How did Uralics prevail against Indo-Europeans...

Same reasons Basques survived.

Basque language somehow managed to survive but that's different.
They never spread over Indo-European land.

Only Uralic and Turkic people have managed to take Indo-European territory and keep it.

uralics did their thing in lands before IE replaced them

Kelteminar culture (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan 5500BC) (Mongoloid)
Scientists hold that Kelteminar culture is related to the Pit–Comb Ware culture and belongs to the Finno-Ugric peoples.
The Kelteminar culture was replaced by the IE Tazabagyab culture

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelteminar_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suyarganovo_culture

Actually, Basques are some of the most cucked people by Indo-Europeans. 85% of them are R1b, the highest frequency in Europe, while Finns are only 8.5% Indo-European (R1a + R1b) from the paternal side.

Theoretical connections to things like Kelteminar are irrelevant until proven.

It however is a proven fact that Uralics invaded and assimilated the women of Fatyanovo-Balanovo to become predominantly Europoid.

The traditional distribution of Finno-Permic languages as well as European mitochondrial DNA both attest that this indeed happened.

Later on the same thing happened in Estonia and Finland.

all of history is theoretical. not to mention, as you type, physicists are proving multiverses, simulated universe, timeline intrusions etc..

but your getting rice'd narrative is true

Hungary must feel very isolated.

>Haploshits
Liao River "N" was N M231(downstream clades of NF2905) not N TAT.

Uralic's are descended from N L1026.
yfull.com/tree/N/

butthurt fingol detected

in recent genetic analysis of ancient human bones excavated from the remains of Liao civilization, haplogroup N1 (Y-DNA) is found with a high frequency of 71%, including old paragroups of N1.[27] So, a new possibility arises that the Urheimat of Uralic languages (and perhaps also Yukaghir languages) may be Liao river region. The oldest Pit–Comb Ceramic, related to Finno-Ugric peoples, is also found in Liao civilization

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumpolar_peoples

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_Siberia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Uralic_homeland_hypotheses

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit–Comb_Ceramic

>he believes "Indo-Europeans" were an actual people.

Estonian Comb Ceramic was R1a but not close to Indo-European R1a but very rare subclades found in North Africa.

Logic would suggest that all Comb Ceramic was also R1a because N1c(L1026) isn't nearly old enough.
It was just some random forestnigger culture that left behind no legacy.

Clearly an important merchant people hugging the Silk road from central Asia into East and West.

>butthurt fingol detected
I'm a chink.

Liao River "N" is a completely diffferent subclade than the N found in Uralic populations(It's impossible for N TAT to be a descendant of N F2905)

The N TAT samples from Dashanqian and Jiangjilang are too young to be responsible for the spread of N L1026.

subhuman fucking kill yourself right now

REEEEEEEEEEEEEE YELLOW PEOPLE ON MY Veeky Forums

He thinks there were Indo-European speakers in Finland before the Finns.

But there were.
It's not controversial or a good subject for debate.

Indo-Europeans showed up well before Uralics.

In all seriousness,the N L1026 is probably some bronze age founder effect not some massive propagation of Asiatic rape babies.

>too matriarchal/feminist to care about getting ethnically replaced
hmmm

it's not a coincidence that I1 is down to 45% in it's most concentrated home areas within Scandinavia.

In the region the Finns lived?

Yes. Corded Ware was present in Finland and Estonia long before the Uralic language family split off into Samoyedic and Finno-Ugric.

The timescale alone makes it impossible Uralic is pre-IE in Finland.

>Corded Ware: circa 2900 BCE – circa 2350 BCE

So when did the Uralic language entered Finland to compare?

Also, it was just on the southern coast, not all of it.

Sami are thought to have arrived in the 2nd millenium BC. Finns in the first millenium BC.

>separating Sami and Finns

Are you sure the latter isn't just a derivation of the former? Sami lived (and still live) in the northern parts of Finland and Scandinavia which wasn't settled by Indo-Europeans, so they probably spread to the southern regions of Finland later and mixed with other people along the way.

doesn't seem to affect balkanites

Finnish has Baltic loanwords and is more closely related to Mordvin than Sami which is spoken very far from Finland in the middle of the Volga.

The Ugric one in Hungary is certainly the weirdest. How would you explain it? The distance between Mansi and Hungarian is fucking enormous.

>balkanites

listen buddy, you don't want to know about the Carpathians.

Raids into Europe like that were very typical at the time and usually conducted by Turkic tribes.

For whatever reason they wanted a new homeland. Maybe they had very bad relations with their neighbours or something.

>hung arians

Okay, I forgot to ask one thing: what's the closest language to Sami if not Baltic-Finnic?

It doesn't have one. It shares the most with Baltic-Finnic but that can be attributed to proximity and interaction.