Liberals BTFO as always

kizzmybutt
kizzmybutt

Liberals BTFO as always

hairygrape
hairygrape

/pol/
>>>/leftypol/

Techpill
Techpill

GDP isn't a good measure of standard of living in a nation.
tfw literally just learned this on my macroeconomics homework 20 minutes ago

Methshot
Methshot

@hairygrape
economic policy isn't Veeky Forums

TreeEater
TreeEater

@Techpill
Nice strawman

Carnalpleasure
Carnalpleasure

@Methshot
The president controls the economy

Well, I guess Veeky Forums is full of retards so at least you'll fit in.

Snarelure
Snarelure

@Carnalpleasure
the President has no effect on the economy
Looks like Veeky Forums is full of you

SniperGod
SniperGod

@Snarelure
Implying that there are only two opposite positions to be taken is seriously ridiculous. However, the president's effects on the economy are not in the ballpark of as direct or drastic as you're implying. The Fed and Congress have nearly all the policy-making power when it comes to the economy, and the president can only impact those indirectly and in a limited capacity. For instance, the success you think Reagan had with the economy was actually almost entirely the result of blessed Paul Volcker, peace be upon him.

SniperWish
SniperWish

@SniperGod
Perhaps you have heard of Obamacare

Carnalpleasure
Carnalpleasure

@SniperWish
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Who wrote and passed the affordable care act durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

@Carnalpleasure
Obama had nothing to do with his signature legislation
Is this the line Dems are going with?

girlDog
girlDog

go back to /int/ or /pol/ you faggot cuck

sage

Spamalot
Spamalot

@Carnalpleasure
being this much of a libtard

StonedTime
StonedTime

@Carnalpleasure
@SniperGod
I think the idea is that the President can't really do much to help the economy and should gtfo of the way. That was Reagan's mantra as opposed to Obama, who sticks his grubby fingers everywhere. OP's chart pretty much verifies this idea

Fried_Sushi
Fried_Sushi

@kizzmybutt
Calculate the variance, SD, and variance of error to see if your data is worth a shit. Then calculate the variance and covariance of your two data sets to see if correlation actually exists before you make a claim of it.

farquit
farquit

@hairygrape

Why do I keep seeing links to pol on this board?

Same guy doing it?

RavySnake
RavySnake

@farquit
Yeah same one who also spams "try r9k"

TechHater
TechHater

@TreeEater
Do you know what a strawman is

eGremlin
eGremlin

@TechHater
Making up a point that nobody mentioned and shooting it down. Just like you did

CouchChiller
CouchChiller

@WebTool
I don't see why anyone tries to argue otherwise, it's widely known that GDP growth and market performance has grown mainly under democrats, especially because of WW2, Dotcom, and the 2008 Financial Crisis

ZeroReborn
ZeroReborn

by end of Obama era GDP grew 5.4%
by end of Reagan era GDP fell 6.1%
showcasing GDP change on the bottom of the list, with reagan era GDP fluctuating at 7.9%, as if it's a good thing

am I being massively trolled here or is everyone on Veeky Forums supremely retarded?

Soft_member
Soft_member

cut tax revenue
increase military expenditure
surprisingly end up with increased public debt for some reason

Nixon will be remembered as the last sane republican president [he just failed in actually getting caught in his corruption]

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

@RavySnake
@WebTool
Stocks =/= the economy. The fact that interest rates have been held low enough to create this bubble speaks volumes towards stagnant economic growth

@CouchChiller
See picture. Bill Clinton is the only case where this is close to true. Or are you referring to Jimmy Carter's years of booming economic growth lol? Reagan's years blew even Clinton out of the water without creating a bubble. Try arguing your case instead of just shilling without statistics or facts

@ZeroReborn
Lmao learn to read a chart idiot.

@Soft_member
be Obama
double the national debt
shills on the internet still try to blame Bush
Sad, really
The last time we came near 10% gdp growth in a quarter was Reagan, so your Nixon comment makes no sense whatsoever.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page