Privilege

it never stops amusing me how poltards keep using retarded version of frankfurt school social studies approach to prove that said school is wrong.

Also no clue how stuff does look like in sociology faculties but in political science constructivist and postmodernist approaches are rare af and neorealism rules supreme.

>no kstew gf

>political science

It never stops amusing me that people who hate the fuck out of this degenerative, self-destructive, relativist, semantic orientated bullshit know it better than people who preach it.

>Also no clue how stuff does look like in sociology faculties but in political science constructivist and postmodernist approaches are rare af and neorealism rules supreme

That is just flat out wrong. I've been to college. I have a younger brother currently in college. You evidently have either never been to college or you actually support this brainless drivel there.

I actually fell for the 'cultural marxist' meme when I was in high school (although they didn't have that term for it back then it was fairly new or more accurately rebranded to appear new). It seems nice and attractive but the reality is it's a regressive cancer that artificially creates the problems you are supposedly trying to solve or further exacerbates it.

If you don't have a problem with the frankfurt school you are a literal retard, sorry.

Sociology is a meme science that's been corrupted. Having an inclination that something is wrong with it, but rolling with it momentarily because you can't quite articulate what's wrong with it is one thing. Taking it seriously and believing it is another.

Lol didn't read

>neorealism
what's this

Go to any faculty, criticize a leftist meme like "diversity" in an abstract manner and they will all instantly become irrational and refuse to discuss it properly, they don't seem like realists. Sociology students are all brainwashed and mentally shitfucked and they will be running the country in 30 years, maybe they will have changed by then but it is difficult to believe anything other than a bullet in the brain can solve this problem.

> I've been to college. I have a younger brother currently in college

>two cases
>I know it all

There we go again.

A lot of words for saying nothing.

>Oh shit he's right
>I can't refute
>Better just pretend I didn't read
>That'll definitely show him who the mature intellectual is
>mfw this person tried to be smug as fuck and got BTFO

Nicely done, lad.

>what is this

I've looked it up, seems to be a word salad centered around marxism and machiavellism combo

>Go to any faculty, criticize a leftist meme like "diversity" in an abstract manner and they will all instantly become irrational and refuse to discuss it properly

Done, it didn't happen.

You didn't raise any points to refute. I love this response.

wow you sure have to be on other level of paranoia to find marxism in neorealism.

Well it's not like you've been to college evidently so there's no reason to take your opinions seriously.

If you have to lie or sit out during discussions and write papers that are literal satire but sound good - full of buzzwords, hollow rhetoric, and memes like muh diversity and muh ebil white poeple - to get good grades so the Marxist professor doesn't fail you or single you out to the class for the SJW horde to eat you alive, then there is something wrong with that.

The only people who would think what I've said is wrong are people who haven't been to college or truly believe the marxism meme.

This guy gets it.

>sociologists will be running the country in 30 years
Fucking lol, try the oxford ppe, no self respecting politican would get their education from a fucking sociology course, jesus fuck you're dumb.

>Well it's not like you've been to college evidently so there's no reason to take your opinions seriously.

I graduated last year. I didn't go to an American college though so maybe that's the problem. I even took a course on feminism that treated the subject neutrally and introduced us to criticism of key feminist texts. Sure, classes acknowledge that race, class, gender, and the perceptions of each have shaped the creation and reception of history, but this acknowledgement makes you objective -- which is what critical theory is supposed to teach -- rather than a sub-100 IQ ideologue.

I don't know what the problem is with American colleges but I can assure you the Frankfurt school, if actually read, express the same dissatisfaction with contemporary consumer society as you probably do. And the co-option of post-Marxist ideas in whatever retarded Third Way liberal hell we have had since the fall of the Berlin Wall doesn't matter; I'd say the Frankfurt school are more important now, as we transition away from the politics of the 90s -- 2010s, as primary sources rather than some abstract boogeyman we treat as the sole source of all the world's problems.

