Ethical thought experiment for anti-homosex Christians:
Jesus appears in front of you and says "user, you must let me fuck your ass and then suck my dick. Quick, there's no time to explain". What would you do?
If you say "no" then you're denying Christ, going to Hell, etc.
If you say "yes" then you did the good thing, God will forgive you etc. BUT there's at least one possible world where you would have gay sex. Think about it, even if you did it because the Son of God told you to that's fucking gay.
Colton Anderson
Something something nature of God is unchanging and God will never contradict himself so your thought experiment wouldn't happen (even though he could and because everything God does is good and right, it would be fine)
But tbqh there's no reason to believe jesus was anti homosex
Henry Howard
But OPs scenario is essentially the same as God telling Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac then at the last moment giving him a ram to sacrifice instead. Jesus sent the Holy Spirit to superintend the writing of Paul who did condemn homosexuality.
Cooper Brown
Except that in OPs scenario Jesus doesn't change his mind at the last moment I guess
Austin Powell
This is what happens when you let subhumans think they know what a "thought experiment" is. They blaspheme and write out stupid fucking shit all in one fell swoop.
Adrian Parker
i shit and god swallows
in five years you'll be in atheist you unoriginal cunt
Dylan Gomez
>Jesus sent the Holy Spirit to superintend the writing of Paul How do you know this? And how do you know jesus would stop at the last minute when he's in your boipucci?
Adam Garcia
He says it in the bible (for your first question)
Noah Sanchez
I would totally suck J.C.'s Holy Cock and offer him my boipucci tho
Justin Adams
something doesn't stop being a thought experiment just because it makes your peepee feel funny
Brandon Wright
Literally show me where jesus says he's sending the holy spirit to inspire Pauls words
Xavier Foster
John 16:12-14 >I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13 But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. 14 He will glorify me because it is from me that he will receive what he will make known to you.
Samuel Parker
If I really had to I'd fuck Satan instead. Jesus isn't even attractive. And I'm already committing sin so it wouldn't even matter.
Jacob Rivera
>Thought experiment, Jesus contradicts his nature, divine morality, he sins and tells lies
OP is a faggot.
Matthew Perez
I would teleologically suspend the ethical and plow dat jesus boi-pucci
Ayden Reed
It is your boipucci being rammed in the thought experiment though
William Long
>when there's no reference to paul and a nonspecific stance on who is actually inspired by christ means that what the holy spirit intends is essentially determined by who takes a stance on an issue first is used to support Paul being right What did he mean by this?
Lucas Scott
Even better
Joshua Hill
The point is that when Jesus ascended he transferred his authority, through the Holy Spirit, to the church, and the the church recognized Paul's letters and the rest of the new testament as "breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work" 2 Timothy 3:16-17
Oliver Ramirez
God I wish that were me
James Ortiz
this is beautiful, whos the artist?
Nicholas Sanchez
Guillaume Geefs
Brody Jackson
>he didn't read the first post
>reiterating your position and not addressing the argument
Robert Moore
Thats not the genie du mal though, he has his hand on his head in the actual sculpture
William Miller
>liking neoclassical """"art""""
Nicholas Walker
I think because you dont like it it makes you really cool and different, liking stuff is lame:)
Adrian Robinson
You're right, it is L’ange du mal
Jonathan Martin
I wasnt aware of that one but itd def make a better bust than its more famous cousin
Luke Lopez
That's not gay sex. Try again retard.
Christian Russell
Actually I was wrong, apparently the picture here is an earlier sculpture by his brother Joseph, the name L’ange du mal is right though.
Lucas Clark
"Gay sex" is an oxymoron; sex is definitionally vaginal intercourse between a man and woman with the aim of procreation or mutual support against sin. Anything else is neurotic perversion. Try again.
Also, not literature related. Reported
Evan Collins
Anti-homosex is only discussed in the old testament (the torah) attack the synagogue not the church, faggot.
Jacob Sanders
It's the first version of the statue (on the left) which was removed for being too sexualized and replaced with the one on the right. Can't have churchgoers getting distracted by Satan's boipussy.
Nathan Fisher
>a literal description of gay sex isn't gay sex
>sex is definitionally vaginally if you use my specific ideological definitions of sex which has an added clause of mutual support against sin which isn't even held by the church
James Parker
Wrong it's in 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy
Ryan Turner
left is better but its a wonder the church let it in in the first place
Robert Bell
να πάει να γαμηθεί ο μαλάkας
Charles Wood
I prefer the right. It's actually way hotter.
Landon Peterson
>get told to remove your sexy statue >your Chad older brother creates an even sexier statue which is accepted because it shows less skin Must feel pretty bad.