ChainLink has a working product confirmed

CouchChiller
CouchChiller

we're currently REIMPLEMENTING the core pieces in golang
and you can build against the current implementation's API, we'll carry that forward with the golang version

How can you reimplement something that doesnt exist. Why reimplement? One good reason is that they are indeed working with SWIFT GPI and other enterprises so they have to adjust the working product they have been working on for years to their client's needs.

Checkout the new Gitter lobby for ChainLink
https://gitter.im/smartcontractkit-chainlink/Lobby

All urls found in this thread:
https://gitter.im/smartcontractkit-chainlink/Lobby
CodeBuns
CodeBuns

Usually you re implement something after it is broken or proven not to work in its current implementation... otherwise why re implement?

Ignoramus
Ignoramus

This should be faster than what fudders expect. Reimplementing something is done faster than coding something that doesnt exist. 2 years my ass.

Sir_Gallonhead
Sir_Gallonhead

LINK FUDers BTFOed, as usual

Boy_vs_Girl
Boy_vs_Girl

@CodeBuns
Didnt you read my post? Software developers dont reimplement just because its broken, there are various reasons. If its broken then why was the PoC with SWIFT considered successful you retard?

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

@Boy_vs_Girl
2/5 steps completed
Yeah sounds real successful.

Flameblow
Flameblow

@Boy_vs_Girl
well i said or proven not to work. could be that their tests are successful but their current implentation can't scale correctly.

they are probably re implementing because go is a better language (especially for concurrency) than what they were using.

why so hostile?

TechHater
TechHater

@Gigastrength
good lord. is anyone seriously falling for this FUD?

buy LINK and be rich in 2018.

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

@Gigastrength
Wait a you talking about this? holy shit you retard those check marks are not referring to ChainLink's implementation. If you visited swift.smartcontract.com when it was up and clicked on a different transaction you would see the same thing with 5/5 check marks.

You LINK fudders are retarded as usual.

Emberburn
Emberburn

@Spazyfool
Without SWIFT confirming a partnership nobody will care.
Enjoy bagholding until April.

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

@Emberburn
Enjoy being a sub 10k faggot.

Nojokur
Nojokur

@Emberburn
Without SWIFT confirming a partnership nobody will care.
Kek nice response after being BTFO. If any cryptocurrency has a chance of a SWIFT partnership, you know deep inside that its LINK. In fact, out of all the low marketcap coins only LINK has huge corporate interest.

Enjoy bagholding until April.
I'm happy that you realize we will be rich as fuck by 2018.

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

@Spazyfool
That was proven fake retard

likme
likme

AAAAAAAA MY LIFE IS FALLING APART WILL LINK MAKE ME RICH AAAAAAAAA

hairygrape
hairygrape

@Need_TLC
That was proven fake retard
How many times do people have to tell you that swift.smartcontract.com was really up and that picture was legit? Fucking retard

FastChef
FastChef

Hodling 8400 linkies. 2018 Toyota Camry or 2018 Escalade?

JunkTop
JunkTop

@Need_TLC
Saw it with my own eyes online you fucking faggot, kys

Dreamworx
Dreamworx

@Need_TLC
If i didn't see it it didn't happen
nice meme

Booteefool
Booteefool

you guys think link is at a good price to buy rn?

MPmaster
MPmaster

@CouchChiller
no one cares about this stupid shit stop posting this garbage coin that will be barely used because the average person does not fucking need oracles or smart contracts

5mileys
5mileys

nice json parser

cum2soon
cum2soon

@Booteefool
Anything under 3k sats is a great price.

Deadlyinx
Deadlyinx

@MPmaster
Average person, no. Businesses who transact millions of transactions a day, yes. Stay poor retard

Methshot
Methshot

@MPmaster
Then what altcoins do you hold genius?

Methnerd
Methnerd

@Booteefool

If you want to pull out 10x what you put in in a year or so, yes.

Garbage Can Lid
Garbage Can Lid

@Deadlyinx
like who you stupid fuck? banks don't need this you morons, they can use normal blockchain technology just fine

Soft_member
Soft_member

@MPmaster
lmao this has to be FUD because that is the worst argument of all time

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

@Garbage Can Lid
something tells me you're not very intelligent.

PackManBrainlure
PackManBrainlure

@Garbage Can Lid
banks and corporations dont need smart contracts and a decentralized oracle
brainlet who is smarter than multibillion IT companies that totally said the opposite

WebTool
WebTool

@Garbage Can Lid
Heard of smart contracts you brainlet? Know how they work and why decentralized oracles are so important? No? Then take your weak FUD elsewhere

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

guys I think I found the best response for these trolls

next time you see someone FUDing LINK, just ask them what coin they hold. They will NEVER answer you

Illusionz
Illusionz

@VisualMaster
Kek yeah, they will probably only respond with BTC and ETH lmao.

Flameblow
Flameblow

@Emberburn
Do you even understand the concept of bags, you fucking dunce.

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

@Garbage Can Lid
Just so you know, SmartContracts were supposed to be ETH's lil baby.

Now the only way they work is through tokens, which makes us have all these shitty PnD's.

Link is moving it to the next level, ya fag.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page