Has there ever been a country where their ethnic populations has been replaced/extinct through immigration and...

Britain. The original Picts were replaced by Romans (Scots if you lived in the northernmost parts of Britain) who got replaced by Anglo-Saxons who ended up intermixing with the invading Frenchmen who mixed with god knows what else afterwards.

The Spanish also just killed a fuckton of them tho.

They were just all killed.

Wrong. Most British people can still trace their DNA to people who lived here PRE Celtic (which is what I'm assuming you meant by pict) the romans did no immigrate here en mass and the same can be said for the Germanic people after, the vikings and the Normans. What you have in Britain is a series of invasions where the culture and the ruling class was replaced, along with migration which did not drastically alter the make up of the native brits. Terribly uninformed post.

Iceland and the Faroes, originally colonized by Irishmen and turned into interracial breeding grounds by Norsemen and their Irish women-slaves

They were killed by diseases then were conquered by force of arms, nothing like modern immigration. Also the natives were never really replaced by the Spanish, but they interbred. Most South Americans have more native DNA then European.

Another military conquest, not immigration.

>Most British people
Yeah why germanic do this?

Do you think germanics were 1000-5000 people?

I don't understand your point.

All the examples cited are dramatic events like armed conquests or the settling of a nomadic people. No gradual replacement via migration that pol claims.

The USA had that kind of gradual migration that Europe has nowadays (the only difference is that the USA also had very high birth rates) and most of their immigrants assimilated eventually.

"British" arent celtic, they are more germanic than anything

That still counts as extinction as far as OP is concerned. This is basic /pol/ stuff- if every german woman has kids only with syrian men (or indeed vice versa), even if the kids can all obviously trace their genes back to germans the germans no longer exist.
It's an.... interesting position of dubious scientific sense, but it is the position /pol/ takes.
Except of course when it's convenient not to.

The original europeans got exterminated by indoeuropeans, the majority of the men got killed and the women made babies with the invaders
From this race-mixing modern europeans are born
The original europeans or at least places where both the paternal haplogroup and mitocondrial dna is still preserved are in Scandinavia, the Balkans and in Sardinia

You expect us to believe Neanderthals could reach Sardinia?

There are countless of examples of barbarian immigrants, ranging from Mesopotamia and invading mountain tribes, to nowadays immigration crisis and EVERY SINGLE TIME the barbarians assimilated to the civilized culture. /pol/ is just full of shit.

I can't talk about my fucking island because of that shitty meme
I was talking about the neolothic farmers with I as their haplogroup btw not about neandhertals

What's so dubious about it?
>If every Neanderthal woman has kids only with Homo Sapiens men (or indeed vice versa), even if they can all obviously trace their genes back to Neanderthals the Neanderthals no longer exist.

It's pretty silly to claim Neanderthals still exist, why would it be any less silly to claim that Germans still exist after a similar such displacement in the German gene pool?

>inb4 pedantry about how Neanderthal were a different species, as if taxonomy is a hard and fast science.

>There are countless of examples of barbarian immigrants, ranging from Mesopotamia and invading mountain tribes, to nowadays immigration crisis and EVERY SINGLE TIME the barbarians assimilated to the civilized culture
lol
>Germans assimilated to Roman culture
>Jews assimilated to European culture
>Europeans assimilated Amerindian culture

Oh and by the way...
>Syrian refugees are barbarians
RACIST!

I don't see the equivalence, or logic, or truth here. I'm not aware of any claim by any serious person that Neanderthals got bred out of existence purely by Neanderthal women mating with Homo Sapien male.

Nor is the actual issue in Europe that German women are all flocking to immigrant mates. The issue is that people from developed countries in general have a small number of children and are being swamped by migrants who have significantly higher numbers of children.

The consensus is that the paternal lineage of the Neanderthals was wiped out
Ded
It doesn't exist anymore
While some of the maternal one still exist

Regarding brown immigrants the governments of Germany and Sweden are doing their best to multiply BM/WF couples
Events, books and other things about this exist and are easily found on a quick google search

Umm, if you are bred out of existence, from one thing to another, wouldn't it stand to reason that the pre-celtic DNA still exists?

Like we call trace our DNA to Africa, but we aren't African, and they aren't Picts

Kosovo, maybe macedonia in a few years

>>Germans assimilated to Roman culture
But they did, you turbonigger. The Germanics were Romanized as fuck.

>Jews assimilated to European culture
Never tried to replace it either.

>Europeans assimilated Amerindian culture
Wars of conquest.

>Syrian refugees
Will assimilate eventually.

>The consensus is that the paternal lineage of the Neanderthals was wiped out

I am interested in this claim and I am quite prepared to believe you if you have some citations.

>Regarding brown immigrants the governments of Germany and Sweden are doing their best to multiply BM/WF couples
Events, books and other things about this exist and are easily found on a quick google search

Regardless of whether that claim is true or not it is certainly not true that the majority of white Germanic women are having children with non-white males.

>position of dubious scientific sense, but it is the position /pol/ takes.
EVERY position /pol/ takes has very dubious scientific sense.
Why the fuck are we discussing their cuck porn fantasies.
>Germans assimilated to Roman culture
Well, they did.
Lombard language was fucking dead in the 7th century, and most germanics that werent arian heretics(and a lot of them that were) were massive romanboos.

Because race is far too much of a sliding scale when compared to the categoric concept of neanderthals vs homo sapiens. There are no Germans, not genetically, they've been interbreeding with the french and the dutch and the danish and the polish and the swiss and whoever else you want to name for years. If there's no distinct german race then there's nothing to stop existing in the first place, the average just slides to elsewhere on the scale.
Replacement on the other hand- immigrant couples having lots of kids while native couples don't have any at all- does indeed count as extinction because the natives stop existing altogether. However I doubt you'll find any histroical examples of that hapening where the natives weren't forced to stop breeding for some reason, usually because they were killed. That's not really the same thing as the current replacement through immigration situation (no, terrorism doesn't happen in nearly large enough quantities to matter on this subject).

