Daily reminder these are the same people who demand 120k a year to pay their ''education'' for free

Daily reminder these are the same people who demand 120k a year to pay their ''education'' for free
Yet they don't even read new york time's best sellers

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oo64nlKdA0k
libcom.org/library/anti-semitism-national-socialism-moishe-postone
thecharnelhouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/moishe-postone-anti-semitism-and-national-socialism-notes-on-the-german-reaction-to-holocaust.pdf
emploisfp-psjobs.cfp-psc.gc.ca/psrs-srfp/applicant/page1800?poster=1111944
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Do those people even browse /lit?

Okay /pol/ thank you very much for this insight. We really appreciate how you are trying to spread your message to other boards by making threads that have something to do, in your opinion, with the board culture, and you probably think of yourself as a valiant missionary, but you really aren't.
You are cancer.
Terminal, spreading cancer.
Veeky Forums is ded because of you.

If only you realised wrong and ignorant you were......

White people's good nature used against them is what this represents. They have no clue about how they're being used as pawns in their own destruction and who is pulling their strings.

State funded education is merely an investment in the human capital of the nation.

Get out of here with your improper ellipses, this is a board for intelligent people.

It was before everyone was encouraged to go and everything resultingly got dumbed down. Now it's a fucking joke.

>posting an image of a few people acting goofy and thinking it is a convincing argument in a very debated topic
>on a board that doesn't care for it

/pol/'s way of debating, everyone

Do your whiny "muh pol" routine somewhere else, we're tired of it.

But if the nation invests without demanding results you get people who do 5 years over a 3 year useles humanities degree

t. Someone who did 5 years over a useles degree.

>whiny "muh pol" routine
that's exactly what the OP is doing.

Somewhere else? Like not on /pol/? How about the literature board, is that ok?

Keep up the good fight, defender of normies

"We" being /pol/ ? Nice try /pol/

No, that's what you are doing. On Veeky Forums we discuss openly Marxism and other jewish-led cultural degeneration as it relates to literature and society at large. I suggest you go to reddit if that's a problem for you.

People's own ambition, selfishness, and materialism should provide results. Consumerism drives the country, thus educated people pursuing higher income careers will have a higher disposable income.

But yes, if you treat university like high school 2.0 and have no thought towards career, the future, etc. then you are not a good example of subsidized post secondary education.

My career trajectory is very good and I have never seriously considered leaving my country (Canada). Yet despite Canada investing heavily in my education (BSc, MSc, PhD), the current government seems to favor refugees or illegal immigrants who have not put a dime into the system and will likely not for at least 1-2 generations. This isn't about a sense of entitlement or anything like that, I don't expect to be handed a job and I think competition is good for the individual/citizen/country/species, but if you invest in people you shouldn't close the door on them when they are ready to give back.

People of course exaggerate or are melodramatic, but it is true: being a white, straight male from a middle class background is not a good profile in this current political climate. For example, when I was applying for government research positions, all job postings stated that diversity was a priority and that preference may be given to visible minorities, First Nations people, gender/sexual whatever, etc. Basically, anyone but a straight, white male. It's hard to maintain idealism and political correctness when you have a young family and see this in print for virtually all job postings.

That’s just because you’re genuinely retarded and mediocre and will never accomplish anything in your life. Even if you studied a STEM major, you’ll be so fucking mediocre and unambitious that you’ll be one of those losers working at McDonald’s thinking the market isn’t in your favor but somehow you’re still entitled to that fictions STEM salary that you losers jerk off over. People like you just need to die desu

The bad vibes in this post really bum me out.

I go to a top private University and it isn't close to that much.
And is supporting freedom of religion and sexual libertarianism really such a bad thing? Or is it only bad when they remind you there are cultural problems in coming to terms with these? How might they secure freedoms without hurting your feefees?

Thanks for specifying they don't read much literature, I almost thought this was an off topic thread

Reminder that most people posting threads like this trying to "redpill" other boards weren't around for visible sage

I sincerely hope this is a troll post.

WE SEEM TO HAVE FALLEN FOR OUR OWN PROPAGANDA AIMED AT MAN'S NOBLER INSTINCTS

youtube.com/watch?v=oo64nlKdA0k

>4 hours

>And is supporting freedom of religion and sexual libertarianism really such a bad thing? Or is it only bad when they remind you there are cultural problems in coming to terms with these? How might they secure freedoms without hurting your feefees?

they don't merely want sexual libertarianism, liberalism puts forwards a secularised religious ethics based on ''sexual libertarianism'', sexuality is now protected from 'shaming', sometimes by law such as in the UK, and 'sexual liberty' for it's own sake is officially celebrated. In the 21st century, sex and pornography are not only a right but a consumer duty, mechanical and contractual.

this.

>sexuality is now protected from 'shaming', sometimes by law such as in the UK, and 'sexual liberty' for it's own sake is officially celebrated. In the 21st century, sex and pornography are not only a right but a consumer duty, mechanical and contractual.
why does this matter, who cares?

Yes. Read Houellebecq.

