It begins

It begins.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RQ9_TKayu9s
youtube.com/watch?v=A6g_geYeL4U
youtube.com/watch?v=JuZBgxTwtIE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I know 3 guys in real life who were huge Peterson fans but in the past couple months have done a total 180 on him

go back there

This isn't the twitter comments section, its the Veeky Forums literature board.

I thought the upper guy was Shadman for about 30 seconds and was very confused

>imagining peter hitchens replying to shadman
jesus christ

Peterson is just someone who in a very theatrical roundabout way tries to make you excited about being a run of the mill liberal wageslave with a wife and kids. He just makes you mumble things about slaying dragons while you work your way through excel sheets.

I've gone from disliking him to liking him to disliking him to liking him again. He's just that sort of guy.

I fucking love Peter Hitchens. He is hands down the most miserable man on twitter.

witnessed

Though I'm sympathetic to Peter's attitudes, I've long dismissed his political writing as dreary polemics. I've heard he was a decent foreign correspondent journalist though. Anything of his worth reading, Veeky Forums?

this makes him sound quite useful though

>When Peterson becomes the founder of a new world religion which splits into three warring sects shortly after his death ushering centuries of bloodshed

Feels good man

Sure, he's kind a priest of the status quo, if you're interested in maintaining it then he's a useful influence on the populace.

But I don't think he's useful to the individual in the sense that he makes them flourish. He just heroicises normality, and that can come at the expense of more agreeable paths.

...

Oh look, it's nobody's favorite Hitchens.

Hitchens is essentially a cynical Ned Flanders.

>Hitchens is essentially a cynical Ned Flanders.

And we love him for it.

Have none of you noticed that a generation of young people has shifted from people 24-25 and up towards an openness to religion? Specifically a decline in the fake-nerd phenomena of the past generation. If so, you're missing what's happening and what's going to happen in the next two to three years.

And who will control the master frame, and how will that aesthetic be defined?

I think most of the people who are into him because of the lectures, and not because of the political correctness or self help stuff, flip flop on him constantly.

I've gone off him completely since he started marketing this shitty new book, but maybe once that's over he'll have something interesting to say again.

At the moment he's literally televangelist-tier and his core fanbase are rick and morty faggots who eat cereal for every meal

Imagine it being Ancient Greece, or being rich enough to actually attend a top tier uni, and being able to be a fanboy of Peterson in person. Hnnng, showing up to his office hours after the department has mostly gone home for the day with the Red Book, full lingerie under your prep clothes and a buttplug inserted to ask for some extra help. Just the thought makes Petersonfags start to ooze.

>and how will that aesthetic be defined?
Blakean apocalyptic gnosis. John Milton aka "Milt" is not my poet. Emanations and zoas not Newton and single vision ok. Praise Los.

If that's true then he's no better than the socialists.

I half expect one day Hitchen's to descend into a mystical trance rap in a daze of flashbacks to the torment of his hippy mother's maternal neglect.
Poor lad.

Essentially an upper-class sober Eminem circa Slim Shady. One day. Maybe.
>Hitchens needs Peterson to help him Clean out his closet.
youtube.com/watch?v=RQ9_TKayu9s
>please meme/photoshop this with Hitchens

>mfw millenarian anarchism makes a ressurgence

>Blakean apocalyptic gnosis.
this will be glorious

...

I don't get the image. Explain?

I've gone from being indifferent to being indifferent

>grown man using :)

I think this rather goes to show what sort of a guy you are

Faggot adult men having embarrassing faggot MSN Messenger slapfights in public for faggot adult diaper babies with nothing to do except watch faggots have internet slapfights. The only thing more embarrassing for the human race than the existence of Twitter is how seamlessly everyone accepts Twitter's existence and doesn't run around screaming at what it betokens for the spirit of the age. Peter Hitchens typing teenage girl gotchas into his instant gratification attention-seeker "app" on his effeminate girly pussyboy cellphone makes me sick and I want to puke. Hope planet is destroyed.

He's an advocate for the current economic and political status quo.

But he's opposed to current changes in the social and cultural arenas.

He's an anti postmodern postmodernist: dominant discourses are where power can be found, but what do ya say go back to when only white men had access to power okay bucko?

>We should be conservative otherwise I feel upset
Wow, I am now a PeterHitchfag

this but also adhd and dyslexia aren't real he was right about that

His whole point is that discourse and social structures in the West are (or at least were) governed by competence, nigger. In other words, it's not competent white men's fault if other people suck at organising and inventing.

I know engaging in psychoanalysis of angry people is misleading, but I honestly think Hitchens is just really jealous, regardless of whether JBP is amassing a cult or not.
Also, his stance on drugs is incredibly stupid

Veeky Forums is the twitter comments section tho
reddit is the Veeky Forums comments section
facebook is the reddit comment section
it's a depressing internet centipede

Best Hitch is a defender of societal cohesion, which (for him) precludes premarital sex. I don't think I'd like him very much if he weren't a perrenial underdog, arguing for the mere validity of Christian ethics. If he were a priest of the status quo [to borrow from another user ITT], it would get old pretty quickly.

As opposed to spamming slurs in anonymous imageboards to try to make an impression of manliness on people you've never seen? I wonder if you are an insufferable faggot whining about muh social media IRL.

By critizicing the Great One, I hereby declare Peter Hitchens anathema.