>If you have to lie or sit out during discussions and write papers that are literal satire but sound good - full of buzzwords, hollow rhetoric, and memes like muh diversity and muh ebil white poeple - to get good grades so the Marxist professor doesn't fail you or single you out to the class for the SJW horde to eat you alive, then there is something wrong with that.

Professors give you good marks if you engage with the material taught. It is still very possible to engage with this material negatively. In my experience people don't get marked down for this, but you will definitely get marked down for making bad arguments (something Veeky Forums has in spades).

>tfw you will never be her sissy slave

why live?

>It seems nice and attractive but the reality is it's a regressive cancer that artificially creates the problems you are supposedly trying to solve or further exacerbates it.

Care to explain why?
In that post you've just said that you went to college and that "cultural marxism" and the frankfrut of school really sucks, without really telling us why.

Even worse, you conflated the frankfurt school with more skeptical and relativistic systems, even though the major thinkers of this school were all very rigorous, schematic and more traditionalist than you are. Can you explain this contradiction?
By the way most of the ideas that came up from this school are ideally compatible with most of the sentiments championed by philosophically blind /pol/hacks: none of them were calling here for a conspiratory dissolution of society, rather they were pointing out the reasons for said dissolution while making predictions that turned out to be 100% true (to the point where I just need to walk in ANY western city in order to discover that Adorno was basically right about everything).

If you've read any major work form this school of thought, please argue your point.
If you haven't, please stop discussing complex philosophies while using random infographics you've found on the internet as sources.

>power relations is the focus

>(to the point where I just need to walk in ANY western city in order to discover that Adorno was basically right about everything

Expand on this please

quaility post

Always amuse me how brainlets hate sociology. Staymad

Not that user
He's probably talking about Adorno's writings on culture industry: in that sense he was certainly right, every aspect of culture, tradition and aesthetic has, at this point, been dumbed down and commodified, to the point where the spirit that was behind those choices is now completely dead. It's easy to notice this in architecture, the kind of businesses that are around, how people dress, talk and spend their time, what is the art that is being produced and so on.
so much glitter for no content whatsoever. Everything is futile and no one will ever build a city as beautiful as Florence, and no sees the problem in it. This tradition of greatness and cultural pride is completely dead, and it wasn't certainky killed by postmodernist marxists.

This is not even a generalization, it's less than that, but I'm not literate enough to summarize 1000 pages of very hard philosophy in a few nice paragraphs. Read Minima Moralia: it's short, easy to read and it gives you a glimpse on what Adorno was REALLY talking about.

>I didn't go to an American college though so maybe that's the problem.
Not sure where you're from but it's a huge problem in the EU as well. Luckily countries like Hungary are shutting down Soro's university. It's a overbearing problem in most universities in the western world.

>I even took a course on feminism that treated the subject neutrally and introduced us to criticism of key feminist texts.
Third wave feminism is cannibalistic and you see people from this version of feminism outright attacking actual feminists who are older and had a direction or goal when feminism was a worthwhile movement. The playing field was leveled (as much as it realistically can be) thanks to them but today's feminists are just resentful, aggressive ideologues that don't give a damn about coherence or consistency.

>but this acknowledgement makes you objective -- which is what critical theory is supposed to teach -- rather than a sub-100 IQ ideologue.
Critical theory is a philosophy that outright denies objectivity. It literally cannot be about something it outright strives to avoid. That is its problem. It's centered around relativist nit-picking and semantics which leads to corruption. It's predicated on the belief that everything is subjective and nothing is objectively true or capable of being understood, or that there are some kind of assumptions that have yet to be found. This leads one to adopt a fluid or contradictory moral relativism.

Yet, a moral relativist cannot be a hypocrite; because there is no situation where he is objectively wrong - even when he is facing disagreement with his own 'morals'. You can't really call someone a hypocrite if they functionally have no morals.

Or some bullshit about muh oppression or patriarchy.

Pic related is the path it leads to.

