Why are so many people on this board anti-Semitic?

Why are so many people on this board anti-Semitic?

Is it because Jewish writers are genetically (perhaps spiritually) superior to their "white" counterparts?

/pol/ leak

Wh-what are you doing, brother? We can't let the goy- I mean gentiles know about our total contr- I mean presence in the media. (sh-shut it down)

Kill yourself.

Whatever do you mean?

>companies that are based in New York employ many Jews

woah who would've guessed

...

R-right you are, brother. Who are these dumb goy- I mean antisemites to dare question our brainwash- I mean heroic journalism.

Are Jews even consider especially "spiritual"?

We're not anti-Semitic. We've just read our Weiniger.

...

S-stop that!

>genetically superior
If you are a /pol/ type who believes in the Bell Curve and adoption studies, than yes, ashkenazis have tip top IQs, no doubt due to 2000 years of inbreeding and working in fields like finance and investing.
>spiritually superior
modern judaism is spiritually bankrupt unless you are a 20 year old kid that just liberated jerusalem

>Veeky Forums - literature

>that Lovecraft quote
Besides the use of "aryan" (which seems completely literal), his point is not wildly crazy. Cultural gatekeeping is a real thing and ironically he is making a argument for natural cultural diversity.

Why is /pol/ so hell bound on proving that Jews are superior? Don't they want to save the white race? If so, then what's the point saving people who are so inferior?

I mean, /pol/ has always been feeding grounds of old style Veeky Forums trolls, but today's /pol/ can't even handle the bait from the media sensationalists.

>Why are so many people on this board anti-Semitic?

The problem is with the category "anti-Semitic," which has been fine-tuned in recent decades so as to register the faintest fluctuations of dislike or mere objective observation of Jewish behavior with all the sensitivity of a princess detecting a pea beneath twenty mattresses.

Contrariwise, Jews are absolutely free to criticize any and all aspects of gentile/Christian/Catholic behavior.

Thus there is a double standard.

Jewish hypersensitivity on the one hand, and a media and cultural enforced taboo on even reasonable criticisms/observations about Jewish behavior.

That said, the system that's been in place since the 1960s - since the canonization of the holocaust - is beginning to collapse, as all such programmatic taboos eventually collapse, as a new generation grows up that doesn't give a shit about the pieties and taboos of the preceding generation.

kill yourself

Superior in what way? Being foreign nepotists in a time when the West has lapsed into degeneracy? /pol/ actually has non-whites, by the way, from what I've seen. There is even *some* common ground between muh far-right and Zionists, in that both are more in the nationalistic direction.

>Being foreign nepotists in a time when the West has lapsed into degeneracy?
How is that not impressive? Everyone else could've done it and whitey had the numerical advantage. And all got cucked by a complete minority. Besides, doesn't /pol/ blame them for lapsing ze West into degeneracy?

>There is even *some* common ground between muh far-right and Zionists, in that both are more in the nationalistic direction.
Sure, just Zionism - Judaism and being ethically Juice are all three different barely related things.

>Being foreign nepotists in a time when the West has lapsed into degeneracy?
How is that not impressive? Everyone else could've done it and whitey had the numerical advantage. And all got cucked by a complete minority. Besides, doesn't /pol/ blame them for lapsing ze West into degeneracy?

Sure, other groups could have hypothetically done it. Jews, as a Middle-Eastern nation unto themselves, have a strong in-group preference based around some degree of religious orthodoxy. It can be seen with Muslims, too. Jews are more well-known for their cultural emphasis on education, though.

I don't know what everyone who frequents /pol/ thinks, but I consider the revolutionary movements since the 18th C to be behind the degeneracy. Jews are an outside group that has happened to most tap into that and manipulate it for their own advantage.

Standing around in awe of your own subjugation isn't going to achieve anything, though. Read the Decline of the West and maybe The Culture of Critique if you really want to read more.

