Stack thread

Last one died. Post your stacks and recent acquisitions. I'll begin.

The sum of their parts somehow looks way worse...

>B&N
yikes

...

Are the Bulgakoff and Dostoevsky both P&V?

>le same 30-odd meme books

Brothers K yes.
m&m is glenny

Why would someone make leatherbound editions of Dan Brown and Star Wars novelizations? Is this a joke?

>no culture of critique

Go away, Kevin.

Why Glenny over P&V?

...

...

>spending $100s of dollars on expensive editions of books that have clearly never been read

so this is the power of dilettantism

be kind, Veeky Forums

>posting this pic in every one of these threads
kys

>one hundreds dollars of dollars
Also how do you tell if a hardback has been read unless it has been read 50+ times? The spinal fold is interior not exterior.

Confirmed for stylelet

>genre fiction
>Bertrand cuckel

That Ibsen collection is brilliant.

>(((finkelstein)))

>Star Wars: leatherbound edition

All good apart from Russell

Am I pleb if I like penguin clothback books?

Isso não é uma pilha, meu negro, é só um livro.

because P&V is shit

Nice.

Stop this meme you fucking idiots and go suck off Garnett

...

Avsey or McDuff are superior choices honestly

yes, cause they have stiff, brittle spines, the paper is too thick and stiff, and the printed cloth cover is generally low quality. although the cover design is usually pretty good

Not going to lie, the B&N editions of The Arabian Nights and Le Morte d'Arthur look pretty dank.

P&V is for reddit.

back you go

but it's a recent acquisition

...

Genre fiction? Are you a fucking mong?

garnett is unironically better than p&v

is that a swiss pack of ciggies?