This shit is spicy as af, paglia ahead of her time, this is from the 90s but everything she's saying is so current...

>if you go back to someone's apartment it means you have consented to having sex with them
what did she mean by this?

Its' a signal to us all that she's an moron.

spotted the fat loser male feminist that gets no pussy despite being a male feminist and living his life to please women.

I want to check out her take on Sade in Sexual Personae but I'm hesitant to take her seriously in general when she has a following here.

I'm an anarchist and a lesbian.
So my idea of feminism isn't necessarily the one reactionary conservatives are bellyaching over.
Any time I've given this woman a chance she's proven to be a moron. Probably smarter than Peterson though.

>get tired of autistic /pol/yps ruining Veeky Forums and leave
>come back half a year later
>they've moved on from kermit to an even more pathetic literally who
Just stick with JBP. He's at least self-aware and fakes profundity masterfully. Paglia is literal non-stop autistic screeching of the worst kind that you'd expect from a 15 year old on Veeky Forums, not an academic.

I want Paglia to kick me in the balls and take my money.

This. It's really pathetic how all Veeky Forums heroes, like Paglia, Bloom or Peterson, are literally mocked on academia.

examples of Paglia being a moron plz. sounds fun.

>Paglia
>Peterson
>Veeky Forums heroes

>Andrea Dworkin will never berate me for my masculinity before eating me

Belongs in a nunnery.

they're all mocked in academia because they fly in the face of the academic narrative on gender politics. are we going to pretend that academia isn't currently overwhelmingly Marxist and that they have a vested interests in discrediting these people?

And how would you like consent to work, sweetie? Please share your opinion.

By the way I respect women so much.
>living his life to please women.
Unironically my life purpose.

This. If you tell anyone in academia that you think any of these people have valuable ideas they will laugh in your face.

how would YOU like consent to work, sweetie? *nibbles on a pencil seductively*

Don't touch my Bloom you dumb fucking faggot.
grr

You know that in academia Bloom is considered even a bigger brainlet than Peterson, right? At least Peterson is somewhat respected in his field.

who do academics read instead?

>appealing to authority this much
He isn't considered a brainlet. It's just that his style of criticism is considered antiquated by our current Zeitgeist which is composed mainly by people who think literature should serve a social function, muh death of the author and cultural critics.

Academics don't read. They just prefer condescension

I'm fairly sure that academics do in fact read.

Sure thing pseud

on the other hand I'm now convinced that you don't.

Hit a nerve didn't I?

she defends the prequels

>current Zeitgeist which is composed mainly by people who think literature should serve a social function
How did this happen? How did literature academia get filled with people who don't care about literature in itself? You would think that most people who study literature would do it because they liked to read and not to push their ideologies.

oh rly? what nerve is that?

The prequels are unironically more interesting cinema than the original trilogy. They are very unique films.

Paglia seems like she would be crazy as fuck in bed. Now I'm imagining her as this short-haired fiery faced young vixen sweatily slamming her ass into my pelvis on her work desk.

>>living his life to please women.
>Unironically my life purpose.
You'll never please women by sucking up to them and acting like a little bitch.

in what way? i get that they are operating in the mode of swords and sandals just like the originals remixed samurai, flash gordon and wwii, but what about them make them unironically good?

>I'm an anarchist and a lesbian.
So you're a loser that desperately wants to be a man. Sorry, sweetheart, you'll never be a man, you'll always be an cheap imitation caused by a failure of biology.

While that's an exaggeration, you're dumb if you go to someone's apartment after a date or a night out and don't expect them to desire sex.

Revenge of the Sith is her favourite film.
It's not the worst thing in the world, but that whole speech was so lame.

Memes really, but that's what passes for heroes around here.

I'm not a cross-dresser butch type. Don't want a penis, don't need it. Capitalism makes us all losers, loser.

>implying anything has changed since the 90's

>I'm not a cross-dresser butch type. Don't want a penis, don't need it.
Because you're a mistake of nature, a wasteful byproduct that will die out and never reproduce.

She's not saying you can't revoke consent later. She's saying that there's a clear social implication and that by going alone to a man's room with that implication in play (excluding obvious cases where there isn't a sexual context) that it's natural for it to be understood as consent for some form of sexual situation, that you shouldn't expect him to then wait for an extra explicit verbal consent.
She's perfectly right too, since this is in practice what happens. A nonverbal social cue is understood and a sexual situation is initiated almost always without verbal consent.
She's not saying that you can't then say no I don't want to, and leave. But she's basically saying not to be a social retard and pretend to be ignorant of the social message you're sending.

Why is capitalism so evil, bros? I just wanted to buy some cool stuff and now I'm slave to capital. Not cool.

there's no such thing as unironically good and there never has been. evaluating art of any kind requires the distance of irony to function, although often the critic themself doesn't realise.

...

>Revenge of the Sith is her favourite film.

Yes, sure. In fact you don't need misogyny to be an average guy.

You aren't an anarchist, you're a moderate.

Why are you so mad, bro? Did a lesbian "reject" you? Maybe you could have been her friend, instead you ended up with bitter rage.

