Bertrand Russell on Vladimir Lenin

interesting...here's footage of Russell talking about his meeting with Lenin

he considers Lenin to be like Oliver Cromwell and that Lenin had serious limitations as a thinker

youtube.com/watch?v=6TK9c-caEcw

do you agree with Bertarnd?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/apr/04.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=qvsPgCx-gMA&t=1s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag#Brief_history
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

yes

neat

>1920:This Communism stuff's kinda neat
>1945: Fucking bomb them back to the stone age with nukes

Whenever you have doubts about the autistic dogmatic lengths the USSR or communist in general can go to, just remember that this happened

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

>numerous scientists were executed as part of a campaign instigated by Lysenko to suppress his scientific opponents
Don't forget about the Romanian Super Proletariat

>cromwells body got dug up and beheaded
Lenins head should be on a pike aswell

>Romanian Super Proletariat
>googled this
>nothing comes up other than Romanian Super Sluts

Communist propaganda was really effective at first, to the point most people thought communist russia was indeed doing well and you had a lot of unironic communists in the west for a long time even after the illusion began to crumble.

I don't even think it was the strength of the propaganda, so much as it was self-deception by the USSR's foreign admirers, especially as most were socialist true believers to begin with.

wasn't lenin a good guy, non-violent compared to stalin?

No.

lenin never executed anyone like stalin did

No, he just had the Kulaks hanged where everyone could see as a joke.

In fairness, Agricultural science and Ecology wasn't taken seriously until like the 1960s/1970s. The 20th century is littered with absolutely retard tier agriculture and lack of understanding of ecology right across the globe, from the Dust Bowl to the Cane Toad retardation of Australia.

Lysenkoism was also most likely entirely political because he was closely aligned with Stalin.

>this is what highschoolers actually believe
Lenin is the one who created the Gulags and the secret police (the Cheka) and carried out mass killings under the red terror
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror

why do people diss on Lysenkoism?

didn't pretty much scientists both in the west and the soviet union saw it as a viable theory?

What was the exact reason the Soviet Union banned genetics

is genetics a threat to communist dogma?

>wasn't lenin a good guy, non-violent
lol no

Compared to Stalin, maybe. Lenin was a psychopathic massmurderer, tho.

Because Lysenkoism was the prettier alternative that said you didn't need to meticulously manage crops, they'd just magically grow up out of weeds, and Stalin was a knuckle dragging brute who didn't know anything about Science.

>didn't pretty much scientists both in the west and the soviet union saw it as a viable theory?
No? Also, what theory? Lysenkoism is the doctrine that Lysenko is god and knows everything, its not one single theory, he fucked lots opf different things up.

>radical centrists of Veeky Forums strike again

Let me guess, Winston Churchill dindu nuffin in India, and Andrew Jackson was a good boy?

>HURR
What does that have to do with the crimes of Lenin, you mendacious sack of shit? Go fuck yourself tankie scum.

IIRC it was mostly idealism ("glorious socialism can achieve anything, comrade!") mixed with pragmatism, since the USSR really didn't have the funds/expertise to fully mechanise agriculture at the time

The Russian Revolution for what it was, was actually quite "bloodless" in terms of violence, but that doesn't mean mass violence wasn't carried out, the Red Terror was a real thing and thousands were killed (on both sides)

Lenin though was nowhere near as bad as Stalin, Lenin didn't purge his own friends and 90% of the party, Lenin argued against ethnic cleansing, argued for the rights of states to succeed etc.

You also had the NEP which was far more moderate than what Stalin did in the USSR and the NEP allowed private business basically in the same way as current China (in fact, Dengism is basically copy-pasted from the NEP)

Lenin was also faaaaaar more Libertarian in his writings than how he actually acted during the Revolution. Go read the April Thesis, Lenin was often berated by Stalin and the right of the party for being a borderline Anarchist lol.

>you didn't need to meticulously manage crops, they'd just magically grow up out of weeds

So it was basically just retard tier version of Permaculture?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

>Andrew Jackson was a good boy
Fuck Banks and Fuck Indians

It's not irrelevant or dishonest at all to insist you put historical events and actions in a consistent context

>HURR was lenib as bad as stollin???
>"yes"
>DURR BU BU BU MUH CHURCHILL
No, fuck you tankie scum.

marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/apr/04.htm

Here is the April Thesis, it's very short, but shows what Lenin thought ideologically.

>marxists.org
HAHAHAHAHAHA

>marxists.org

OH NO NO NO NO

>is upset and surprised that an archive of leftist writings is where you finds writing by leftists

Theyre just texts collected and put up there you absolute sperglords, jesus christ

>HURR
So if I link a rebuttal on stormfront, you'll go there and read it, will you? Fuck off, tankie scum.

Russel was a literal cuck. He literally got his wife impregnated by a bull not just once but twice. His fetish strongly reflects on his thought. You should not consider him seriously.

>I care about a guy who believes in solipsism and shits on communists

yes

he would have been remembered as a complete monster if it were not for the likes of Hitler and Stalin that came afterwards

Lenin was obviously an intelligent man, but when you wrap yourself up that fully into an ideology you obviously limit your ability to objectively evaluate reality.

Andrew Jackson was certainly the cause of less death and misery than Vladimir Lenin.

Read Lenin, then make you own opinion.
You need some very reasonable words to turn all working class against tsarcucks and bourgeoisie. April thesis are what every working man secretly wants, but then he follows the narrative and votes (lol, if those votes ever matter something) for capital.

Cromwell is top tier so very good compliment

Duranty was reporting from the USSR. Information was strictly limited.

Bertrand Russell is cute, CUTE!
youtube.com/watch?v=qvsPgCx-gMA&t=1s

genetics is contrary to equality

What? Neither Cromwell was possessed of anything that might be recognized as merit. They’re both shit, with Oliver being particularly odious

Lenin was said to be a bad writer. Much better as a speaker and activist than thinker.

Shapagne socialists exist to this day I don't feel any sympathy for them. In their mind it all makes sense. It's so simple it's so just and fair. Theoreticians fail to predict how things will go in real life or they don't care about the casualties.

The gulags were created by the Czar and the red terror was only a response to the white terror started by supporters of the Czar and foreign imperialists.

>gulags were created by the Czar

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag#Brief_history

>was the government agency in charge the Soviet forced labor camp system which reached its peak during Joseph Stalin's rule from the 1930s to the 1950s.

>The agency's full name was the Main Administration of Corrective Labor Camps and Settlements

>t was administered first by the State Political Administration (GPU), later by the NKVD and in the final years by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD)

Note that Gulag does not represent those sent into exile or those sent to "labor colonies". That entire story you crafted came straight from your butt.

I almost wish I didn't watch it. Dude is much weirder than I expected.

Like a character from Universal movies.

>wikipedia

>lysenkoism isnt real because theres a wikipedia article about it

Has "centrist" become the new progressive/socialist buzzward for people who are not far right loons but still have the temerity to disagree with their insane agenda?

WE

Yes, but rightist """thought""" is so juvenile that all of of its core writings are easily refuted.

Thomas Cromwell dindu nuffin