>Upon initially booting up the title, it seemed like a typical grimdark male power fantasy with severely floaty controls and a muted, masculine aesthetic. Today, I consider it the only mainstream video game I have played that embodies the trans experience.
>grimdark
this person is either ex-chan or currently shilling their work here

> And the co-option of post-Marxist ideas in whatever retarded Third Way liberal hell we have had since the fall of the Berlin Wall doesn't matter; I'd say the Frankfurt school are more important now, as we transition away from the politics of the 90s -- 2010s, as primary sources rather than some abstract boogeyman we treat as the sole source of all the world's problems.

Except it does matter because it quite literally is the source of most of this worlds problem (socially speaking). It's not a boogeyman if it factually contributes to the radicalization and divisiveness we see in the world today.

This is just factually wrong. Answer me this honestly; do you actively engage in dialogue that criticizes the marxist philosophies being pushed in schools or do you support them?

I think I know the answer because everyone that dared to speak up or even play devils advocate with such subjects it dealt with harshly.

>ITT college dropouts blaming their failures on marxists
Humanities when will they learn.

It's called cultural marxism because they have divorced marxism from economics and married it with the cultural aspects of society.

Rather than agitate on apart of the working class; they agitate on people's group identity. The target audience was changed but the underlying pathological, murderous, radical system is the same.

It's just more forms of collective guilt attributed to groups of people in the form of those that are 'privileged' vs those that aren't, It breeds resentment which makes it easier to manipulate and radicalize.

I'm limited to 2k characters but if you are truly interested just check out this;

youtube.com/watch?v=04wyGK6k6HE

It has to be the most simple dissection of the philosophies and why they turn out so regressive despite their intentions. There's really no simpler way to put it.

(Don't worry you dont have to watch all 3 hours-Only to about 1:30:00 is what's answers the most. Also fuck Rogan it's all about Peterson).

Also if you're going to be a smug piece of shit I suggest you don't fill a paragraph full of hot air and fluff and pretend you made some kind of point.

Could xhey have fit more dumb buzzwords in the first fucking sentence of that article?

KGB financed Frankfurt School before it was established. Amazing chart, kek.

It's also not a problem in Poland.

>It's called cultural marxism because they have divorced marxism from economics and married it with the cultural aspects of society.

They were just analyzing the relationship between contemporary economical systems and culture itself. This is perfectly reasonable, especially when you consider that all aspects of culture are now tied with the free market.

>It's just more forms of collective guilt attributed to groups of people in the form of those that are 'privileged' vs those that aren't, It breeds resentment which makes it easier to manipulate and radicalize.

At this point you're making shit up. If anything Adorno, Marcuse and Horkheimer were some of the most impersonal philosophers of this century: they talk about systems, not classes. In this identity politics has really nothing to do with their philosophy.

>I'm limited to 2k characters but if you are truly interested just check out this [JP video]

Go fuck yourself
>tfw /pol/tards pretend to be academics while pretending that a fucking Joe Rogan interview with fucking Jordan Peterson is a serious source

Also do you fucking realize that the Frankfurrt School has literally nothing to do with postmodernism and post structuralism? In fact these philosophies are simply incompatible.

I knew it, you don't know the first thing about this subject: all the informations you've got are second hand criticism of badly summarized philosophical movements. You don't have an actual beef with what Adorno said, you just like the way JP talks about things you think are linked to Adorno.

You're a fucking joke.

You know this is Nazi propaganda? They just called it cultural bolshevism. Hell, a lot of this shit is taken straight from Protocols of the Elders of Zion and other anti-Semitic pamphlets.

>deliberately being this obtuse over semantics in order to justify his willful ignorance of the reality of the flow chart

Pssssttt... buddy... NKVD -> KGB.

