But user, communism killed millions of people!

>but user, communism killed millions of people!
how do you respond?

there's billions more where they came from.

That's why I'm a national socialist, dear.

I tell them to fuck off back to /pol/ instead of shitting up the literature board with this inane shit

to save billions, my dear

>telling someone irl to fuck off back to /pol/

And resource abuse and the genocide of ecosystems will lead to the death of billions and prevent any life from occurring again.

I said that to my professor, the whole class was so shocked they didn't respond. That or they were silent because they didn't know what the fuck /pol/ is. I pronounced the / and everything.

Yeah, it did. I don't know who you're responding to.

> I dont know who your responding to
some fag with an IQ thats who

Genocide of Russians and Holodomor was a lie spread by Nazis, even Dr Suess knew.
Now, acquaint your head with the pavement, thot, for spreading Nazi propaganda. NYEH!

Stop talking through a straw; it's further proof there're still too many humans living.

>literal autism
Nice one, bro, you sure showed him.

I would never get to this part of the conversation, because I wouldn't defend Communism if you paid me.

Except that that's not occurring

>I wouldn't defend Communism if you paid me.
think about that for a moment, user.

The ting go "Sis! Boom! Boom! Sis! Rah!"

okay there's no reason to make me feel bad for only killing six of them. stalin was like an ubermensch or early riser or some shit, jeez, arabella.

>Be Communist
>Whenever Communism fucked up it could only roll back to what was there before Communism
>The countries you point towards as good Communism are the ones which couldn't establish the same level of tyranny with a government that couldn't apply the same level of force.

HAHAHAHA

...

Well if I lived under Communism I wouldn't speak out against it.

you're really shit at capitalism, you might have to move and shut up.

>not being a nordic model social democrat
o i am laffin

I'm still seizing your means of reproduction

>le grab by le pussy xD

noice

You’re right, honney, but I never said communism is the best political structure out there. A strong welfare state is not the same things as the old fashioned communism of the Soviet Union. By the way, what the free market defenders have to say about the atrocious modern slavery system that corroded thousands of lives during the early times of the industrial revolution, before the State had to step in with laws that would curb the greed of factory owners? How can people defend the erasing of labour law when history shows us that, whitout it, the few would devour the many, demanding suave -labour for scraps of payment ?

That system is going to fail soon. It relies on a high employment rate and productive citizens. The influx of Muslim immigrants/refugees is going to really put their system to the test.

This. Is the best model yet created. By the way, OP, who is this cute girl?

>but user capitalism is the essence of human nature, surely you don't expect human nature to change along with a country's political system, the weak will always be dominated by the strong.

>By the way, what the free market defenders have to say about the atrocious modern slavery system that corroded thousands of lives during the early times of the industrial revolution, before the State had to step in with laws that would curb the greed of factory owners?

Defend the premise. Why do you believe the poor people who voluntarily moved from rural farms to cities so they can take part in the industrial revolution were worse off because of it?

Here's an argument for relaxing safety regulations. Companies are only interested in protecting themselves from liability. Under the current system they do that by following government sanctioned safety regulations as best they can. The problem with this is that the government is often very slow to react to fluid or changing situations. As a consequence of this it's not uncommon for workers to engage in unsafe practices for months or years until regulatory bodies like OSHA finally comes around and takes notice of it, and before that happens accidents do happen and people do unnecessarily get hurt from those unsafe practices. I believe safety regulations disincentive a proactive approach to safety because when we rely on government regulations, companies only need to to the bare minimum in order to protect themselves from being sued by injured workers.

In a world without any safety regulations, it would be up to a judge to decide on an individual case by case basis to decide if a company did what was necessary to protect the workers. This would cause companies to go 'above and beyond' to protect their workers because nothing eats into profits faster than being sued.

>leftist memes

>The influx of Muslim immigrants/refugees
That's not the social democrats' fault, that's neo-liberals who want cheap labor and bleeding heart socialists who don't know anything about realpolitik.

>this thread
r*ddit and /leftypol/ please leave