Prove it wrong.
Prove it wrong
[eqn]\forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \frac{\mathrm d \vec{p}}{\mathrm dt} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,+\, \vec{F}_{B \,\to\, A} \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,-\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,=\, \vec{0} \quad\text{then}\quad \forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \vec{p} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{p} \left( 0 \right) \,=\, \vec{0}[/eqn]
Back to 9GAG.
[math][eqn]\forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \frac{\mathrm d \vec{p}}{\mathrm dt} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,+\, \vec{F}_{B \,\to\, A} \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,-\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,=\, \vec{0} \quad\text{then}\quad \forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \vec{p} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{p} \left( 0 \right) \,=\, \vec{0}[/eqn][/math]
[math]\forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \frac{\mathrm d \vec{p}}{\mathrm dt} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,+\, \vec{F}_{B \,\to\, A} \,=\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,-\, \vec{F}_{A \,\to\, B} \,=\, \vec{0} \quad\text{then}\quad \forall t \,\in\, \mathbf R,\, \vec{p} \left( t \right) \,=\, \vec{p} \left( 0 \right) \,=\, \vec{0}[/math]
For the record, I'm not the first poster, these latter two have been me just messing around trying to get this to display right
Test #2
Oh, nvm I was on mobile that's why it was ugly, lesson learned
hehe what an epic meme image!
looks alright
...
>momentem
i rest my case
except the SUPER MAGNET HELMET would attract the metal clips towards you, since you weigh more
How does it feel being an autist?
But steel is heavier than meat?
I do miss the classic Troll Science stuff.
>mfw
explain. Why isn't this something worrisome to mathematicans
Basically you define length by using the derivative of a curve so those steps don't actually converge to the circumference of the circle.
Because that's not how you define a circle.
>a round plane figure whose boundary (the circumference) consists of points equidistant from a fixed point (the center)
The corners will always exist in the picture at different distances than the inner corners.
Because the area approaches pi*(.5)^2, but the perimeter does not because it's all "scrunched up".
The function "remove corners" must satisfy that the perimeter before = the perimeter after removing corners
>infinity
>steel is heavier than meat
Not my meat
My favorite
hilarious that this would theoretically work, if we lived on a spinning ball and not a stationary plane like every experiment has proven, that is