What would be the synthesis of Capitalism and Communism

What would be the synthesis of Capitalism and Communism

Enlightenment and progress.

China

False, China is less Communist in practice than the West.

We're actually living in one right now. Every first World country is characterized through a government share in all economic activity of 35-55%.We're thankfully not living in actual free market conditions, but in a hybrid of public and private economic activity.

The dialectic is reflective, and not predictive.

If you want predictive, you would have to consult Marx.

Human extinction

There can't be one since there is no difference between them.

>a government share
That's not communism.

Doesn't matter. China combines communist state control of industry with neoliberal capitalism. Ultimately it's a synthesis of communism and capitalism.

Fascism is the synthesis between communism and capitalism. We're heading towards it, just not in the way you'd expect. By the end of this century there'll be one mixed race in the West, one postmodernist statist culture, universally banned firearm ownership, non-neoliberal expression censorship, no religion etc. Aspects of it are already in place: state-enforced childhood brainwashing in the school system, eugenics through the legalisation of abortion, anti-free-speech laws in Europe, illegal guns in Europe, mind-control in the pharmaceutical industry, state worship in the American military/police culture, multiculturalism etc. The idea of an exclusive class reserving the right to rule by any means necessary can also be observed in the occult beliefs of the elite, which involve human sacrifice (both military and ritualistic) and spiritual suppression symbology (e.g the Lincoln monument and the one dollar bill).

This begs the question-what's the antithesis to said system? This is difficult to answer, but some sound ideas include: widespread knowledge of the mechanics of power and occultism (taught to people from a young age), total free speech, drugs that decrease reliance on, and increase control of, emotions and the desire for subordination, and more esoteric ideas regarding the activation of higher-brain capabilities such as out-of-body projection and intuitive connection to the collective unconscious.

>We're actually living in one right now. Every first World country is characterized through a government share in all economic activity of 35-55%.
>communism is state involvement in a capitalist economy
imagine being this much of a brainlet

This is such a dumb statement that even refuting it is insulting.

does matter if you give it as the best example of the synthesis, which you did, when in reality most western countries are a better fit, as the poster correctly stated. china isn't really communist at all, it's just an aesthetic LARP

What

retards itt

>aesthetic LARP
I'll have to remember this

t. Leftist response to any arguments they don't like

...

Okay.

Read Prometheus Rising and listen to some Mark Passio talks for a better understanding of these ideas.

Market Socialism

commies hate it cuz it actually works

I forgot to mention Jung as well.

die drugnorm

t. Rightist response to any arguments they don't like

>this is your brain on left-libertarianism

Veeky Forums is completely entrenched in the right/left reality tunnel, always trying to comprehend every idea by using this fleeting method of organisation. There are systems which don't involve either view, a lot of them are more primitive, such as tribalism and feudalism. Futuristic systems involving widespread mind-enhancement are also like that.

Universal basic income.

The antithesis to said system is Kaczynski's revolutionnary approach to it. Meaning total annihilation of the industrial and technological system. Well - not really - but it certainly is in terms of the dialectics of today's mainstream ideology. If we were to be wise, we'd argue in favor of what the mystics have been preaching for ever. The 'individual' revolution, which was contemporarily interpreted by Jung. I rarely see sensible content on this website, and we both seem to hold similar views. Is there a way we could contact each other? Maybe a dummy email adress?

How about Discord?

Your votes only count according to how much Bitcoin you own, but the fewer votes you have, the more the government sends you in UBI (and vice versa.)

>There are systems which don't involve either view, a lot of them are more primitive, such as tribalism and feudalism

I would argue that both of these are right-wing.

Isn't discord a voice chat? My oral skills are too rusty to talk fluently about such matters, I have left the US long ago and haven't practice spoken english since then. I would fare better over text.

scandinavian-style welfare/social-state, duh.
capitalistic market with a socialist-style state that provides for it's citizens

Go outside sometime

thats because your a fag

communism is the antithesis to capitalism, I think it would be reasonbale to call social state system of northern/western europe a synthesis; However, the real interesting question should be what the new emerging antithesis will be(maybe 'fascism', or the new right, reactionary movements) and what the synthesis of those two will yield

If I had to choose, I'd say that feudalism is right-wing, and tribalism is a kind of leftism, maybe anarcho-communism. They're both entirely necessary for production in their respective technological conditions though, so I wouldn't really assign wings to them, as it seems like wings are usually voted for or forced (this is probably wrong).

[email protected]

No.

The alt-right is the antithesis to the establishment, but it's been purposefully engineered by the establishment to a degree. The same thing happened with Al-Qaeda. It doesn't tackle issues like the illegitimacy of government.

Can you expand on the human sacrifice part. That's giving me the creeps.
Always nice to meet a fellow RAW fan btw

In the American military culture, sacrifice is an essential factor, but it's presented as a sacrifice for the good of the nation. Many peoples in the past have done this, so what's the difference? In America, you join the military voluntarily (other militaries required conscription), so your sacrifice essentially amounts to a voluntary one, which is the most powerful in magic schools of thought. I don't believe in magic, just to be clear, but the elite certainly do. There's obviously a logistical and morale-based benefit to having voluntary service, but the occult side of this idea is by no means lost amongst the elite.

In terms of rituals, the elite practice very literal ones, very often. Pizzagate is a prime example of this, and the Bohemian Grove is quite possibly another one. They also practice esoteric ritual sacrifices that are similar in terms of detachment to the military ones. The best example of this is 9/11, which the elite engineered primarily to further socially dialectical and financial goals. There was a secondary ritual side that's rooted in Kabbalah and other ideas that I've forgotten about now.

When it comes to literal sacrifice, the ritual is all that matters. When it comes to massive sacrifices carried out through detached plans, the sacrifice is actually the secondary aspect of it (the financial/tyrannical aspect being the primary one).

>ctrl+f "Distributism"
>no results
nice trips, satan

>secondary ritual side that's rooted in Kabbalah
jumping from sephira #9 (foundation; the irony of WTC's foundational stability is overwhelming) to #11 = 1 (wisdom) of a new Tree.

or, in simpler terms, asserting human control over the divine paradigm, while 'playing by divine rules.' "Ten sefirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not eleven."

Interesting, you're far more learned in this than I am, so I couldn't add anything to that.

I'll email you tomorrow. Also are you or ?

I'm the longer post with the longer dick.

>The alt-right is the antithesis to the establishment

Lmao, have you seen the current establishment lately? Have you seen the tax bill they just passed, and how exuberant the alt-right was over it?

At least it's an argument.