Seriously Mod? What is your deal with not allowing my PERFECTLY Veeky Forums worthy threads, where I specifically do not wax political, to reach the bump limit? Even the shitposts by OTHERS was minimal.
warosu.org
warosu.org
warosu.org
Please. Stop. I do not give a shit if you do not personally care for the topic; stop axing my threads for no reason. I wouldn't have even made these last two if you hadn't cut me off in the middle of a reply.
Seriously Mod? What is your deal with not allowing my PERFECTLY Veeky Forums worthy threads...
Joshua Diaz
Elijah Butler
>ayn rand
enjoy your vacation, shitposter
Jaxson Scott
I think there was actually a Veeky Forums rule that ANY randposting is bannable at some point, but since it's such an old meme I thought the rule was discarded.
Those threads look suspiciously like shitposts/troll threads though, they have that
>RAND
>NOT THE BEST
>PROVE ME WRONG FAGGOTS
format to them.
So that is probably pissing someone off. What is probably killing you more though is that you're being report spammed by users, to the point that even if it's a legitimate thread it has 5x as many reports as any other on the board. No matter what the thread is, it'll probably be fucked if that happens.
I think you should be able to randpost. And it's unfair that you have to self-censor when other "PROVE ME WRONG FGT" type threads aren't banned simply because they aren't about rand. But you might consider posting something like
>Let's have a serious thread about Ayn Rand. I like her books. Please, no trolling.
as a peace offering.
Michael Baker
It's literally Veeky Forums culture to ban all Ayn Rand threads. How new are you?
Jaxon Green
Does that look like a shitpost skipper? Like it or not the woman was an author and not even one of a particular political bent so telling me to fuck off /pol/ or something doesn't hold.
Michael Torres
Not new at all; I've probably made 5% of the Aristole threads you've ever posted in.
Well I'm not going anywhere so the mod better drop all pretenses and ban me himself.
>Those threads look suspiciously like shitposts/troll threads though, they have that
>RAND
>NOT THE BEST
>PROVE ME WRONG FAGGOTS
format to them.
Bullshit they look like that.
Juan Williams
>What is probably killing you more though is that you're being report spammed by users, to the point that even if it's a legitimate thread it has 5x as many reports as any other on the board. No matter what the thread is, it'll probably be fucked if that happens.
>Having to stoop this low
The absolute state of commietards.
Tough break OP
Daniel Hill
anne rand (no I won't say "Ayn" because that's just wrong) sucks balls. That's all she deserves for commentary.
Hudson Ward
>and not even one of a particular political bent
how delusional are you
Daniel Gonzalez
>>Let's have a serious thread about Ayn Rand. I like her books. Please, no trolling.
>as a peace offering.
You know damn well that A. Such a topic-less thread will incur only mockery B. It'll be taken as vaguely passive aggressive and C. olive branches to people who would do this in the first place will always make the left double down
Or maybe you didn't think of that. No offense. Good response in any event.
Carson Roberts
She discusses Philosophy as a base first and foremost and politics as the Ethics-fork branch of philosophy that it is. By "political bent" I mean one of topical politics such as is /pol/s purview.
Xavier Adams
>not even one of a particular political bent
Juan Sanchez
why not cool it on the randposting?
Robert Collins
>commietards
>everyone who wants me to stop randshilling are literal communists
You think exactly like a randshill. Do you pray to molyneux twice a day to ban all democrats and vaginas?
Zachary White
Same reason why a stirnerfag doesn't have to cool it with the Stirner posting or a zizekfsg doesn't have to cool it with the zizekposting if both are having Veeky Forums worthy discussions.
And I ain't shit posting with Rand; nothing close.
Jeremiah Long
I feel you brother. I got a ban for schmittposting which is in and of itself laughable. The thread was even moved to /pol/.
That just proves that the Veeky Forums mods are insufferable liberal douchebags. Whodathunk?
Leo Wilson
Was the OP and general content of it as incontrovertibly Veeky Forums as my 3 examples? If so I feel for ya.
In fact; post its archive
Nathan Cruz
>Well I'm not going anywhere so the mod better drop all pretenses and ban me himself.
This is not a meritocracy, faggot. You're insufferable and shit up the board. Banning you would have to do with the flaws of your character, not your ideology.
Owen Collins
"Da Joos" thread belong on /pol/, sorry. You used a quote as a vehicle of political resentment.
Wyatt Edwards
I didn't. I referenced the fact that Schmitt considered liberalism to be less democratic than national socialism and that's all I did.
For fuck's sake, it wasn't even the first time I made a thread like that. The other one a few months ago reached almost 300 posts before it got archived. But no... faggot commie mods think they can curtail critical discussions of right-wing writers and political philosophers on Veeky Forums. Let's have a gazillion Zizek and Peterson threads instead.
Colton Bell
>Let's have a gazillion Zizek and Peterson threads instead.
Yes, I would like that. Along with Otto Weininger threads, so I can piss off some trad neckbeard. Meanwhile, I'll contribute to actual literature discussions and all of you will have to either adapt, get banned or go back to /pol/ :)
Luke Allen
Sorry sweetie but I'm here to stay.
>also Otto Weininger
He was /ourguy/, even killed himself because he was a Jew.