What are the weirdest ideas in philosophy?

What are the weirdest ideas in philosophy?

>the present king of france is bald
Well, it's true.

I think the weirdest idea in philosophy is probably panpsychism.

Paramenides

inverted solipsism

thinking everyone in the world is real except yourself

>tfw you have always been a Mereological Nihilist without knowing that it was a thing to be.

heh.. you are like a little perra.. try this

But that is kind of true. We only really exist via the collective perception of we the subject as part and our own individual perception is just an image acting as a mechanism for continuation of the collective perception.
If we are sole, we are not and, we fade. But, we can know that the other is absolutely existing and will continue to exist beyond our reality. You know?

Materialism

>We only really exist via the collective perception of we the subject as part and our own individual perception is just an image acting as a mechanism for continuation of the collective perception.

This literally doesn't mean anything.

>tfw meteorological nihilist

>meteorological nihilist
>meteorological
Not sure weather or not you're playing a joke.

>The sacrifice of the scapegoat reconciles the rivalry engendered by the mimetic desire

Posadism is a boring meme, I made memes for it for about a year. It's only good to subversively spread socialism.

You didn't understand his post

>tfw metrological nihilist

OSCAR

Girard is not weird and your greentext is absolutely correct.

Your mind is the idea of your body

>bicameral mind

If the subject is that which stands in relation to reality, then it is outside reality, and if it is outside reality, it is unreal.

Aristotle thought the soul/mind was the form of the body

ooga booga?

The noumenon
I mean, think about it. The idea that we never get to see things themselves, rather only their apparitions, is so counter-intuitive on a purely experiential level, yet it makes so much sense philosophically.

>our own individual perception is just an image acting as a mechanism for continuation of the collective perception
There is no collective perception.

>There is no collective perception.
Well, that is the stupidest thing that I've heard yet today. What are society, culture, and history?

what if... life is like a dream man

Yea but Spinoza thought that your mind was like a TV screen view of your body that had nothing to do with what your body does

Kinda creepy desu

>king
He is God-Emperor, he said so himself

no

>What are the weirdest ideas in philosophy?
that it matters
or that it belongs on this board

>What are society, culture, and history?
Ideas.

fucking this

Zeno (SVF - 91)

"The Stoic Zeno believed that colors were the coloration of matter."

HYLOZOISM

He actually makes a formal distinction between soul and mind. The soul is rooted in the body, the mind is autonomous.

this is true isn't it?

Check the Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta.

Also, this time from Cleanthes: (SVF - 508.1)

"...all the other stoics believe that the stars are spherical, Cleanthes, instead, that they are conical."

theyre mostly round right?

>right?

:D

kek my sides user;ppppppppp good 1 bruv

cogito ergo sum or that micky mouse/donald duck meme picture.

Azathoth will wake in strange aeons.

>>>/reddit/

no

theyre cubes

>Ideas
MY ideas.

mereological nihilism are morons with a fundamental misunderstanding of how atoms are measured

Neither did you

What an absolute word-soup of an answer

>he believes in material composition
>he thinks 1 grain of sand is a heap

What are you on rn user???

stop smoking pot user

...

Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

...

Modal realism. I'm not sure I'm convinced but David Lewis's book on this blew my mind.

Bicameral mind theory

Oh my. Oh, my my my.

It seems to be the proper term for "dude you're just molecules LMAO"; if I can describe software on my computer as existing despite "really" being a bunch of charges or absences in silicon, then you and I exist despite "really" being atoms and shit.

What are you, some kinda Jap Fascist?

good and evil objective absolutes who exist outside of human experience
I think they call it God
weird lizard-tier shit

And what about the practice of "measuring" atoms refutes mereological nihilism?

the main point of it is parisomony and getting around stuff like the sorites paradox and the ship of theseus and the like

>What are the weirdest ideas in philosophy?
the suggestion that existing, ergo, living, is worthwhile

The entirety of existence is nothing more than inflections, curves, and folds of an endless irreducibly complex array of becomings, the processes of which compose the false conception of beings. All is contracted intensities of verbs of a univocal plane that is actually a modal composite of endless topological vectors that are becomings of themselves. The leaf is not green, the leafing greens.

what

This is just Heraclitus with some added modern sophism.

I actually like the unabashed pseudry reminds me of land

...

I'm not user, but I quite literally base a lot of my metaphysics on meteorology and atmospheric conceptual metaphors. Teleconnections and chaos theory come up a lot in the field and are very useful for describing the behaviour of many complex systems, and really what system is more complicated than reality?

atmospheric science*

eliminativism

the peoples perceptive responsibility is harpooned in this Kafkaesque montage that we plebians call society, we are so intermingled with the mechanism of collective perception that ingots fall into themselves periodically, conclusively and developmentally to construct ideals and power manifesto's to the effect of world wide mushroom power trigger?

Thats coo, but why did you post Jack Nicholson?

What.

I believe in panpsychism, ama

We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?
Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7. Activity recorded M.Y. 2302.22467. (TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED)

best game

Reddit user Anonymous has been gifted 2 months of reddit gold for this post

>the way you interact with the real world and change it is entirely through your perception
>the physics are actually a jumbled incoherent mess, not only ugly and unintuitive, but also constantly in flux - the science of Physics is not about truth, but mostly about beauty
>everybody is immortal because they project themselves across all of time, although they live only during a short part of it
>one of the rare ethical universalities is weird inherent block against escapism
>thoughts exist, anything else is uncertain

Your education has failed you. Seek urgent remediation.

I-include me in the screen cap.

Meaning doesn't exist. There is only weather

Ok tell me if I'm correct in my interpretation of your garbled mess. You're saying, "We act as we do because of societies expectations of us as a result of how we look." For instance if one wears nerdy glasses the outside force expects one to be nerd, and therefore the individual will act as a nerd. I suppose this would be a chicken and the egg situation. Was the person already nerdy, or are they nerdy because society expected them to be? I personally believe the former.

>i personally believe the former
I know "literary types" are above using reason and evidence, but couldn't you at least try?

>tfw continentals think theyre so clever when they give shitty rehashes of old analytic ideas

Idealism (Berkeley's version)

Weird but right

Neither did I

Cogito Ergo Papel
The God Inside the Diaper

life IS like a dream. dreams are based on reality

The idea that the white race is the supreme race.
That shit crazy.

i just came up with this vague vague so maybe with concept of karma and other lives, in utero what you absord determines what you become, so if you absord the right things you will come out of a human woman so the world is created base don what you eat

It's hard to find weird ideas in philosophy because philosophy always panders to human intuition. But some weird ideas in the sciences include the MWI, and the copenhagen interpretation, which is also just as fucking weird despite being the only alternative.

Paraconsistent logic is kind of strange.

isn't Deleuze right though? he defines a rhizome in such a broad way that it applies to anything, so of course he's "right" but in a trivial sense.

>sniffs nose
>And so on and so on...

read Emerson's "experience"

Phenomena are not "apparitions," they have objective validity. Have you even read Kant? It's like you read Rand's assessment and believed it, even though she herself never read him

I wonder why they chose atoms and molecules as the cause of their nihilism. Why not, "we're just bones and m eat," or "we're just animals," etc?

The atom-view doesn't even do an effective job of conveying true nihilism, since the knowledge and distinguishing of atoms still requires a point of view.

This is just an age old idea poorly expressed.

>he defines a rhizome in such a broad way that it applies to anything, so of course he's "right" but in a trivial sense

t. someone that hasn't read D&G.

Geotrauma