I googled 2017 great novels and all the authors are women or coloured, wtf Veeky Forums

I googled 2017 great novels and all the authors are women or coloured, wtf Veeky Forums

Other urls found in this thread:

unz.com/isteve/great-moments-in-google-american-inventors/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_authors
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>googled
google "american inventors"

the booker prize was won by george saunders

>google '2017 great novels'
>second recommendation is by George Saunders, an obviously white man

he looks like a meme

token white guy

>George Saunders
honestly i thought that was a woman for some reason hah

i bet you look like a meme too

that goes without saying

michael burnham

You probably mistook the name for George Sand, a woman

yeah and george eliot

Well Paul Auster's in the list but they're mostly women, we're losing. Women are getting into publishing power positions and we're getting etched out. I'm sick to death of this shit its all over the culture, women gays and blacks. Nothinng for us but porn and video games

>we
>we
>us
Great authors don't have anything in common with autistic neetards like you though.

tits or gtfo

Now it's time to embark upon the journey where you learn why.

>I am utterly enthralled by media and everyone else must be
Normies get out

There's tons of autistic neets in the canon

This a legitimately impressive effort.

Jew male writers have always done well, most jews in the states are smart, bad at sports and have rich relatives.

>Jew male writers have always done well

Not really, there's what, Kafka and..?

name five (5) works from white men from 2017 that missed out

>Token White Guy

Just what in tarnation did he mean by this?

wemen

We can't know because the Jews don't even publish them

So there's either a Jewish conspiracy involving all the major publishers in the Western world to shutout white male authors, or

White men just aren't writing anything that good.

Hm, I wonder which seems more likely.

Uh.. And white men remain the best writers out of sheer ability in spite of this.

It makes more sense than fucking Taqueesha Shamomo writing anything worth reading

>We don't know the best works written by white men because Jews won't publish them

>White men are the best writers

Hm.

Even with all their meddling the only figure that has entered the canon in recent time has been David Foster Wallace

Do the major Jewish-controlled publishers and literary magazines have no say on "the canon"?

You must be black or something since the logic you're applying is nonsensical. White men invented literature and have been the best at it since day one. Since jews took over the publishing industry they are published far less. This doesn't mean they are never published or that they aren't forced to be published out of economic interest alone since people want to read what they have to say more than the heavily promoted latinx or nigger.

They are trying to shape it, and moneyed jews promote their gatekeepers like Bloom to subvert it slowly.

what is this shit thread doing in my Veeky Forums

>Bloom
>Subverting
lol

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THIS SHIT IS INFURIATING

Lol, I knew google leftwing bias was bad but holy shit.

>coloured
People that use old-timey racial language are cringy as hell, my nigra.

So,

>There's a conspiracy involving all major publishers and all major literary magazines to shutout white males from the written world

>These conspirators influence literary thought, as well as the Western canon

>Only a white male has entered the canon recently.

Gee, these influencers sound pretty toothless to me.

You say that and yet...

i want to see a chart like this but for major corporations and their CEOs all being white men. but for some reason no one here is interested in that conspiracy.

>White men invented literature
I'mma stop you right there...

Jews are not good writers nor have they ever been. Even the jewish writers that other jews have historically propped up to pretend otherwise, primarily Kafka and Proust, are praised for being teen-lit proto-goth subversives and maximalist nothingburgers, respectively.

Bahahahaha. That’s pretty fucking funny.

You have no idea how the system works. The power is not in the corporations themselves, it's in the entities that are able to control them via jewish-dominated realms like wall street and the media, influencing them through markets or attacking them if they don't go along with the tranny plan, etc.

There's heaps, Roth, bellow auster, lerner he's great

Guys maybe its google that's the sjw filter

Can someone explain to me the Jewish motive for opposing white men?

Lol, no.

what do you mean no? you're a twerp

The thing is that statistically in white countries white men are bound to dominate boardrooms as a result of sheer demographic probability. But when Jews are vastly over-represented in certain industries, especially subversive ones (i.e. ones which aren't conducive to maintaining a healthy national body) there is cause for concern.

