Will two-door SUVs ever come back in any form? I know normies don't like them much anymore...

>16507865
Breaks my heart, but you are probably right. Millennials hate real trucks, and the 2 dr. Bronco was on F-150 frame

SUVs arent dying actually, as much as I really want to believe that.. They are the popular choice of vehicle for soccer moms who can't drive for shit.

2 Door SUV's take out the U in SUV.

Had a 2 door Explorer Sport. It sucked man. Why hype it? It's not a MEGA SUPER COOL IT GOT ONLY 2 DOOR. There will always bee the Jeep though.

Smartest thing I ever did buying this thing for 1800 2 months ago

don't take turns too fast

I lust for a clean 2-door Tahoe with a small lift

don't tell me what to do

fuck.

my uncle owns one, it's light blue like pic related and bone stock

he doesnt drive it much anymore since it fucking chugs gas like a motherfucker and we live in the city.

It will share a frame with the ranger, so it can't be a crossover.

news.pickuptrucks.com/2013/04/is-the-regular-cab-pickup-doomed.html
Short answer no.

Do you actually believe the tripe you post?
It's still believed the next Bronco will be or at least have a 2 door option. The myth that it was to be a minorly facelifted Everest that stemmed from reddit last week has since been debunked. While it will share the Ranger/Everest platform, it looks as though it will be its own independent body design.

maybe trump will rollback these bullshit regulations

An SUV is not a crossover. Soccer moms drive crossovers.

Dump the TTB in the garbage and put a toyota 8" up front

Nigga that's the Bronco II, aka the cuck mobile. A Bronco for Eunuchs. It's literally the size of a Honda element get that pussy shit outta here

Bronco a shit.

Ram charger was a poor copy of bronco/blazer
Under engineered and under designed.
Majority had a rear hatch like a minivan, difficult to use once lifted.
Rear glass was stationary, unlike bronco or blazer.
Non removable shell.
Hell, passenger seat wasnt even standard when it was introduced in '74.
Plus a weak and fragile power train and now you know why theyre hard to find today (because nobody bought them when they were new)

>Drove my dads beat to shit one
>Thing felt like it could fall apart at any moment
>Work nights in the city, so mornings going home, the freeways are empty
>Regularly take that shit to 90-100 mph
>Tread ripped off tire at speed
>Was fine
>Also regularly took corners faster than anyone else except my dad in his Firebird
I really do wonder if I was just lucky with this thing, or if the roll over shit is just a meme.

UKfag here, we don't have them sadly. Closest we got was this and it was shit.

Did the 2 door Broncos have seats in the back or is that all cargo area, as in a covered pickup? Love the look of them.

Wrangler owns that market already and it's too small of a market for it to be worth fighting for.

>same huge width and height as four door SUVs
>same bad gas mileage as four door SUVs because they only weigh a few hundred pounds less at best
>same shoddy handling as four door SUVs, worse in fact because of the shorter wheelbase and therefore rougher ride and lower stability
>but less passenger and cargo space

Rear bench seat, easily removed for cargo if you wanted to.

I just want SUVs to look brutal again.

I don't think anybody offers 2 door "compact" trucks like the Tacoma or Colorado anymore

Theyre good for 260k. Everything else will fail before the engine. Also the 2.9 was weak as piss

A lot of people will remove the sway bars for offroad and then they become a nightmare

Ignore everyone else, those are fucking SWEET. With a few not-so difficult modifications, they embarrass the fuck out of any other SUV or truck on the same tire. True, they have handling that takes getting used to, and are not sports cars, but they absolutely shine at what SUV are supposed to do - go places other vehicles can't. The 2.9 is better than the 2.8, but the 2.8 can be made good with a duraspark modification, basically just a newer ignition. Buy one, lift it properly, lock it, and laugh your ass off at Jeeps. But I am really not kidding when I say a Wrangler has better street manners, and even those have a reputation as being rough. First gen explorers are also good, especially if you find a 2-door with a stick. I had one with open diffs and all terrains and cruised through trails that lifted cherokees got stuck with lockers and bigger mud tires. It was an animal with the turning radius of a forklift.

A toyota axle? You're on crack. Dana 35 TTB with Dana 44 knuckles, and it's actually stronger than a real 44.

This, the others are dumb. I own two and have had very little break on them. I had both a 2.8 and a 2.9, and even tho it is carbed abd has less power, i liked the 2.8 bettwr. Get an early one, do the duraspark, swap in a dana 35 from a first gen explorer and an m5od from the same explorer andnit will go anywhere and be pretty damn reliable. The 2.9 was kind of weak and the heads liked to crack, so get a 89 or 90 and hrab a 90 ranger with the 4.0 and drop it in the B2, its practically plug n plug. If anyone is ever interested in, skip the auto, they are trash.

What? Every single midsize pickup I know of (Ranger, BT50, Colorado, D-Max, L200, Amacok, Hilux, Navara etc) comes in either a crew cab or regular cab option, and most of the have a space cab on top of that too. Are you talking specifically North American market vehicles?

They actually had a Plymouth version of the Ramcharger for a few years in the 1980s. It was called the Trailduster iirc. They're rare as fuck.

The Nissan Murano SUV comes in a 2-door convertible.

And the Range Rover Evoque SUV comes in a 2-door coupe and 2-door convertible.

The Jeep Wrangler qualifies as a 2-door SUV.

And there are rumors of a Jeep pickup planned for 2018, which will mark a return of the open-top pickup.

Crossovers need not apply

Gross.

>non removable shell
74-79 did

>weak and fragile powertrain
225 /6, LA engines, and RB engines are some of the best of they're time.

>This level of retardation
Please educate yourself
allpar.com/trucks/ramcharger.html