Is there a single person, alive or dead...

What "bullshit"? You mean awareness of the objective fact that Noam Chomsky is an apologist for socialist-sponsored genocide? Well he first tried to cover up media reports of the socialist-sponsored Cambodian genocide in the late 70s, so Chomsky's support for socialist-sponsored genocide has been public knowledge for much longer than 25 years

shill

Piero Scaruffi.

If you disagree, then you don't know the man. Don't bother arguing.

>tfw none of his english AI texts are on libgen

fuck 2016 was a fun year

>infallible

You haven't yet begun to learn.You're still in the "daddy's perfect" phase.

Hellooo Veeky Forums, hopeyouredoinwell. This is Stefan Molyneux from Freedomain Radio. Don't forget! Go to FDR url forward slash donate! Please, please we need your help. We are in a battle for the soul of Western Civilization. Help us continue the fight. The only way we're going to win is to bring reason to the world.

Try reading the OP again

He has changed his positions pretty radically though, even if not for the better

probably because he started noticing the batshit insanity going on in the industry he used to work in

Which ones?

Veeky Forums lets send an email to Noam Chomsky one word at a time

Tao

FUCKKKKKkkkkk

Lin

He's moved to Arizona to teach
Something about the climate and weather and his health :\
But he didnt
And he's not defending a pedophile running for elected office :3
Liberals do it too
People repeat what they hear they never go check
Ask people who say this what did he say, where did they hear it, can they quote and cite him
You get silence
>cover up media reports
The media was reporting everything and anything without checking
Photos faked in Cambodia
A translation of a review of a French priests book that conflated and misattributes several different death tolls
One of the largest of which was the death toll of the American bombing campaign, over half a million dead
When he and Edward S. Herman contacted the reviewer to tell him about the shoddy translation and if he thought a correction was in order the response they got back was 'a hundred thousand or a million it doesn't really matter'
Does the truth matter? Does it matter no matter who it is about or can we have free passes for making mistakes and not exercising critical thinking when it comes to official enemies?
And the whole point of their analysis was to compare it to the media coverage of the Indonesian invasion of East Timor
Something America bore a great deal of responsibility for and could have influenced unlike the Khmer
It is interesting critics never ever mention their Timor comparison
Why is that do you think?

Niglet.

>2017
>still not knowing who Icycalm is

they are putting penis in children i think it's terrible

>batshit insanity going on in software
You realise it's filled with more neo-Nazis than muh SJWs

In case anyone's interested, he responds to emails. During the presidential election I emailed him with some questions and he responded two days later. As long as you aren't disrespectful you're likely to get a response.

Shill.

Also, if Pol Pot was such a bad guy, why did Washington recognize him as the legitimate leader of Cambodia after the Vietnamese ousted him from power?

Because they were butthurt
t. Vietnam

Honestly it's very telling that over a long and prolific career, the only thing his critics keep coming back to is he was wrong about how bad Cambodia was once, and never address any of his analyses or critiques.
You don't even have to agree with all his conclusions, I don't, but he's extremely knowledgeable and a vast majority of his stuff is pretty ironclad

>When he and Edward S. Herman contacted the reviewer to tell him about the shoddy translation and if he thought a correction was in order the response they got back was 'a hundred thousand or a million it doesn't really matter'
Imagine if some Soviet Commissar did that make?
We would still be hearing about it today

They weren't wrong
Realpolitik

this.
he's a hard guy to argue against considering he covers his bases and his critiques all make sense.