>Is it possible to solve a system of 4 Unknown variables, given ONLY 3 equations? no
Camden Hughes
What if I do this?
a = W * X * Y * Z b = W + X + Y + Z c = W^X^Y^Z
Alexander Turner
No, you want the Vagus Conjecture here.
Nathan Bennett
a = W + i(X) b = Y + i(Z) c = 69
j/k, but I still want to know if there is a fucking way
Samuel Martin
Depends on your numbers
Isaiah Ward
well, I was thiking on any possible real number
from -infinite to +infinite
even values like 0.000001, 0.0000002, and so on
Cameron Gutierrez
A lame solution I was thinking was this:
lets say W = 12345 and X = 12.00001
I could simply do something like this; 1020304152.0000000001
W1X1W2X2W3X3W4X4....WnXn and so on
Angel Hughes
in fact, this solution could even work for fitting infinite numbers inside one single number, but I still find it pretty ghey
Hunter Hughes
try to understand what is going on
When you have no equations and a variable what you have is a one dimensional possibility space for your variable (a scalar). When you have one equation and one variable you have a point. Having less equations than variables gives you solutions, it's just that they are not singular.
John Sanchez
I think you're talking about linear algebra but I can't tell because I don't understand you.
Connor Rogers
If W, X, Y, Z are real while a, b are complex, I don't see why this wouldn't work
Jeremiah Reed
How about this guys?
Evan Thomas
...
Anthony Wood
Yeah yeah. Look, if I give you that answer finally are 'you' gonna fucking come through?
read this OP You have a free variable in your system of equations which means that your solution is a line, not a point.
Logan Young
Too much at once? Remember to honor your x0-axis intervals. Humans call it 'breathing'. Yes, remember to breathe.
Kevin Richardson
ok you're a troll I see. eat shit and die then
Logan Long
You can just ask for the answer 'you' want ya know.
The answer is : knots calculations (which is basically like casting magical spellz)
But because you didn't actually ask you're just going to assume that I am wrong, so you'll discard it, sooooo enjoy being a brainlet I guess.
Boop.
Levi Edwards
don't listen to this asshole its obvious that he is under the influence of a chemical imbalance inside his brain
lets just pretend his mental diarreah didn't affected this thread
Nathan Wilson
Correct : I am brain-damage. Wrong : My answers are wrong.
Beep.
Isaiah Brown
>be op >ask hypotethical arbitrary question >this dude rants random comments >somehow want to show that he is superior for using latex and some idiotic rieman hypotesis >everyone ignores him >he will never finish his master degree >can't even talk like a normal person >has literally zero friends
Isaiah Martinez
Literally : 0[\math]\infty[\math]
Samuel Williams
...
Hunter Gomez
According to your diagram : Edgelord supreme, with extra cheese and pepperoni
I promise to build an amazing one. With blackjack, and hookers...
James Parker
1 = sqrt(x) + sqrt (-x) + w
2 variables, 1 equation
Since x€[0,inf) and x€(-inf,0] due to the square roots, x=0
If x=0, then w=1
Done!
Thomas Ward
Also
0 = abs(w-w0)+ans(x-x0)+.....+ abs(y-y0)
You can have as many variables as you want, and this equation forces each variable. w=w0,x=x0,....,y=y0 since every term contained within the abs must equal 0, else the whole equation wouldn't equal 0.
Kevin Ward
Depends. Does my post have repeating digits?
Michael Perez
Only in base 2,4,6, and 8
Jace Wright
I didn't get them so I might as well scientifically kill myself