>who is Gramsci
>who is Marcuse
>who is Foucault

mate... The "sexual liberation", and student revolutions of the late 1960s were willed and influenced by a small group of intellectuals. Gramsci detaches Cultural Marxism from Economic Marxism, which besides some interpretations of Trotskyism has little to say theoretically about non-economic social issues. Cultural leftism was then allowed to swim about, and even absorb itself into Western capitalist societies. Foucault's "deal with the devil" when he was in Death Valley was that the left would accept economic oppression in exchange for cultural liberation. And that is what we've seen. The left now don't care so much about consuming in a "global capitalist system of oppression", because they are a cultural vanguard and not an economic one. "Who cares if I work at Starbucks for pittance because I can fuck my boyfriend's ass, and smoke pot, and watch as much pornography as I like." is the new leftist mind. This has produced quite severe tensions between older more socially conservative Marxists and the so called "Western-Marxists" or Eurocommunists. The real dinosaur left are really social small-"c" conservatives with 1930s values, which is why they think they've lost and that leftism has gone down totally in the society. In fact, there is still now a hudge-gudge alliance between radical cultural leftists and liberal capitalist amoralists. And the symbol of this is the Che Guevara T-shirt.

>Triggered by Jordan Peterson
Pseudo intellectual confirmed.
In a broader context, cultural marxism is just application of marxist analysis (privileged vs. oppressed) to areas outside economics (to culture). Basically modern SJWs, so clearly not debunked. Sounds like you guys just are afraid of your ideology being described in objective terms. That's not making shit up you fucking faggot lmao. It has everything to do with what Marcuse said and he is the guy that modern identity politics stem from (due to his work at Cal in the 70s). Benjamin and the Theses on the Philosophy of History also have a lot to do with this. Angel of history, crying at constant oppression of the lower classes, historical materialism is the only way out... etc

I never said the Frankfurt school had anything to do with Post-Modernism but that doesn't stop mordern marxists from blending the two.

muh nazi propaganda.

Sorry, no it's not.

I'll respond in 2.5 hours from now.

See you later

Here;s a beauty:

>You are all just sexually repressed. Sexual repression begins in childhood, and therefore adult-child sexual relations need to be encouraged. Pedophilia is normal and healthy and I write about it throughout my works.

Defining work of Cultural Marxism aka Critical Theory

If you EVER defend critical theory or cultural Marxism, you are advocating for pedophilia.

I shouldn;t even be surprised because we actually have Pedosexuality being pushed now in the mainstream. You people are sick in the head.

>It's 2008
>"We can't let gays get married then people can marry their dogs or have sex with kids"
>"Uhhh hey buddy that's just the slippery slope fallacy" I (me, the person writing this post) actually said to someone
>2017
>Pedosexuality being pushed and dog sex legalized in Canada

>I'll respond 2.5 hours from now

I knew it, you don't know the first thing about this subject: all the informations you've got are second hand criticism of badly summarized philosophical movements.

All commies who push Cultural Marxism just change the definition to suit their agenda or whatever subversive tactic they are using.

When outside forces try to subvert and change a culture of a people for their own reasons that is cultural marxism

Commies use it to try and make every1 a grey slate and in conjunction with the commies there are the Jews. who are basically one and the same.

Thats why normal people associate commies with subversive cultural tactics. Better dead than red as they say.

The free use of women, the sexual liberation, the whole idea that ownership, belonging are bad is much more marxist in nature than capitalist.

When counter culture, such as youth culture emerges, capitalism made a movement to incorporate and pacify them into capitalism, but the origin of that youth culture was more embedded in marxist theory than capitalist doctrine. Same as with feminism, you see the history of capitalism (property) tied with the ownership of women (needed to transmit property to your own descendance). Feminism arose against that tenet and now it's being recuperated by selling crap to feminist women and basically neutralizing its actual subversive power. Sexual liberation of women happened then capitalism found out what to sell these people, such as sex toys, and realized that women in the workforce and the dislocation of the family meant more households that needed more crap. Capitalism is great at that.

Or maybe they just liked their ideas? You know, people tend to like different things. I can easily say that you were brainwashed by the neo-nazis and all your thoughts are based on ignorance and lack of education.

>outside forces
How are they outside sources? And what is this 'culture' you are talking about?