What the hell else are the jews supposed to do, Move furniture? They're too small

as a joke

It's rooted in nature: group struggle and competition for resources. That said, jews have been indoctrinated by a culture for millennia that has taught them that they are gods and everyone else is a subhuman, goyim, so they have a unique seething hatred of the Other. Memorizing torah and talmud passages that say your greatest imperative in life is to slaughter amalek and enslave his children has turned jews into a sick bunch. They hate everyone but white men are their main enemy for obvious reasons so that's where the target is laid.

what? women are 50 percent of the population. black people are 12 percent of the population. no way is the represenation in boardrooms of white men who went to certain private colleges demographically accurate.

legitimately scary

In the long run no. They can try warp it in the present but eventually an entropy sets in and cream rises while shit sinks

I'm compiling a list of all the male celebrities / prominent figures who have been fired for sexual harassment in the past few months. 52 names so far.

Anybody care to guess what percentage are Jews?

Reminder that only around 2% of the US population are Jewish, and around 1% being Jewish males.

Roth is sitcom tier. After looking into it JD Salinger and Arthur Miller are the only other Jewish writers of worth I can think of. Maybe Proust but his worth needs to be reevaluated after the bribing revelations

>his worth needs to be reevaluated after the bribing revelations

52 wow. I know it's a lot but let's hear it. Make sure you post that here when you're done, I'll save and repost.

>Presumably, Google must get a lot of requests for “African American inventors” and assumes that’s what you really meant when you ask for “American inventors.” After all, what kind of sick Nazi do you have to be to be interested in your fellow Americans irrespective of race? That’s racist!
>One interesting thing is that Hispanics and Asians are completely shut out of this phenomenon.
>Microsoft’s Bing is similar but slightly less absurd with Edison edging out George Washington Carver for the top spot, and Latimer coming behind Franklin and Bell, with Tesla making the top dozen.
>I don’t mind a sprinkling of Diversity Tokens, but when there’s no room for Oppenheimer or Feynman on Google’s Top Fifty (#8 and #17, respectively, on Bing’s list) because of all the black obscurities, well, that’s just stupid and boring.
>On the other hand, Google’s Mexican outlet, Google.mx gives you a much more plausible list of “inventor americano:” The Mexican Top 50 American inventors includes 46 white men, two blacks, and two white women.

unz.com/isteve/great-moments-in-google-american-inventors/

It seems like a reasonable course of action to me? Any author who seeded his own reputation through covert means deserves extra scrutiny. Perhaps he will stand the test of time but this has been a potential major unveiling of whether he deserves his reputation

>their gatekeepers like Bloom to subvert it slowly.
The most notable Jew in literary criticism, notable principally for his conservative defense of the Western literary canon, is called subversive by fifteen year old poltards.

Take a guess first my man.


1% of the population are responsible for what percentage of high-profile sexual assaults revealed in recent months?

But that's precisely how Jews operate. They take control of both the narrative and the counter-narrative. The same strategy is seen clearly in politics and economics

I love whoever made this


That said,
are puerile antisemitism. Bloom is /Our Guy/. Individuals aren't populations.It's all evolutionary psychology.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald

Roth is overrated, Lerner is at turns sentimental and repulsive. His "Hatred of Poetry" is the worst book of literary criticism I've ever read.

Proust is acclaimed post-humously because he is an incredible writer, not because of some parisian critics

The issue here lies with the warped definition of "conservative" that's been implanted inside your brain.

80%

>the tranny plan
t. Alex Jones. Yeah, I'm sure Rupert Murdoch has a tight reign in fucking Charles Koch and every US president. Wait, u actually just looked up Murdoch and he isn't even Jewish. I hope you can fall back on the Hibernian conspiracy. Get this poltard shit off my board.

Perhaps but I'm hardly going to just take your word for it like people took their word for it. Like I said its not cause for a write off only a reevaluation

>That said,
>are puerile antisemitism. Bloom is /Our Guy/. Individuals aren't populations

True. One big mistake counter-semites make is tarnishing the entire Heebhood when a number of them are decent, even admirable individuals. Which is why we should out-jew the jew by posting statistics and so on, as they tend to do to prove whites are too powerful.

Proust bought reviews for Swan's Way, which is the first book and isn't even what made him famous/the truly revolutionary part of La Recherche.
Read him dude, he isn't considered one of the best authors of the past century because he bought reviews on some french journal.

