Aside from The Prince.
Books on Realpolitik?
Other urls found in this thread:
that one indian man whose name escapes me
...
The Dictator's Handbook.
The political science one. If I remember correctly there's also a comedic one.
Prisoners of Geography might be of your interest as well.
>literally who
No one watches The Apprentice here lol
What Is To Be Done? by Vladimir Lenin
"Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky
Read the Discourses on Livy. It is one of the must read books on classical republicanism.
Also read Kissinger's Diplomacy. He might be a war criminal but he gets shit done.
Carl Schmitt - The Concept of the Political
Politics are a waste of everyone's time
Wu-Tang Clan ain't nuthin' to fuck with
t. Bernie Sanders
NIETZSCHE + FREUD
ZIZEK - VIOLENCE
AGAMBEN - HOMO SACER
GIRARD - VIOLENCE AND THE SACRED
KIERKEGAARD - EITHER OR
WU TANG CLAN DEBUTE ALBUM
NAS - ILLMATIC
Kautilya?
This one?
Diplomacy by Kissinger is fantastic.
bump
This, except the last chapters where he couldn't avoid to be apologetic. It is still nice to see how he came to his decisions though.
kenneth waltz
kys
Any analysis of Klemens von Metternich. Seriously. Simultaneously the most important and least popularly known figure of diplomatic politics in the first half of the 19th century.
The Rebel by Camus :^)
he's the president of the united states, you ignoramus
Yep that one
(The book not the Indian)
Is reading Livy's History of Rome necessary before reading Discourses?
Dinesh D'Souza?
Thucydides.
Political Testament - Cardinal Richelieu
Venkatesh Rao?
>no one has mentioned Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes
Did no one mention him because it was a given or because you're all double digit IQ fags?
Read Kissinger or any other smarmy political kike in general.They have a brilliantly sickening mind for grand systems.
I mean, they came up with the idea that MONEY could somehow produce even MORE MONEY from itself.
It's just....UGHHHH.
USURY IS A SIN FOR A REASON, YOU FUCKING SHLOMOS. NOW YOU'VE GOT EVERYONE ENSLAVED INCLUDING YOURSELVES.
calm down christcuck
He completely failed at his aims though. Best to study Cavour.
No. Machiavelli quotes wherever necessary, summarizes whatever necessary, and lays out his points easily and eloquently. Frankly, the Histories are more a curiosity piece to me, and the Discourses are distilled value.
That being said, my particular interest is political theory. If you're a historian, I'd suppose you think the opposite.
...
...
...
...