Tfw I like fascism

...

>this qualifies as """a witty retort""" for a rightist
L M A O

Yes:

The Mass Psychology of Fascism, by Wilhelm Reich

...

...

Seconded

>(((Reich)))
>"""psychoanalysis"""

Giovanni Gentile was the "philosopher of fascism". Read his works.

I love the stupidity of /pol/ in how a republican (more socially hard with authority) goes to libertarian (more socially soft with authority) to then Fascist just cause their propaganda says so.

>muh pole
grow up, commie

>everybody who disagrees with me is a communist

On Veeky Forums usually, yes.

well that's because a lot of the board goes down that route
not because that's inherently the case, it's just a pattern on the board

you're probably the same /pol/tard of the other thread. idk if you're trying to hide the fact that people recognize you or you're just shitposting. either way /pol/ gets hated for not minding it's own business outside of my board.

>there is only one other thread on Veeky Forums
>my board
Kek

no. gtfo /pol/

It's more "generic conservative" than anything hard - "i like the way things are atm" etc

...

k

>this from the guy who thinks everyone he doesn't like is a communist

>everyone on Veeky Forums is the same person

Stage 5: Anarcho-primitivism

Are you saying that you don't visit and/or generally agree with /pol/?

Go back to nature yourself, Rousseau.

>bugs...
>I don't know
>my diary desu
>I like anime
>tfw I like [insert ideology]
Veeky Forums has the worst memes

Sudoku for dummies

>fascism
>books
pick one my man

ride the tiger

there's a bluepill edition of this /r/ing

>(((Reich)))

Evola, establishing a dichotomy between two worlds (Traditional v Modern) is the ultimate stepping stone to third eye fascist awakening

youtube.com/watch?v=4YqKf3v2aPs

But I only browse Veeky Forums, I find /pol/ hilarious at times, and I think Xavier Renegade Angel is superior to rick and morty

and yet
I am still a Liftist

Pol doesn't have any ideology. It's just about shocking the normies and holding the most contrarian opinions about everything. Right now normies think there is nothing more evil than being a fascist so naturally pol embraces fascism.

>unironically reading that retard

This couldn't be more antithetical to fascism, you fucking moron

This is why there can't be good threads on fascist literature

my diary is a classic and most boards have some variant of it
the rest are shitty forced memes that most other boards also have

if you want to see shitty memes go to Veeky Forums, it doesn't get more plebbit than that

>le contrarian meme
No, /pol/ is simply a free speech political discussion board, and so the views that are able to hold prominence there are those which can withstand constant criticism from every angle.

...

>no argument to be found
/pol/ is by definition a free speech board.
Name some supposedly /pol/ views that aren't true. I'll wait.

>/pol/ is simply a free speech political discussion board
>so the views that are able to hold prominence there are those which can withstand constant criticism from every angle
The whole point of pol is that it's an user board, so you can post things that are flat out wrong without facing even the slightest of consequence. It's a backup plan for people who were rejected by their peers.

>This is why there can't be good threads on fascist literature
No, it's due to anybody disagreeing with it simply coming in and shilling against it rather than discussing it. Many on Veeky Forums have claimed to be communists--this is all quite funny considering neither fascism nor communism stand any real chance of major political success in the West today.

>so you can post things that are flat out wrong without facing even the slightest of consequence
Personal consequences aren't relevant to the discussions there. Incorrect views expressed there will be countered by other arguments, however. Those with the best arguments can withstand all counter-arguments.

>It's a backup plan for people who were rejected by their peers.
This is irrelevant and conjecture.

lol

...

13 ways to kill yourself as painfully as possible

by Tonya Tonka

>Personal consequences aren't relevant to the discussions there.
Which is tantamount to saying that you can be as wrong as you like. Peer review without consequence and selection is not legitimate peer review. If your arguments really held water, then they'd hold water in places where there were actual risks to be had. The way you're using the word "withstand" is completely meaningless. There's nothing to be withstood, there's no danger, you can make up as much bullshit as you like and get away with it. So as I said, it's a backup plan for people who were rejected by their peers.

It's interesting to read about different ideologies even without agreeing with them
I agree the problem stems from people who disagree coming and shitting up the thread, but desu this applies to both extremes on the spectrum

What makes /pol/ more "free speech" than any other board? If you give me a meme answer I'm not feeding a (You)

AF is unapologetically royalist--that's the whole point. Just because they hated Dreyfus and many members were collaborators doesn't mean they're fascist.

It's time to read Gramsci, my friend.
Work for humanity, not against it.

i get banned from /pol/ all the time.... not even for posting porn. I just highlight how terrible contemporary western culture is.

joking about endemic russian shills gets you banned too.

also if you float the idea that "archive.is" is a honeypot ran by mi6, mossad and the NSA you get banned.

total echochamber

The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald!

mosley - my life

proofs? also can you elaborate on how you highlighting how terrible contemporary western culture is got you banned? since most of /pol/ would seemingly agree with your assessment

...