Trips of Satan

It matters because as far as we know, there's only one way to make human babies. A strong, familial bond creates better babies who grow up to create a better world. Very rarely does someone born from a slut without a father amount to much of anything in the world. Sexual liberation destroys that.

tell men to keep it in their pants then

we are heading for a nihilist consumer hellscape of hedonist units separated only by meaningless labels and ''identities''. Even the muslims are supposed to be sex positive blue hair Queers(tm). what's even the point of living anymore?

>nihilist hedonist
Doesn't compute

Men are intrinsically less responsive to group pressure, hence why they sought to achieve the limitation of sexual expression through women: because they weren't going to become disciplined, chaste individuals on their own. It's like giving your car keys to a really good friend when you're drunk and have a chronic drinking problem, someone who you can trust will not give them back to you unless you are in an acceptable state of mind to drive, except instead of winning your car keys through demonstrations of sobriety, you win a chance with a lady you fancy through feats of strength or intellect, by creating something, by improving to world to win her favor. When a man no longer has to work for pussy, he will not work for pussy. And so women had to be taught to be the gatekeepers.

You sound upset

I just never got how the Jews went from being a bunch of rabbis trying to follow The Law of YHWH and avoid encouraging his wrath, to an elite minority with secret globalist intentions of expanding the practices of gay sex, drug use, atheism and women in the workplace.

Like, how did they go from being the rabbis of the Talmud, debating ad nauseum whether or not you could drink goat's milk on a Saturday while standing on one foot, to being the Rothschilds?

What was that process and how is there no explicit literature indicating it occurred?

>sage-of-this-thread
Fuck you namefag retard

It's very complicated, but when you inbreed your population after a bottleneck to where everyone is a fifth cousin of one another then ingrain in them the beliefs that they are destined to rule the world, that everyone else is their slave, and that they have been perpetually victimized by these slaves due to no fault of their own, needless to say, you're going to end up with a severely fucked up population of people, which is precisely what jews are.

I keep on hearing about these job postings, but I have yet to really see anything like that in my own searches. Is it something that I'm missing, even though I'm currently in a social science major technically?

okay so im not a /pol/ fag and i dont believe in the global conspiracy

but the way i understand it, the argument is: jews can not exist unless the world around them is accepting of them. israel could not exist without US backing them, jews in europe can not go about their business if the population wasnt so accepting and multicultural already, and generally if the world fucks off and does their thing, then jews get to prosper. so, supposedly, they are manipulating media and global politics to bring a state of postmodern deconstruction so jews can do their thing. I dont buy it.

Rothchilds became rich because Christians werent allowed to engage in banking in europe. So jews started the first banks, the first rothchild just happens to have come at an opportune moment where he became the court jew for the crown and his sons were equally motivated to continue the business. are the rothchild's very powerful? yes. are they behind a hidden illuminati scheme? probably not. the average 4chaner never rubs shoulders with celebrities or polticians so they assume that they are some form of elite people, when in reality they are the same as everyone else-scared of their own shadow

IMHO it's more that the Jews have undergone more selection pressure for intelligence than any other group and as such are the only group that can be said to be almost uniformly intelligent at a population level. Combine this with their alienation from everywhere due to lack of a nation until recently and you get a lot of butthurt averagefags. It's also in the nature of intelligence to destroy biological niches and in the nature of unintelligence to be reliant on a biological niche. National culture is just an artificial biological niche for animals, so the Jew is at odds with nationalism just by the fact of their intelligence. If there were no Jews, popular culture would just label everyone with an IQ over 130 as a sociopath and periodically purge the intelligent like in Cambodia.

>manipulating media and global politics to bring a state of postmodern deconstruction

Tfw 'the jew' is actually an euphemism for deterritorialising global capitalism.

libcom.org/library/anti-semitism-national-socialism-moishe-postone
thecharnelhouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/moishe-postone-anti-semitism-and-national-socialism-notes-on-the-german-reaction-to-holocaust.pdf

Reminder that if you think higher education shouldn't be free, or at least affordable then you're a pathetic waste of a human being, who is willingly taking it up the ass from rich people getting richer.

Enjoy actually believing that giving your hard earned tax dollars to people who don't need it is the better alternative to funding people who do need it, you fucking swine. Enjoy filth.

Exactly what is being implied here? I ask this out of genuine curiosity.

Did you read the Bible? They brought wrath and ruin to ever society they came into contact with

The modern world is entrenched with cultural capitalism, not cultural marxism.

It's all about money through total domination power control etc. Technological innovations of the past 20 years have made this much much easier. It's literally a group of corporations and people in power working together to make everyone the same type consumer. McDonalds and Starbucks on every street. Everyone consumes popular media only (or face social backlash for being racist, sexist). Everyone's data file is kept up to date. Monitoring your choices (be a good consumer now, do your global duty).

This concept It doesn't take cues from Marxism, but instead Stalin-era Soviet Union and their relationship with citizens which is totally removed from Marx and Engels and is just totalitarianism.

It's not like the spread of influence was one way (ie. capitalist ideals infiltrating the Soviet Union in the wake of Stalin's downfall), but was in both directions (Stalinistic ideals infiltrating the capitalist West during the Soviet Union's weakening/Cold War ending).


