It amazes me

How things changed over time

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=vZCVHB68cuY
wwwnytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html
twitter.com/wikileaks/status/862801658132254720
youtube.com/watch?v=tLhi3MJ58Hg
youtube.com/watch?v=c05oee-_H6o
blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2012/07/16/idle-corporate-cash-piles-up/
pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#bankrupt
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

sure does

yep

The south was largely Democrat until Johnson pushed through the civil rights act. They were called the dixiecrats for a reason.

>republicans are now the racists meme

At least better than "the democrats are the REAL racists" meme.

Thehy sure like to talk about it a lot :^)

>what is the southern strategy

>Seeking appeal of a voter base that was leaving the democratic party with a neutral middle of the road proposal is racism.

t. young republican who ignores 99% of his fellow club members are all glaring white

Yeah like when they accused the president of being a communist, Islamist, foreign sleeper agent for 8 years because he was black and had "Hussein" as his middle name?

Oh wait. That wasn't the democrats. Who was it?I can't seem to put my finger on the name.

Nah I tendo to more libertarian position in many aspects and I'm not even a Burger
Wow, harsh criticism and pressure from the political opposition, surely the democrats are sensible and respectful about republicans and base their criticism on pure objective facts.

so?

You think about it long and hard, Tea Party-kun.

>Republicans didn't play to the animosity of WASPs in the south after the civil rights act to gain votes

You're aware that Republicans have openly admitted this was an active strategy and apologized for it, right? Fuck Republican strategists from the time have openly talked about it and how it was adapted for future presidential runs.

But they are. Just because they don't hang the niggers doesn't mean their policies aren't harmful to blacks.

all white republicans are racists. Nice stereotyping racists bigoted cunt

I mean, half the time Dems assume black people are to fucking stupid to fight for their own rights and the other half of the time the policies the Democrats implement are detrimental to the black community ( the creation and sustaining of the welfare state) and that they'll vote Dem because they are pandering towards the African American community (this just as well applies to any nonwhite community the Dems pander to).
That sounds pretty racist to me really, moreso than the Republican platform is nowadays.

The racist thing is ignoring black people have agency and power because that's how you're talking right now.

Yeah, but I don't assume that black people are so stupid they can't get a fucking ID from the DMV in order to vote, am I?

youtube.com/watch?v=vZCVHB68cuY

Also, I'm not talking in an absolute sense. I know that some black people won't vote for the Democratic party, but in reality, they're a minority. I'm just talking about overall trends in the community as a whole, which tends to vote for the Democratic Party

*they're a small minority of the black population

Blacks vote for democrat year after year and their lives only get worse. Thank fuck Asians and Hispanics are wishing up to this 'GOP are racist! Stay away!' bullshittery. You wanna know why the South is so solid red? Their lives have actually improved under GOP leadership.

>calling the president a bigger
>calling the president a secret muslim
>harsh criticism

Next you say "it's jus bantz, bro".

>The Dems never called President a cock holster
>The Dems never called the President a secret Russian spy
>
.....

The Democrats do the same thing and are as willing to stoop as low as the Republicans are and vice versa. it's just political theater to rile up their bases at this point really.

Not what I said.

Southern Whites were marginalized for many reasons, not just civil rights. If anything civil rights was the 1960s-70s abortion or homosexual marriage of today. An issue which is used to divide people but doesn't have real importance or substance.

>glaring white
Are you cucks so beyond the norm that you think White people think loving and being with other White people is a bad thing? I wouldn't care if the republican party was 100% White. I'd like it better actually because we'd have more policy positions in common.

>
They weewee marginalized for many reasons. Republicans didn't aim for many reasons to take the fucking south. They used specifics ones.

>As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South...
>You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now, you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites.

From Lee Atwater, Republican strategist and RNC member. Wallace and Goldwater both very clearly ran on racial tensions in the south and used the 'muh States rights' arguments to justify it.

>Not including the full quote

He was answering a question about race-baiting in politics. He says that race baiting is becoming more and more abstract to the point where it's not even about race anymore and that's how racism will be pushed out of politics. He wasn't endorsing it.

wwwnytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html

>the president isn't a russian spy

That's still not even close to as bad as the things they called Obama.

