Why do people unironically defend the Romanovs?

Why do people unironically defend the Romanovs?

NICHOLAS DINDU NUFFIN

HE WAS A GOOD TSAR

HE DIDN'T MEAN TO SLAUGHTER ALL THOSE INNOCENT PETITIONERS

HE'S WAS GETTIN' THE DUMA BACK ON TRACK

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_du_seigneur
twitter.com/AnonBabble

At least they weren't commies

>communist
>innocent

Not an argument.

Rich people can do no wrong

monarchists are ultimate cucks
>muh divine right

Because Veeky Forums has a vocal minority of bitter NEETs dreaming about fascism every single day of their miserable lives.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_du_seigneur

Literal cucks.

>monarchy
>fascism

oh brother

>Implying most fascists on this sub dont fetishize over monarchies

nice b8 m8

Rather the devil you know. Communism is the worst possible option, it's an authoritarian obligatory cult.

Because they pretend to be in a world where they're hardcore anti-communist crusaders. Therefore, anyone who was opposed by communists are automatically good guys.

>not knowing Franco restored the monarchy after taking power
Wew laddie

The people massacred on bloody sunday were just peasants who didn't even know what communism even was. But it's no surprise that right-wingers know nothing about history, since they are low IQ, uneducated, and play video games instead of reading books.

We're not defending him, we're defending his family

Always do the opposite of what the jews say.

then how can they be communists?

nice projection

>HE DIDN'T MEAN TO SLAUGHTER ALL THOSE INNOCENT PETITIONERS
>when you retards will start learning history?
>"the Tsar was not at the Winter Palace and did not give the order for the troops to fire"

Because the soulless beast it turned into pretty much absolved him.

Franco wasn't fascist, though.

Pretty much this. Excesses of Bolsheviks far outweighted the excesses of Romanovs.

It doesn't absolve him, it means the excesses a
of Communism in Russia are also his fault as his failures caused the revolution.

...

Don't see what's there to disagree with.
Franco's regime was just a regular conservative dictatorship.

It's the fact they gunned down and bayoneted his family in a basement that disgusts me.

Just hang Nicky, you don't need to stab his fucking daughters to death.

Italy had a king while Mussolini was in charge.

...

Romanov family deserved to have their lineage wiped out to the last child. Its divine justice for what they did to the Circassians .

Fuck the Romanovs. The only reason they support them is because they dislike communism more.

Nah, Im Circassian, killing woman and children are never justified

>HE DIDN'T MEAN TO SLAUGHTER ALL THOSE INNOCENT PETITIONERS

he literally wasn't in the city at the time, they demanded to see him, the guards said he wasn't in, they tried to force their way in anyway, they got shot, some how this is the tsar's fault.

you are quite forgiving, then .

Not real Fascism.

just like circassian women and children starved en masse and died from disease as the tsarist armies exported them to istanbul. really makes you think...

What the fuck, Italy was literally the first fascist nation in Europe.

>it's an authoritarian obligatory cult
Yes, unlike the absolute monarchy of the Russian Empire, which was very liberal and free.

Nigger tried to destroy my nation. Burn in hell faggot LMAO

Wow I thought being a cuck was just a western thing.

>HE DIDN'T MEAN TO SLAUGHTER ALL THOSE INNOCENT PETITIONERS
Well, not only he didn't mean to slaughter them, he outright didn't slaughter them. He wasn't even in St. Petersburg at the time and the massacre happened because of a single gung ho Cossack commander.

Nicholas mentioned in his diary:
>Difficult day! In St. Petersburg there were serious disturbances due to the desire of workers to get to the Winter Palace. The troops had to shoot in different places of the city, there were many dead and wounded. Lord, how painful and bad!
Doesn't sound like a memory of a bloody sadist who gave the order to shoot does it?

>Why do people unironically defend the Romanovs?

Some people are born slaves, even in a free society they yearn for a master and dote piteously over every ruler they see.

>expecting Commies to know anything about history

>Tsar Nicholas and his family PERSONALLY killed over 9 gorillion innocent Russian peasants with their bare-hands and teeth!
Those monsters....
Thankfully we had the brave men of the Bolshevik Red Army and the Check to put them in their place by brutally murdering them in a basement without trial, mutilating their bodies and burying them in an unmarked grave!

>PERSONALLY
I wouldn't be surprised if the Bolsheviks actually made people believe that. I mean, the revolutionaries during the French revolution literally spread propaganda that the aristocrats are witches and vampires who feast on murdered children every night.

>HE DIDN'T MEAN TO SLAUGHTER ALL THOSE INNOCENT PETITIONERS
He didn't, though.

Behold, the subhuman morality of a communist.

Because Nicholas was put into a position that he was ill prepared for and didn't even want.

Not to mention the fact that the Bolsheviks executed his family and attendants in the name of "Muh socialism" when they could have just killed him and let his family go to Denmark or England.

Franco legitimately wasn't a fascist though.

Nico wasn't a good Tsar, but he wasn't a bad person. I'd say he got what he deserved if he was deposed instead of having himself and his whole family brutally murdered.

Fuck off tsarists Romanovs are dead and they'll remain dead

They didn't want any of their children to act as a rallying point for Monarchists. You can't support the royalty if their are no royals left.