>Juice
Oranges?

jews are better than you in everything

t. jewish footstool

>Juice
It's even funnier when you hear a beaner say "I don' like dee chooss"

>around some degree of religious orthodoxy
Which is still the case for whites in US of A too. (Also most people on the juice list tend not to be believers either way) Or some shithole like Russia. Muslims failed too, despite access to resources, and massive fucking numbers. There are no excuses for other ethnicities to get cucked by a small minority outside of massive inferiority.

>Standing around in awe of your own subjugation isn't going to achieve anything, though.
Neither is standing up against evidently superior people. Hoping that they succeed in cleaning the earth from inferior ethnicities is the only ethical choice.

>Which is still the case for whites in US of A too. (Also most people on the juice list tend not to be believers either way) Or some shithole like Russia. Muslims failed too, despite access to resources, and massive fucking numbers. There are no excuses for other ethnicities to get cucked by a small minority outside of massive inferiority.
Whites is not a religion. "Juice" don't have to be practising their religion, it is broadly cultural. You appear to have completely ignored the part about education. In the US Jews like to keep elite schools to themselves and give stooge jobs to other minorities via affirmative action. Once they bought the casino they made the odds rigged for their benefit. The stupidity, naivete, call it what you will of the non-Jews (white, black, whatever) is thinking that the Jews would play fair in their "progressive" wonderland.

>Neither is standing up against evidently superior people. Hoping that they succeed in cleaning the earth from inferior ethnicities is the only ethical choice.
Hitler and Stalin agreed.

>Whites is not a religion.
So? Most Jews aren't religious either.

>it is broadly cultural
So not the ethnicity is superior by their culture, well why not.

> keep elite schools to themselves
Nothing stops whites from doing it themselves, and they have higher numbers too. If you have 250m+ million of people, and can't find enough who are as capable as few millions Jews, you're doing something very, very wrong and the other side something very, very right.

>Once they bought the casino they made the odds rigged for their benefit.
Every other ethnicity, especially Whites had ridiculous amounts of opportunities to do it.

>Hitler and Stalin agreed.
And both fucked over their countries over it while the Juice survived and got even more powerful. Further evidence that subhumans shouldn't attempt to stand up against Jews.

If you believe any of this then you're an idiot. You should go back to /pol/ and do your anti-/pol/ shilling there. Leave discussions to grownups.

why is this thread still here

mods one day somebody will have had enough and will start spamming cp in threads like these just so you would fucking do something

ITT a bunch of subhuman goys rattling their chains.

You guys are worst than niggers.

Either the meme images are correct or not. If they are, it's a solid indicator that the Juice are superior. If they aren't, the posters either have to be Jews or idiots. There is nothing to believe.

If anything, I am questioning the contradicting viewpoints expressed by people, who post the memes, but that seems too complicated to follow for self proclaimed grownups. Is your deficient reasoning skills the result of Jews infiltrating academia too?

A stream of deliberately boring nonsense designed to deflect attention away from:

First excuse me for the poor quality of my writing here, but I have to get this off my chest.
So I've never read any of these famed magazines and yesterday I said I'll give it a shot.

I read a few of the current New Yorker and the Paris Review pieces. Before I opened the New Yorker I said to myself that the majority of published stories will surely be by females. As I went through the names, surely that proved to be the case. As I started reading my second premonition turned out to be true as well. I expected this to be some sort of mildly cynical, detached, holier-than-thou expositions of supposed intellectual superiority and sure enough that also proved to be the case. After reading a long exposition on modern marriages , the tone and content clearly suggesting everybody knows marriage is a dead concept and how it's oh so obvious to be emotionally detached from it I finally gave up because every cliche I thought might be in it, not only ended up being in it but was so pronounced that it produced visceral disgust in me. I can only imagine the type of unsufferable audience these magazines have. Probably a clique of spoiled wannabe intellectuals who have never done anything in their life, who virtue-signal by donating to charity but would never want to see any of people they're donating to within 10 feet of themselves. Shit, Nassim Taleb was right about everything, I didn't realize it was this bad.

>worst than
hang yourself, illiterate mongrel.