>Anyone who doesn't agree and show unconditional support for a radical, murderous, suicidal, and degenerative ideology (that's been constantly re-branded, re-defined, and re-labeled throughout each decade since it's inception more than a century ago), that has destroyed every country and culture it has ever been implemented in (as well as the deaths of 85-100 million people intentionally through genocide and forced labor camps because they disagree politically) is a Neo-Nazi

Sure thing, pal. If common sense and a sense of historical perspective makes me a Nazi--then I guess I'm a Nazi.

It's hardly 'brainwashing' on my part because as someone who falls left of center on the political spectrum I still get called a Nazi because I haven't gone full retard (commie).

Critical Theory, Post-Modernism, Cultural Marxism is just superficial trash. It's for edgy, contrarian, resentful outcasts.

& Humanities was a mistake

This every time.

It is. In 19th century conservatives were afraid of modernization and blamed I on Jews. Jews were responsible for capitalism, socialism, destruction of people's community, cities (asphalt jungle) and so on.

Now they are accused of globalization, 'cultural Marxism', destruction of 'traditional' family unit and feminism.

It's pretty much the same thing. I do find it funny how anti-Semites of the past considered late 19th century and early 20th century to be degenerate and full of decadence and now those times are considered 'the highest point of western civilization'.

This is an extremely commonly used word everywhere on the internet, not even isolated to warhammer 40k which is liked everywhere too.

This new left has virtually nothing to do with communism. SJWs would be arrested in the Soviet Union.

Well we can always say that nationalism caused 2 world wars and numerous other conflicts. Both are murderous ideologies then.

>How are they outside sources?
What the hell do you mean 'how are they outside sources'?

As in you have a defined culture of group of people -- then you have people who are not inherently apart of that group (meaning outside the group) pressuring said group to change or guide it in a direction they wish to see it go.

Culture -> Outside group comes in -> Subverts .> Now a new or destroyed culture.

>And what is this 'culture' you are talking about?

Just a broad example but Cuba, USSR, Maoist Revolution era China, North Korea, any I'm forgetting? When I mention this, I mean as a direct result of the governmental body of such countries. Like it or not, capitalism isn't married to politics the way that communism is - a communist state has to have the political system tied with the economic system of the country, a capitalist country doesn't have to have it's government married to the capitalist economics it may or may not have been founded on.

I study comparative literature at university and here they're quite open about endorsing marxism. We study feminism right now and our lecture taught us that it's a branch out of marxism, Lacan, Focoult and Derrida.
If you've read Marxists methods and theory you would know that these things operates the same.

At least some intersectional feminists don't realize they are pushing a weird form of Marxism

Self identifying commies have no excuse to not understand why the ideology is retarded.
If feminist claim not to be associated with marxism, then they haven't read up on any of the material. First wave of feminism was right to vote etc. but the following four waves all claim to be a branch from marxism.

Fun fact: fifth wave feminism states that girls should be prohibited from reading male-written literature until they are adults.
The third and fourth waves are the gender bender.

New-Left and Western Marxism will never transform the world into the next Soviet Union. You can call it cultural Marxism if you want but those communist dictatorships were not culturally Marxist.

And it has nothing to do with communist dictatorships.

But what is this natural original culture? Nationalism itself is recent. Do you want us to return to feudalism?

Uhhh buddy. I got some bad news for you.

>German Revolution 1918 (Pic related)
>Bolshevik revolution 1917
>Bolshevik Govt that genocided 20 million Russians

Guess what ethnicity these people were? They actually were all Jews. Lenin, Trotsky, Rosa Lux, etc.

Winston Churchill:

"In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."

I'm not justifying what he did but he didn't just wave some magic wand going "The Jews! The Jews!". There was some merit to what he was saying.

Even actual Jews and Rabbis don't deny it.

youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo

Maybe retake that beginner level college prep highschool world history class... Hitler hated the Communists.. the communists were actually overwhelmingly Jewish

That is factually wrong. It's the same shit that's more than a century old re-branded.

