Why does he trigger SJWs? They won't even admit he was a good writer

because we don't have actual culture. we have some kind of weird frankenstein recreation of other countries cultures

stop obsessing over people whose views you disagree with/dislike

you're fueling your own bitterness and unhappiness

bernie please leave

Kek. Thanks for that.

>Hemingway
>good

Pick one

Hemingway is "books girls will never understand" personified.

WRONG

you're correct, but you should also never post on this board again

you ruin Veeky Forums; go back to your containment bubble, please

>The world is a fine place and worth the fighting for and I hate very much to leave it.

One of the single best sentences in literature.

Fuck off cuck

Not him but kill yourself for being so triggered

SJWs are a motley crew infinitely divided by their identities. Any success outside of their sub-group of identity has the possibility of being met with hostility, even the successes of other SJWs. In fighting among female identities, gay identities, and even animal rights activists are prime examples.

Hemingway was not only a straight white old male, but he was flamboyantly masculine. Between his identity and his themes he draws the ire across the board of "oppressed" identities with his success. The vast minority of SJWs are opposed to him simply because he is a straight white male, it's precisely his success that evokes their hatred en masse.

In many ways he's the perfect target. An effigy of successful identities to be burned, of whom it was in vogue to hold the contrarian opinion that he was an overrated hack before the modern SJW movement even took off. SJW's run with this and retroactively assert it was almost exclusively his identity that made him successful. It's the ultimate form of hypocrisy, fighting against this nebulous concept of oppression by judging the man by the color of his skin and not the content of his character.

I don't know why. An emotionally abused (as a child), mentally ill, closeted gay man with a deviant hair fetish should be somebody they love. But they probably never even bothered to learn more about him and judge based on the cultural portrayal of him.

Where is there evidence that he was gay? All evidence I've ever seen could just as easily be him being insecure about his masculinity.

this. SJWs don't need a reason past him being a white man to hate him.

isn't /pol/ sick of getting wrecked in every argument on this board?

>Why does he trigger SJWs?

He was a white male writer, that's sufficient all on its own.

Who cares, American literature is trash.

For the 10,000th time Veeky Forums is the intellectual arm of /pol/ and shares the same alt-right political agenda.

>Veeky Forums is cucked by a political agenda
Can't wait until Trump saves all those shitty prole jobs nobody wants so you can work in a sweaty claustrophobic factory 12 hours a day instead of posting.

nonsense, Veeky Forums was always left.

Veeky Forums is too Christian to agree with /pol/.

this is completely false

do you project your own political opinions onto people you see as smarter than yourself in order to justify and validate them?

hmm

this.

But he really was a bad writer. People only read him because of his supposedly cool, manly persona.

>literally being a shill for the neoclassical finance-imperialism that turns half the planet into a sweatshop, so that you can spite mild nationalists who prefer autarky to the "borderless world" daydreams of corporatist croney capitalists

Man, the left has been on a wild fucking ride this past generation. How many different flavours of neoliberal cock have you tasted in the past year alone?

Do you get cognitive dissonance at all anymore, or are you just used to unreflectively disliking whoever MSNBC's owners tell you to dislike in Two Minutes Hate?

when you think something so simple, so convenient, and so at odds with the views of so many people you know to be so much smarter than you, maybe it's time to take a step back and ask: "might I be missing something?l

>waaaaah, manual labor :( :( :(

>not studying your opposition
>not challenging your own views
>not exposing yourself to ideas you disagree with

for this sort of thing to genuinely challenge your own views, I think you have to respect the people you're reading
the flipside, knowing thine enemy, is cool too, though

He's a fucking white male conservative who embraces masculinity. Why wouldn't they hate him? They fucking hate Shakespeare now for being too politically-incorrect. Nothing is beneath them.

>not understanding things
:^)
Manual labor is unpleasant and degrading. If you want to glorify it to justify your shitty job that makes you bitter, be my guest. Alternatively you're a NEET and should try it some time to see for yourself.

>Manual labor is unpleasant and degrading.

t. bourgeois cunt, whose upper-middle class is a holdover of middle-capitalism and will be progressively liquidated into precisely the slavery he finds unnecessary and degrading.

