Are Ann Coulter's books worth reading? Heard good things about them

She got some horse face

I hate /pol/ I hate libcucks, conservashits, drumphautists and women who become controversial in an effort to look intellectual. You can be intellectual without being a media attention whoring fuck. Screw her and everyone else.

Are these titles the biggest way to mark your book as trash?

Agreed

If you're going to have low standards, keep it to yourself instead of trying to drag us all down there with you.

I enjoyed this

>tfw you need this book to reply to people hating Ann in this thread

Why would you trust anything /pol/ says they're a movable ideologue.

Based Americans protecting the world from rogue states

>replying to this thread

who is this semen demon

>some guy on /pol/
There is a 4-in-5 chance that anybody who posts on /pol/ is a monumental fucking retard. Anything those spastics say should be ignored.

no

just read Spengler, Schmitt and Yockey if you want to be a dope awesome kickflip rw pseud on twitter user

Slit your wrists you fucking spastic.

Both sides are retarded.

fucking kek, that title.

>4-in-5
That estimation is far too courteous.

tfw no crazy aunty mommy gf to rub my dick while telling me she's going to make cumming great again

nice

>low standards
for what?

gonna need a source
>theweek.com/speedreads/692021/ann-coulter-puzzled-why-trump-hit-syrias-assad-better-leaders-region

She's my mommyfu, so yes.

dude you can just have a fucking older gf who has sex with you and jerks you off, you don't need to insult your mother like that. why do people have these weird fetishes? if you want to eat a girl's pussy, just eat her pussy and then fuck her. If you want her to sit on your face, eat her pussy while she sucks you off. I don't get all this domming shit and weird denial shit. Its so vulgar. Just have real sex like a fucking adult, get yourself off normally, cum inside your gf or wife like an adult male. Why do you need to make it so creepy? Why can't people just have sex? why the choking and rayp play and domination shit? Its so weird. We're not enemies or relatives or whatever, that's my partner.

Does she seem, I don't know, sarcastic to anyone else? Like she's trying to come across as genuine but there's just always this tone of sarcasm to everything she says. She sounds like she doesn't really like herself.

Honestly, she's kind of cute in a weird sort of way. Even though she's ugly.

You are lying to make pol look bad. The would have told you to start with Evola.

You are aware she's 56, right? Photoshop is a hell of a drug.

They might but none of them have actually read him.

>implying /pol/ has even read Ezra Pound, let along Evola
Never underestimate that place's retardation

So every /pol/ book thread is only Evola? Point out where anyone said anything about what to start with.

No that was the old stupid /pol/
>starting with an esoteric text
yeah real entry level stuff lmao

Starting with ann coulter is nu stupid /pol/ which is redditors who hate brown people. which is ironic cause about 3/4 of them are brown anyway

Her books on specific topics might be worth reading, like her book on single motherhood.
All these books like "Woah, Liberals are Dumb Right, Let Me Tell You Why Even Though You Probably Know Why And Already Agree" are definitely a waste of time.

Saying that liberals are dumb is one thing, but implying Republicans are smart is a stretch too far

Ann Coulter walks into a bar.
The bartender asks: "why the long face?"
She answers by going into an endless tirade about child-eating liberals and satanic democrats.
The bartender interrupts: "Holy shit this horse can talk! Too bad it can't think as well!"

No

not bad desu

I read a few pages of Adios America. It was okay. You already know if you agree with her or not and she's not going to change any opinions.

...

What does this mean?

What did YOU mean by THIS?

Because most people here CAN’T get partners (or lose their virginity)

I meant to seek a clarification as to why you were responding to the comparison with that particular picture

She's so fucking hot. *teacher fetish activated* I want her to cuddle me while we mock progshits.

i think atomization, chemical shit storm, social fracturing and technologically induced psychosis is also a big factor. Im convinced people have repressed extreme violent urges too from
watching psychotic media programming and its coming out in their sexual habits and tastes. S&M and rayp play are mainstream, cucking is mainstream, fart and scat stuff is mainstream, trannies are mainstream, fem domming is mainstream. This isn’t just virgins, all the porn sites and tumblr porn is rapidly moving in this direction

>everyone and everything is to blame except me

Honestly, they're trash, and these 20-40 year old twitter personalities have no real understanding of how the world works.

Sure, if you want reactionary outrage and to become even further away from actual understanding. Ann Coulter is a hack and she markets outrage to the dumbest and most fickle. If you want to think for yourself and discuss politics, read any other fucking book that isn't from one of these outrage salesmen.

>the eternal centrist

Americans were a mistake.

Liberals ARE centrists , something that Americans will never understand

this

yeeee

Wew lad, name one Anglo party that isn't liberal.

They are complete and utter shit, but if you want to learn about why the alt right is popular atm you might find them a bit interesting in a masochistic way (similar to how people read mein kampf and stuff by stalin to learn about political extremism).

she looks like her vagina has a weird smell and a metallic taste

wtf she literally looks like a cyborg in that pic

>she's kind of cute in a weird sort of way.

There's one good line in all of south park, and that line is transvestite donkey witch.

Have you embraced your bisexual tendencies yet or are you still in denial?

New Labour may be shit, but at least I know it is centrist. Americans always lump liberal with left.

>bait. What is it? How does it work?

Not even baiting, Coulter is just that retarded. No logic in her writings, just buzzword spam and pathetic attempts at using pathos.

It's interesting to see why people are falling for such retarded "ideologies". I don't care if people are left or right, but at least give some proper arguments for your viewpoints.

t. Butthurt shitlib mad that Coulter roasts his opinions so hard

What criteria do you think a book should fill to be "worth reading"?

