WE

Black americans came from the west coast of africa they were never Egyptians

Mexicans are not aztecs, the city was destroyed and population masacred there are no aztecs alive others indians are.

Modern romans have nothing to do with the people that raped the sabine women. The italian peninsula was invaded countless times and was depopulated during the gothic wars.

Western europe were nothing but savages and never did anything until they were raped by rome.

I agree

Every single thing you've said is wrong, except for the first one that is only partially wrong. Now fuck off.

Actually the last one is very much correct. Good job, you get a cookie. Now fuck off.

All the we wuzing you mentioned is still better than what nationalist Macedonians actually believe

What do they claim, and who are they really?

firsthand accounts were recorded in the Florentine Codex concerning the adverse effects of the smallpox epidemic of the Aztecs, which stated, “many died from this plague, and many others died of hunger. They could not get up and search for food, and everyone else was too sick to care for them, so they starved to death in their beds. By the time the danger was recognized, the plague was well established that nothing could halt it”.[21] The smallpox epidemic caused not only infection to the Mexica peoples, but it weakened able bodied people who could no longer grow and harvest their crops, which in turn led to mass famine and death from malnutrition.
Reproduction and population growth declined since people of child bearing age either had to fight off the Spanish invasion or died due to famine, malnutrition or other diseases.[22] Diseases like smallpox could travel great distances and spread throughout large populations, which was the case with the Aztecs having lost approximately 50% of its population from smallpox and other diseases.[23] The disease killed an estimated forty percent of the native population in the area within a year.

All this before the spanish attack.

So if we consider half the population died from the chaos created by this plague before the final attack.
And this happened during:
Cortés cut the water supply to the city via de acueduct to chapultepec, then concentrated on letting the Mexicans "eat up all the provisions they have" and drink brackish water.
Cortés razed every neighborhood he captured, using the rubble to fill up canals.
The situation inside the city was desperate: because of the famine and the smallpox there were already thousands of victims, women offered to the gods even their children' clothes, so most children were stark naked. Many Aztecs drank dirty, brackish water because of their severe thirst and contracted dysentery. The famine was so severe that the Aztecs ate anything, even wood, leather, and bricks for sustenance.[6]
Spanish forces, primarily the Tlaxcalans, continued to attack even after the surrender, slaughtering thousands of the remaining civilians and looting the city. The Spanish and Tlaxcalans did not spare women or children: they entered houses, stealing all precious things they found, raping and then killing women, stabbing children.[16]

Almost all of the nobility were dead, and the remaining survivors were mostly young women and very young children.[18] It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine with any exactitude the number of people killed during the siege. As many as 240,000 Aztecs are estimated to have died, according to the Florentine Codex, during the eighty days. This estimate is greater, however, than some estimates of the entire population (60,000–300,000) even before the smallpox epidemic of 1520. Spanish observers estimated that approximately 100,000 inhabitants of the city died.

Yup Wiped

ancient macedonians
And of course they reject they are Bulgarians brainwashed by Yugoslavia

I know this may surprise people but West African ports were merely the locations of entry into international markets.

By the 16th century most Africans came from further inland, I'd argue Sahelian connecting them within Mande speaking realms after the Songhai collapse along with Atlantic speakers such as Fula during and after the Fulani Jihads.

There was also a small but significant Mozambique and Madagascar immigration.

Mexica people were not only the Aztecs living in Tenochtitlan. By that time, the Aztec empire covered pretty much all of central Mexico, and even if most of it consisted of subjugated tribes, the culture and race of the aztec expanded.

There is a reason why there are about 1 million people that speak nahuatl as their native language today.

The Tlaxcallans spoke nahuatl too, that does not mean they were aztecs. It was a regional language. People under aztec rule were not aztec thats why they paid tribute to them.

Aztec is a catch all term that was made to refer to the Nahua, it's just that when we speak of the Aztec people historically, it's usually referring specifically to the Mexica. It's the term that most people will recognize.

is it really worse?

Modern FYROMs most certainly are mixed with balkan peoples many of which have some connection to ancient Macedon way back in the line.

Yes because there's really no connection beyond the geographic location and very very little genetic similarity

But there is a large genetic similarity between greeks and fyroms. Sure they were Slavicized by Bulgar invaders but the genetic stock of the balkan peninsula has remained relatively unchanged.

Western sub saharans pretending to be egyptians is far sillier than balkanites claiming partial ancient greek descent which is actually true in most cases.

Completely agree
The only legitimate WE is Persians, and not wh*tes claiming Persia but rather Persians not being Ar*bs.

Also Mongolians claiming they wuz mongols n shit is a-ok

I have an Aztec relative alive today you mong.

stop believing /pol/ memes
no one cares about genetics in the real world.
this is the last thing that's relevant to ethnicity maters in the balkans.
and by your logic poles and ukrainians should claim alanian and scythian heritage, croatians illyrian, germans celtic etc.
one uestion though - what's the point? no one cares, it's not a aristoctratic society, it's post-socialist one where most people come from peasants. they wont care about their ancient heritage,

>no one cares about genetics in the real world.
Trillion dollar industry no one cares about. The other guy may have said some dumb shit, but this tops the cake.

>no one cares about genetics in the real world
I beg to differ. I did a thesis in undergrad on genetics. Of course it matters.

>and by your logic poles and ukrainians should claim alanian and scythian heritage, croatians illyrian, germans celtic etc.
Yeah. What's wrong with that?

>what's the point? no one cares, it's not a aristoctratic society, it's post-socialist one where most people come from peasants. they wont care about their ancient heritage

Genetics does matter when discussing the identity of groups of people. Just because you're descended from peasants doesn't make
you any less part of that group. A king and a swineherd can both be French.

Blood is the foundational identity and cannot be removed. Blood ties form families and ethnicity is just an extension of the family. Those types of bonds cannot be broken.

Arbitrary civic nationalism and rugged individualism will never substitute the ancient concept of the thede.

You do realise this is all part of a hyperreality and even a white guy who plays Caesar would still be a simulacra, right?

it literally doesn't matter who portrays caesar so whenever you retards complain about this it really makes me laugh

Do people bond more by blood or culture? Is it possible for an outsider of different blood to become fully immersed in a different culture and be accepted?