Which is the more patrician choice in sadomasochist literature?
Which is the more patrician choice in sadomasochist literature?
Bump
right for sure
left is just absurdly gross and gory
Venus in Furs was fantastic, though I'm not sure if I would enjoy a second read. Sade is horseshit.
Masochism is for patricians, sadism is for dumb brutes.
the real patrician choice is of course being completely vanilla and making love in the missionary position mostly for the sake of procreation.
Reading fifty shades is the purest masochism.
They're both irredeemable shit
just like all fetish material
>Musil's first book
>about explicit homosexual sadism in an Austrian boarding school as well as philosophical skepticism and Kant and maths
what did he mean by this
Most patrician choice is The Story of the Eye
why do intellectuals cram homosex at boarding school?
hey, I'm not complaining.
i vote for this too, i didn't care so much for the ending though
>Törleß was about homosex
Shit nigger, way to miss the point
I didn't say it WAS about homosexual you faggot
Venus in furs was hot. I want a bouncy little jungle bunny to tease me, sexually
It is weird though.
>more frank, explicit homosex than Oscar Wilde or anyone else at the time
>footnote to the rest of the book's content and the author's personal life
Bump
Moravagine is better than both.
Why
The Circe episode of Ulysses was heavily inspired by Venus in Furs. Joyce made Nora read it.
Ordnung und Idealismus
>mostly
Disgusting swine
What a bastard
>it was all a joke guys :^)
totally agree