Is Jordan Peterson right about what he wrote about the dangers of Post Modernism?

*there's

>him
>his

white muslim?
Asian muslim?
muslim muslim?

He's not right about postmodernism itself but he's right about how a certain kind of american/canadian flavored postmodernism has been extremely nocive to the youth.

How so?

Have you seen all those blue haired dykes, bro? That's how.

Daily reminder that peterson diddle kids

Dyeing your hair blue is detrimental to the youth? You can't be serious.

But thats not postmodernism. That's ideology that has appropriated certain postmodern ideas and terminology out of context. A big project in postmodernist philosophies is to stray away from ideology and look at the comstructs that define them or the "skeleton" of ideology, whether be left or right leaning. Modern liberals are very far from the picture postmodernists would want.

all white people in Toronto already converted to Islam

That shit ain't natural. Real hair don't come in weird ass colors.

What is that thing? A wild /pol/tard?

It's been a lot better since Sharia law was enforced in my neighbourhood.

>gen-Z drumpf supporters
I cannot help but chortle

Yeah, I know. That's why I said he isn't right about postmodernism itself, but he has some valid points against americanized postmodernism.

no. also, why is he looking at that thing like that?

what's wrong about pursuing one's self interest as a white man. To be fair, many of us- the smarter ones- have leaped off the Trump Train and into the SIEGE Bandwagon. Trump is a Lubavitcher plant, and the entrenched ZOG machine wasn't going to let go easily.

The fuck does any of that mean

?

>he thinks that supporting Trump is pursuing his interest as a white man
now that's really stupid

pederasty

not an argument

Trump is standing up to the left, which would see us be dethroned so to speak. He is securing our existence, and our countries existence.

I do no longer support Trump I support Helter Skelter and the Cult of the Black Sun.

Watch this for a short introduction to the SIEGE mindset, it's all about Helter Skelter.

youtube.com/watch?v=oo64nlKdA0k
youtube.com/watch?v=vjY0synjmvs
youtube.com/watch?v=c7pSUz-CMzM
youtube.com/watch?v=JrWhpSbVmmE

>I'm a virgin
Yeah, we know.

I don't have time to watch all those videos. I quick summary if you will? (20 words or less)

How does that even relate to your first statement?

Those are Trump supporters interests as A Wyatt Men, and they are pursuing them

Oh, so basically a Manson cultist. Charming.

This might sound like a mindfuck to you normies, but what if Hitler was actually the Avatar, the reincarnation of God on this earth, or rather the destructive aspect of God. Hitler did not die, the Fuhrer slumbers in the halls of Shambala deep inside the Hollow Earth below the Himalayas, waiting for the right moment to arrive.

Hitler is God and Charles Manson was his Prophet. Unfortunately, Manson couldn't complete his task, so it's up to us to bring about Helter Skelter, that is the final War, the cleansing fire that will bring an end to the Kali Yuga. Accelerationist Hitlerism, my man. We gotta make Helter Skelter happen.

You tripping, bro.

>what if
huge red flag

This. Many french Post-structuralist philosophers, such as Guy Debord, Georges Bataille and Michel Foucault were actually Black Sun cultists. Foucault went to California as a Pligrim, to visit the site of the Manson Murders.

>Helter Skelter

ahah yeah I love that game bro

Please share your sources, if any.

>jewelry
>bright colors
>low test
>fake military shit
funny how 90% of right wingers look just like stereotypical leftists

is thataway my boy

No, but we should be wary of postmodernism. This aversion to structural theories inhibits out understanding of the world and turns every social analyst into some embarassing self-important wannabe orator

>Isn't the University of Toronto mostly white and asians?
"asians"

microfibers get in your lungs and may give you cancer

>bright colors
>leftists
what? even when they dye their hairs blue or green they use shitty muted shades instead of going full chad

Guy Debord was a Marxist, which puts him totally at odds with post structuralism. Post structuralists believe Marxism and all structural understandings of the world are bad, because every place and time is different.

One of Foucault's major points was that it's pointless to argue about whether power is held by the propertied class or by elected officials or by cultural icons, because power is just a "strategical situation" in which one person or group of people can influence others.

Honestly, I think he's wrong about using the word postmodernist, because it's not postmodernism, it's critical theorists that teach students about intersectionality, colonial theory and all of these pseudo-leftist disciplines about oppressor and oppressed.

derrida reticently acknowledged to being a marxist, and yeah while you can read Foucault in different ways the interpretations of his work in academia are always filtered through a very left wing shitty lens

that makes no sense, Adorno was an elitist and almost reactionary at times, i guess you could read Marcuse like that but not most of the frankfurt school

spooky

nah the Derrida book about Marx is him categorically rejecting Marxist analysis while providing a basic normie critique of neoliberalism that he sees as "capturing the spirit of Marx"

Universities aren't Marxist anymore and Foucault and Derrida are a big part of that

...

>Adorno was an elitist and almost reactionary at times

So what? The supposed dynamics between oppressor and oppressed that academics and SJWs use come from him and Marcuse. Maybe more from Marcuse, but still, this whole shtick is from them, not from "postmodernists" whoever that's supposed to be.

