he couldn't explain.
Also, I don't like cats a lot.

Evilember
Evilember

@kizzmybutt
Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjWKPdDk0_U

WebTool
WebTool

Petersonfags need to die

Snarelure
Snarelure

@Evilember
Veeky Forums btfo

Flameblow
Flameblow

@Fried_Sushi
My view is just a more robust platform to build the argument off of. I'm not adding any unnecessary baggage to the philosophy, especially since Benatar is also a materialist.

hairygrape
hairygrape

@Stupidasole
book trailer

holy shit Baudrillard wasn't kidding, we hyperreality now

Sharpcharm
Sharpcharm

@Emberfire
I'm okay with Peterson, Evola, and Rand being permanently on the ban list though I know Peterson is just a fad and doesn't have enough to last for longer than a few months from now, so it's probably not necessary.

Pic related.

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

@Stupidasole
There is nothing, nothing, more post-modern than a trailer for a book.

BinaryMan
BinaryMan

@Raving_Cute
Kermit

Perfect

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page