Why did the USA decide to participate in WW2? What was their motives?
Why did the USA decide to participate in WW2? What was their motives?
Matthew Rivera
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
Noah Green
((()))
Ayden Turner
Luis Torres
What a dumb fucking question
Noah Baker
...
Christopher Edwards
The Japanese attacked us at Pearl Harbor, and right after that Germany and the other Euro-Axis powers declared war on us.
One could make the argument that we should have focused more on Japan than we did, but war with Germany was a real threat, as their ships were terrorizing our East Coast.
Andrew Gomez
Im sorry, but you really did not need to make a thread about this. ANY remotely educated person should have learned this in early grade school.
Try again with a more meaningful question.
Brody Hernandez
This with the fact the US world polices for shits and giggles
Austin Ross
oops wrong link
Caleb Bell
They were attacked by the Japanese and Hitler declared war on them because he's retarded.
Or believe /pol/:
Ethan Lee
With regards to Japan: well they attacked the US.
With regards to getting involved in the European theater: to prevent the Russians taking entire Europe.
Chase Ramirez
Because those pansies across the pond needed to be bailed out again by ol Uncle Sam. Ol Winston was taking a beating by the Krauts again. So we decided to let Tojo attack our pineapple fields on purpose to gain sympy from the American citizens.
Justin Fisher
>With regards to getting involved in the European theater: to prevent the Russians taking entire Europe.
Except the USA sent an unbelievable amount of fuel, tanks, trucks, planes, and everything else to the soviet union? The USSR would have buckled and collapsed without American lend lease.
Landon Moore
This shit again
Liam Garcia
>500,000 vehicles sent
>13,000 airplanes sent
>B-but the commies could have done it without america!
Brayden Long
they would have done it, just a LOT slower and suffering way more casualties
germany had absolutely no chance after the battle of moscow, and and that point lend-lease was negligible
Carter Diaz
The battle of Moscow was the USSR's battle of the bulge. They threw all of their far east divisions at the Wehrmacht. (which they could free up because America was busy cucking japan).
Without lend lease keeping the soviet war machine alive, those divisions would grind to a halt and the Nazis could have definitely counterattacked.
Aaron Martin
They did counterattack. You also forget the Soviets didn't put everything they got from the west straight into the fight. They were stockpiling for the war's end to ensure material strength. Just because the shipments were made officially, doesn't mean it all trickled down to the front line.
David Bailey
Eurasia/Europe united under any ideology at odds with the US represents an existential threat to the US and their way of life.
Josiah Peterson
Mason Hirohito attacked Mason FDR's outpost in the Pacific after much provocation.
Hudson Nelson
>mfw French revisionism on posters
Aaron Brooks
> b-but what bout lend lease
OP was asking motives. Lend lease tells you nothing about US motives to enter the European theater. Or do you want to imply that the US motive was to actually strengthen the Sowjet Union?
Landon Campbell
>which they could free up because America was busy cucking japan
Which they could do because the Japanese had their shit slapped so hard at Khalkhin Gol two years earlier that their entire strategic outlook changed because they were terrified of the Russians.
Colton Hughes
This guy has done his homework.
Charles Reed
Lol, right?
Christopher Young
They were tired of the British Empire and were in no hurry to see it Replaced by a German one. By intervening in Europe they took two birds out with one stone by preventing the unification of Europe and simultaneously toppling the British Empire's domination of world trade and its oceans.
Zachary Butler
>Lee tanks