I've listened to probably 30-50 hours of JBP over the past year or two. He has a point about free speech in Canada, and his lectures about Biblical mythology as read from a Jungian perspective are interesting, but he's overall not a big deal.

The only people who really feel strongly about him are rudderless brainlets who needed to be told to clean their rooms and fascist LGBTQIAP+. Am I missing something? What's the big deal?

Literally all of his books are worth reading, Abolishen of Britain is probably the best though

Drug control isn't stupid just because you disagree with it, mate. In my view it's a matter of opinion.

Hitchens spends literally every waking moment of his life on Twitter.

cereal is fine.

Post lewd sannys

I want Hitchens to explain to him why postmodernism is both not what he's fighting and wrong for other reasons including architecture.

holy fuck that image is amazing

its sweetie posting.

Who would you most want to be your dad, Veeky Forums?

1) Jordan Peterson
2) Peter Hitchens
3) David Foster Wallace
4) Sam Hyde
5) Terrence Malick

Absolute kek

does JBP know hitchen's probably never has his bed unmade, including when he's in there?

1

>JP: cleaning your room makes you feel better
>uberHitchens: that's because you're a peasant without proper religion and lords

>1) Jordan Peterson
>3) David Foster Wallace
>4) Sam Hyde
>5) Terrence Malick
lmao

malick, but i would hate his movies anyway. at least he is an artist of some sort. the rest of that list is misanthropes who can't exist in society

>this post

As opposed to you pointing out the obviously ironic post in order to appear smart.

Peterson raises purple haired insta thots with severe health problems and depression and is clinically depressed and on SSRIs himself. Basically everything from his genes to his memes seem calculated to be a shit parent.

Foster is also a depressed lump of maldaptation, Sam Hyde is a degenerate, Malick is Hollywood so he's evil.

They're also all new world plebs. Only Hitchens remains as a sensible option and he seems great to have some fatalistic bantz with over some brandy while smugly observing the fall of Western civilisation.

Peter Hitchens is far more intelligent than Peterson.

>clinically depressed and on SSRIs himself.
Lol why would anyone take his advice?

i have that thing on my reading lists, what should I expect? im new to philosophy and everything basically

Are you sure you didn't mean to call him by his righteous name, Jordan Muad'Dib?

I don't think the university of Toronto is that expensive if you're Canadian.

>unironically writing out the words "what it betokens for the spirit of the age"
>calling anyone else a faggot

Tuition for most arts and science programs works out to 8500 CAD per year. Textbook costs aren't likely to be above 1000 CAD, although living expenses will run to perhaps 10-15k CAD if you aren't a local.

He's my favorite Hitchens by a mile.

Was meant for I think he is more intelligent, at least as far as either of them have let on, has much more to say and says it better than CH did.

>is clinically depressed and on SSRIs himself.
really? source?

>angry people
Who's angry at whom and what gives you this impression?
I don't think he's "jealous" at all. He's annoyed at being bombarded with "check out JBP" "what do you think of JBP" "you should" "have you" "peterson" "peterson" "peterson" messages every day.
His stance on drugs is that the correlation between them and mental illness, as well as violent crime, should be investigated. An eminently sensible position, seems to me.

i mean, im a jew but i guess peter hitchens. he's the most respectable of the bunch. i can't take malick seriously, his movies are too mushy and that leads me to suspect that he's too effeminate to be a good dad

I assume that by 'every waking moment' you mean a couple of hours a day? Makes perfect sense.
Honestly, he's my favorite Twitter account.

I have a weak spot for the man. He is a popular philosopher for the masses and not an original or brilliant thinker. Also he spends way too much time tweeting.

>im a jew but
So is PH.

who will win in this dastardly duel?

Peter or Peterson?

There's nothing resembling a duel as of yet, or debate, or altercation.
Hitchens has nothing against Peterson, and didn't even know who JBP was until last week or something. In his own words, his irritation is directed towards JBP fanboys who keep pestering him in a 'cultish' manner.
This is just fanboys and shitposters blowing everything out of proportion.

thats a shame, a debate could have been interesting/entertaining

youtube.com/watch?v=A6g_geYeL4U

this i believe

>I reintroduced soy
>I had the worst reaction
>soy causes depression
pottery

I want this, for real.

this, i unironically love youtube laid-back debates. i recently saw one conversation between the 4 atheist guys (sam harris, the good hitchens and the other 2 guys) which was 2 hours long but flew by in a second, it was comfy af. pity theres so few like it out there

holy shit

Damn, she's qt as fuck, I'd stick my chopsticks in her takeout if you know what I mean.

this tbqh

yeah well ok, but he still has a point
there's nothing more pathetic that unironically using twitter

Reminder that you are debating a Jewish family feud.

lmao i wonder what butthurt pinko cunt made this image

>the good hitchens
delet this

sam hyde of course

youtube.com/watch?v=JuZBgxTwtIE

Jared Taylor.

lmao imagine being this mad.

Samefag, looks like user hit a nerve.

>inb4 Peter-son rescues his Peter from the belly of the whale
S Y N C H R O N I C I T Y

u mad, lol?

Which one is /ourguy/? I vote for Hitchens.

Not the suicidal one

she got impregnated 5 months after this interview had taken place

>i don't really think we know anything about anything, the more you dig in to something the more you find out people are just randomly guessing

Woah, easy on the postmodernism peterson...

sauce now

shes not that attractive but id still hit it