Read:

So you are that idiot? Better stick to modern times, you don't know ANYTHING about German history.

Maybe common on the degenerate corners of the internet you browse...

Truth doesn't exist and arguments are the delusions.

...

Why be deliberately obtuse my friend?

I fucking dare you to look up the leaders of the Bolshevik party, the SPD, the KPD and tell me what ethnicity they are.

I'll be waiting for your reply. Evidently since you are so right it will be very easily debunked and I will be proven the fool you think I am.

1, 2, 3... and GO!

Way to not even address a single point in that guy's post lol

Okay, name all those SPD Jews. I can help you, the three most important people were Ebert, Scheideman and Noske.

>New-Left and Western Marxism will never transform the world into the next Soviet Union.

Dead fucking wrong, bucko.

Let's run through the latest example, shall we? The US 2016 presidential election (Yes, I'm going there folks). Still here fuckface? Good. Strap in and get ready.

So we all know Clinton's connection with Saudi Arabia and ISIS. The plan was to destabilize the region for a number of goals (not important to specify right now). Well in the process of manufacturing this crises for profit for the ultra wealthy who control her we produce an effect; the Refugees. So, what do we do with them? We flood our country with them.

America is already 50/50 politically speaking. But now you've just flooded the country with millions of refugees as well at the influx of dreamers from SOTB that would have happened under her open border policy. Well guess what? Who do you think these people are going to vote for? Obviously the government that is continually appeasing them and giving them welfare.

So; Now you've just upset the balance of power and paved the way for unconditional support for a directionless, authoritarian, bureaucratically hungry regime led by a despotic war hawk like Clinton whose predecessor just spent the last 8 years weaponizing the federal government with purely political appointees and expanding its power, only to hand that totalitarian power over to someone like Clinton in a rigged election. ANDDDD she's got total control of the media. A total monopoly over the distribution of information because she just squashed the last 10% of 'alternative media' aka the only media that would dare report actual news under the guise of curbing '''fake news''' aka pure censorship.

The modern left in America was unironically the useful idiots Josef Stalin talked about. And we came this close to game over.

What does any of this have to do with the Soviet Union? Are you suggesting that censorhip existed only in communist countries? What about Pilsudski's Poland or Francoist Spain, or Mussolini's Italy?

In response to this and the Bolshevik Revolution, members of the left and of the far-left of the SPD formed alternative parties, first the Spartacus League, then the Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany and later the Communist Party of Germany. After 1918 the SPD played an important role in the political system of the Weimar Republic, although it took part in coalition governments only in few years (1918–1921, 1923, 1928–1930). Adolf Hitler prohibited the party in 1933 under the Enabling Act – party officials were imprisoned, killed or went into exile. In exile, the party used the name Sopade.

>first the Spartacus League,

>The Spartacus League (German: Spartakusbund) was a Marxist revolutionary movement organized in Germany during World War I.[1] The League was named after Spartacus, leader of the largest slave rebellion of the Roman Republic. It was founded by Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg, Clara Zetkin, and others. The League subsequently renamed itself the Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (KPD), joining the Comintern in 1919. Its period of greatest activity was during the German Revolution of 1918, when it sought to incite a revolution by circulating the newspaper Spartacus Letters.[2]

>Clara and Rosa
>Pic related

Whoops looks like ONE guy might not have been Jewish. So all but one person wasn't Jewish.

Because you can look back to the Soviet Union to get a glimpse of the future we would have created for ourselves had we fallen for the same bullshit.
Do you now understand the saying 'those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it'.

>Are you suggesting that censorship existed only in communist countries?

Of course not but that's a prime example. Why deflect that hard with whataboutisms that really only further strengthen my case?

You forgot to mention that Ebert (SPD) gave order to crush the spartacists. And the one responsible for it was Noske (SPD).
Like I said, go back to your conspiracy theories because you don't know enough about Germany's history to discuss it. No, this small passage from Wikipedia is not enough. At least read the whole entry.

