Um, guys?

youre an idiot because you failed to realize "spectrum" is part of this one already

Alarmist & doomsayers of the past aren't proof against global warming

They first called it 'global warming' because the average temperture goes up. But warming on a global scale will change wind currents causing some places to become colder than they're supposed to be. This is why scientists now changed to 'climate change'. The AVERAGE goes up causing a shift making some places freeze over where it's supposed to be sunny. Average != minimum.

...

...

I won. Trips check

great now i have a good image macro to deal with these idiots

...

Kek doesn't speak through repeating numerics outside of /pol/ plus you couldn't even crop it right. Spoken like a real loser.

We've advanced.
We used to burn witches for this shit.
Now we just tax the hell out of everything.

...

hAHA THIS

>what is a weak analogy

Oh wait, I forgot the planet was the titanic

FFFFFFUUUUUU ICEBERGS

>My predictions didn't match the observations but my hypothesis still stands.
How AGW changed Science™

We all know the Weather Network is part of the "global warming" conspiracy denialists.

NASA and the NOAA are in on it too.

The planet can't fail like the Titanic if there are no icebergs.

Predictions can be wrong, but the data still stands, which is the thing people are denying with the incorrect predictions.

NASA was about one fired hack away from ending this lunacy but Hansen played persecuted political victim.

Wasn't the data declared wrong too and needed readjustment?

Depends on what data you're talking about. CO2 levels ARE going up nearly 100% due to human activity and average temperture is going up as well.

m-m-mman made

The impact of CO2 is logarithmic even in a perfect greenhouse and human contribution to that is pathetic. In fact, it's trailed past temperature increases and the key argument this time is "but we are here now". Basically, a single datapoint.

well here's temperature

and here's arctic sea ice.

pol knows climate change is real.

and here's indoor air quality wich will apply to the outdoors in the future as well

>temperature has increased since the last ice age
>CO2 has increased
>We are here now
>We emit CO2
>Thus we created the temperature increase and such trajectories can only go one direction and can only be bad
Don't know why anyone would question this "logic".

>Mauna Loa
>Vulcan
>that emits CO2

>going there to calculate total average of the world
>mfw

OF COURSE user BECAUSE ICE CANNOT KEEP CARBON DIOX... oh wait nvm lolololo

under8ed post

It's just one of the many graphs but jeez:
youtube.com/watch?v=x1SgmFa0r04

see the burning spots? that's human activity.

inb4 BUT NASA....

Australia confirmed for no human activity. Been saying for years.

>My predictions
So Al Gore is a scientist now?

HUGE landmass, little activity.

>The impact of CO2 is logarithmic even in a perfect greenhouse
So? The impact has been a linear increase in global temperature due to the exponential increase in CO2 concentration since the industrial revolution and feedback effects.

>and human contribution to that is pathetic.
Humans are the only source of net CO2 increase. The rest of the planet absorbs more CO2 than it produces. So our contribution is not only significant, it's more than 100% of the net effect.

>In fact, it's trailed past temperature increases
Which ones exactly?

>and the key argument this time is "but we are here now"
Yes, who cares about humans, let's go back to the Cambrian #MakeAmericaBarrenAgain

You are a lying piece of shit.

They are actually a very large coal exporter. And despite the lip service China pays toward warmists, they love any theory that causes the west to switch from the cheapest energy source and kneecap themselves as China builds two coal plants a week. "Environmentalists" (as they call themselves) commit the bigotry of low expectations and give this a pass while demanding ever more from the West that already has way more regulations on actual pollution than China. But while Obama usually gets the blame for killing coal in the US, the real killer is Australia's cheaper production as coal is fungible.

From the comments of the video:

"Just in case you did not know it; this vid is pure fiction, generated in a computer model by an alarmist.
Here is real data from NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 in Dec 2014;
nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/mainco2mappia18934.jpg
And earlier (in 2008) from AIRS;
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA11194.jpg

You have to be joking; the computer model (the video) shows high concentrations of CO2 to be only in the northern hemisphere, over the industrial areas, and much lower CO2 concentrations in the southern hemisphere.

