Well known author comes to Veeky Forums

He's too scared to post here because we'd insult his prose, not just his politics

I wonder if it ever dawns on /pol/ that they might actually be the sheep and the snowflakes they so often decry. I mean, they're the ones who are slavishly devoted to a strongman, and they're the ones who seem to be violently offended by everything.

lolwut
Heinleins mainline lolbertarian
To reject him shows what a moran the compiler of that list is

>/pol/ is now Veeky Forums
/pol/ is right about this guy, actually. You know he saw the title 'politically incorrect' and went there instead of 'literature' so he could make this snide comment to all his impressionable fans. What a faggot.

one of the best gifs I've seen
thanks

...

I am reading The Phoenix Program at the moment, and the description of the propaganda campaigns that proceeded it remind of the American right today

/pol/ isn't really right about the guy. Yes, he is a massive faggot, but that doesn't make them right.

You would hardly believe me but I had already calculated the fact that since I posted that post there would be more than 13 replies and even if I were to state that fact, no matter what number of actual posts I would have predicted, this post would have stayed up as long as that. Either by the zeitgeist of the board or by sheer chance because I'm literally the luckest dude to ever grace this green site, it would've been 299+ and I would've been hear laughing at everyone. But, unforunately, now that I've stated this, I'm afraid this post has only ten more replies left in it. SORRY, BUD ;)

>/pol/ gets shitty genre fiction authors to insult them on twitter
>Veeky Forums has alt-lit divas making threads about themselves so they can post about it on twitter
i think it's clear who is winning

>/pol/
>libertarian

/pol/ is actually right about him though

Wait, does /pol/ not know AC Clarke was gay? I thought that was the biggest open secret since Liberace.

Meme magic is real

lol nigger, these statements are easy to anyone semi-familair with Veeky Forums's disposition.
There will be 5-10 more posts in this thread ;)

Here's your (You) my friend

Wow dude how long did it take you to come up with that response that's going to be absolutely wrong because anything that comes after this post that I'm writing right now is at MAX MAX MAX three posts because one of them is going to be you disguised as someone else either adding to the discussion or giving me another you like this guy who absolutely can't be fucked but is at least able to realize that I'm here only to be here for the moment.

I'm proud of us desu

Here is your second (You).

He wrote that post himself to shill and virtue signal his books.

good
let Veeky Forums remain as independent as possible from association with the larger Veeky Forums

Wow dude, can I get a third (You)? I liked you when I first saw you but then I had this overwhelming feeling of immediate disdain, distaste, and any other dis-word I can think of because although you're telling me that what I'm saying has no purpose whatsoever and you're right, you still are giving me nothing to work off of and I want to keep working for your (Yous). Tell me some of your favorite authors or favorite books or least favorites so I can at least talk shit about your taste and we can get something going. If not, do or don't give me that third you because guaranteed there's only 2 more posts left in this thread if you do or don't, considering , , , and are all

why are you feeding the trolls

Eh, I don't really think interracial is correct here.

I mean, right? We can all agree, we have seen evidence that the races are different. But at least on Veeky Forums and Veeky Forums no one really gives a fuck. In other words, yes the races are different but they aren't NEGATIVE differences. My point is, no, I don't think interracial sex is a big deal. The media portraying it a certain way? Yeah, that's something else entirely.

Anyway. They were right about homosexuality. That is expressly forbidden in the Bible. A whole city was destroyed because of it. California is getting their shit fucked up right now because of it, among other concerns.

wot

Who is this retarded faggot? How come he's a "well known author" while literally nobody here know who he is?

>random faggot
>"Veeky Forums declares"

There's positives and negatives with all the races.

White people are both empathetic (And that's a good thing) and empathetic (and that's a bad thing) for example.
Nigs are super violent but they're great in social situations and know how to dance.
Asians are intelligent and relatively rational but lack creativity and follow authority like a race of ants or perfect prussian serfs
Indians are disgusting and smelly but 1/100000 of them are creative supergeniuses that make up for the rest

It's easy to use a VPN and there's no way you can prove that you didn't, and there's no way that no one here doesn't believe that you did.