But it was a completely different bullshit in the Soviet Union. In fact the situation itself was completely different.

You are objectively wrong but that's okay, we need special people to make everyone else feel smart.

The KPD was originally apart of the SPD and broke off. I had originally said SPD here in this post: And then specified and differentiated more clearly in this post: The point still stands. Nine out of ten belligerents (communists, bolsheviks, and socialists) were Jewish.

The whole point of cultural Marxism was to destroy the ability of the West to resist the expansion of the USSR by sapping the will of their youth to fight,and especially to fight against the USSR. Of course, the USSR died before it's plan came to full fruition, but I'm sure those of the theorists still alive are absolutely delighted and astonished with how successful their project turned out.

>Lenin was a Jew

Please stop pretending you are retarded.

Wrong, it was used by the West to appear well-cultured, prosperous and generally comfy. So that people in the East would see how shitty Marxism is.

See CIA sponsoring Pollock

Yes, there was a split inside the party, so what? It happens in every party. Why does this matter? This split happened 3 years before the revolution. How is this relevant?
Why are you so stupid? Is this really that hard to understand? SPD was against the communists, there were two stages of this revolution. The Spartacist revolt was a minor uprising in a much bigger event.

No. It wasn't. What aren't you getting? I'm not going to repeat the same shit over and over.

Read this until it gets through that dense skull of yours mate.

It is only different in that rather than agitate on apart of the working class they agitate on apart of group identity.

Instead of Proletariat vs Bourgeoisie it's now Privileged (i.e. white, heterosexual, binary gendered) vs non-Privileged (minority, transgendered, homosexual)

It's the same oppressor vs the oppressed bullshit used to divide, conquer, and consolidate power.

>So that people in the East would see how shitty Marxism is.
How would we see that, you fucking idiot?

...

I'm sure they at happy that China is more powerful than ever (actually considered a bigger problem for the Soviet Union than the West), USSR doesn't exist and the West has the highest standard of living in history.

Their secret conspiracy worked perfectly.

>content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2077413,00.html

'Vladimir Lenin Was Part Jewish, Say Declassified KGB Files'

"This post is in partnership with Worldcrunch, a new global-news site that translates stories of note in foreign languages into English. The article below was originally published in Le Temps.

(MOSCOW) — A recently opened exhibition in Moscow's State Historical Museum is shedding some light on a long-guarded Russian secret: the origins of Soviet founding father Vladimir Lenin. Lenin's maternal grandfather, the exhibition revealed, was born Jewish."

Another fun fact: Karl Marx was also a Jew and related to the Rothchilds by blood.

if it wasnt for shitlers fascism youd have had a unified communist block east and north of the danube and rhine, up to but excluding norway. it would be todays unrivalled superpower, america and china nullifying one another/turning. the last dregs of english anglo empire squeezed out and amalgamated in. spain italy etc wastelands aka commo syndiclism. france fall and america fall apart. if it wasnt for hitler german would be the worlds language and thus world would be a totalitarian idiotocracy shitstate while we allwere sat around waiting for the next grand celestial impact and mass extinction on the surface of this planet and good riddens. fuck you shitler umuch inevertible misintended shitstain double agent of Ampire.

fuck this retarded shit fucking garbage losers

That's a pretty big difference if you ask me. How will their version of collectivization look like? Will they also fight against private property? What about their government, can we expect a one party system?

The Reich wouldn't survive that long. There would be Slavic terrorism, constant uprising and huge economic difficulties.

>Why is it relevant that a violent political party that was made entirely of Jewish people (KPD) backed by an even bigger, more violent political party that was also made of Jewish people (Bolsheviks)

Probably because it is one of three major factors that contributed to the rise of National Socialism. The KPD being linked to the Bolsheviks and by extension the USSR that Hitler hated and platformed on destroying.

All of it occurred within a relatively short time and the facts were still fresh in people's mind and went into the decision making to support the man who would go after the Jews who put forth effort into taking over their country.