My father had a blue-collar job that gave him a stable career with upward mobility, a decent wage for decent manual work, and the peace of mind to raise a family. He used these things to sacrifice for me so that I could devote myself to academic/professional training at a great university, which he never had a hope in hell of acquiring.

My brother, who went into blue-collar work and who my dad trained to follow in his footsteps, is now fucked because my dad's awesome job got bought out by a conglomerate, eagerly pushed my dad's generation into retirement, and immediately outsourced the entire company to India. Now my brother works shit with no longevity and no security and is nervous about starting a family, despite having great training.

This isn't limited to blue collar workers. You are not part of the elite because you come from the top 15%. You are just as superfluous, and there is the same economic rationale for grinding you down into a securitiless wageslave.

The people whose dream it is to run the entire planet as a streamlined production-consumption loop, serviced by a universal prole class and solely benefiting their exclusive class of ultra-oligarchs, are as eager to replace you as they were to replace my dad. And the people getting those jobs are even worse off.

wow, your father and your brother sure would've had easier lives if they weren't in manual labor, huh?

which was, if you'll notice, the claim you're responding to; he said manual labor sucks, not 'manual laborers suck'

In any case, I hope things get better for you and your family

Yes I realize you and the other guy are trolling but I'm mostly writing for the benefit of people who actually believes the Clintonian Reaganomics lessons they get from the media.

Neoliberalism is malignant capitalism and finance-imperialism. It isn't normal by any means.

Absolutely fucking SAVAGE

...

pol refuges (migrants) say things like this in all caps and post laughing reaction gifs in totally inappropriate places--it's cringey as fuck, guys, you're your own laugh track

wowee, even after having the point explained to you, you still missed it

what even brought you guys to lit?

we have our own memes and our own cultural identity. assimilate or go back to where you came from

>conservative
w-what?

Because he was a successful white male.

Well, he wasn't a good writer. Not really. The hate for him isn't limited to "SJWs", not by a long shot.
Though if I had to answer your question, I'd say it was because he had many female contemporaries 10x more talented than he who have no recognition. He also represents traditional masculinity and that is the prevailing theme in his writing.

i'll use this as the name of my tumblr emo revival band, thanks

What the fuck is your definition of a good writer you pseud

>lit
>intellectual

Yeah but they were always 2intellectual4you marxists who thought that identity politics were a "distraction from legitimate class struggle." I normally can't stand leftists, but I get the impression that some of them still have a spine and blood in their veins, which makes them slightly tolerable.

Only a woman or an effeminate man could talk that intersectionality rubbish with a straight face.

Is "SJW" the new "commie?" Seems like whenever someone doesn't like something or someone they link it to that.

There's a difference between manual labour and being completely exploited by people that don't care about you and see you only as how much profit you can bring, yet at the same time you're easily replaced.

I have a garden and that involves manual labour. However, I reap all the benefits of my garden and can use the seeds and stuff again the next time. I am not being exploited and the means of production are seized. It is also hard work, but definitely worth it.

The people that try to one up each other over hard work are basically arguing over who is the better slave. Pretty sad!

I've never met an SJW who got triggered by Hemingway. Maybe because I don't live in the US and our liberals are not armchair activists who insist on being offended. It's an anglosphere thing to be triggered by all kinds of shit, even fiction.

Most people I know either dislike Hemingway because they perceive his style as "bland" and lifeless, or like him because it's minimalistic. I had a female prof. who's favorite American author was Hemingway. (actual) Feminist, liberal, 30ish woman, still adorned Hemingway because of his "sheer manliness", even though she couldn't quite get the theme of masculinity in his works sometimes. Think about that.

Your 2 cents were shit desu.

>implying sustenance farming isn't even worse than sweatshops
>implying industrialization isn't a necessary first step to socialism
>implying protectionism is anything except a band aid

>he said manual labor sucks, not 'manual laborers suck'
no don't you understand if you acknowledge that some jobs suck YOU'RE the one that hates workers

You sound spooked

This, hunter-gatherer revolution!