I'm looking to learn the arguments for and against immigration and nationalism.
Recommend me some books thanks.
I'm looking to learn the arguments for and against immigration and nationalism.
Recommend me some books thanks.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
openaccess.leidenuniv.nl
youtube.com
twitter.com
you'll find them next to the arguments for and against public transport and post-left individualism
>nationalism
Advanced tribalism, you retarded nigger.
stfu jon
*smokes cig*
dude NATIONS?? lmao
fuckh8 brah
*crowd claps wildly*
pretty much
he's not exactly wrong though
Clash of Civilizations by Huntington
tribe deniers are a week breed, you can't escape the game by pretending it's not there.
Dutch historian and philosopher of law Thierry Baudet won two seats in parliament this election. He wrote a great book in defense of the nation state
the only people who hate nationalism are cucks
disagree with me and I will not hesitate to designate you a cuck
These are two very distinct topics, despite the current overlap; they may appear to be joined at the hip, heart, and head right now, but you're best off picking one or the other to focus on so that you get actually decent responses.
nationalism is all these things i dont like *tips dart*
I voted for him desu
I disagree
>if i didnt do a thing then i cant care about it HAHA FUCK WHITE PEOPLE
Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee Brown
As if people today are the same that killed Indians.
Let their people come by Lant Pritchett
It is 160 pages and is available for free as a PDF from the center for global development.
I love it when pro-immigration advocates use images like this. The decline of the American Indian population due to European expansion is a perfect example illustrating the dangers of alien cultures living in close proximity.
That's right. You start a global tribe.
Max Stirner, The Ego and its own
As if the land they lived is not, and their children own it more than indians
But you are evading the fact that european culture is the most historically invasive, and also promoting a false sense of ownership over the land
It was clearly the punchline to a joke that was cut out or at least part of a previous one.
definitely /ourguy/
With that being stated, nationalism is essential, yet it can have very dire consequences (see: Arendt, or history on the international protection of minorities)
>false
by which standards? If the Indians didn't believe in private property was there any property that was stolen in the first place?
Land is not divinily given, it needs to be owned and protected if you do not want other tribes to seize it. This is basic human nature (inb4 oy vey that's just a constructivist argument by which you merely perpetuate the institutions you were born into)
difference between caring about something and have "pride" in it.
Nationalist are the same people who say "WE WON" when describing their favorite sports team. even thought they didn't do shit. if you're a nationalist you're using people or being used yourself.
pride goeth before the fall.
Indians believed in private property, how can you trade with some whom doesn't believe in private property? and yeah manifest destiny where Americans believed they were doing god work by going west and the U.S government would routinely fuck over treaties with tribes.
A nation is nothing to the individual
Unless you're spooked