Is there any reason to believe we're not just self-aware animals?
Is there any reason to believe we're not just self-aware animals?
Other urls found in this thread:
nah
We're not very self aware. Animals aren't completely unaware either.
just what the demiurge wants you to believe senpai
Can an animal do this
/thread
One just did you stupid fucking nigger
many other animals are self-aware though, to varying degrees
If we aren't "very" self aware, what is?
Why don't abortionists exert their will on others before conception?
God
we have souls
Who is this cartoon quoting?
No, we know that for a fact.
Your actual question is, "Is there any reason to think there's any meaning to life or moral driving forces behind us?
you're a blaspheming piece of trash. Enjoy failing classes
reminder to report all threads which have no relation to literature
sys.Veeky Forums.org/lit/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=10159425
>Wants to kill humans with no consequence
>wants others to pay for it, regardless of killing it or not
hmm, republicans must really be hypocrites...
liberalism is the lowest form of not accepting responsibility.
>philosophy doesn't belong here
The argument that patriarchy prevents women from exerting their own will could just as easily be used against abortion.
It doesn't.
It belongs on
Drumpf
>hmm, republicans must really be hypocrites...
True.
There are many things about ourselves that we are unaware of. If there were few things then I would consider us very self aware.
Humans are the most ignorant of animals.
you are the stupidest of animals
humans invented both the concept of human and animal and the disctinction between the two
your issue is thinking of the world as if it already existed 'out there' just laid out and then humans came along and observe it like windows upon the world
distinctions between classes of beings (huma and animal) is a fundamentally human thing
>a field which is mainly communicated by literature belongs on a history board
Kys
>implying abortion isn't orders of magnitude cheaper than the care system
Basically all his conclusions were wrong, so his opinions are shit. The only valuable thing he contributed was a system of logic
>those discussions of philosophy that take place on Veeky Forums should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.
>Welcome to Veeky Forums - History & Humanities Anonymous
>This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy
>Philosophical discussions can go on either Veeky Forums or /his
>those discussions of philosophy that take place on Veeky Forums should be based around specific philosophical works
>just
>your issue is thinking of the world as if it already existed 'out there
it isn't?
>ideally
animals don't have souls and can't perform magic