I'd genocide her pussy, if you know what I mean.

Zat was ze joke

You support the murder of the entire Romanov family because of an unprepared monarch who was neglected by his idiot father? Nice opinion dude, Anastasia totally deserved to have her skull smashed in by the rifle of a communist.

>Alexander III
>idiot
The only idiot here is you, he was probably the best tsar since Peter the Great. It's not his fault he died so early without time to properly prepare the tsarevich.

because they are americans and naturally they are retarded, could be english too, they have hardon for monarchs, amiblobs are just afraid of commies

>Oh, let's not train my son to be czar even though he's well in his 20s by now.
He was a lazy piece of shit to not train his son from the moment Nicky could read.

All the commies on this board are Americucks, plus Americans have a pathologic fear of monarchs dating all the way back to George Washington.

The killing of nobility is necessary to prevent counter-revolutionaries rallying around them and to show the power of the vanguard, comrade

Powerful leaders keep the idiotic and sensationalist masses in check to prevent the starvation of millions of innocent people, 'comrade'.

>powerful leaders

>lol don't disturb me while I piss and shit myself to death in the bathroom
So powerful

Guess how old Alexander himself was when he became the heir apparent?
>calling the best tsar a piece of shit
I want republican cucks out.

>best tsar

You misspelled Nicholas I

>one elite replaced by another
>power taken by small number of commies right after the civil war
>population starves and suffers, while the Party leaders eat meat every day
Hmm, I wonder why?

DON'T BULLY NICKY

This. Leave Nicko alono

INNOCENT

I
N
N
O
C
E
N
T

>supports an ideology that wants the government to have maximum power in the country
>calls others cucks

>he doesn't like absolute monarchy
>therefore he is a communist
Boy, the cold war was a fucking adventure, huh.

at least monarchy can lose its power and be reduced to tourist attractions, unlike communism

>tfw Tsar Alexander the Liberator was literally days away from starting the process of introducing constitutional monarchy in Russia when the Anarchists fucking blew him up and consigned the nation to his moron autocrat son

Good 'ol Joe actually did something to get his power, he worked his ass up - he was not born into the position like some cunty monarch. Being a monarchist is the biggest cuckedom ever, you literally support someone being in a position of power and wealth that can never be attained by you.

Alexander II was a fucking dipshit who got killed by the very same people he wanted to liberate. Do you think it's a coincidence that the hardline reactionary rule of his son was also the most peaceful and prosperous period in modern Russian history? Try reading Petersburg Dialogues from Joseph de Maistre, he exactly predicted the real consequence of the Russian liberation 100 years in advance.

>communism can not fail
Da, Comrade, USSR4EVR

The problem is the monarchy model is so related to blood line that if they had spared them it would have merely given them a chance to revive and retaliate, you can say its gross or morally wrong if you wish but its the only real way to annihilate monarchy.

You realize Romanovs and claimants still exist right?

Yes but my point is it makes no real sense to spare them, if they did they would just raise their chances to retaliate at some point.

But there were already Romanovs in exile at that point so what the fuck did it accomplish? It didn't extinguish the dynasty.

Nicky's children weren't even eligible for the throne. When Nicky abdicated, the right to the throne passed to his cousin(?), Michael.

Two wrongs and all that liberal bullshit

>divine justice
>communist
kufar scum get out

He had hot daughters

I'd give the one on the right my bayonet if you know what I'm sayin.

Why do people unironically defend the Bolshevists?

LENIN DINDU NUFFINS

HE WAS A GOOD BOY

HE JUST WANTED TO SPREAD C*MMUNISM THROUGH VIOLENT REVOLUTIONS

HE'S WAS TRYNA KILL DA EBIL BOURGEOIS

That's all correct

That only makes sense if they had a realistic way to get at the other claimants. All they did was make everyone else consider them a reckless and illegitimate violent mob.

>Cucks your path

heh nothing personal, crown...

>Sub
Go back to le ddit please

>sub
You're not even trying are you

>Still doing dumb looks for cameras
>Still planking
>A century ago.
Never change humanity.

>i don't understand communism

Explains why people are still commutards, then. Pathetic slave mentality combined with child like naivety.

>expecting commies to know anything
Literally the dumbest group of people in existence.

Too bad (for commutards anyway, lel) he failed and his legacy is mud.

He doesn't have to, it's failed every single time it's been tried and has been irrelevent since the 1990s.
You may as well "understand" ancient Aramean religion. I mean, you could, but no one cares and it's dead, so what's the point?

Reading about ancient aramean religion would unironically be more interesring than listening to a bunch of deluded teenagers try to shill their failed ideology.

>HE DIDN'T MEAN TO SLAUGHTER ALL THOSE INNOCENT PETITIONERS
What fucking business did they have marching at his palace? The soldiers were in the right to shoot. Too bad people don't do that shit anymore, border police should be shooting at refugees right now. Learn to respect borders and property.

>supposed legal right
>no evidence of the right being exercised in medieval Europe

That's irrelevant.

The point is that he didn't slaughter anyone, he didn't even know about the massacre until much later that day. Nicky was an incompetent tsar, but he had a heart made of gold, portraying him as some sadistic butcher and a tyrant is 100% Anglo and Judeo-Bolshevik propaganda.