>>>r/politics

>The party that has always championed freedom and equality of opportunity for all
>Used to be vilified for supporting equality for blacks
>Is now vilified for supporting equality for white males

Really gets the grey matter going

>Russia has an economy and it is not smaller than that of Italy
>Russia has up to date hardware in all departments and isn't reusing military weapons from the USSR
>Russia's sphere of influence expands past the Baltic region and the Near East and it's totally not irrelevant on the world scene, moreso than even N. Korea
>The investigation into the Russian probe has turned up essentially nothing 10 months later and shows very little actual collusion between Russia and the Trump team members other than routine monetary interactions with Russian businesses and diplomacy
>Michigan could be hacked even though it uses paper ballots
>Wikileaks is working with Russia despite leaking shit on both Putin and Clinton
>Exposing political corruption/incompetence isn't the job of a journalist

*Michigan could be hacked even though it used paper ballots exclusively

More like they don't have a car, public transport to the DMV, or the time to meet their local DMV's hours. But you're right, those lazy porch monkeys just need to suck it up and accept the piping-hot dickings their coincidentally Republican representative passed down on them.

There's literally buses that go around 90% of any city and it usually takes upwards of 2-3 hours to actually get a license or an State ID. If you can't go to a DMV, which are open between 8:00 - 5:00ish which is a huge time gap. In addition, there are online services where you can schedule an appointment or even not need to go to the DMV in the first place at a lot of these DMVs and many, MANY working people are somehow able to get their shit in order at the DMV during their lunch break. If you don't want to get a driver's lisence that's fine with me, don't blame it on "MUH RASICSM" just because you're a lazy shit and unable to take responsibility for yourself. Literally everything is accounted for (or most everything) when these DMVs are implementing services. Jesus Christ, you liberals are fucking delusional.

I'd also like to mention that they intentionally make it easy for people using the bus to use the DMV because tey have to cater to people with expired licenses, hence why they are usually downtown in most cities. If rural faggots can get driver licenses, there is no excuse not to get one in order to vote.

*they

twitter.com/wikileaks/status/862801658132254720

Thanks for the input, /stormfront/.

Name ONE (1) person with as much mainstream acceptance as Stephen Colbert who made a comment about Obama comparable to "Trump's mouth is a cock holder for the Russians."

Name ONE (1) person with as much mainstream acceptance as Kanye West who made a comment about Obama comparable to "Bush doesn't care about black people."

>white people existing is now the stormfront position

what a time to be alive

Donald Trump: I do not believe Barack Obama was born in America

1) He said the same of Ted Cruz too (this election cycle in fact), so it's not like he was only targeting Obama
2) That's not really an insult so much as his belief

kek

>literally missing the context

You didn't even get a GED did you?

Ted Nugent has more "mainstream" acceptance in the south than either of those people and he made referenced to lynching obama as a traitor and shit like that

Right. It's not insulting to imply that because his father is Kenyan Obama must not have been born in America. That from the time of his birth there has been a multi-decades long conspiracy to make it seem like a secret Kenyan is now running for office. It is insulting in every meaning of the word to make him show his long form birth certificate and then deny that is fake and that he has created a task force that "has found things, shocking things in Hawaii, about Obama". If you are not willing to admit this was an entirely racially motivated act then I don't know what to say to you.

rekt

HE did the same fucking thing to Ted Cruz and accused him of being ineligible to be president, and do you notice how Ted Cruz appears to be conspicuously white with a Irish-Canadian mother and a White Cuban father? Not to mention, he even did worse things to Ted and claim his father was connected to JFK's killer. If you aren't stupid, you would realize these were fucking publicity stunts and it was just a way for him to get attention in the political world. Sort of like b8 threads here on Veeky Forums are made just yous get (You)s.

Sheriff Joe proved Obama's birth certificate was a fake, and even found the original birth certificate of the person it was faked from.

Obama wrote himself he was born in Kenya.

Which does not matter, because "natural born citizen" is "the child of citizens", plural, and Obama's father was not a citizen.

Obama was never a natural born citizen of the US, and exactly what the founding fathers tried to avoid. Split allegiances. Obama sent our military in to aid Kenya, and took the Muslim Brotherhood's side in every single instance.

>calm down bro it was just a joke he was doing it for attention
Lovely. If you find that acceptable behavior by all mean go for it, it doesn't make it any less disrespectful and slanderous.

You're right.

Incidentally, Rachel Maddow proved that Trump is actually a cheeto, and thus ineligible to serve as president.

Don't engage with a literal retard you'll only excite him.

I don't care. he can do what he wants because free speech and all. It may be rude and crude, but it's no reason for moral censorship.
And my point was it wasn't targeting Obama because he was black. he was targeting him because he was making headways into the political world, which worked really. Nice Strawman.

These days the Republicans are just for the Jews.

1) Nice maymay
2) You're implying that the Dems give a shit about the working class and all those minorities they pander, which is blatantly untrue seeing that the only thing they care about is their corporate overlords, along with the neocons in the Republican party

This video is disingenuous because it pretends it can interview blacks in New York City as evidence that poor rural predominately black areas in places like Mississippi and Alabama aren't suspiciously being disenfranchised by new voter rules.