Yes but you're dumb. You can't dogmatically just say these things. Most of those are false anyway! And if you perpetuate these theories they are true as far as you let them be.

In other words, that is why I said the differences didn't have to be negative. Because you think of specific things, and so does everyone else. And yes, races have certain attributes, but trust me, neither I nor you could pin them down like this. IQ is not a valid test btw.

Also. They aren't negative or positive. They just are. Anyone is how God made them.

Everything except the nigs one is based on personal experience and biases.

Nig hyperviolence is anything but a theory and you are an imbecile and a fool if you think otherwise.

>Also. They aren't negative or positive. They just are. Anyone is how God made them.
Also this smacks of idiotic subjectivism; "lol reality isn't real nigga, just interpret everything the way you want and create your own reality!"

>based on personal experience and biases.
Right, and you are defining things subjectively without thinking about everyone's point of view.

In short, if I may:

The differences between races are apparent, but should be left at this: they are neither positive nor negative, and thus because of this limitation of our current morality, we have people who tend to think that for every positive or negative, there must be an equivalency. An equal exchange if you will. They are wrong. The way reality works is that flowers just look and smell different. That's all. They all look and smell great, they are fucking flowers. But they are different.

We are made in God's image. There is no defect in anyone because of race. But don't try to specify attributes, that's where you lose me.

>Also. They aren't negative or positive. They just are. Anyone is how God made them.
What about the inclination of the homosexual toward his own sex? Or any sinful inclination that a man has because of his state of original sin? These impulses might not be "sinful" (i.e. something he is morally culpable for) supposing he does not act on them, but they are still "negative", are they not? They are not part of God's ideal creation, and are a hindrance to many people's salvation.

t. not any of the guys in this conversation prior to this point

Actually, on the contrary. Your post reeks of subjective interpretations of racial characteristics applied to a gradation scale.

I simply said they were different.

You were the one that applied negative and positive attributes to the different races.

I posit these inclinations are wholly manifest in societal impulses.

You have an underrating of how much reality influences us from our infancy. This is going to get a bit muddled but here we go. Lets say homosexuality promotes a certain mentality. Then someone with homosexuality makes a movie. Then someone watches the movie. The guy was homosexual and put his inclinations in the dialogue or made the actors act a certain way, not even necessarily gay. But the overall psychological impulses that come from interaction would make anyone in contact with this individual more prone to acting certain ways, especially if this homosexual were in an authoritative position.

Now then. Here's where the media kicks in. Because if you've let this sink in at an early age. BOOM, you have a higher chance of being gay. You are literally that susceptible to influences. People can make you be a certain way, especially if you are influenced at an early age to be that certain way. It's like kind of how shorter, blond people are always portrayed as gay. I can guarantee you, that's not what God wants, bud. But someone wants it. Someone possessed by homosexuality and by extension, Satan.

Now if you don't agree with this or believe it, go back to watching Don Lemon or Anderson Cooper, gay enthusiasts on a news channel, one of whom is related to the Vanderbilts.

There is a strong physiological component with homosexuality though. I have no intention of denying the possible influence of social and cultural factors - I am not a dogmatist. At the same time, it seems very clearly established to me that much of the causative factors in homosexuality are prenatal, genetic. Homosexual people are more likely to have different facial structures and that sorta shit. Twins are more likely to share eachother's sexual orientation than normal siblings (you can make a point that they also share similar socialisation, but still).

>Homosexual people are more likely to have different facial structures and that sorta shit
EXACTLY.

HOW DOES THIS NOT PROVE MY POINT.

The media portrays gays a certain way, and BOOM. All of a sudden they have similar characteristics. Why do you think? Hmmmm

Mental illness? What the hell. Do you think people's DNA morphs and makes your skeletal structure change based on what TV shows you watch? I'm not talking about shit like hairstyle and pose. Studies where they examined this removed culturally signifying elements like that and focused purely on the physical structure of the body

Ive had that thought too and its interesting for them to fail to see that they are the in same vain as the sjw etc they always complain about only on the opposite side

No you idiot. You've lost the point. I'm saying that media influenced people to be gay first and then they became gay and the science then backed it up with statistics, because the people that became gay because of the media were already gay because of very intense amounts of vapid social conditioning.

