Why did Rowling make Slytherin so shallow?

Why are they so shallow? Why did Rowling struggle to make them anything other than a group of evil Rich Kids with the depth of a kiddie pool?

>why isn't there depth in a series of young adult "novels" written for literal children

because she's afraid to properly explore that side of the human psyche

Dumbledore was a total Slytherin, Rowling goofed up

this

and this.

because hp is literally for children and those readers don't have the tools to begin work on the question of evil. also, she wanted it to be friendly and approachable and have mass market appeal.

as a contrast, consider leguin whose earthsea books are far more philosophically instructive but less popular.

Because its heralded as Landmark writing for some reason despite having the depth of a spoon

don't insult good children's books please.

checked and motherfuckin wrecked

stay btfo

>Why did the deranged champagne socialist woman make House Tory into a bunch of cartoon villains

>Those dudes that hate on Harry Potter as if it's anything other than a quaint children's book
I read them as a kid. Enjoyed them. Forgot about them. Will give them to my kids.

Slytherin is the perfect example of how the eternal Anglo manifests its hatred towards Aryan man.

>Harry Potter
>any depth anywhere
Besides, spoiled old money kids are shallow.

They are children's books.

CHILDREN'S books. As in, the intended audience is small kids.

I always read that Slitherin though commonly falling to those bad ideas aren't by nature evil and have important aspects in themselves, then I watched the movie and they all get marched off to the dungeons.....

I wonder why she didn't have a flip side of slitherins that were against Voldemort?

>Be one of four founders of a prestigious wizard academy
>Believe non-pure bloods should not attend, and be killed if they do
>Build a hidden chamber to house a monster, which can only be opened by a descendant of my bloodline so that he can release the monster, and kill all the non-pure blooded at the school
>Somehow, my secret gets out
>Still be regarded as a respected founder of the school and have a great House named after me because of reasons

Hufflepuff is the best house of those shitty books.

Explain.

It's a book for little kids, you fag.

Sage.

Why would they even let Slytherin kids into the school, if the sorting had is a School-Shooter detection mechanism?
Was there literally any redeemable Slytherin student, like some one-off grrrrl witch who does one redeemable thing?
Why were entire families placed in the same House?
What kind of naive classifier were they pawning off to students?

Snape was a Slytherin, and he's the real hero, isn't he? He had depths, we just didn't see it for the most part.

>Was there literally any redeemable Slytherin student,
Snape and Regulus Black, off the top of my head. I'm sure there were others.

What would have happened if Slytherin realistically? Would Slytherin have been the best house?

from a bookish kid's perspective: why does the school allow bullies to attend?

these books are successful in a large part because kids find them relatable - especially the early ones

>no pasta

REEEEEE YOU FUCKERS LET ME DOWN

Harry Potter

touche