Not just capitalism. But post-industrial, late neo-liberal capitalism. The kind of thing that happens in a world where you've already progressed so far that the only real commodity of interest left is the exchange of control over humanity. Made even easier in a globalized world.

Think about how corporations are constantly consolidating or merging with each other. There were like 20 major film studios in the early days now there are 3 distinct entities (where the largest, Disney, has control over 50% of the entire American film and television industry). It's like that, but with blocs of nation-states and generalized consumer culture. Like "The West" or other "first world" countries are all becoming homogenized, consuming the same general products/media, etc.

>1: be jew
>2: have found relative peace in Europe for the first time in history, being accepted by everyone except for fringe elements
>3: Mastermind mass immigration from countries with strong antisemitic outlook
>4: ???
>5: Profit

Food for thought, mostly. It's worth noting that whenever anyone tries to conquer, subjugate, or kill the Jews, it's not the most moral who survive, or even the wealthiest, but the most intelligent, and aggressively intelligent at that. Jewish culture prioritizes intelligence, and the average IQ of the Jewish population is about 10-15 points above average.

There's something ethological at work here, and also something unintentionally eugenic. The pattern is also recursive and iterative, and goes back to the Bible.

Bottom line: The Jews are the population best adapted to surviving the human race when you view the human race ethologically.

I see it quite often, eg:

emploisfp-psjobs.cfp-psc.gc.ca/psrs-srfp/applicant/page1800?poster=1111944
>The Public Service of Canada is committed to building a skilled, diverse workforce reflective of Canadian society. As a result, it promotes employment equity and encourages candidates to indicate voluntarily on their application if they are a woman, an Aboriginal person, a person with a disability or a member of a visible minority group.

Sometimes the language is stronger, for example saying that such candidates will be preferred or only Natives will be considered etc.

>the average IQ of the Jewish population is about 10-15 points above average.
Is this even significant?

The Jew envies and hates Whites more than he loves himself.

capitalism is a people management system, it's about producing governance through a process of inputs and outputs. muh sjws are just a rational product of capitalist bureaucracy and the ideals of the enlightenment. Our society is so obsessed with political correctness precisely because it needs to conceal its true hobbesian, dog-eats-dog nature.

Yes, very much so. The same difference in the opposite direction is used by the alt-right to support treating blacks differently, and it's harder to account for +10 points externally than -10 (Which could easily be caused by some combination of malnutrition, lead poisoning, dietary factors etc).

Very. but it's not true. It coems close for Ashkenazi Jews. All other kinds have an IQ below Europeans.

fuck off conspiritard

Hm. Well there's some truth in that, especially about jews defining themselves in opposition to their host, mostly as a means of strengthening their own in-group identity, which results in rabid revolutionary behavior, but their high intelligence is often misunderstood. It is limited to the verbal realm and rote memorization. Jews contributed literally nothing to arts and sciences until a couple hundred years ago and even then their said contributions are often suspect. What they are good at is manipulating people and seizing power, but their track record of holding onto it for any period of time is, well, they've never been able to, hence the constant expulsions. We also have a pretty good understanding of their behavior and history now as well, so we don't need to speculate too much, though even with the current year internet not many people can be counted on to actually dig into it.

Can we please rangeban North America? We know they only have three books between them and none of them were interested in them. It's the mixed race nazi love child of Brazil and Australia in terms of lit.

> It is limited to the verbal realm and rote memorization.

Most of what you consider "real" intelligence is probably irrelevant and obsolete folk knowledge prone to disruption by scientific and capitalistic progress. It's self-demonstrating so don't even bother trying to argue.

10 IQ points makes a difference in survival, really?

Not really. They are purely parasitic and need a host to survive. Jumping from place to place, blending in, destroying it from within, then running to the next place and repeating the process is an effective strategy to an extent, but it's one that is not going to last much longer in the information age.

If you're too good for public education, you don't need to use it. There are still private options. The push for government spending on student's college tuitions has never applied to anything but public education never by any significant activist groups or legislators.
Thus nothing changes about the fact that government funded education would be an investment in human capital. Nobody is proposing not letting people pay massive prices or go into massive debt for prestigious degrees. An affordable alternative to this remains an investment in human capital.

These things are measurable and have been measured. Jews and Asians are not very creative and are not abstract thinkers or staunch individualists. Whites are, which is why whites have been responsible for nearly all innovation. There are different variables for understanding intelligence.

What you're describing is terraforming, specifically the externalities of progress. A polar bear would probably feel the same way about the human race if it were smart enough to understand the causal link. In the long run, the polar bears will all die, just as a plurality of those with an IQ below 120 will die. It doesn't matter if you succeed in killing the Jews, as I've said it's an emergent property of populations that follows some unknown and unidentified ethological and eugenic law. The majority population will periodically purge the minority but in the long run the minority is better adapted, history proceeds forward by the work of the minority, etc. You think the information age will help you seek out and destroy the Jew, but the transition to the post-scarcity age, managed assymetrically, will more probably be a final reckoning for the bottom half of the human race.

>blacks have a rich oral history... t-they never needed writing

I think hedonism now a days is fueled by selective/subjective nihilism.

Where did this even come from?