I can't help your ignorance; only you can do that.

Natural born citizenship is a requirement for being POTUS.

Obama's father was Kenyan, thus no matter where on earth Obama was born, he was not a natural born citizen of the USA.

Because the definition of natural born citizen is a child born to citizens.

citizenS.

Plural.

Obama's presidency was completely illegitimate, and his birth records were frauds and hoaxes that only an SJW would take at face value.

Jews: 90% vote Democrat.

You are just fucking dumb dude.

Yes, rather than completely hijack a single party, the wealthy elite of this society has hijacked both of them at the same time.

The Democrats are the party of lawyers and celebrities, the Republicans are the party of oil barons and the military-industrial complex.

Both parties are totally dependent upon billionaire donations in order to win elections. Both parties will put the needs of their pet billionaires over the needs of their constituents.

8 years of Barack Obama and income inequality is stronger than its ever been, there are fewer banks which hold even greater power, and his "grand legislative achievement" amounted to creating state-monopolies out of the insurance companies by requiring everyone by law to buy their product.

If you still hold on to the delusion that Donald Trump is going to do anything but turn around and enrich himself and his fellow Republican leaning billionaires, then boy do I have a bridge to sell you.

And it's going to be this way for as long as Citzens United is the law of the land

Even if that were true, he doesn't reach an audience nearly the size of either Colbert or Kanye.

While Trump enriching himself is a possibility, the fact that he even proposed a tax hike to make taxes 15% across the board (including for middle-class business owners, who get to keep more of their money) and actually propose that multi-national corporations actually pay taxes in the first place is not something that a neoliberal or neoconsevative in the pockets of big business wouldn't do at all.

>>>/leftypol/

Both parties are actually the same shit today, with only minute differences.

In terms of their policy yes but in terms of the culture they represent no.

Policy is the only fucking thing that matters though, especially economic, foreign, national security and fiscal policy, not wedge issues.

Are you a flat earther too?

Yeah, he sure has made a lot of promises and got you conservatives all riled up, but we'll see what he (is able) to sign into law, if it amounts to anything but a giant tax break for the wealthiest members of society with a few crumbs thrown to anyone else

back to the_Donald with you

...

>Only corporations benefit from tax cuts
Nice meme.
youtube.com/watch?v=tLhi3MJ58Hg

*Only corporations benefit from Trump's proposed tax cuts

EL
GEE
BEE
TEE
QUE

It definitely matters more but it is not the only thing.

Good point but Trump's whole schtick is that he doesn't represent the traditional Republican party.

Nice random youtube asshole. Is he all excited about Trump's 1 page tax plan, as well?
youtube.com/watch?v=c05oee-_H6o
Two can play at this game

And where did I say "corporations"? I said "wealthiest members of society." I said the people who are least in need of help are getting more, at the expense of people who need it the most i.e. most of the gullible assholes in run-down shitholes who voted for him.

The people that need tax cuts the most are the middle class, since they are the producers in American society and generate most of our wealth as a nation. We ought to reduce the tax burden on them in order for them to generate more revenue and further grow our economy.

Also, that's a good way to get back your base (hint: the Rustbelt is traditionally blue. They only voted for Trump because their local economies didn't see an upturn unlike those of California and Virginia and the like (The East and West Coasts) after the stimulus Obama passed ). It really makes me think you and any one else that has leftist ideals are too stupid to understand your audience enough to actually get their attention back after they shunned you for good reason: your bitch candidate didn't talk shit about their suffering or how to fix it. nor did that autistic LARPing socialist retard Sanders. All they talked about were social issues, which didn't affect the Democratic Blu Collar base at all. Now they're completely out of power in the federal gov't and out of powere in the majority of state governorships and legislatures.

Also, yeah, the tax cuts cover them bitch.

>Veeky Forums doesn't even know what a Mugwump is

>who stands to lose the most from an empowered, independent black population in the United States today?
>surely not the party hell bent on keeping them dependent, in shambles, and voting Democrat every 2 years

insanity is

>The people that need tax cuts the most are the middle class, since they are the producers in American society and generate most of our wealth as a nation. We ought to reduce the tax burden on them in order for them to generate more revenue and further grow our economy.

No. Businesses sit on wealth rather than invest it or pump it back into payroll
blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2012/07/16/idle-corporate-cash-piles-up/

What we need are less investments in security theater and military bloat and more investments in education and infrastructure which creates NEW markets and acts as the fuel for Capitalism. And single-payer healthcare would take the burden of providing health insurance OFF of the backs of businesses, just like having public schools means that businesses don't have to worry about their employee's children's educations.

