Should "art" that could be painted by a two year old be considered art?

Should "art" that could be painted by a two year old be considered art?

The only people who care about this shit are bottomfeeders who are below even modern artists on the food chain.

Art can be shitty too.

No

/thread

Sure, in the same way that you shouldn't be assumed to be an idiot just because of that filename.

First post is already some triggered nu male trying to culture signal by sticking up for an aesthetic style designed to literally destroy the concept of art

Only if it's a brilliant 2 year old. The thing in your image is not art, it's just some bullshit. Modern art is not killing the West, though. 99% of Westerners never even look at it, how could it be "killing" the West?

Yes

>complaining about the destruction of art
>posts a modernist fascist rally
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm really gets that noggin joggin, as they say

Pic related is at least the level of a 5 year old.

technically anyone can consider anything they want to be art, but considering that to be art and pretending this makes you an edgy intellectual is like putting on a chastity cage, encouraging your wife to fuck a black guy and pretending this makes you a special snowflake

Dude, these people are arguing over the definition of art. You really expect them to be intelligent or consistent? For fuck's sake, the guy used the phrase nu-male, essentially confirming him as incel

OP here, maybe I should have said "art worth respecting"

>should anything be considered anything.rdjeyeroll

art can be craftsmanship ("traditional" "beautiful" art) aswell as it can be innovation/exploration (breaking with the past's rules and finding new ways to express art)
Is your pic either? Depends on the context it was made in. Most of nowadays' art tries to be groundbreaking innovation while actually fallign in line with what's mainstream and overdone by now

Yes

Only triggered culture signalling faggot I see is you, cuckboi

No

If it isn't pretty then it isn't art!

Art is anything that was created primarily to cause emotions in the viewer.
Given that you are mad as fuck, I think it qualifies as art.

IMO it isn't art if it can't effectively communicate a feeling or story to the average viewer*. If the artists can't pull that off then their creation is merely masturbation.

*Average viewer in the intended audience, not just the average person.