What would Evola say about the current iq obsession of the right?

From reading Evola it seems like he had a great distaste of any sort of scientific racism or scientific form of hierarchy.

This board is for the discussion of literary works, my friend.
Kindly fuck off with this shit

Isn't the task at hand kind of literary? I'm asking what a certain author of various works of merit would view something based on his previous works.

As for the racism of the German state, it merged a sort of pan-Germanic nationalism with the ideas of biological science. With respect to the latter, I believe that Trotsky was not far off the mark when he described racism as a kind of zoological materialism. The German state embraced biology, eugenics, and the theory of heredity, accepting all the materialist assumptions behind such doctrines. This led National Socialism to posit the unilateral dependence of the superior to the inferior: of the psychic and super-biological part of man to the biological. This materialist view was little affected by the superimposition of a vague mystique of blood. A materialist perspective was also responsible for the National Socialist illusion that mere prophylactic intervention on the biological level - an intervention, that is, upon the physical race - might automatically better all aspects of the life of peoples and nations. Where a similar analysis might have proven valid was in the idea that it is not the state, society or civilization which are of central importance, but rather race - had 'race' here been understood in its higher sense, as describing the deepest and most fundamental components of man. Also potentially valid was the National Socialist acknowledgement of the need and opportunity to 'fight for a worldview' appropriate for the Aryan man - this representing a means of promoting a broad reassessment of the values which have come to inform the Western world. A negative element, instead, was the fanatical anti-Semitism of National Socialism, something which many people have regrettably come to identify with racism tout court.

Certainly it seems that Evola was more interested in a more esoteric spiritual framework.
However, I think most old writers perhaps wouldn't like the modern adaptations or evolutions of the movements they were once a part of.
I think the fixation on IQ is born out of a few things.
One, generally people have left behind religion and spirituality.
Two, the current climate of politically correctness forces the right to only talk about things which are factual and scientific in nature, because that's the only way to force the left into a position where they either have to agree, or willingly go against facts.
Short answer: he wouldn't like it because it's not his style, but he'd probably realise there's no other choice in the modern political climate

As far as i remember from Ride The Tiger he basically says that blacks are inferior not because of biology (i think he even says they have a superior physical frame), but because they are spiritually inferior.

I also seem to remember sth about germans being spiritually inferior to romans too.

>What would Evola say about the current iq obsession of the right?
I would answer this by referencing to the quote of when he got asked in a trial if he was a fascist, he answered "im a super-fascist", pointing to the idea that he was not worried about the "creation of the superman", because he already *was* the superman, so he just went along his life doing superman-tier stuff.

Imo he has a less biological approach to the themes and sees what fascists and nazis would aspire to create via genetic process as sth that is actually to be created through a personal spiritual process.

Sounds a fuck lot like a roman-imagery McKenna type too

>As far as i remember from Ride The Tiger he basically says that blacks are inferior not because of biology (i think he even says they have a superior physical frame), but because they are spiritually inferior.

So basically Evola was aping Hegel like every other dime store reactionary. Yawn.

>I don't like the idea that IQ might have a correlation to race, therefore it can't be true.

Imagine how many academic man-hours have been wasted trying to explain away the low IQs of certain demographics.

I dunno what you mean, but he wasnt a philosopher in the true sense of the word at all.

That idea isn't even his, its from Blavatsky if im not mistaken.

Whats his is a weird mixture of hallucinogenic esoterism, fascism, and futurism

You think someone who likes Evola would be on the fore front of proving blacks are just as good as whites with respect to a material measure like IQ? That's where you /pol/aks flounder, you are the epitome of pre war we wuzers who think 1950's america was not degenerate.