>pturn unlike those of California and Virginia and the like (The East and West Coasts) after the stimulus Obama passed ).

Basically every professional economist agrees that the stimulus was a paltry fraction of what it should have been. Obama did nothing to reverse rising income inequality, and did nothing to reverse the situation where billionaires control both parties (in fact, it's probably much worse after his tenure)

And guess who are going to benefit the most from "Trumpcare"? Those same coastal elites which you seem to think are in the pockets of socialists.

> All they talked about were social issues, which didn't affect the Democratic Blu Collar base at all. Now they're completely out of power in the federal gov't and out of powere in the majority of state governorships and legislatures.
Because these are safety issues with Democrat-leaning billionaires. You won't get your most important donors nervous by talking about things like cracking the glass ceiling and letting female CEOs screw over their payroll with as much abandon as their male counterparts do.

I agree with your suggestions of reducing military bloat and the like and investing in education and infrastructure, but getting the gov't more involved in healthcare in the form of single payer healthcare is bound to result in disaster, namely the gov't has proven itself incomptetent to handle anything of that magnitude without fucking it up in extremely laughable ways. A single-payer healthcare system may work for Norway and Denmark, but we have a larger population density than those two countries and our health habits are very shitty in general, specifically in the South. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Southerners did crash a singlepayer health market.

I agree with the rest of what your saying though. My main problem with Trumpcare is that I don't know what's in it. it's the exact same situation as Obamacare: we'll find out about the details after it's passed.

Meant for

>incomptetent to handle anything of that magnitude without fucking it up in extremely laughable ways.
But that is utterly disproven by the fact that we as a country provide education to every single child who is a citizen (and probably a few who aren't, unfortunately). In fact it is only an organization as vast and monolithic as the federal government which is capable of doing so: an ecosystem of private educators mostly focus on the wealthiest members of society, and that holds true both in the United States, where people have the option of public or private schools, and it holds true in places which don't have any public education at all, and only the rich kids get to go to school.

The problem in the United States is that you get places with lots of people who are actively antagonistic to the public system, so they elect politicians who actively sabotage and turn them into poorly funded shit-holes. Places that aren't like this have already retooled their educational institutions to reflect the needs of the 21st century: most high school graduates leaving with a journeyman skill that they can use to live a comfortable blue collar life, while the smartest individuals go on to advanced placement courses (which are heavily focused in STEM courses) and prepare them for college. The poor places are falling further and further behind because of this.

We do this because we can't afford not to. Ideology aside, countries which invest in the education of their workforce out-compete those who don't. Similarly what we are also seeing is countries which also invest in the health of its workforce also gains an edge over its competitors: a healthy population is a happier, more loyal, and more productive one.

Single payer is not only the moral option, it's the fiscally prudent one, as well.
pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#bankrupt

>Democrats gain voters if black people aren't broke as fuck
>Republicans lose more elections if black people aren't broke

REALLY

>Ted Nugent has more "mainstream" acceptance in the south than either of those people

Fuck off, no one in the south cares about Ted Nugent. Stop projecting autism. Hank Williams jr would be a better example and his gaffe costed him big time.

Uh dude, not disagreeing with you but Denmark is vastly more densely populated than the US.

Norway less so but that's mostly due to impassable mountain ranges and forests.

t.triggered by more than 10 White people gathering together without a non-White.

What interests me more in your post, OP, is the fact that racial slurs were allowed as a tool for electoral campaigning. This is like Trump running around and screaming "Only niggers vote for Hillary"

>state survives off money coming from blue states
>meme tier legislation that treats critical services as products
>life improvements.

Literally the same exact thing can be said about these leftist progressives.

Tax payers are mostly Republican. So the state may be blue but the people paying the taxes aren't.

They aren't real Jews.

there can still be an argument made that supports that image.

in a sense, modern democrats, often SJWS, are the ultimate white supremacists, in the sense that they argue that other races are objectively inferior against them and that we should institutionalize handicaps for them so that they are on their level.

in another sense, modern republicans, often nationalists, argue in favor of strong borders and self-reliance of people, europe for europeans or africa for africans, and allowing africa to develop itself is much more beneficial to them than to bloat them with a temporary food/medicine supply that's caused nothing but overpopulation, poverty, and the inevitable looming collapse. africa has been fucked sideways by globalist humanitarian idealism, of which many republicans are opposed to.

you seem to think things have changed

blacks are still slaves to democrats

saying it like it is a bad thing

this

is that the monday night football guy?

RIP

Negro is not a racial slur.