I don't know what the fuck this cucklord wrote about post-modernism, but much smarter philosophers than him have condemned it

that's because the left is nothing in current year, just a random "resist" things identity to be co-opted and used to redirect energy when necessary by different interest groups

...

You don't know what critical theory means but neither does Peterson probably.

He uses postmodernism as a catch-all boogeyman to describe any and all philosophical outlooks to the left of Macron.

Nothing remotely reactionary about Adorno, he rejected aspects of postwar culture not because "muh tradition" but because he recognized the beginning of new artistic industries that placed profitability over artistic value. Rather than earning money to produce more art, he saw that record companies and film studies had begun producing art simply to make money.

is there anything more po-mo than a butch dyke / man with low testosterone wearing a maga hat?

What he's most wrong about white collective interest.

How do I guide you. You are so far off course that I truly wish this is a shit post. Do not hurt your fellow man. Its that fucking simple.

...

>You don't know what critical theory means

Yes I do. I just explained it.

>He uses postmodernism as a catch-all boogeyman to describe any and all philosophical outlooks to the left of Macron.

Absolutely bullshit, and you would've known that's bullshit if you'd watched a video where he talks about the subject.

I'm laughing my ass off if you think nobody wrote about freedom and oppression before Adorno. This isn't only a huge part of the Marxist tradition, but the basis of liberal philosophy since the late 17th century.

Modern SJW stuff is an extension of this same enlightenment liberal egalitarianism, heavily influenced by postcolonial theory and subaltern studies, shifting focus away from how economic processes shape society to how cultural phenomena affect identity and consciousness, especially the identity and consciousness of the marginalized. This post-structuralist outlook often focuses on the ways that culture and media exclude gay people or the homeless from society, rather than exploring how class society allows this exclusion to happen like a Marxist would.

While there's some language borrowed from revisionist Marxists like Gramsci and Marcuse, this outlook is generally incompatible with Marxism because it either ignores class altogether or sees class as little more than a factor which can intensify existing forms of non-economic oppression like racism or sexism. There's no way to read Marx or Lenin or Bordiga or Adorno and think the world's biggest problem is cultural appropriation or prejudice against trans people or whatever.

For sure, and it's been that way since the 80s. Neoliberal triumphalism and the fall of communism crushed socialist parties everywhere, and the rise of postmodernism allowed radical professors to be sidelined from university faculties and replaced by navel-gazing Idpol opportunists.

There's some evidence that capitalist institutions like the CIA pushed hard to crush materialism in the academy, but I think a bigger factor is the rising power of students and parents versus professors. It used to be almost impossible for a professor to be punished for making radical philosophical propositions or even jokes. Now it happens all the time.

thephilosophicalsalon.com/the-cia-reads-french-theory-on-the-intellectual-labor-of-dismantling-the-cultural-left/

nytimes.com/2014/09/13/world/middleeast/professors-angry-tweets-on-gaza-cost-him-a-job.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=C7B30B00859C60147C12CD02D953FC9C&gwt=pay

slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2016/12/26/drexel_censures_professor_for_white_genocide_tweet.html

>capitalist institutions like the CIA

Stop this

>Modern SJW stuff is an extension of this same enlightenment liberal egalitarianism, heavily influenced by postcolonial theory and subaltern studies, shifting focus away from how economic processes shape society to how cultural phenomena affect identity and consciousness, especially the identity and consciousness of the marginalized.

I know, which literally why I specifically called them critical theorists, and not postmodernists, and also literally why I called them pseudo-leftists.

Please pay attention.

>secret police of a capitalist country
gee, i wonder what mysterious unknown ideology may they have, i bet they are all a bunch of radical monarchists

Don't you chucklefucks have anything better to do than post a dozen threads a day about this jackass?

Reported and saged.

I for one am tired of the evil screeching of marginalized voices. It's like they relish victimhood. If you are trans then FUCK YOU! Marxist child raping blue haired SCUM

Capitalism is an economic system, not an ideology. An ideology may incorporate support for capitalism, but "capitalism" is not an ideology.

Classifying an institution by its accidental ideological orientation can really only be done in a highly qualified sense anyways.

that doesn't work anymore, it's not the 90s anymore and we don't live in a post-ideological world anymore, we are post-post-ideological now

Not to mention that this faggot doesn't even understand normal rational self-interest. The only ideology that exists for a CIA bureaucrat is whatever ideology increases their yearly budget, nothing else.

>da whyte main self indares
>ZOG in full force
>{^^^^^} train

You are a living, breathing meme. You can literally only express yourself in bottom tier pol memes. Fucking Kill Yourself

Savitri Devi-The Lightning and the Sun
jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/lightningsun.pdf

Jorg Lanz von Lebenfiels- Theozoology: or, the science of the sodomite apelings and the divine electron
ia802703.us.archive.org/9/items/EuropaHouseTheozoology/Theozoology.pdf

Miguel Serrano- Adolf Hitler: the Ultimate Avatar

aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/Adolf-Hitler-The-Ultimate-Avatar-Part-One.pdf

Also read Helter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders by Vincent Bugliosi