Bitch, please. The woman has no arguments.

>Historically, the best way to convert liberals is to have them move out of their parents' home, get a job, and start paying taxes. But if this doesn't work, you might have to actually argue with a liberal. This is not for the faint of heart. It is important to remember that when arguing with liberals, you are always within inches of the "Arab street." Liberals traffic in shouting and demagogy. In a public setting, they will work themselves into a dervish-like trance and start incanting inanities: "Bush lied, kids died!" "racist!" "fascist!" "fire Rumsfeld!" "Halliburton!" Fortunately, the street performers usually punch themselves out eventually and are taken back to their parents' house.

Look at this crap. The bitch does nothing but use shitty generalisations, strawman and ad hominem attacks - there is no logic to her writing. There are plenty of conservative thinkers who are talented at arguing, Ann Coulter is not one of them. She is way below Veeky Forums's (even plebbit's) level.

>that entire paragraph
I love how she's instructing people on her side to try to convert the opposition by being a condescending asshole, and to assume from the get go that the person from the opposition is an unstable child.

>If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans is a book by American conservative columnist Ann Coulter. Published by Crown Publishing Group on October 2, 2007,[1] the book is a collection of Coulter's quotes,[2]
How far up one's own ass must one be to publish a book of your own quotes? It's like posting screencaps of your own posts but with more dead trees.

Amen

ann coulter says dumb retarded things to sell books in which she says dumb retarded things so she can be a paid guest on talk shows where she says more dumb retarded things

>It's like posting screencaps of your own posts but with more dead trees.
I seriously hope you don't mean to imply you don't keep an archive of all of your posts, including (You) count, in order to eventually produce user's Greatest Hits; or The Underrated Posts He Made Along the Way.

Where did it all go wrong for her?

My dad works for penguin and he told me Pynch's next novel will be nothing but Veeky Forums threads in which Ruggles shitposted, but his posts won't be highlighted and some of them weren't even posted (I believe around 20 or so have been posted on other boards, but I've read one of those (from Veeky Forums) about the differencies arising between brazil's north and south thanks to the preference of coriander over parsley on their traditional cooking and those are kinda easy to spot.

birth

She's not instructing anyone's conversion. It's squarely aimed at Republicans who have no intention of ever associating with Democrats, and who would grasp for their gun at the mention of Socialism.

You don't need to lie to make /pol/ look bad

I remember when Veeky Forums wasn't infested by /mu/ and /pol/.

Those 3 months were nice...

From Wikipedia:

>She summarized her view of Christianity in a 2004 column, saying, "Jesus' distinctive message was: People are sinful and need to be redeemed, and this is your lucky day, because I'm here to redeem you even though you don't deserve it, and I have to get the crap kicked out of me to do it." She then mocked "the message of Jesus... according to liberals", summarizing it as "something along the lines of 'be nice to people,'" which, in turn, she said "is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity.

So basically she believes that the great message of her religion is that, no matter what she does and thinks, if she believes in Christ she will be forgiven? Now that’s what I call an egotistical, crying-baby and all-for-myself vision of the world. You are only in it for the property in Heaven and to clean your fear and heavy-consciousness, allowing you do treat other people, races, cultures and countries as shit.

More:

>Confronting some critics' views that her content and style of writing is un-Christian-like,[80] Coulter stated that "I'm a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don't you ever forget it."[81] She also said, "Christianity fuels everything I write. Being a Christian means that I am called upon to do battle against lies, injustice, cruelty, hypocrisy—you know, all the virtues in the church of liberalism".[82] In Godless: The Church of Liberalism, Coulter characterized the theory of evolution as bogus science, and contrasted her beliefs to what she called the left's "obsession with Darwinism and the Darwinian view of the world, which replaces sanctification of life with sanctification of sex and death".[83] Coulter subscribes to intelligent design, a theory that rejects evolution.

And she also denies common knowledge and verified evidence only because it goes against the Bible (that she endorses only because it allows her to be a terrible person but safe a seat in heaven for herself)? Whoa, so she is both an hypocrite and stupid.

This is simply too much. She is probably a troll cashing inn and making money on the low-IQ spectrum of the population.

I don’t know American politics that much, but if the majority of Republicans hold views similar to those of these lady (if they legitimacy believe in them) then this people are as cancer-like as the Islamic extremists they fight against.

I'm convinced she's actually a giant troll. Even Bill Mahr likes her. stay away from my woman, Bill

Why clone Natalie when she's not old yet?
Also pls clone Audrey Hepburn.

>Also pls clone Audrey Hepburn.

I think my gf looks like her. She says I am crazy and thinks herself normal looking; to her Audrey is simply so beautiful she could never even be remotely compared to her.

Yet, to me, she resembles Audrey quite a lot.

The evangelicals indeed are a pox on the north american continent

Why would you ever read a book by a “pundit”

She has her moments of wit but is about as subtle as an armored tank.

Why are these books always red white and black?

Crypto commies

I don't know how my post implied that at all

GASP

>leftypol

wew I was in that thread and he was as far right as they come.

>resorting to claiming people are leftists when they aren't

>Womemes who should be in the kitchen write books while ripping the benefits of feminism considering themselves "conservative"
More proofs that americlaps are dumb

Why are these kinds of books almost always poorly titled?
>No Campus for White Men: The Transformation of Higher Education into Hateful Indoctrination
>Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans
>¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole
Why do they by and large have these long ass abstracts right in their title?

Clickbait irl

>user walks into a restaurant
>they make him put on a helmet for insurance reasons

>people are their ideologies
You are what's wrong with the world today.

easier to grasp for retards what is it all about