>I'm an anarchist and a lesbian.
made me kek more than it should have

Same-sex couples were prone to adopting orphaned children in many cultures throughout history, thus providing a valuable social service.

read Evola instead

I used the same word as Btw, "unironically" is a qualification invoked to refer to enjoyment of something which might seem goofy and like it's only done for a laugh. When nowadays people e.g. watch a bad movie for the enjoyment of camp, that would in contemporary vernacular be called "irony," and so the opposite, watching a bad campy movie and *really* enjoying it would be called an "unironic" enjoyment.

>are literally mocked on academia
meanwhile, academia is literally a joke for 12yo retards on the internet. make of this whatever you want.

the prequels are geopolitical
youtube.com/watch?v=oKm4ueVuxpY

I'm a mild person, but my passions run deep.
Chomsky is a moderate. I used to follow his promptings to vote third party in my safely Blue state, but this tactic will never work.
I'm not a strict pacifist, but I don't want things to get violent. The capitalists are the ones killing us and unleashing fascists on us, so there IS and will be violence beyond breaking windows and burning limos.

So you have no respect for it. No surprise. You know nothing about it.

lol

give ONE example where this happened

just bought some cookies in some soulless supermarket, breddy gud desu

lollipop land

>lives in one of the richest countries in the world
>still complains
There are a lot of bad things about capitalism but it isn't killing you. If anything you're over feed.

Where does Evola talk about Sade? I know very little about him.

unironically I hope you enjoy your baked goods that are complicit in the suffering and death of thousands of people

You have no passions. You're a moderate. A socdem and probably a plebbit anarchist.

Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex

a lot of his early work was heavily influenced by Sade but it's mostly out of print

nice armchair diagnosis, do me next?

ur gey

holy shit how did you know

Interesting. thanks

...

what a bunch of retards, if only Peterson were a fascist he may say something actually interesting.

I am not being showered with bombs, or forced to live in a shanty town, but there is media that shows me what's going on out there, and now there is a growing homeless problem. I see this all everyday now. There is a sense of guilt that wont go away even if I were to give away all my meager pay. The problems are systemic, I know what would fix it and I know why they are being fixed.

I *was* a soc-dem/progressive when I first came to Veeky Forums, but I turned into a Democratic-socialist and then libertarian-socialist (anarchist) about 2011 or so.

>plebbit
Is this another advertisement for your home-page?

>Know why they AREN'T being fixed

Stalin did nothing wrong tho. How do you expect communes to form when a behemot fascist warmachine is invading the eastern countries, raping and killing.

As someone who lives in a country which became extremely capitalist after a short period were the first step to socialism were attempted unsuccessfully, I can tell you that while capitalism is not an utopia it's better than the alternative.

Stalin, that imperialist mass-murdering autocrat sociopath did everything wrong, not just morally but also organizationally, and I'm a communist.

You mean like Vietnam?

>but also organizationally
I'm afraid to ask you to elaborate, because I don't want any trotskyist drivel.

I'm not advocating for a stalin like character to acquire power in your country, but he got the job done in Russia, and nazi Germany, the most powerful and cruel state at the time was defeated.

Authoritarian-socialism is still capitalism.
And I don't mind your neighborhood getting electricity and wifi or whatever you're going to credit capitalism with, but it's not going last. It cheats people at every step and an alternative must be implemented before its too late.

How does Bookchin answer this? I need to read him soon.

please, leftists are fine, but try to put some effort, just repeating meaningless memes is not an accepted form of debate anymore

Stalin killed tens of thousands of intellectuals and promoted bootlickers and incompetents in their stead because he was afraid his autocratic power might otherwise be threatened. The Holodomor, which was most likely and by most accounts accidental, is a brilliant example of the sheer incompetence his regime was capable of.

paglia is, like, a soft libertarian
'bernie was my candidate'

>It wasnt communism, it was capitalism all along
You're reaching holocaust denier levels of delusional here.

i was talking about the retarded meme debate on the comments, not Paglia

youtube.com/watch?v=qQ49PVf4UQ8

Chile.
>Authoritarian-socialism is still capitalism.
It was democratic.
>but it's not going last
Why not?

>How did this happen
Intersectional feminism

Not exclusive to literature, and not even contained in academia. Same is true of film and television industry, even fucking video games.

Why do people like you even continue to live? Do you really want to?

>media shows me
Surely the media always shows me reality!

Out of spite towards everyone around them.

Nope, you're still a socdem. Isn't it obvious?

The state owning all the means of production and all the property is authoritarian-socialism, and it is a type of capitalism, certainly not "free-market" or "corporatist" capitalism, but it is all that capitalism is based on.
The holocaust included socialists, homosexuals, Roma/gypsies and the mentally and physically deformed among the Jews. This is not a denial.

How long did Allende hold office before Kissinger put Pinochet in there. Of course the US wants to profit from "neocolonalising" you and rewarding you for keeping your poor shut up.

>Why not?
How infinite do you think the Earth's resources are?

Start with the Greeks.

Most of it is corporate-state propaganda, but I know what to look for. There are some journalists out there.