Peterson eternally btfo

there, goober hero thoroughly dismantled and scattered to the winds of a thousand angry diaperdweebs. can we please ban petershit threads now?

>Rand readers
>Clever

Twitter screenshot posters should be banned and sent to be bebothered by de Sade.

peterson did get btfo, but not by jimmy here.

brandt's people should fire the idiotic social media intern who keeps meeting his quota by spamming Veeky Forums

>implying he didn't btfo himself
there's a chapter to be added about him in the next edition of fashionable nonsense

funny thing is that tweet reads like it was written by a very clever teenage boy

why is everybody so triggered by Peterson? just shut the fuck up about him if you don't like him, how does his appeal to a bunch of basement dwellers affect you, besides maybe reminding you of the fact that you are in fact a basement dweller that needs to clean his room? stop projecting. I think Peterson is a pseud because he abuses the fuck out of post-modernism but who tf cares. This is a literature board not a pop psychology board.

notice how peterson posters just dismiss him and pretend the opposition is paid despite having no evidence. face it, peterson got demolished

out of the term post-modernism*

they're both fucking pseuds and discussing them should be an instant ban on this board

he's right

To be a pseudointellectual, you actually have to seem like an intellectual to some people, but even a dog can tell Russel Brand is just a shitty comedian who somewhere along the line got the idea that he is clever.

Objective truth exists and the Marxists shouldn't get to tell you what to do.

>inability to detect sarcasm
>posts on Veeky Forums

i don’t know what the fuck this means

Where did Brand BTFO Peterson?
In like an article or something?

/thread

So Brand is not a pseud? That's kinda his appeal. I don't fall for the whole new age, organic, mind, body, soul centeredness his image conveys, but he's a comedian and a podcaster. That is to say he doesn't come off as someone whose every mannerism and word choice is consciously filtered and distilled through a screen of affectation typical of academics and conmen who want to come off as academics. Brand may be a kook, but he is free to be a kook. Or maybe it's just the expectations of the two target audiences that lead the two men to behave in such different ways.

Ok, but are there any actual arguments?

He's not a pseud in the same way a high school chad who thinks he's clever is not a pseud.

no, this is the oldest trick in the book and it still doesn't work

>using dream interpreter as an insult
>hurrrr dreams are just meaningless noise
What a retarded, soulless piece of excrement

Russell Brand is a wannabe Alan Watts. And he's shitty at even being Alan Watts.

That's such a fucking non sequitur. I actually sort of agree with what i think he's trying to say, but why the fuck would you try and get that across on Twitter in such an oversimplified way? Really butters my balaclava.

*tips

>why is everybody so triggered by Peterson?
NAZIS GET PUNCHED

single-handedly solved the history of knowledge there young man

I would be inclined to agree, just because of how hard the guy is being shilled, but lets remember hes had a successful clinical practice for 25 years so I think its advice is sound

Honestly I think the problem with Peterson is not the man himself, but his fanbase. Check out this interview with PragerU

normiebook/thewillwitt/posts/165822284044438

Peterson is talking about why people should get their life in order first and foremost, and the interviewer just goes "hmmm, so do you think femenists really want equality or superiority?"

Conservatives treat Peterson no better than Cathy Newman. Dave Rubin's interview is similar. Whenever Peterson wants to talk high brow, the interview immediately
pivots to "lol libtards sure love IDENTITY POLITICS and HATE FREE SPEECH amirite"

.

To be fair you really do need a high IQ to understand Brandism

Something Peterson posters just can't understand. Brand is playing a different game that involves some level of dissimulation. Peterson fags with their neo-new-sincerity shit are just too stupid to get it

Expand.

He's not. I'm no scientific realist and also religious, but the notion that you need axioms therefore God is that axiom is completely unnecessary. Faith in the physical, observable world is much more convincing to begin with, from an arguing standpoint. Also, supposing God without any evidence or proof other than unverifiable cultural documents is much worse than the evidence-filled world of physics and matter. It's just not a good argument.

>they aer young and he looks dumb lol!!!

Not that idiots on Twitter should be taken seriously, but I actually think it's the opposite.
He literally tells atheist Reddit losers to be Christians and that it's their fault that they can't get laid - and they listen and believe it.
Peterson appeals to the sort of men he appeals to because he takes them seriously and explains things they would usually be against in terms they understand.

chat with the most gorgeous jordan peterson in a nutshell today!!
do you live in a nutshell and need an asian beauty?

>peterson thread #4356
fuck off teenage crossboarders
we don't care

is there anyone in this world who needs to read Wittgenstein more than Jordan B Peterson?

Gödel's theorem has nothing to do with what he's trying to say, it's about recursively axiomatizable theories expressive enough to contain Peano arithmetic.
Tarski's undefinability theorem is closer to his idea, but it only applies to some formal theories.

tl;dr Peterson is a retard.

You can use that exact same argument for Marxism

Lol, and he's probably criticizing "postmodern" relativists in his next tweet

>Karl Marx's main quality is that idiot teenagers love to hear their own idiot teenage thoughts echoed by a "professional philosopher" who looks like a raisin

>I think it's like why so many teenagers get hooked on Sartre too, "objective truth doesn't exist and the Capitalists shouldn't get to tell you to work" is a very appealing ideal for a certain kind of a very spoiled teenage boy

>not capable of providing a thought in layman's terms
>intelligent

not everything can be understood by the laymen

you'd knew this if you didn't decide to keep yourself completely uneducated and incompetent all your life, sweetie

A shekel has been deposited into your account, bucko!

...

You're right about the second one, but I think that line of thought appeals more to teenafi firls these days.

He's right.

>PETERSON IS WRONG GUISE!
Yeah thanks for that great analysis.

>'Weird Twitter' screencap
>Interpreting it as anything other than ideological propaganda by the worst champagne socialist hipster mediocrities

Peterson is wrong on postnidernism, and his followers are mostly foolish children, but let's use our fucking brains. Twitter posts by the progeny of something awful are worthy only of derision.