Kekkèk

Sir if you're not able to reasonably convey your arguments I suggest you leave for some Jew censored website where you dont have to think about these matters

>Bloom is trying to destroy the Western cannon by protecting the Western cannon

*hits blunt*
*turns on infowars*

Nope, 48% so far, although several names may admittedly be missing from the list as it stands.

So 1% of the US population are responsible for 48% of recent high-profile sexual assault scandals.

While 31% of the US population (white male) are responsible for roughly the same amount (considering Latinos, Asians, African-Americans have been fired too)

I will, I'm in the midst of building towards fluent French and currently busy with Jean Anouilh and Baudelaire. Proust will have his opportunity

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_authors

quite a few good ones there, Heller, Arthur miller, Ira levin, and that's just the americans. If only the holocaust didn't happen we'd have hoverboards and realistic sex robots by now

If you don't see how he cleans up and disneyfies all the major canonical figures completely understating any Christian spirit or "problematic" notions they held then you're well behind the looking glass

>But that's precisely how Jews operate. They take control of both the narrative and the counter-narrative.
You've reached the point where your theory is immune to being disproven. You basically just reiterated that Bloom must be subversive simply because he is Jewish. If any evidence to the contrary is so effortlessly subsumed into your scheme of history, your scheme is a bad one.

This perspective is pretty retarded IMO, and I'm very jwoke. You're essentially trapping them in a catch 22 where they can't win.

Like two of worth on that entire list rest are either mediocre or literally who's if not outright terrible and masturbatory

Oh have you read them all?

This isn't really about Bloom himself. Its about the institutions and publications that enabled him to have the position he did in American Academic life. They knew they had to have one token advocate of the canon so whenever they held fraudulent debates or references in discourses he was always a safe cushion to fall back on when pressed as opposed to a white defender of the Canon whose interests they couldn't rely on

Zola wrote his own reviews lol. If proust was no good it wouldn't have survived today, plenty of stuff gets good reviews at the start then dies. Dickens got bad reviews

I may as well have, you hear one of these Bronx born middle-brow cosmolites you've heard them all
Incestuous rats

How the fuck would you not consider Bloom's criticism to be based in a conservative attitude toward literary tradition? He famously advocates the preservation of an aesthetic tradition that began in antiquity. What the fuck is your definition of "conservative"?

I would argue Proust's reputation is already rapidly declining. Outside of niche advocates like his fellow khazar Alain Dubotton its extremely rare to hear him referenced in discourse today. For someone who was once heralded as rivaling Joyce his influence is a sparce and empty field now

Hope you don't watch TV shows or films cause I've got news for you

But that's exactly the point. The Jew can write sitcoms and capeshit fine as they need to be but when it comes to anything approaching art their ironic self-involved rodent brain meets a hefty wall

It's obvious that you're just talking nonsense and haven't read Bloom.

Anyway, Christianity is just Judiasism + sentimentality. The real essence of the Western tradition is Grecco-Roman, which Bllom knows, and which you would know if you were actually cultured. Christcucks haven't produced any great work except by accident or flirtation with heresy.

Don't be stupid mate, your fav show or film has a plethora of jews behind it, get a grip

>muh personal unsupported highly elaborate conspiracy theory

>If you don't agree with me then you simply lack the capacity for rational thought.
So you simply disagree with Bloom's criticism and offer no examples. Calling the rest of us incapable of understanding your arguments prior to making them is laughable. Contribute to a dialectical discussion if you want. If not, stop pissing in the discursive punchbowl.

>its obvious you haven't read Bloom
>immediately unironically repeats precisely what I accused him of

Try read an author like Melville or Joyce without a Christian consciousness and see how far that will take you.

Incorrect. Though I do find plenty of Jewish works entertaining of course but its rare to find them breach more than that.

>Bllom

Huh, nice spelling mistake retard. I win.

>They knew they had to have one token advocate of the canon
I guess they let it get out of hand when he became the most notable literary critic. That isn't exactly token status. Also do you truly believe that a Bilderberg of Jewish "big criticism" preordained the notoriety of Bloom's work?

There's some fucking weirdos at Veeky Forums now, Trump's emboldened people to just make shit up? To go NATO with their inklings

That there is a jewish gatekeeper pretending to be an authority on white culture and taking seriously non-white writers and women in the first place is the problem.