My brother gave me a Burberry Watch he picked up after a fight at a strip club. He thought it didn't work but he's just dumb.
Anyways, after looking it up I found out it's a 800 dollar watch but it's listed as a woman's watch. Is that a problem for me to wear? It doesn't look feminine, it's massive.
Pic related. Model number is filename
Jonathan Gonzalez
>YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TWENTY. >WEARING WATCHES.
Caleb Edwards
but they look nice if they aren't digital
Asher Moore
SO, YOU WOULD WEAR ANYTHING, REGARDLESS OF FUNCTIONALITY, OR NECESSITY, AS LONG AS IT "SEEMS NICE"?
Alexander Sanders
like.. why even wear clothes in the first place.
Jack Walker
get the fuck out faggot digital watches are effay as fuck
Cooper Stewart
BECAUSE THEY ARE NECESSARY, FOR US HUMANS, TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST THE ELEMENTS —AGAINST NATURE.
Charles Gray
...
Caleb Evans
POSTPUNK AF
Ayden Foster
You are on a fashion board.
Michael Brown
Fuck off from this board, then.
Thomas Kelly
Not since the advent of the house.
Dominic Harris
YES, I AM.
WHAT IS YOUR "POINT"?
Juan Powell
Some people value aesthetics over functionality. For example, of course a Ferrari is less economical and you can't drive/leave it the places you can drive a Honda, but people will buy it because they like the way it looks/functions on the inside
Plus fashion is somewhat about creating an identity for yourself by distinguishing yourself with products. Watches are similar
Michael Cruz
>Some people value aesthetics over functionality.
1. AESTHETICS, AND UTILITY, ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, NOR MUTUALLY OPPOSITE.
2. PREFERRING APPEARANCE, WHILST NEGLECTING, OR DISREGARDING, FUNCTION, IS NOT AN ACT OF AESTHETICS OVER UTILITY, BUT AN ACT OF FRIVOLITY AND VANITY.
>For example, of course a Ferrari is less economical and you can't drive/leave it the places you can drive a Honda, but people will buy it because they like the way it looks/functions on the inside
THAT ANALOGY IS INAPT.
>Plus fashion is somewhat about creating an identity for yourself by distinguishing yourself with products.
1. FASHION IS THE STUDY AND CRAFT OF DRESS.
2. IDENTIFYING ONESELF WITH SOMETHING EXTERNAL TO ONESELF IS AN ACT OF ONTOLOGICAL FALSITY.
IF SOMEONE IDENTIFIES HIMSELF/HERSELF WITH WHAT HE/SHE WEARS, THAT PERSON HAS FORGOTTEN HIMSELF/HERSELF, CONSEQUENTLY, PERSONALITY WOULD BE NULL —IDENTITY, AND PERSONALITY, ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE AND OPPOSITE.
Cameron Rivera
you win this round you fuck
Cooper King
>$800
And I bet it has a $2 Chinese made quartz movement.
>"""fashion"""" watches
Levi Phillips
Pretty sure Fossil makes them, so yeah.
Nice going getting a dressed up Wal-Mart watch.
Andrew Walker
Why'd you post this in /r9k/?
Carson Ramirez
>havent been on Veeky Forums for a year >come back >see this oh man so it wasnt just me? This board really is getting worse?
>edgy a e s t h e t i c meaningless band wagon name >only posts in capital letters >probably only fucking writes numbers in roman numerals too, right? > a e s t h e t i cc lmao
Jason Lopez
I used to work at a watch store
Half the time guys would pick female watches and would be all over them. I can't even remember how many times it's happened a lot of times because they were more interested in "ice", we usually say "oh, I thought you were shopping for your girl". Anyways, wear whatever you like, more guys than you think wear girls watches. If you're at a place, ask lol