Jacob Lurie

Dmitry is an idiot. The guy he replies to knows what's up:

Mariam Mirzahani everything. This is her punishment for Grothendikovo, because she pressed the prize from St. Jacob Lurie.
In general, if you look at who the last 2 Fields were handed to, you can fall into the deepest depression and despondency, it's just what nasty idiots in a fucking committee sit. It's the same with Abel.

This second-cultural trend can very soon turn into a great catastrophe. We need to do something about this. To revoke all second-calenders, for example. Let's start with Rodion

Then Dmitry the moron says: "Everything is better than Lurie. Mirzahani is a genius without fools at all."

Dmitry is clearly jealous as fuck. The rest of teh post from which this excerpt is taken:
"A man does not just not understand how terrible everything that he does - it seems, he does not in principle understand that mathematics is not horrible. He is never wrong. It's not a mistake that he does not do anything. The robot is stupid - with inhuman computational force, and with perseverance, like a real graphomaniac.

However, I am unfair: when he is engaged in his direct work, i.e. Topology, everything is very nice (although still predictable and inherently trivial). At least you can see that he likes it.

And the situation with the general justification of the equipped categories, etc., is completely understandable. Type, it happens that people for many years trying to do well, then despair, and do anyhow like. And here is not the case: here some people despaired (Deligne, etc., etc.), then completely different people came and did somehow. Because in principle they do not know what is good. "

What a fag. this Dmitry.

But unlike you, he knows what he's talking about

You think the people who gave Lurie the Breakthrough Prize are also incompetent?

Can someone explain to me why this is important?

It isn't.
No one will read that stuff.

That's a bit hard to answer for a few reasons, his work is really abstract so it's difficult to explain, much of what he's doing is building up theory that's providing deep insights in algebraic geometry and algebraic topology however only time will tell how successful or useful this program is (unlike scholze's perfectoid spaces which have been immediately useful), and due to the nature of pure math many of the concrete results he has claimed have yet to be confirmed. This is not uncommon in mathematics, grothendiek for example wasn't awarded the fields medal for arguably his greatest work in algebraic geometry, that's just of pure math is. I would however not focus on just lurie's work, there's a lot of other approaches to AG that have already yielded extremely interesting results.
arxiv.org/pdf/0909.0069.pdf

This. No one's ever going to read a 2000+ document full of dense proofs. Only an AI could make sense of it.

Pure mathematics is funny, if you think about it for a second.

You mean like when he jerks his own dick off? I wouldn't call that "god's thoughts" though!

The proof itself is mathematics at work in a way. Just meaningless permutations of the same nonsense over and over. Think of it as group theory applied in practice.

...