2 pages in

The highest patrician fetish is being an unironic violent rapist. Dragging a woman into your car and taking her home to have your way with her over and over in every way culminating in a glorious climax of murder then going back for round 2 is the most raw, complete and aristocratic sexual experience.

It is the total unrestricted id, exorcised of any bourgeois slavish sensibilities.

Can't be cucked if nobody will ever love you.

Now that's a feel I know.

don't cut yourself kiddo

I think you'll be more at home on this other board

pleb

trips confirm

>spend a couple months devoting your whole life to stalking, capturing and containing struggling women
>all so for a few brief minutes a day you can fuck them
sounds pleb as fuck. also
>exorcised of any bourgeois slavish sensibilities.
absolutely wrong. sex is bourgeois as fuck, just another consumerist product designed to waste your time and capital. and it looks like you fallen for it hook line and sinker.

>all so for a few brief minutes a day when you can fuck them
>brief minutes
heh this guy

lmao have you never had sex before? the only reason you would need longer than that is if you're holding back to try to impress the lady or she's loose/ugly af.

believe me, I get laid a lot and I only need a few brief minutes.

>the only reason you would need longer than that is if you're holding back to try to impress the lady or she's loose/ugly af.
Or because it's fun and not a mad dash to orgasm.

it's actually quite boring to me. I see it as similar to taking a shit. Something one has to do and might as well be as efficient as possible.

I trust you'll feel the same once you save up enough for a prostitute or someone takes pity on you.

so, this is what liberals and jews actually believe. you people disgust me.

there is no such thing as rape.

>Something one has to do

You're not gonna believe this user...

Imagine being cucked before the invention of paternity testing. That must really fuck with a guy's head

>read this guy once
>become frightened of women for life

Not sure if autism, or insightful ironic commentary on an oversexed but totally sexless culture.

Amazing, when we thought this thread could not get any edgier user comes along and tops it in just seven words.

Bravo

>Aladdin was a gook
wat?

The patrician fetish is vocaloid gril in french maid outfit

reminder that men always take women's lust seriously

You can watch Y&R to see that women love anything revolving around sex and fucked up stories involving sex while never ever seeing they are whores.

>This is what the guy looks like
FUCK.

Yo, Veeky Forums, any book recs on how to be a cult leader?

actually it isn't the primal seual desire itself that they are trying to restrain.
indeed they still orgasm, jacking off thinking about their cuckold expierences.

the true meaning behind "cuckoldry" and open marriages is like the Bene Gesseriet mother from Dune, when she had the gom jabbar.
If a man were to truly love he would assume that the highest form of love would go beyond the physical body, and in this case completely in the realm of emotion. but theres other spiritual dimensions love can exist on as well.
So while a heteronormative couple would consider adultury a grave sin against their marraige and threaten its stabililty.
The patrician knows that if there really is love there then it should be stonger than sexual desire.

So love does encompass sexual desire but it isn't the be all end all, nor is it a critical aspect of it. It still plays its part.

What some ameteur cuckold's don't realize is that they are still thinking in traditional means, in that they treat the relationship as a power dynamic; this for that, submissive, dominant etc...
What these people don't understand is that true love is the absence of this power dynamic.
Furthermore what other people don't understand about love is that it cannot be viewed from the outside, it can only be witnessed from within.
So while there is an objective form of love, the objects and criteria all reside in subjective experience.

>love is real

Men evolved jealousy as a mechanism to ensure the survival of their genes. Paternity is always questionable, and a man understandably doesn't want to spend his time and resources propagating genes that aren't his. It's that simple.

Arabs are a weird people.

i feel sorry for you user
i really do
i get that but a man is much more than just his genes. back when the whole orgasming is pleasurable was really a sneaky trick from nature to get us to fuck alot and make a lot of babies.
but now there is higher level awareness and cognition, there is willpower to stop those egoistic behaviors that seem to be like bad habits. there is contraceptives as well.
Paternity and legacy are still important.

if I were to really engage in the cuckold fethis my wife could only have sex with tiny penises, so that she will be unsatisfied with them and crave mine even more.
The whole thing that doesn't sit well with me and polyamourous lifestyle is that I can't really handle the fact that to a polyamourous person love and sex are two different things. And that sex is a desire that should be satiated.

I don't really like the fact that a person cannot be a complete package for another and that if I really can't satisfy my woman then there isn't really a point in being with her. instead of letting her have sex with someone else.

bumpu

>I'm surprised he didn't just go NEET and spend all his time in his room playing board games and wanking to imported erotic Japanese prints
Didn't he fucked his wife's loli sister?

The prophet Mohammed was a chinaman

is this bait?

No. It's for porn addicts who have gone so far down the rabbit hole of constant virtuality that they can no longer fathom the thought of being an actor instead of a spectator.

The correlation between the rising popularity of the cuckolding fetish and the accessibility, frequency of use and normalization of pornography is only going to seem like a coincidence to idiots. If your primary sexual outlet is watching another man fuck a woman, you're going to end up being into that.

Cuckold fetishists are Pavlov's dogs, except they have less dignity.

Probably both. The two are not mutually exclusive, and they actually fit pretty well together.

That's really just the tip of the iceberg.

so if I'm reading this thread correctly, does one need to be a cuckold in order to be sexually patrician?

Yes at the very least.

>What am I in for lads?
The Burton translation, if picrelated. He questioned whether he should release some of the notes on sex practices but I think the only lost ones his wife burnt. It's fucking excellent.

This whole thread is bait user