>free speech is somehow a dialectical process that automatically produces the best political position
First, for this to be true you would need said freedom of speech to be exercised free of rhetoric. On /pol/, this is completely untrue. They manipulate, misinterpret, generalize, cherrypick constantly in order to make their point. Think of the "fags are more likely to become mentally ill" meme: /pol/ interprets this "mental illness is inherent to being gay". They don't even know about basic correlation/causation stuff and the problem of induction.
Second, you would need the vast majority of participants to have a decent level of expertise on the topic at hand. Imagine this scenario: a couple of hundreds of masons organize a meeting in order to decide whether eggs are good for your health or not. This is /pol/: a bunch of uneducated morons talking about things they don't knoe anything about.
Third, you're completely ignoring how echochambering reinforces pre-existent cognitive biases (which goes back to my first point).
Fourth, if free speech were indeed a dialectical truth machine, as you presume, that would mean that the liberal democracy is indeed the best political system, since it has free speech and the vast majority of people who live under it don't want to abandon it.

do you really like Fascism or do you just like Hugo Boss?

This isn't an arbitrary question, this distinction SAVES LIVES!

this unironically happened to me after the last 3 years of current events, learning more history, and reading more books

Kreisler was shaving himself, one eye fixed upon Paris. It beat upon this wall of Paris drearily... The late spring sunshine flooded, like a burst tepid star, the pink boulevard: beneath, the black-suited burgesses of Paris crawled like wounded insects hither and thither... Imagining yourself in some primitive necropolis, the portraits of the deceased covering the holes in which they had respectively been thrust, you would, pursuing your fancy, have seen in Kreisler a devout recluse who had taken up his quarters in this rock-hewn death-house.

Homossexual people do are more likely to display personality disorders and mental illnesses

>basic correlation/causation
fuck off to reddit

Q.E.D.

>Origin and Doctrine of Fascism
>For My Legionaries
>Imperium

The concept of "humanity" was never stable or meaningful to begin with. I'm glad we're witnessing its total breakdown.

bjp.rcpsych.org/content/185/6/479.short
>Of the 1285 gay, lesbian and bisexual respondents who took part, 556 (43%) had mental disorder as defined by the revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS - R). Out of the whole sample, 361 (31%) had attempted suicide.

psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-01069-008
>Results indicate that gay-bisexual men evidenced higher prevalence of depression, panic attacks, and psychological distress than heterosexual men. Lesbian-bisexual women showed greater prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder than heterosexual women. Services use was more frequent among those of minority sexual orientation. Findings support the existence of sexual orientation differences in patterns of morbidity and treatment use.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/12/lgbt-mental-health-sexuality-gender-identity

But yeah, keep talking about cognitive biases, the induction problem and so on, you delusional redditor

Dude, I'm not saying that fags aren't more prone to contract mental illness. Can you read?
>/pol/ is le free speech utopia but if u disagree with me you are reddit and u need to go back
q.e.d. again. I bet you also have a lot of infographics on niggers and IQ.

read it dude, good book, long dick.

>Personal consequences aren't relevant to the discussions there. Incorrect views expressed there will be countered by other arguments, however. Those with the best arguments can withstand all counter-arguments.
>he thinks /pol/acks care for truth rather than fall for sophistry

>The concept of "humanity" was never stable or meaningful to begin with.

Pedantry, we both know what humanity is. If you want to work against it, own it.

>tfw liberal democracy + capitalism is the most successful form of human organization and there's NOTHING pinkos and fashies can do about it

that's the fucking joke absolute dimwit

Lmao how can leftists consistently appropiate and ruin memes

Read the book you cuckslave, you might actually learn something.

Why dont you read Raspail's camp of the saints.
Bannon often masturbates to that book.

>most successful form of human organisation
>is literally imploding as we speak

Egoism and fascism can get along perfectly well if the individual's interests match up with the state.

Hunter-gatherer band living has a couple of millions year track record for hominids and is still practised successfully.

Universal suffrage democracy is 124 years old and already going down the drain.

Feudalism also has a better track record than democracy, as do empires.

Democracy is a bit of a meme.

Holy... I want more

Both

PUNCH A NAZI

Your just as bad as the actual Nazis you little shit

>actual Nazis
>2017

A nazi in this case being anyone who disagrees with antifa

antifa in this case anyone being who disagrees with nazis

But what about people who disagree with both?

>get randomly attacked while walking downtown one night
>start fighting back
>bystanders start yelling at me "wow, you're just as bad as your attacker now!"

Your linear understanding of the difference between Conservatives and Libertarians is juvenile. There is no such thing as the "Social Axis", or if there is, it only refers to feelings on specific policies, like drugs. Whats more important is the fundamental issue of what "Liberty" is; in both the Conservative and Libertarian worldview, liberty is simply the transfer of powers from the State to corporations, whom individuals may theoretically (but not practically) freely choose to associate with. Once the Libertarian has accepted that these power dynamics exist and begin to embrace them, they can then begin to shift their ideas on authority to the "Social Axis", or vice versa. From here, the jump to Fascism should be obvious.

This guy reads a lot of fascist books, check out what he reads and likes

youtube.com/watch?v=2_CTdqJhyUI&t

>Fascism
Giving up your freedom to big brother government is fucking sad. I can't believe you sissies have the gall to call other people cucks.

Just become a degenerate Accelerationist

le radical centrist meme

Conversations in Sicily ; )