Do try to keep up.

/pol/ is so illiterate they didn't even bother to include Samuel R. Delany

So the media made people who already "look" gay become gay? You realise that "effeminate men" have been something people recognised and associated with buttfucking for millenia, right?

Scatzi go away.

Man I read Scalzi after thoroughly enjoying Heinlein, Haldeman, and Steakley and I was very disappointed. Old Man's War is trash in comparison to Starship Troopers, Forever War, and Armor.

>how unbelievably awful these people are
Is that really true though? I'd say the typical normie twitter fags are far more petty and awful, than anyone on Veeky Forums. Mainly because they're overtly genuine in their animalistic sperging and tribalism. Whereas most people on Veeky Forums are actually pretty open-minded and playful.

I'm not saying this cycle hasn't been around for a long time. It's just a repeating cycle that keeps aspects of Satan alive in society. Like a broken record.

Because everyone thinks something is gay, then unless God can get through to his common sense, he might become gay. This has happened often probably.

Trust a de Sade before a Saint-Just

You are odd and delusional. I suggest you stop browsing /christian/. Are you the same user shitposting about Mishima not being a faggot

Not at all. There are others who share similar thoughts.

who......

The guy posting about Mishima not being a faggot

you shouldn't call actual homosexuals 'faggots'.

I never called you a faggot

lurk more
cry more

feel worse about yourself.

This isn’t the races in a RPG you know.

>well known
>
Also kill yourself for making a thread about a genre fiction trash writer.

I doubt much ever dawns on them. But sure- /pol/'s ideology is basically what happened after right-wingers noticed contemporary identity politics and decided to play that game (while still constantly complaining about identity politics).

I'm sorry, who?

literally who the fuck is john sclazi?

some namefagging /pol/tard apparently

10/10

/pol/ is always right

>it's a "Veeky Forums talks about /pol/ despite never visiting it and then pretends that they're not just sniffing their own farts" episode
What do any of you know about /pol/ other than memes?

If we went to /pol/ we'd be /pol/ fags, like you.

we know they read genre fic

>his politics and identity are so fragile that it can be overwritten by osmosis
embarrassing tbqh

>he can only interpret a statement one way

>he refuses to explain what he actually means to avoid locking himself down to a position he might need to defend
At least this way you can always hide behind "nuh uh that's not what I meant" as if it's my fault that you can't communicate.

But it's not that you can't communicate, it's that you don't want to. You know that you can't lose an argument if you don't start one - the equivalent of flitting around just out of range in a duel, except the arena is infinite so you can always step back whenever I step forward.

>buttrustled

Are we talking about the same Permavirgin Elliot Rodger Worshipping Autismo Enabling Chink Drawing Masturbatory Forum?

When you spent more time playing arpeegeez than doing anything else reality becomes... fleeting.

>/pol/ is Veeky Forums
Every fucking time

Veeky Forums is /r9k/

Maybe. But at large this never happens.

/pol/ is what happens when right wing ideologues manipulate contrarian edgy loser NEETs on the internet a fascist regime would be beneficial to them instead of sending their useless lard asses to labor camps.

/b/ is Veeky Forums everything else is fluff

...

>John Michael Scalzi II (born May 10, 1969) is an American science fiction author and
/pol/ can keep him

Yeah what a dumb fascist idea it was to kill the people invading the country you swore to protect.

Why is Stephenson there? Is it because of Isaac Newton?

Did you read Seveneves? It's quite literally about a female President of the United States allowing Reddit to decide which members of humanity deserve to survive an apocalypse.

>well known
who is that random retard?

We need a smaller brain saying '/v/ is Veeky Forums'.

A reply for the cause

>/pol/ is so pleb that even its list of "degenerate" writers are all straight white men

L I T E R A L L Y

W

H

O

It's hard figure out you've been tricked into believing propaganda. It's takes a lot of self-awareness and openness.

Hi John.

4channers who rarely wander elsewhere on the internet fail to realize the boards are indistinguishable relative to other forums.