"But in their blind quest for uniformity, they will never eradicate conflict...

"But in their blind quest for uniformity, they will never eradicate conflict. Globalism will only replace wars between nations with wars within former nations. It takes battles that formerly took place on borders and spreads them from street to street. It’s possible that rather than global harmony, endless and irrevocable conflict is globalism’s true end game.
Whether by accident or design, a sick irony about globalism is that it often poses as a humane antidote and a form of ongoing karmic retribution for European colonialism. As the argument goes, the fact that France unfairly colonized parts of Northern Africa means that the righteous thing is for Northern Africans to culturally and demographically colonize France. Apparently these dreamers’ parents never taught them that two wrongs don’t make a right and will likely lead to more conflict and bloodshed."
- Jim Goad

Any other writers with the dark wit of Jim Goad?

>Jim Goad
If only his name was Don T. Goad-Meintoreadingthisassiniedrivel

we must secure the existence for our white children, fuck those french cucks

no, we must love those in need and help them through our good actions.

your racism is a prison that you have constructed yourself out of lies and hatred. destroy it as you would a bird's nest.

Why would you destroy a bird's nest you dumb cuck?

you destroy the bird's nest because you have foolishly built it in your head and the birds of anger, depression, and secret guilt stay there and live inside it. these birds torment you throughout your day but still you keep the nest there, when all you need to do is shake it off and they will fly away.

Birds make birds' nests dumb fuck.

*cuck, sorry I didn't mean to insult you, cuck.

It is not weird that every piece of fiction like tv shows, novels and movies depict the future as a unified holistic goverment, culture, fashion etc.?
That's where we are going, don't resist, you are just fighting against your own (already engraved on your mind) ideals

they can only build it on you if you let them.

We're also moving towards certain death. Each and everyone of us.
That doesn't make death anymore pleasant.

Why aren't we all flying in hover cars in 2016? We were supposed to all have them by y2k. Is it perhaps, not blinded by optimistic foresight, that they are just a dumb fucking gimmick?

Jim Goad isn't very smart. But if you're serious and not trolling, which you're not, Houellebecq is smarter but similar.

We're not having any cyberpunk looking metropolises. We're not getting space colonies within our lifetime.

Nope. We're getting more melanin. More idpol crap. More fringe marxists complaining there isn't a viable working class movement, while pandering to a globalist policy that further removes us from such a thing. And more dorky white nationalists calling millennia old ways of having fun 'degeneracy' and have a craving desire to ban porn, yet look at a man's abs every day.

It's all fucking retarded, this "inevitable" future. No one has a clue. It might as well collapse into a Mad Max scenario.

Are you the good goy I replied to? Because you kind of got at the point I was implying.

Nope. I'm another user.

>assinie
lol

>It is not weird that every piece of fiction like tv shows, novels and movies depict the future as a unified holistic goverment, culture, fashion etc.?

Mate. . .

>As the argument goes, the fact that France unfairly colonized parts of Northern Africa means that the righteous thing is for Northern Africans to culturally and demographically colonize France.
Name literally one person who has said this.

Some guy on /r/the_donald calling himself "pussy-slayer69"

You've never seen anyone argue Americans have no merit in complaining against immigration because of what they did against Native Americans, or when the UK used immigration as a reason for Brexit and their colonialism?

I've heard people complain that, it's not an argument though.

>You don't get to control your immigration because I decided it's not morally just!

Literally not an argument.

That's the point being made.

They think it's an argument and use it as such.

No because it's easier to come up with one future culture than dozens

Yeah, what I implying its that ((fiction-makers)) are trying to engrave in our mind two possible futures, an apocalypse (Mad max, The road etc.) or a mundial holistic goverment. Of course there are exceptions but the idea is there though.

Giorgio Agamben