Both pictures (which are NOT models, but real satellite data) show the complete opposite; that CO2 concentrates mainly in the temperate zones, and has no relationship with industry at all.
This proves that CO2 comes mainly from nature, with little input from man, and the video is pure fabrication."

>Humans are the only source of net increase in CO2
>The incoming infrared radiation from CO2 is the largest factor in current observed warming
Purposefully ignoring these two facts and pretending global warming is about correlation rather than causation is pathetic. You are scum.

Mauna Loa measurements have volcano emissions subtracted out. Nice try moron.

>Hey guise it's not that cold on this specific day at this specific place
>THAT MEANS THAT GLOBAL TRENDS AREN'T HAPPENING
You have to be 18 years or older to post here.

>They are actually a very large coal exporter.
How is that relevant to what you're replying to?

>Volcano emissions substracted out
>how much
>comparing with the non-volcano areas
>then why not establishing there in the first place
>because you moron
>oh

>You have to be joking; the computer model (the video) shows high concentrations of CO2 to be only in the northern hemisphere, over the industrial areas, and much lower CO2 concentrations in the southern hemisphere.
HOW DO I READ DATA?

also the 'real data' linked shows the same picture's if you actually knew how to fucking read data.

>reads youtube comments
AUTISM CONFIRMED.

>"Just in case you did not know it; this vid is pure fiction, generated in a computer model by an alarmist.
Lie, it's the same data.

>nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/mainco2mappia18934.jpg
October to November. Now look at the video from October to November. Fucking moron.

>You have to be joking; the computer model (the video) shows high concentrations of CO2 to be only in the northern hemisphere, over the industrial areas, and much lower CO2 concentrations in the southern hemisphere.
Yeah, because it is for most of the year you utter moron.

>Both pictures (which are NOT models, but real satellite data)
The pictures are averages of the same data for only a few months. They don't conflict with the video.

How many times do you need to get BTFO before you leave and make another thread, coward?

Too stupid to use google?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauna_Loa_Observatory

web.archive.org/web/19980114152259/http://mloserv.mlo.hawaii.gov/publish/steve/VolcCO2.htm

>then why not establishing there in the first place
Because anywhere near vegetation and man will have several local sources of CO2 that are harder to measure. A tall volcano has only one source of local CO2 that is easy to measure, as it comes out of a giant hole.

Again, from the commetaries:

"Not sure if they have released new maps or not, but the maps totally contradict the message of CAGW, as a lot of other data does.
.
"The October/November distribution on that map strikingly contradicted the models in this video."
.
That is because the models in the video are complete tripe, designed to frighten the general public."

That's a one nice spectrum right there

>Because anywhere near vegetation and man will have several local sources of CO2 that are harder to measure.

>suddenly, no desserts

Yeah, except here it's supposed to be 90F and the average is about 70F, and this whole month has felt like summer...

Do these "commentaries" have any merit? You can't just keep repeating the same thing in the face of evidence that contradicts what you're repeating

CATAGORY 6! CATAGORY 6! CATAGORY 6!

with all these idiots around I'll actually live to see the day!

TURBO KATRINA IN NEW YORK! GET READY BITCHES

Are you blind? Look with your own eyes instead of relying on retarded YouTube comments. The video shows exactly what the image does in October - November and July. These are just cherrypicked months that ignore the annual averages.

>Deserts
>below the inversion layer and in the middle of continents
so not only are you too lazy to google, you are also too lazy to read what I googled for you.

Ironic schizoposting is still schizoposting

In Europe it was snowing the past days.

I actually see joy in destruction when I'm not effect personally and I couldn't do anything about it either. It's the perfect storm for amazement.

This is a fake quote.
This is how you know this is /pol/.