I thought scientists were supposed to be intelligent? but what i see them doing is pretty dumb
>edit DNA cell >wait for something to happen >oh look something is growing >we dont know whats growing but its a new life form
is this really what they do? they dont even know what the fuck they are giving life to they dont actually have a Plan A or a Plan B its literally throwing shit at the wall and (HOPE) something happens.
Jaxson Thomas
What makes you think they're just throwing shit at the wall? Why don't you become a scientist then since you're so, "smart".
David Walker
Read the article you dumb nigger the scientists responsible were asked questions what the outcome would be and they did not know
>IT could be a disease >or it could be a cure to a disease etc
they just answered with hypothetical nonsense clearly they dont know what the fuck they are doing and they clearly dont have an objective
>Lets just see what happens
dumb ass scientists
Jason Jenkins
The point of the experience was not to create a particular life form, just to test the method of creating life.
Robert Gray
this, OP is a brainlet
Leo Harris
Did they create a living organism out of inanimate matter, or did they just modify an existing organism?
Levi Gonzalez
>this is the level of intelligence of your average trump-cuck
Back to Thanks!
Robert Sanchez
Not sure if bait.
Liam Long
That's how a lot of science works.
Justin White
>if you do experiments and tests instead of knowing everything you're dumb The sad part is that brainlets actually think this just because they've never had to make discoveries and are just reading other people's as if it took no effort at all.
Blake Bell
>not understanding the concept of exploratory research Go back to mopping floors and let the big boys do the science.
Colton Rodriguez
>dna cell
Back to high school
Christopher Green
But that's literally what scientific experimentation is. You change one factor, holding all other factors constant, then you observe the response, constructing theoretical and often mathematical models from the outputs as they relate to the inputs.
They just knew that there would be a response, and went on to try and discern the relationship. It's not like the specific Maxwell equations were predicted before the experiments. Before the experiment, you expect a response of the output, but you don't know what exactly. After the experiments, you hopefully have a better grasp of the output as it relates to what you're changing.
Dominic Brooks
Science is all about studying what happens. Engineering is about actually using the results to create something.
Noah Parker
>in the end engineers alwais take the blame
Nathan Gutierrez
What could go wrong?
Owen Myers
exactly how is this dumb? in the worst case scenario of it being a super contagious deadly disease it's still safely contained in a lab
Ryder Hughes
can you send them to reddit instead we don't want them either the shitposting is rather unsavory
Easton Green
I think what he is saying is that scientists (or rather people who champion scientism, but who know nothing) like to make out that science knows everything, that it concurs all and that it always has the answers even if you don't. This simply isn't true and anyone who knows how scientists actually think, know that this isn't true.
Dylan Moore
ladies make new forms of life in their pussies every night. it's DNA is unique (probably) so its a new life form
Jack Kelly
t. dumbshit science-hating /pol/cucks
you know what else was the result of a wild experiment ("throwing shit at the wall") with an unknown result?
this thing called a transistor. it turned out to be a little bit useful. maybe you've even heard of it.
neck yourself piggot (that's a portmanteau of "pig" and "faggot" -- it means pig-faggot)
Aiden Young
All of science is only possible because of trial and error