Is this drivel the lowest form of literature?

Is this drivel the lowest form of literature?

Is there any genre worse than female erotica?

Also what does genre say about women in general?

We have video porn, they have book porn. I mean, I watch porn to jerk off and not because the plot is fantastic.

ohh well i hope this was just an oddity that kind of sexuality is not endearing what an odd thing for most women who speak of objectification to then fetishize it with an ostensible member of the 1% and they fetishize that to the flexing of material power ohh how romantic?! it isnt just stop it you silly womens

we watch porn only because of the body (and that varies a lot)

Every female erotica novel is the same
1. plain simple women with no special talents.
2. meets wealthy strong chad like man
3. women values him because he dominates her and he has wealth and good looks

A whole genre exactly the same.

Are women just retarded?

Yes. She even released a second trilogy written from Grey's perspective.

My problem about erotica is that it's so visible to the public. Women openly flaunt their erotica like it's something to be proud of. I can't even count the amount of times I've seen women reading or talking about 50 Shades of Grey in public. At least men keep their pornography to themselves and hopefully in an incognito tab.

Now you're just looking for excuses to hate on women.

In the past, these were kind of books were filled with romantic stuff. Today, even Twilight could be considered women's erotica. Their sexuality operates through fantasies and books are a great way to sustain those. And just like you have your favourite category of porn, they have their favourite fantasies. Some are team Jacob and some team Edward. It's not the pinnacle of literature, but it gets them off and that's fine. There's nothing wrong with them desiring a wealthy and attractive man who gives her a sense of security.

Sorry for the typo. I've had a few cold ones with the... I had them alone.

>Women openly flaunt their erotica like it's something to be proud of
Like how gays flaunt their eroticism in pride parades.
>At least men keep their pornography to themselves and hopefully in an incognito tab.
Gay men have no shame.

Ni, they're just cows, our species' biological needs don't require more of them.

I see where you're coming from, but consider this. If you compare this to porn, shouldn't women not try to flaunt this book in public and not brag about it, you really dont see men watching porn in the library, at starbucks, or on the bus,.

I think this is the major difference

thats why so many people see homosecuality as degenerate.

enough! for one i dont watch porn and it annoys me to no end to have that thrown whenever i am critical of sexuality but more importantly you should not be measuring feminine sexuality by the crude masculine its like oh atleast they werent nazis stop it girls should not want to be tied up and treated like an object of degradation that is malignant disgusting worse than the male active role in the same equation and now there is a market for spreading perversion set on the wheels of capital and the impetus of "sex postivity" but where do the tracks lead other than manipulation and nearly psyop levels of fetish instillment the frontpage of a porn site is an awful thing the collective subconcious of something so obviously wrong but 'hey nothing matters its good because uhhhh' sexual "freedom" egh disgusting

Watching porn is ashamed and "reading" (whatever,as a hobby, just any book) is seen as intellectual.

It is objectively good literature because objectively a large proportion of the population enjoys it and obviously well communicates the cultural memes that the people who buy this work enjoy.

They're not really masturbating while reading. They're saving it for later in their minds. I mean, reading Twilight in public isn't that indecent. And so what if they even were horny? As if you've never had a half chub in public. Anyway, it's a different culture today. In the past everything sexual would be repressed. Even today, many women would never admit that they've read such a book or would straight up avoid those books. But there is a cultural difference. Today, just because something contains sex doesn't mean that it's indecent. There are ads with naked people everywhere. Sex sells and it's for both genders. Women can't be blamed for these things.

>enjoyment is good
Get off my board

>Women can't be blamed for these things.
yes they can and should be

It's ok user. You'll find a gf one day and she'll imagine you as the powerful vampire in her fantasies.

>he doesn't browse erotica sites
>he limits himself to what can be filmed, animated, and drawn instead of what can be imagined

pleb, all of my greatest nuts have been to web erotica

absolutely retarded posturing sociopath

Is your penis feminine? Would you be my gf (male)?

nein, nein

I worked hard on my posturing. I plan on getting my Patreon soon and getting $70000 a month.

trips confirm

Interesting, isn't it? Really shows how fucked-up decades of destructive feminism eroded female psyche. You can see narratives of fighting patriarchy, abuse, rape culture, etc., and those of >sex-positivity being pursued at the same time, interchangeably. One one hand it's understandable that they would juggle narratives like that as need be, but on the other hand it is also inconceivable in case they were going for some integrity. A woman reading Fifty Shades in public is signalling her promiscuity but veils it as virtue of progressive openess. In times when systematic soy reprogramming is taking place, it is becoming increasingly obvious to me that women subconsciously defend themselves in such low-level discharges of tension. If they can't cut off from Buzzfeed and Twitter mentality, all they have left is dirty fantasies and flaunting in public. I'd fucking wager money on most of those women not evev reading the book per se and either rereading the """"juicy"""" parts or just pretending to be reading and fantasizing about men around watching them read it. Besides, women watch porn just like guys, but porn is still too dirty for women to embrace it en large.

That tumblr post is probably a joke, user.

wait I thought grey was spelled gray? fuck /lit I just send an email to my boss with the second spelling did I fuck up

If he's a man, he'll appreciate that you don't know anything about that shitty book.

gray is the American spelling
grey is the English spelling
this book is the work of the Anglos it seems

test

>objectively good
>because a large proportion of the population enjoys it
fucking pleb get the FUCK off my board

this is such a narrow understanding of both the body and not just women’s sexuality but sexuality in general. hope you come to your senses someday or you will be miserable for ever.

youre completely right. fetishization of power dynamics between men and women, powerful and powerless (that both men and women are conditioned to view as erotic- and i dont understand why the people here dont seem to understand this) are inherently toxic and evil

I work in a library, and literally the only people who read these are old ladies (make of that what you will) and they're just as badly written as the westerns read by their male counterparts.

hummm didn't Hegel write about Bondage and domination?

It has to do with "changing" a "bad" guy.

pOnOs in vagOOO

But seriously, maybe.
Anyone remembers Twilight?

>Unironically believes the literary zeitgeist is good

E.L. James is just a penname David Buss came up with to get his theories out to a wider audience. Do you hate science, faggot?