That happened in the Americas. In South America, specially.

>>Germans assimilated to Roman culture
They literally began calling themeselves the Holy Roman Empire. And in Latin majority areas like Italy and France they did assimilate. The Lombards took over all of Italy in the 500s as a Germanic speaking people. Now Lombards are just considered a subgroup of Italian who speak an Italian dialect. The Franks also adobted the Latin dialect spoken in Gaul that later evolved to French and adopted Roman custons.

Yes, they created new states becaus thex were not immigrants but conquerers, but even they got assimilated.

>Syrian refugees are barbarians
Barbarian originally just meant foreigner, so yeah, they are. They are also not coming as an organized army lead by their king and chiefs, ready to carve out a new state, unlike how Germans migrated to the Roman Empire

Source on this, got my dick hard for a qt redhead slavegirl

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Iceland
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Faroe_Islands

>Most Icelanders are descendants of Norwegian settlers and Gaels from Ireland and Scotland who were brought over as thralls or slaves during the age of settlement. Recent DNA analysis suggests that around 66 percent of the male settler-era population was of Norse ancestry, where as the female population was 60 percent Celtic.
>Recent DNA analysis have revealed that Y chromosomes, tracing male descent, are 87% Scandinavian.[1] The studies show that mitochondrial DNA, tracing female descent, is 84% Scottish / Irish.

>Y-DNA = auDNA
2/10
Anyways most of the New World, Australia, New Zealand, and Southern Africa but this is explained by mostly HG being swamped by settled agricultural populations. Usually this required a difference in carry capacity of both populations

Except in Sardinia where the auDNA is nearly the same of those old europeans

So in Scandinavia proto europeans fucked to death indo european women?

Also I clearly stated "at least places where the y dna and m dna still exist"
So you can take that 2 cocks and put them up your butt

Didn't London go from like 94-48% White since the 1970s.

The US went from around 90% White to about 50% since WWII.

Mass globalized migration and declining birth rates didn't exist in history. It's not comprable.

Most actuarial reports have West Euro Whites becoming minorities in the third quarter of this century but thanks to segregation I doubt total replacement is very likely.

Nobody knows for certain which continental tribes the pre-Roman Britons had connections with, but it seems they were a diverse bunch. Roman records describe Iberian-type Silures with swarthy skin and black, curly hair, as well as Germanic-alike Picts and tribes in what is now England who resembled their neighbours just across the channel, in Northern France and Belgium. Basically, it seems Britain was populated by people coming along the Atlantic Coast from Spain, as well as by people travelling Westwards from Central (and perhaps Northern) Europe.

It seems pretty clear that a huge number of people arrived in the Roman era, especially from the provinces within France, the Benelux and Germany. Others, on a smaller scale, travelled from all around the Mediterranean, from Italy, Greece, North Africa and the Levant (as testified by tombstone inscriptions, and a number of genetic quirks in sub-Roman Britons that can't otherwise be explained). The region around York, for example, features a number of cemeteries containing simple gypsum sarcophagi, those contained within having come from Northern Africa.

After the Romans left, the Anglo-Saxons migrated here. The evidence suggests that far from slicing their way across Britain, the only place in which they fully displaced the Romano-British was in parts of the South-East. From there, their spread was more a result of cultural dominance and intermingling than anything else. Many natives retreated to Northern England, South-West England and Wales.

Interestingly, Celtic-originating names are fairly common in Anglo-Saxon genealogies. The Kingdom of Wessex was founded by either a) Anglicised Britons, or b) mixed Anglo-Britons. One of the most prominent kings of Mercia was Penda, the etymology of his name also implying a possible British origin.

The Vikings settled heavily in East Anglia but mainly in Yorkshire, which has the highest concentration of Scandinavian place names in the country.

>48% White
At the last census the White British population was about 48%, though when you add European migrants it was north of 60%
There are 300,000 French people in London, that's the size of my entire city

PS. That census was 6 years ago, it wouldn't surprise me if it was sub-50% now

I think by your logic then we would all just have African DNA. Because we all came from Africa??? I don't think you understand what I meant here.

Kingdom of Jordan. They're majority palestinian now. The original population was nomadic bedouin arabs.

I doubt the nomads were bred out of existence as opposed to just squeezed out, though.

Let's play Spot the Scot

Mesopotamia, anatolia, libya, persia, sythia, bactria, and northern india

Sumerians, 2600BCE-1800BCE
Sure the Akkadians were an empire for 2-3 generations, but for the rest of that time is just a recurring >Nomad semites migrate to Sumeria
>Cities got swamped
>Sumerians are extinct by 1600BCE.

>gets replaced when immigration happens
Literally proving my point.

It's your turn to get replaced, subhuman. That's for the Amerindian genocide.

bump

4500 BC
>Sumerians are extinct by 1600BCE.
known sources say that but there could have been sumerian town until arab conquest

Arabs totally replaced Assyrians and Babylonians in the Middle East

Settler societies in the New World totally replaced the natives (USA, Canada, Argentina, South Brazil, the Cape in South Africa, New Zealand and Australia)

Africans totally replaced the natives of Haiti.

Turks mostly replaced the Greeks in Anatolia

Germans were totally expelled from the Sudetenland and modern Poland

Arabs were ethnically cleansed from Zanzibar.

Native Taiwanese were replaced in Taiwan.

Ainu were displaced by Japanese.